Final Report (PDF, 2132K) - Measure DHS

More documents

Recommendations

Info

Table 1.2Number of Selected Primary SamplingUnits by Local Government Area andUrban-Rural Residence, ODHS, 1986No. of Primary Sampling UnitsLocal GovernmentArea Urban Rural Riverine Totali Akure 8 1 92 Akoko North 3 4 73 Ekiti East 2 2 44 Ere 2 2 45 Ekiti South 3 1 46 Ekiti South-west 1 1 27 Ekiti Central 2 3 58 lJero 2 1 39 Ekiti West 1 2 3I0 Akoko South 1 3 4]i Ekiti North 2 4 612 Owe 3 5 813 Idanre Ifedore 2 3 514 Ondo 2 7 915 Ifesowapo 2 216 Ilaje Eseodo 9 9]7 Ikale 2 4 6Total 36 45 9 901.10 Background Characteristics of ODHS RespondentsThis section presents information on the demographic characteristics of ODHS respondents.Table 1.3 shows the distribution of respondents by selected characteristics along with Ondo State datafrom the 1980 National Demographic Sample Survey (NDSS).AgeData on age were obtained in the ODHS by asking respondents two questions, "In what monthand year were you bom?" and "How old were you at your last birthday?" Interviewers were instructedthat, in cases where respondents could not provide a year of birth, it was essential to obtain informationon age and they were trained in techniques of probing for age. As a last resort, interviewers wereinstructed to estimate the respondent's age.The year of birth was recorded for eighty-five percent of respondents: both month and year for 66percent and year only for 19 percent. Fifteen percent of respondents did not provide a year of birth. Agewas recorded for all 4,213 respondents.The age distribution of respondents in the ODHS and the NDSS, by five-year age groups, isshown in Table 1.3. Both distributions conform to the pattem characteristic of a high fertility population,i.e., more women in the younger than in the older age groups. However, the ODHS distribution issomewhat irregular; the percentage of women is high in the age group 15-19 (26 percent), declines to 13percent for the age group 20-24, remains constant for the two following age groups, declines to 11percent for the age group 35-39 and remains constant again for the two following age groups. This
contrasts with the NDSS distribution where, above age 25, the percentages in each successive age groupgradually decline.In terms of broad age groups, the distribution of respondents is about the same in the ODHS andthe NDSS with the percentage under 30 being 53 and 56 percent, respectively. Moreover, the substantialdecline in the percentage of women between age groups 15-19 and 20-24 in the ODHS is consistent withthe enumeration of twice as many women in the age group 10-14 as in the age group 15-19 in the 1980NDSS (National Population Bureau and Institute for Resource Development/Westinghouse [1988]).Thus, the ODHS survey found the same size difference between adjacent age groups as was found sixyears earlier in the NDSS. Nevertheless, peculiarities of the ODHS age distribution, particularly the fiatspots over the broad ages from 20 to 34 and 35 to 49, suggest errors in age reporting and those errors mayaffect some of the survey results.Table 1.3Percent Distribution of Women Age 15-49 by BackgroundCharacteristics, 1980 NDSS for Ondo State and 1986 ODDSBackground 1980 1986 Background 1980 1986Characteristic NDSS ODHS Characteristic NDSS ODHSAge Religionf15-19 21.6 26.3 Catholic |80.6 10.320-24 16.6 13.4 Protestant [ 74.425-29 17.6 13.3 Moslem 13.0 13.430-34 14.9 13.0 Traditional 5.3 1.035-39 13.2 11.4 None 1.2 0.940-44 9.7 11.345-49 6.3 11.3 EthnicityYoruba 87.8 85.8Residence Other 12.2 14.2Urban 31.7 40.2Rural 168.3 52.0Riverine 7.8EducationNone 53.5 36.9Primary 20.5 23.8Secomdary 19.2 33.4Post-Secondary 6.7 5.8Total Percent I00.0 100.0Number of Women 8867 4213Source; National Population Bureau and Institute for Resource Development/Westinghouse [1988]: Tables I-2, I-3, I-4, 11-2.ResidenceThe distribution of respondents by residence area was as follows: 40 percent urban, 52 percentrural, and 8 percent riverine. This represents a somewhat greater concentration of the population in urbanareas than was found in the 1980 NDSS (32 percent) which suggests a net rural-to-urban migration flowin recent years.
Page 1 and 2: ONDO STATE, NIGERIADEMOGRAPHICANDHE
Page 3 and 4: This report presents the findings o
Page 5 and 6: Page4.34.44.54.64.74.8Current Use o
Page 7 and 8: PageTable 3.3Table 3.4Table 3.5Tabl
Page 9 and 10: PageTable 5.1Table 5.2Table 5.3Tabl
Page 11 and 12: PageAPPENDIX A ....................
Page 14: PREFACEThe Ondo State Demographic a
Page 17: percent of women using each) and th
Page 20 and 21: 1. BACKGROUND1.1 Geography and Hist
Page 22 and 23: Although the reporting of family pl
Page 26 and 27: Religion and EthnicityThe majority
Page 28: Sources of WaterInformation was als
Page 31 and 32: consistent with the comparable stat
Page 33 and 34: esults must be interpreted with cau
Page 35 and 36: Following the birth of a child, the
Page 38 and 39: 3. FERTILITY3.1 Fertility Data in t
Page 40 and 41: educational attainment, differences
Page 42 and 43: distributions. The proportion with
Page 44: Table 3.5 Percent Distribution of A
Page 47 and 48: Table 4.1Percentage Knowing Any Met
Page 49 and 50: Women who had heard of methods were
Page 51 and 52: Table 4.6Percent Distribution of Al
Page 53 and 54: Table 4.7Percent Distribution of Cu
Page 55 and 56: 4.4 Trends in Family Planning Knowl
Page 57 and 58: Figure 4.4Source of Family Planning
Page 59 and 60: 4.7 Intention to Use Contraception
Page 61 and 62: Table 4.16 presents data on wives'
Page 63 and 64: Table 4.18Percentage of Currently M
Page 65 and 66: Figure 5.1Fertility PreferencesCurr
Page 67 and 68: In order to examine fertility prefe
Page 69 and 70: Table 5.4 also indicates that less
Page 72 and 73: 6. MORTALITY AND HEALTH6.1 Mortalit
Page 74 and 75:
Table 6.1 Infant and Child Mortalit
Page 76 and 77:
Table 6.3Mean Number of Children Ev
Page 78 and 79:
Table 6.5 • Percent Distribution
Page 80 and 81:
For the investigation of differenti
Page 82 and 83:
In considering the morbidity inform
Page 84 and 85:
Cough/Difficult BreathingThe ODHS c
Page 86 and 87:
Nutritional StatusNutritional statu
Page 88 and 89:
Weight-for-HeightWeight-for-height
Page 90 and 91:
Weight-for-AgeTable 6.13 shows the
Page 92:
REFERENCESCttieh-Johnson, D., Cross
Page 96 and 97:
APPENDIX ASURVEY DESIGNA.1 Sample D
Page 98 and 99:
However, as shown in Table A.2, the
Page 100 and 101:
A total of 32 field staff participa
Page 102:
Table A.3Household Response Rate an
Page 106 and 107:
APPENDIX BSAMPLING ERRORSThe result
Page 108 and 109:
Table B.I List of Variables for Whi
Page 110 and 111:
Table B.2 Sampling Errors (con't):
Page 112 and 113:
Page 114:
Page 118 and 119:
MINISTRY OF HEALTH, ONDO STATE, NIG
Page 120 and 121:
CONTINUED FROM PREVIOUS PAGENAME OF
Page 122:
MINISTRY OF HEALTH, C, OVERNMENT OF
Page 125 and 126:
!P............IM,RSKIPattended: pri
Page 127 and 128:
i SECTION 2: REPRODUCTION. ISKIP201
Page 129 and 130:
TABLE 2.1rRECORD INFORMATION STARTI
Page 131 and 132:
SKIP230 CHECK: COMPARE NUMBER OF BI
Page 133 and 134:
I ISECTION 3:HEALTH AND BREASTFEEDI
Page 135 and 136:
316317CHECK ~2:LAST BIRTH ALIVE [ ]
Page 137 and 138:
SKIP334 What was done?CIRCLECODE 1
Page 139 and 140:
!TABLE 3.1(ASK QUESTIONS STARTING W
Page 141 and 142:
LTABLE 3.3(ASK @UESTIONS ONLY FOR S
Page 143 and 144:
TABLE 3.5CF. TABLE 2.1:ENTER NAME A
Page 145 and 146:
TABLE 4: IPILL "Women can take •
Page 147 and 148:
SKIP413CHECK 404:NO STERILIZATION [
Page 149 and 150:
SECTIOM 5: MARRIAGE. lSKIP501 /Have
Page 151 and 152:
SKIP520 kow we need some detmils ab
Page 153 and 154:
SKIP606 For how long should • cou
Page 155 and 156:
SKIP7e9CHECK 7@8:DOES/DID NOT WORKI
Page 157:
INTERVIEWER'S OBSERVATIONS.(To be t
show all

Final Report (PDF, 2132K) - Measure DHS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Delete template?

Save as template?