12.07.2015 Views

Africa's Missing Billions - Oxfam International

Africa's Missing Billions - Oxfam International

Africa's Missing Billions - Oxfam International

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

principles of customary international law. We have brought togetherthese obligations – the minimum necessary for an ATT which willreduce the human cost of armed violence – in a set of GlobalPrinciples for Arms Transfers. 121 They can be summarised in the‘golden rule’: the ATT must prohibit arms transfers if they are likelyto be used to:• Commit serious violations of international humanitarian law (the‘rules of war’);• Commit serious violations of international human rights law; or• Undermine sustainable development.Provisions that are broadly consistent with the Global Principles havebeen incorporated into the ECOWAS Convention and the BestPractice Guidelines for the implementation of the Nairobi Protocol. 122However, we have seen that the vast majority of arms used inAfrica’s conflicts originate from outside the continent, so Africanstates and arms producing states share responsibility for theirresponsible arms trade. Arms producers must take responsibility forensuring their weapons are not diverted to misuse, and African stateshave a responsibility to prevent internal diversion of these weapons.This is why a global ATT is so necessary and, to be effective, it isimportant that it comes with a mechanism to enhance transparency inarms transfer and also significant and long-term capacity-buildingsupport, to enable compliance and implementation.Preventing irresponsible arms transfersThe ATT will not prevent the responsible transfer of weapons fordefence, policing, peacekeeping, or other legitimate purposes. It willnot prevent a transfer if it is legal under the national laws of allcountries concerned, legal under international laws, and upholdscurrent best practice, particularly in ensuring that the arms are notlikely to be diverted to another user.Thus many arms transfers would not be affected. But the ATT wouldimpact on the following transfers:Irresponsible transfer to a state: Such a transfer may be irresponsibleif it was not authorised by all of the states concerned (throughimport, export, brokering, transit, or transhipment), or if the transferwas in violation of international law. For example, the transfer wouldbe prohibited if it breached an arms embargo, or if the arms werelikely to be used for serious violations of international humanitarianor human rights law.24Africa’s missing billions, IANSA, <strong>Oxfam</strong>, and Saferworld, October2007

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!