The Legal Education - Law Commission of India

More documents

Recommendations

Info

12413.4 Therefore, we are of the emphatic view that the proviso below sec.24A(1) must be deleted.13.5 Yet another aspect is whether dismissal or removal on the ground ofmoral turpitude should be a disqualification only in respect of employeesunder the ‘State’ as defined in Art. 12 of the Constitution of India andwhether persons in private employment who have been dismissed orremoved from service should not suffer such a disqualification. We do notfind any good reason to allow those in service under entities not fallingwithin Art. 12, who are dismissed or removed from private service, oncharges involving moral turpitude, to be allowed to be enrolled. As atpresent, sec. 24A(1) does not disqualify such persons even for two years.It is, therefore, necessary to delete the words ‘under the State’ in sec.24A(1)(c) and to also delete the Explanation.13.6 We, therefore, recommend deletion of the Explanation and theproviso below sec. 24A(1), and also the deletion of the words “under theState” in clause (c) of sec. 24A (1).
125Chapter XIVSummary of RecommendationsThis summary of recommendation is gathered from the variousChapters I to XIII and arranged subject-wise for the purpose ofconvenience.1) In as much as the Bar Council of India cannot be required to consultall Universities, as now stated in section 7 (1) (h), the provisions of section7(1)(h) have to be amended by prescribing that the Bar Council of Indiamust consult a body which effectively represents all the Universities andthat such a body should be constituted by the University GrantsCommission. This requires amendment of the Advocates Act, 1961 andthe University Grants Commission Act, 1956.(para 2.22)2) The consultation procedure between the Bar Council of India and theUniversities must be simple and effective.(para 2.21)3) Section 7(1) (h) has to be amended by providing for ‘consultation’ asproposed in sections 10AA to be inserted in the Advocates Act, 1961 withthe Legal Education Committee of the University Grants Commission.(para 3.13(1).
Page 1 and 2:
Law Commission of India184 th Repor
Page 3 and 4:
3colleges for prescribing standards
Page 5 and 6:
5CONTENTSPAGESCh. I Introductory 1-
Page 7 and 8:
7suggestions, while some others opp
Page 9 and 10:
9in as much as it did not formulate
Page 11 and 12:
11Conference of Heads of Legal Educ
Page 13 and 14:
13subjects are: the respective role
Page 15 and 16:
15recommendations. The Commission w
Page 17 and 18:
17considering the provisions of ano
Page 19 and 20:
19The Advocates Act, 1961 thus deal
Page 21 and 22:
212.10 If the UGC Act, 1956 is expr
Page 23 and 24:
23subject of legal education comes
Page 25 and 26:
25“In the field of legal educatio
Page 27 and 28:
27between the Bar Council of India
Page 29 and 30:
29Court Judge are now in the Commit
Page 31 and 32:
31decision cannot be taken without
Page 33 and 34:
33In case, during the tenure of the
Page 35 and 36:
35(4) All questions which come up b
Page 37 and 38:
37Education Committee and who are i
Page 39 and 40:
39the absence of a consensus, the m
Page 41 and 42:
414.7 It must be noted that standar
Page 43 and 44:
434.10 As to the co-ordination betw
Page 45 and 46:
45In the Karnataka High Court Judgm
Page 47 and 48:
47the proposals for the consultatio
Page 49 and 50:
49(a) two law teachers in office fr
Page 51 and 52:
51aspects and we propose to lay emp
Page 53 and 54:
535.6 Rule 9(1) lists 6 subjects fo
Page 55 and 56:
55skill to identify the administrat
Page 57 and 58:
57(6) preparing for negotiation, co
Page 59 and 60:
59technologies which require corres
Page 61 and 62:
61education and laying standards in
Page 63 and 64:
63years, the number of civil matter
Page 65 and 66:
65formulated may be adopted by the
Page 67 and 68:
67Procedure, even though they have
Page 69 and 70:
69Chapter VIIAdjunct Teachers from
Page 71 and 72:
71“And there is no need to fit sq
Page 73 and 74: 73“The adjunct teachers teach the
Page 75 and 76: 75High Court or Supreme Court or be
Page 77 and 78: 77students who will go to the Bar o
Page 79 and 80: 79Inspections:8.4 As per section 7(
Page 81 and 82: 81India, when it wields powers, is
Page 83 and 84: 83one where the college is proposed
Page 85 and 86: 85(The existing section 7A should b
Page 87 and 88: 877C. (1) Where there is a differen
Page 89 and 90: 89(vii) The following clause be add
Page 91 and 92: 919.3 Whatever be the percentage of
Page 93 and 94: 939.10 Prof. Myron Moskovitz of the
Page 95 and 96: 95malpractices. We are only referri
Page 97 and 98: 97get acquainted with several pract
Page 99 and 100: 99Chapter XEducation on Legal Educa
Page 101 and 102: 10110.3 Several of the above Commit
Page 103 and 104: 103colleges located in cities and d
Page 105 and 106: 105Chapter XIDerecognition of Unive
Page 107 and 108: 107Chapter XIITraining and Apprenti
Page 109 and 110: 109The court held that once the rel
Page 111 and 112: 111include problem method, moot cou
Page 114 and 115: 114advocates as well as the requisi
Page 116 and 117: 116senior counsel in these big citi
Page 118 and 119: 11812.17 There is a strong view tha
Page 120 and 121: 120graduates are proposed to be rec
Page 122 and 123: 122Chapter XIIIDisqualification of
Page 126 and 127: 1264) Clause (b) of subsection (2)
Page 128 and 129: 128Advocates Act, 1961 for providin
Page 130 and 131: 130prescribe higher standards.(para
Page 132 and 133: 132be amended.Consequently, section
Page 134 and 135: 13430) Section 7(1) (i) to be amend
show all

The Legal Education - Law Commission of India

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

Delete template?

Save as template?