01.12.2012 Views

OXFORD EMPLOYMENT LAND STUDY APPENDICES March 2006

OXFORD EMPLOYMENT LAND STUDY APPENDICES March 2006

OXFORD EMPLOYMENT LAND STUDY APPENDICES March 2006

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

<strong>OXFORD</strong> <strong>EMPLOYMENT</strong> <strong>LAND</strong> <strong>STUDY</strong>: SITE ASSESSMENT CRITERIA<br />

The criteria for assessing the quality of allocated sites (and certain other sites) are set out below.<br />

These criteria mainly relate to the inherent value of a site rather than current conditions on it, although<br />

such characteristics would also be noted. Each site would be given a score of between 1 and 5<br />

against each criterion (1 = poor, 5 = very good). No individual weightings would be attached to<br />

different criteria. Not all criteria will apply to each existing or potential employment site.<br />

1. Access to strategic road network:<br />

5 = very good: within 2 Km of strategic road junction/ via good unconstrained roads<br />

1 = poor: over 5 Km from junction/access, and/or through constrained/local roads, and/or though<br />

town centre or residential areas etc<br />

2. Local road access including congestion and quality of roads;<br />

5= very good local access: via free moving good roads avoiding residential areas/difficult<br />

junctions;<br />

1 = poor: difficult/narrow road access, via residential roads, difficult site junction, congested<br />

roads;<br />

3. Public transport access;<br />

5 = very good: near centre of urban area, close to range of frequent public transport linking<br />

residential areas and services<br />

1 = poor: remote site, poor infrequent public transport access, 1 bus service per hour or less;<br />

4. General location in terms of proximity to urban areas, and ease of access to labour and<br />

services;<br />

5 = very good: near (within 0.5 Km) centre of urban area, good access to residential areas and<br />

services<br />

1 = poor: remote site, no services or residential areas nearby;<br />

5. Proximity to incompatible uses:<br />

5 = within larger employment area/ no incompatible adjoining land uses<br />

1 = B2/B8 adjoining residential/other sensitive uses on one or more boundary;<br />

6. Site characteristics including topography, size, profile, development constraints etc:<br />

5= very good: generally level site, regular shape, over 5 ha. in size; no significant other<br />

constraints on development e.g. flood risk,<br />

1 = poor: sloping/uneven site; under 1 ha. size, irregular/narrow shape, other severe<br />

constraints e.g. contamination;

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!