12.07.2015 Views

The Legal Education - Law Commission of India

The Legal Education - Law Commission of India

The Legal Education - Law Commission of India

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

107Chapter XIITraining and Apprenticeship12.0 Before the Advocates Act, 1961 was enacted, there was a system bywhich a law graduate had to undergo training by way <strong>of</strong> apprenticeship inthe chambers <strong>of</strong> a lawyer for one year and pass a separate Bar examinationconducted by the Bar Council on the subjects <strong>of</strong> the Code <strong>of</strong> CivilProcedure, 1908 and the Code <strong>of</strong> Criminal Procedure, 1898. It was onlyafter a law graduate successfully completed his apprenticeship and the Barexamination that he became eligible to be enrolled as an Advocate. (Priorto 1961, the enrolment had to be moved in the court <strong>of</strong> the Chief Justice <strong>of</strong>the High Court concerned and the motion for enrolment was to be by asenior advocate practicing in the High Court. <strong>The</strong>re was convention <strong>of</strong> abrief interview in the chambers <strong>of</strong> the Chief Justice <strong>of</strong> the High Courtbefore the enrolment was later moved in open court on the same day).12.1 After the Advocates Act, 1961 came into force, the procedure forapprenticeship was continued by virtue <strong>of</strong> clause (d) <strong>of</strong> subsection (1) <strong>of</strong>sec. 24. (<strong>The</strong> enrolment was, however, to be before the enrolmentcommittee <strong>of</strong> the State Bar Council.) That clause required the graduate inlaw to undergo a course <strong>of</strong> “training in law and pass an examination aftersuch training”, before he could be enrolled. Certain categories <strong>of</strong> personswere exempted under a proviso to the said sub-clause.12.2 In the year 1964 there were certain amendments to sec. 24 but it isnot necessary to refer to them in as much as in 1973, by Act 60/73, clause(d) <strong>of</strong> subsection (1) <strong>of</strong> sec. 24 was omitted and the amendments made in

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!