12.07.2015 Views

Kill Phil The Fast Track to Success in No-limit hold - Las Vegas Advisor

Kill Phil The Fast Track to Success in No-limit hold - Las Vegas Advisor

Kill Phil The Fast Track to Success in No-limit hold - Las Vegas Advisor

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

“This book is a dangerous weapon <strong>in</strong> the poker world. A detailed strategy forfuture <strong>to</strong>urnament-poker champions.”—Joseph Hachem, 2005 World Series of Poker Champion“This book is go<strong>in</strong>g <strong>to</strong> liven up a lot of ‘dead’ money.”—Mike Sex<strong>to</strong>n, WPT host; author of Shuffle Up and Deal“Aggressive players w<strong>in</strong> <strong>to</strong>urnaments. <strong>Kill</strong> <strong>Phil</strong> provides an ultra- aggressivestyle that can be followed by anyone. It’s a w<strong>in</strong>n<strong>in</strong>g formula that’sgo<strong>in</strong>g <strong>to</strong> give the <strong>to</strong>p pros trouble.”—Josh Arieh, 2005 WSOP Pot-Limit Omaha Champion;3rd place 2004 WSOP Ma<strong>in</strong> Event“It’s like giv<strong>in</strong>g the gun <strong>to</strong> the rabbit.”—Marcel Luske, w<strong>in</strong>ner of WPT and Hall of Fame titles“ <strong>Kill</strong> <strong>Phil</strong> is not a poker strategy book, but rather a <strong>to</strong>urnament strategybook … And this book provides a wonderful approach for exactly that.”—Steve Rosenbloom, ESPN.com commenta<strong>to</strong>r, Chicago Sun-Times columnist, and author of <strong>The</strong> Best Hand I Ever Played“As an old-school guy, I found a lot of the concepts discussed <strong>in</strong> <strong>Kill</strong> <strong>Phil</strong>helpful as far as adapt<strong>in</strong>g some of my <strong>to</strong>urnament game <strong>to</strong> the modern style.I’ve known Blair and Lee for years as <strong>to</strong>ugh players, and they’ve given up alot of valuable <strong>in</strong>formation <strong>in</strong> their book.”—V<strong>in</strong>ce Burgio, 1994 WSOP Seven-Card Stud SplitChampion, Card Player magaz<strong>in</strong>e columnist; author ofPizza, Pasta, and Poker“ <strong>Kill</strong> <strong>Phil</strong> is a well-written poker book that will likely raise a newbie<strong>to</strong> be<strong>in</strong>g competitive at no-<strong>limit</strong> <strong>hold</strong> ’em <strong>to</strong>urnament play faster than anyother method.”—Bob Ciaffone, author of Improve Your Poker; co-author ofPot-Limit and <strong>No</strong>-Limit Poker; Card Player columnist


“ <strong>Kill</strong> <strong>Phil</strong> teaches the <strong>in</strong>side secrets that the pros don’t want you<strong>to</strong> know.”—Mel Judah, 1989 and 1997 WSOP Seven-Card StudChampion, 2003 WPT Legends of Poker Champion“Tournament poker has changed immensely s<strong>in</strong>ce I won the WSOP and itwill cont<strong>in</strong>ue <strong>to</strong> evolve. <strong>Kill</strong> <strong>Phil</strong> provides the <strong>to</strong>ols <strong>to</strong> stay ahead of thecurve.”—Mansour Matloubi, 1990 WSOP Ma<strong>in</strong> Event Champion“As a <strong>to</strong>urnament direc<strong>to</strong>r, I’ve had a bird’s-eye view of Blair Rodman’sstrong play for years, and I recently watched Lee Nelson put <strong>Kill</strong> <strong>Phil</strong>concepts <strong>in</strong> action <strong>in</strong> a dom<strong>in</strong>at<strong>in</strong>g performance <strong>in</strong> w<strong>in</strong>n<strong>in</strong>g the 2006 AussieMillions. <strong>Kill</strong> <strong>Phil</strong> is a must read for modern no-<strong>limit</strong> <strong>to</strong>urnamentplayers.”—Matt Savage, 2004 WSOP <strong>to</strong>urnament direc<strong>to</strong>r“<strong>No</strong>t only does this book <strong>in</strong>troduce a quick and easy way <strong>to</strong> learn strategy onhow <strong>to</strong> give yourself a chance at w<strong>in</strong>n<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> the big <strong>to</strong>urneys, it also expla<strong>in</strong>sthe logic and gives a frighten<strong>in</strong>gly honest <strong>in</strong>sight <strong>to</strong> how the <strong>to</strong>p pros th<strong>in</strong>k.”—David Colclough, 2003 European Poker Player of the Year“I begged Lee and Blair not <strong>to</strong> write this book. <strong>The</strong>re are a lot of booksout there, but this one reveals secrets that pros really don’t want players <strong>to</strong>know.”—“Crocodile” Billy Argyros, Australian <strong>to</strong>urnament pro“A must read, especially for those of you just gett<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong><strong>to</strong> the poker <strong>to</strong>urnamentscene.”—Mason Malmuth, publisher Two Plus Two


ContentsForeword—One of the <strong>Phil</strong>s Fires Back.............................. xiIntroduction <strong>to</strong> the New Editionand Important Strategy Updates....................................... 1<strong>The</strong> Mathematics Beh<strong>in</strong>d <strong>Kill</strong> <strong>Phil</strong>....................................... 9Let’s <strong>Kill</strong> <strong>Phil</strong>...................................................................... 15Part OneBeg<strong>in</strong>n<strong>in</strong>g Considerations1 <strong>The</strong> His<strong>to</strong>ry of Poker Tournaments .................................... 312 Understand<strong>in</strong>g <strong>No</strong>-Limit Hold ’Em.................................... 373 <strong>The</strong> Benefits of Big-Pot Poker............................................. 534 Characteristics of W<strong>in</strong>n<strong>in</strong>g <strong>No</strong>-LimitTournament Players............................................................. 59Part Two<strong>The</strong> <strong>Kill</strong> <strong>Phil</strong> Beg<strong>in</strong>ner Strategies5 <strong>The</strong> Basis For <strong>The</strong> <strong>Kill</strong> <strong>Phil</strong> Strategies.................................. 676 <strong>Kill</strong> <strong>Phil</strong> Rookie.................................................................... 737 <strong>Kill</strong> <strong>Phil</strong> Basic....................................................................... 77


f • <strong>Kill</strong> <strong>Phil</strong>Part Three<strong>The</strong> <strong>Kill</strong> <strong>Phil</strong> Intermediate Strategies8 <strong>Kill</strong> <strong>Phil</strong> Basic Plus............................................................. 1119 F<strong>in</strong>e-Tun<strong>in</strong>g <strong>Kill</strong> <strong>Phil</strong> Basic Plus....................................... 129Part FourAdvanced <strong>Kill</strong> <strong>Phil</strong> Strategies10 <strong>Kill</strong> <strong>Phil</strong> Expert.................................................................. 15311 <strong>Kill</strong> <strong>Phil</strong> <strong>in</strong> Practice............................................................ 17512 Attitudes and Latitudes...................................................... 19713 <strong>Phil</strong> is Dead; Long Live <strong>Phil</strong>.............................................. 227Appendix IPoker Hands...................................................................... 231Appendix IIBasics of <strong>No</strong>-Limit Texas Hold ’Em................................. 233Appendix IIIHow <strong>No</strong>-Limit Hold ’Em Tournaments Work................. 237Appendix IVGlossary.............................................................................. 239Appendix VPre-flop Match-Ups........................................................... 253Appendix VIPost-flop Match-Ups......................................................... 255Appendix VIIProbability of W<strong>in</strong>n<strong>in</strong>g a Showdownwith A♦K♥ vs. Black Pairs................................................. 257Appendix VIIIOuts................................................................................... 259Appendix IXPair Probability.................................................................. 261Appendix XDeal Formula..................................................................... 263Appendix XIRecommended Read<strong>in</strong>g and Websites............................... 265Appendix XII<strong>The</strong> <strong>Kill</strong> <strong>Phil</strong> Strategy Cards............................................... 269Index ........................................................................................ 281


Forewordby <strong>Phil</strong> Hellmuth, Jr.One of the <strong>Phil</strong>s Fires BackFirst of all, let me—<strong>Phil</strong> Hellmuth, Jr.—say this, “Donot take the title of this book literally! <strong>No</strong> one wants that fate<strong>to</strong> befall any of the <strong>Phil</strong>s. Rather, the authors want you <strong>to</strong>beat us <strong>Phil</strong>s out of our chips at the poker tables.”I admit I was amused, and flattered, when I heard thata book with such a title would soon be circulat<strong>in</strong>g throughthe poker world. “<strong>Kill</strong> <strong>Phil</strong>” obviously refers <strong>to</strong> me <strong>to</strong> someextent, but with <strong>Phil</strong> “Unabomber” Laak, <strong>Phil</strong> Gordon, andespecially young phenom <strong>Phil</strong> Ivey also shar<strong>in</strong>g the name, Iwasn’t sure what portion of the attribution I could assume.To be honest, I would prefer that this book had foundno publisher. I mean, who wants a credible book out there by<strong>to</strong>ugh-as-nails poker players (Blair Rodman and Lee Nelson)tell<strong>in</strong>g the world exactly how <strong>to</strong> beat you? <strong>The</strong> strategy theypresent here is simple and effective. It’s basically an extensionof one of the tactics that David Sklansky presented <strong>in</strong> hisbook, Advanced Texas Hold ’Em Tournament Strategy.<strong>The</strong> tactics are about putt<strong>in</strong>g pressure on the great playersby mov<strong>in</strong>g them all-<strong>in</strong> before the flop. In this way, you’re


h • <strong>Kill</strong> <strong>Phil</strong>forc<strong>in</strong>g them <strong>to</strong> commit all their chips, which is someth<strong>in</strong>gthat none of the great players ever wants <strong>to</strong> do. Personally, Iwill go <strong>to</strong> great lengths <strong>to</strong> avoid putt<strong>in</strong>g all of my chips at risk<strong>in</strong> any hand, because when I’m all-<strong>in</strong>, then it’s possible for me<strong>to</strong> be elim<strong>in</strong>ated.In 2004 I was even explor<strong>in</strong>g the theory of fold<strong>in</strong>g handswhere I was actually a 4½-1 favorite. For example, I foldedpocket queens <strong>in</strong> the ma<strong>in</strong> event of the WSOP (World Seriesof Poker) even though I thought my opponent had a smallerpair. In that particular case, I was right: My opponent hadpocket sevens, giv<strong>in</strong>g me a 17% chance <strong>to</strong> be elim<strong>in</strong>ated. IfI’m go<strong>in</strong>g that far <strong>to</strong> avoid be<strong>in</strong>g all-<strong>in</strong>, then it’s correct foryou <strong>to</strong> move all-<strong>in</strong> on me almost every hand. Even when Igave up the tactic of fold<strong>in</strong>g a 4½-1 favorite (I have <strong>to</strong> putthe chips <strong>in</strong> sometime!), I was still go<strong>in</strong>g <strong>to</strong> great lengths <strong>to</strong>avoid mov<strong>in</strong>g all-<strong>in</strong>.In many of the <strong>to</strong>urnaments that I’ve won, I’ve been all<strong>in</strong>—andcalled—less than three times, and I’m proud of thisdist<strong>in</strong>ction. Rodman and Nelson understand this and they’reteach<strong>in</strong>g you <strong>to</strong> put me all-<strong>in</strong>, so that I can fold one morestrong hand—and you can w<strong>in</strong> the pot by bluff<strong>in</strong>g me. Ifenough people read this book, then I’ll have <strong>to</strong> change mytactics, the tactics that have worked so well for so long, andthe “<strong>Kill</strong> <strong>Phil</strong>” title will have earned real mean<strong>in</strong>g: It will haveforced me <strong>to</strong> change my game!What was I <strong>to</strong> do when I was asked <strong>to</strong> write a forewordor jacket blurb for this book? Ignore its existence? Say no andwalk away? After all, it did have my name on it, and whatthe heck, I’m a promoter! So I chose <strong>to</strong> read it over and thendecide what <strong>to</strong> do. If it was good, then maybe I would recommendit.With all k<strong>in</strong>ds of books out there on the subject of pokerstrategy, I cannot and will not recommend <strong>to</strong>o many of them.(Of course, I recommend the books that I have written!) Toooften, a good writer, but mediocre poker player, has written


i • <strong>Kill</strong> <strong>Phil</strong>a book that has some good po<strong>in</strong>ts, but a lot of bad po<strong>in</strong>ts aswell. Rodman and Nelson truly have been through the warsand understand the game. So even though the title of thisbook is a bit unfriendly <strong>to</strong> me, I’m recommend<strong>in</strong>g that youbuy it.When you’ve completed your poker education, br<strong>in</strong>g onyour best game! I’ll be wait<strong>in</strong>g for you at the biggest and mostprestigious poker <strong>to</strong>urnaments <strong>in</strong> the world. Just don’t takethe title literally!Good Luck,<strong>Phil</strong> Hellmuth, Jr.


Introduction <strong>to</strong> the New EditionandImportant Strategy Updates<strong>Kill</strong> <strong>Phil</strong> (KP) was published <strong>in</strong> 2006. At that time, it wasimpossible <strong>to</strong> envision the changes that would occur <strong>in</strong> theworld of poker <strong>in</strong> the next three-plus years. To this day, whena <strong>to</strong>urnament player at our table pushes all-<strong>in</strong>, a la <strong>Kill</strong> <strong>Phil</strong>,other players at the table stare at us, like it was our do<strong>in</strong>g!<strong>The</strong> truth is, the all-<strong>in</strong> move is a viable strategy, and acceptedpoker wisdom was headed <strong>in</strong> that direction, KP or no KP.We released <strong>Kill</strong> <strong>Phil</strong> before the flood of modern-erapoker books had reached the market and the poker explosionhit full sw<strong>in</strong>g. At the time, we were a bit apprehensiveabout unleash<strong>in</strong>g the KP strategies on the poker world. Weasked ourselves: While these strategies are the great equalizerfor <strong>to</strong>urnament novices, is publiciz<strong>in</strong>g them and “dumb<strong>in</strong>gdown” <strong>to</strong>urnament poker the right th<strong>in</strong>g <strong>to</strong> do?In fact, while KP sold more than 30,000 copies and manyplayers, rookie and experienced, used the strategies and concepts<strong>to</strong> improve their results, the phenomenon and evolutionof no-<strong>limit</strong> <strong>hold</strong> ’em were bigger than any one book. <strong>The</strong> all<strong>in</strong>move, especially at later stages of no-<strong>limit</strong> <strong>to</strong>urnaments, is


2 • <strong>Kill</strong> <strong>Phil</strong>now utilized as a matter of course. KP didn’t br<strong>in</strong>g this about;it was just a bellwether of th<strong>in</strong>gs <strong>to</strong> come.From the advent of poker <strong>to</strong>urnaments <strong>in</strong> the early ’70suntil the popularity explosion fueled by the Internet crazeand hole-card camera <strong>to</strong>ok <strong>hold</strong> <strong>in</strong> 2003, advancement <strong>in</strong> thestrategies of <strong>to</strong>urnament poker had come about very slowly.S<strong>in</strong>ce the early 2000s, however, books, televised poker,and Internet forums and teach<strong>in</strong>g sites have propelled pokerknowledge forward <strong>in</strong> hyperspeed. Today’s low-rung <strong>to</strong>urnamentspecialist would likely have been a star <strong>in</strong> the ’70s and’80s. Astute players attempt <strong>to</strong> stay on the cutt<strong>in</strong>g edge ofevolv<strong>in</strong>g trends and strategies.For example, pre-2003, if a player went all-<strong>in</strong> with astack of any reasonable size, he’d generally only get calledby players with a <strong>to</strong>p hand. This was a function of the factthat players would only move <strong>in</strong> with very strong hands. Today,move-<strong>in</strong> ranges are much wider and call<strong>in</strong>g ranges haveadjusted accord<strong>in</strong>gly. Young onl<strong>in</strong>e-honed players who’veplayed millions of hands of <strong>to</strong>urnament poker onl<strong>in</strong>e are nowenter<strong>in</strong>g live <strong>to</strong>urnaments and play<strong>in</strong>g uber-aggressive poker.Inexorably, new-school poker, characterized by loose-aggressivesmall-ball play and tight-aggressive long-ball strategies,is crowd<strong>in</strong>g out old-school poker. Old-school players whoare either unwill<strong>in</strong>g or <strong>in</strong>capable of adjust<strong>in</strong>g <strong>to</strong> the moderngame will most assuredly struggle <strong>in</strong> the current climate.<strong>The</strong> orig<strong>in</strong>al KP move-<strong>in</strong> strategies were based on thecall<strong>in</strong>g ranges we estimated at that time. While generalizedcall<strong>in</strong>g ranges <strong>to</strong>day (2009) are significantly wider than theywere at the time of the first edition, revamp<strong>in</strong>g the strategiesisn’t the solution. Wider call<strong>in</strong>g ranges will lead <strong>to</strong> playerstighten<strong>in</strong>g their all-<strong>in</strong> requirements, and so on. If we startedtry<strong>in</strong>g <strong>to</strong> change the strategies <strong>to</strong> keep up with the evolv<strong>in</strong>gtrends, we might chase our tails until we came full circle <strong>to</strong>the pre-2003 dynamic. <strong>The</strong> solution as we see it is <strong>to</strong> giveyou some guidel<strong>in</strong>es <strong>to</strong> br<strong>in</strong>g the strategies up <strong>to</strong> the present,


3 • <strong>Kill</strong> <strong>Phil</strong>but be aware that trends will cont<strong>in</strong>ue <strong>to</strong> evolve. Top playersconstantly moni<strong>to</strong>r chang<strong>in</strong>g conditions.Here are our suggestions.For new players: Stick with the Rookie strategy as presented.This should still give you the best chance for successuntil you ga<strong>in</strong> some experience and move on <strong>to</strong> the more advancedstrategies.For <strong>in</strong>termediate and advanced players: <strong>The</strong> play of AAand KK was a major po<strong>in</strong>t of discussion when we developedthe basic and advanced strategies. Our orig<strong>in</strong>al idea was <strong>to</strong>give players a reasonable chance <strong>to</strong> garner some chips withthose powerful and <strong>in</strong>frequent hands by rais<strong>in</strong>g less than all<strong>in</strong>.However, <strong>in</strong> the modern climate, all-<strong>in</strong> moves tend <strong>to</strong> beviewed with more suspicion than smaller raises, so we suggestalter<strong>in</strong>g the play of these hands as follows.Early <strong>in</strong> a <strong>to</strong>urnament with huge stacks, if your opponentshaven’t yet pegged you as a KP player, the strategy aspresented on pg. 73-76 is still viable, though not necessarilythe best course of action. In the latter stages or if you’rerecognized as a KP’er, just move <strong>in</strong> with your aces and k<strong>in</strong>gsrather than mess<strong>in</strong>g around with a smaller raise. Your chancesof gett<strong>in</strong>g called are much greater <strong>to</strong>day than at the time ofthe first edition, so move <strong>in</strong> and hope <strong>to</strong> get action.An advanced adaptation <strong>to</strong> the new style of hyper-aggressiveplay is <strong>to</strong> occasionally limp <strong>in</strong> with AA after a coupleof mid-position raisers if you have some aggressive playersyet <strong>to</strong> act who likely can’t resist putt<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> a big raise wheneveryone appears <strong>to</strong> be weak. You can then come over the <strong>to</strong>pand put them <strong>to</strong> a <strong>to</strong>ugh decision. <strong>The</strong>y might th<strong>in</strong>k you’remak<strong>in</strong>g a play at them and call you down with small <strong>to</strong> mediumpairs or hands as weak as AJ or AT.A play that we like mak<strong>in</strong>g with AA or KK when shortstacked(CSI of 7 or less) is limp<strong>in</strong>g from middle <strong>to</strong> late positionand just call<strong>in</strong>g a raise pre-flop. We then check on theflop and call an all-<strong>in</strong> bet or move <strong>in</strong> over any bet. If our op-


4 • <strong>Kill</strong> <strong>Phil</strong>ponent checks back on the flop, we push all-<strong>in</strong> on the turn.This may be <strong>in</strong>terpreted as a bluff and called by a weaker hand.We’re will<strong>in</strong>g <strong>to</strong> accept greater risks when short-stacked <strong>in</strong>exchange for a greater possibility of doubl<strong>in</strong>g up and garner<strong>in</strong>ga decent stack size.When we developed the Onl<strong>in</strong>e Strategy, we did so withthe understand<strong>in</strong>g that onl<strong>in</strong>e players were much looser andcalled with more hands than did live players. <strong>The</strong> <strong>in</strong>flux ofonl<strong>in</strong>e players <strong>in</strong><strong>to</strong> live <strong>to</strong>urnaments has caused a shift <strong>to</strong>wardthe onl<strong>in</strong>e dynamic. Our suggestion at the present time is <strong>to</strong>lean heavily <strong>to</strong>ward the Onl<strong>in</strong>e Strategy <strong>in</strong> live <strong>to</strong>urnaments.<strong>The</strong> essential differences are that Group 2 hands, and <strong>to</strong> alesser degree Group 3 hands, are given greater value, whilesuited connec<strong>to</strong>rs are downplayed.Another adjustment can be made <strong>in</strong> the area of defend<strong>in</strong>gaga<strong>in</strong>st late-position raises, employed by aggressive playerswith a considerably wider range of hands than at the timeof the first edition. You might consider add<strong>in</strong>g suited connec<strong>to</strong>rsand 1-gap suited connec<strong>to</strong>rs <strong>to</strong> your re-raise arsenalaga<strong>in</strong>st suspicious late-position raises if you have enoughchips that you reta<strong>in</strong> fold equity. For our purposes, we considerfold equity as offer<strong>in</strong>g our opponent less than 1.5/1odds <strong>to</strong> make the call.As your experience and skill at play<strong>in</strong>g the player (pgs.114-117) <strong>in</strong>crease, the more success you’ll have when youuse these variations. While variations make a simple strategymore complex, players work very hard <strong>to</strong> improve their gamethese days and if you want <strong>to</strong> reta<strong>in</strong> your respective edge,you need <strong>to</strong> follow suit. However, for the player who simplywants a strategy that gives him a reasonable chance of successwithout requir<strong>in</strong>g a major effort, the strategies as presentedstill give you a better chance than anyth<strong>in</strong>g else out there.While we received some criticism when the book wasreleased that we were simply tell<strong>in</strong>g players <strong>to</strong> become pushmonkeys,not only was that never our <strong>in</strong>tention, but it’s not


5 • <strong>Kill</strong> <strong>Phil</strong>true. In fact, that criticism often came from players whohadn’t read the book and would likely benefit from some ofthe concepts we cover.<strong>Kill</strong> <strong>Phil</strong> is a learn<strong>in</strong>g platform that’s different from otherteach<strong>in</strong>g approaches <strong>in</strong> that we come at the game from the<strong>to</strong>p down. Other books give pre-flop start<strong>in</strong>g-hand charts,but once they get <strong>to</strong> post-flop play, they become hopelesslyconfus<strong>in</strong>g <strong>to</strong> the rookie. Players adopt<strong>in</strong>g that approach <strong>to</strong>learn<strong>in</strong>g the game have little chance of success until they’vepaid for lots of expensive real-life lessons. <strong>Kill</strong> <strong>Phil</strong> provides amethod that gives a new player a realistic chance of success,while ga<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g real-time experience at the tables <strong>to</strong> observeand learn from good players.Opponents’ reactions <strong>to</strong> <strong>Kill</strong> <strong>Phil</strong> practitioners have beenvaried and often comical. Some players become frustrated<strong>to</strong> the po<strong>in</strong>t of los<strong>in</strong>g their cool and mak<strong>in</strong>g huge mistakes.Blair vividly remembers an onl<strong>in</strong>e player who berated himendlessly <strong>in</strong> the chat while he was experiment<strong>in</strong>g with thestrategies, then decided <strong>to</strong> teach him a lesson by call<strong>in</strong>g ahuge all-<strong>in</strong> with Q3!Similarly, Blair was on a radio show with Gav<strong>in</strong> Smith,one of the <strong>to</strong>p players who’s known for play<strong>in</strong>g many potsand outplay<strong>in</strong>g opponents post-flop. Blair asked Gav<strong>in</strong> howhe’d react <strong>to</strong> a KP player at his table. “I guess I’d have <strong>to</strong>tighten up and s<strong>to</strong>p splash<strong>in</strong>g around.” Amaz<strong>in</strong>g how a completenovice could force a <strong>to</strong>p player <strong>to</strong> change his game.Powerful stuff, <strong>in</strong>deed!After the publication of <strong>Kill</strong> <strong>Phil</strong>, we did numerous <strong>in</strong>terviewsand radio shows. One of the questions we frequentlyheard was how <strong>to</strong> counteract a KP player. It would havebeen silly <strong>to</strong> present an immediate solution <strong>to</strong> the problemswe created for opponents <strong>in</strong> <strong>Kill</strong> <strong>Phil</strong>. However, while Blairchose not <strong>to</strong> get <strong>in</strong>volved <strong>in</strong> writ<strong>in</strong>g a follow-up poker book,<strong>in</strong> 2007 Lee teamed up with math-model<strong>in</strong>g expert TysenStreib and <strong>Kill</strong> <strong>Phil</strong> co-author Steve Hes<strong>to</strong>n <strong>to</strong> write <strong>Kill</strong> Ev-


6 • <strong>Kill</strong> <strong>Phil</strong>eryone, which presents the answers <strong>to</strong> many questions raisedby <strong>Kill</strong> <strong>Phil</strong>, and much more. After read<strong>in</strong>g <strong>Kill</strong> <strong>Phil</strong> andga<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g some play<strong>in</strong>g experience, we suggest you advance byread<strong>in</strong>g <strong>Kill</strong> Everyone. It targets <strong>in</strong>termediate <strong>to</strong> advancedplayers and is replete with useful <strong>in</strong>formation about unexploitableequilibrium strategies for multi-table <strong>to</strong>urnaments,Sit-and-Go’s, and satellite <strong>to</strong>urnaments. <strong>Kill</strong> <strong>Phil</strong> and <strong>Kill</strong>Everyone <strong>to</strong>gether are a powerful tandem that needs <strong>to</strong> be onevery <strong>to</strong>urnament player’s bookshelf.While <strong>Kill</strong> <strong>Phil</strong> was be<strong>in</strong>g prepared for publication, otherpoker books were hitt<strong>in</strong>g the market, notably Dan Harr<strong>in</strong>g<strong>to</strong>n’sHarr<strong>in</strong>g<strong>to</strong>n on Hold ’Em. Some of the concepts wecovered were simultaneously be<strong>in</strong>g treated by Harr<strong>in</strong>g<strong>to</strong>n, sosimilar concepts had different names. What we call “CSI” hecalls “M.” Likewise, our “Power Re-Raise” is his “SqueezePlay.” While M and squeeze play have become the acceptedpoker terms, we’ve decided not <strong>to</strong> change the KP nomenclature,s<strong>in</strong>ce our readers are familiar with the KP term<strong>in</strong>ology.Just be aware that they’re the same concepts.Our forum, <strong>Kill</strong><strong>Phil</strong>Poker.com, came onl<strong>in</strong>e shortly afterthe publication of the book. A bunch of new players <strong>to</strong>ok <strong>to</strong>the book and shared their ideas and progress on the forum.Many of them developed <strong>in</strong><strong>to</strong> skilled players with notablesuccesses. Our forum members are very will<strong>in</strong>g <strong>to</strong> share theirexperiences and help new members with their poker education.<strong>The</strong>y even put <strong>to</strong>gether a series of private small-buy-<strong>in</strong>onl<strong>in</strong>e <strong>to</strong>urnaments that are fun and educational. <strong>The</strong>y havebecome some of the <strong>to</strong>ughest <strong>to</strong>urnaments around! Check i<strong>to</strong>ut—it’s a cool place <strong>to</strong> hang out on the Net.F<strong>in</strong>ally, one more key change <strong>in</strong> this second edition isthe <strong>in</strong>clusion of the strategies <strong>in</strong> the <strong>Kill</strong> <strong>Phil</strong> Strategy Cardformat, which you can f<strong>in</strong>d <strong>in</strong> Appendix XII. After much discussion,we decided <strong>to</strong> do this for a couple of reasons. First,it adds significant value <strong>to</strong> your <strong>in</strong>vestment <strong>in</strong> this book. Butmore important, it gives you an alternate and possibly more


7 • <strong>Kill</strong> <strong>Phil</strong>familiar method for memoriz<strong>in</strong>g and apply<strong>in</strong>g the strategies.When <strong>Kill</strong> <strong>Phil</strong> was published, the formatt<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> the bookwas the common style of the time. Soon after, however, a differentmethod—us<strong>in</strong>g hand values <strong>in</strong>stead of hand groups—became the standard, and when Steve Hes<strong>to</strong>n formulated thestrategy cards, he used that method <strong>to</strong> lay out the strategies.This is the method used <strong>in</strong> most of <strong>to</strong>day’s poker literature.Experiment with both methods and use whichever worksbest for you.


<strong>The</strong> MathematicsBeh<strong>in</strong>d <strong>Kill</strong> <strong>Phil</strong>Steve Hes<strong>to</strong>n played a vital role <strong>in</strong> the development ofthe <strong>Kill</strong> <strong>Phil</strong> strategies (as well as the accompany<strong>in</strong>g <strong>Kill</strong> <strong>Phil</strong>strategy cards). For the first edition, Steve was concerned thathis association with a gambl<strong>in</strong>g project might have a negativeeffect on his reputation as a math professor at a major university,so he asked us <strong>to</strong> downplay his role. However, s<strong>in</strong>ce thenhe’s changed his stance and the value of his contributionswere strong enough <strong>to</strong> <strong>in</strong>clude him on the cover of the secondedition as an author.Steve Hes<strong>to</strong>n’s explanation of the math beh<strong>in</strong>d the <strong>Kill</strong><strong>Phil</strong> strategies follows.Blair and Lee didn’t just pull the <strong>Kill</strong> <strong>Phil</strong> strategies ou<strong>to</strong>f th<strong>in</strong> air. Well, actually they did, until they enlisted myhelp! While Blair and Lee were confident that their comb<strong>in</strong>edpoker knowledge and experience enabled them <strong>to</strong> put<strong>to</strong>gether highly effective strategies, they wanted <strong>to</strong> really nailit and requested my assistance.When we wrote <strong>Kill</strong> <strong>Phil</strong>, there was grow<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>terest <strong>in</strong>no-<strong>limit</strong> <strong>hold</strong> ’em, but few books for beg<strong>in</strong>ners were avail-


9 • <strong>Kill</strong> <strong>Phil</strong>able. <strong>No</strong>-<strong>limit</strong> cash games had dried up many years previously.This happened because cash games typically use largestacks, more than 50 times the bl<strong>in</strong>ds. <strong>The</strong> correct strategyis <strong>to</strong> play extremely tight when the money is this deep. Toquote poker expert Mason Malmuth, it became as <strong>in</strong>terest<strong>in</strong>gas watch<strong>in</strong>g pa<strong>in</strong>t dry. But all this changed with the popularityof <strong>hold</strong> ’em <strong>to</strong>urnaments and onl<strong>in</strong>e poker. <strong>The</strong>se newgames are fast-paced and always end up short-stacked. Sobeg<strong>in</strong>ners can play real no-<strong>limit</strong> poker without <strong>in</strong>vest<strong>in</strong>g a lo<strong>to</strong>f time or money.Players responded enthusiastically <strong>to</strong> the first editionof <strong>Kill</strong> <strong>Phil</strong>. In extreme cases, beg<strong>in</strong>ners have posted <strong>to</strong> ourforums (www.<strong>Kill</strong><strong>Phil</strong>Poker.com) that they actually won<strong>to</strong>urnament prizes on the first day they purchased the book!Experts have also rendered generous praise. <strong>The</strong>y acknowledgethat our push-or-fold strategies are effective for beg<strong>in</strong>nersand that they <strong>in</strong>variably use similar strategies themselveswhen stacks are small. Indeed, this book documents caseswhere professionals have actually played slightly <strong>in</strong>accurately<strong>in</strong> the end stages, because they have less experience <strong>in</strong> thosesituations.Along with the laurels, a few misconceptions about <strong>Kill</strong><strong>Phil</strong> have also emerged. Curiously, these have been held byplayers who aren’t complete novices, but not yet experts.Some th<strong>in</strong>k our strategies <strong>in</strong>volve mov<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>, or “do<strong>in</strong>g theall-<strong>in</strong> rhumba,” <strong>in</strong>discrim<strong>in</strong>ately. This would <strong>in</strong>deed be suicidal.Fortunately <strong>Kill</strong> <strong>Phil</strong> strategies are highly selective. Mostimportantly, they w<strong>in</strong>. One noted gam<strong>in</strong>g author had the patience<strong>to</strong> test our mechanical strategies on 500 s<strong>in</strong>gle-table<strong>to</strong>urnaments, and he showed a tidy profit at small stakes.This isn’t a matter of statistical significance. When you putthe strategy <strong>in</strong><strong>to</strong> practice, you’ll rout<strong>in</strong>ely see low-<strong>limit</strong> playerscall with worse hands and high-<strong>limit</strong> players fold worsehands. That’s when you know the strategy is work<strong>in</strong>g.


10 • <strong>Kill</strong> <strong>Phil</strong>Perhaps some of these misconceptions arose becausereaders didn’t appreciate the underly<strong>in</strong>g math. <strong>The</strong> biggestsurprise of all has been that some readers actually want thegory mathematical details! <strong>The</strong>se readers understand thatpoker is a game of math, and players who apply game theoryand optimization have a decided advantage over those whodon’t. Our subsequent book, <strong>Kill</strong> Everyone, expla<strong>in</strong>s more ofthe underly<strong>in</strong>g equilibrium concepts and gives sophisticatedanalyses of <strong>to</strong>urnament situations.An important mathematical po<strong>in</strong>t is that although <strong>Kill</strong><strong>Phil</strong> uses a nonrandom strategy, your opponents won’t beable <strong>to</strong> read your hands. This occurs because the strategymixes powerful hands like AK with bluff<strong>in</strong>g hands like 54s.Offhand, it seems foolish <strong>to</strong> use a strategy that bluffs withsuch weak hands as 54s, much less publish it and <strong>in</strong>formyour opponents! Presumably, opponents could beat you bysimply call<strong>in</strong>g with hands as weak as 64s. Unfortunately forthem, it isn’t quite so easy. When you move <strong>in</strong>, they can’ttell whether you have AA, AK, or the bluff<strong>in</strong>g hands. <strong>The</strong>strategy is mathematically calibrated <strong>to</strong> balance these hands,so opponents can never tell whether you are really bluff<strong>in</strong>g ornot. <strong>The</strong> only defense is <strong>to</strong> call with a really good hand. Youropponents won’t have really good hands very often, so you’llironically avoid confrontations by be<strong>in</strong>g selectively aggressive.If you want peace, you must prepare for war.<strong>The</strong> exact optimal (equilibrium) strategy for no-<strong>limit</strong><strong>hold</strong> ’em isn’t solvable with current or foreseeable computertechnology. Even if we could solve it, the length and complexityof such a strategy would require a book so heavy youcouldn’t lift it. Besides, the optimal strategy aga<strong>in</strong>st an exper<strong>to</strong>pponent is def<strong>in</strong>itely not the best strategy aga<strong>in</strong>st your average<strong>to</strong>urnament opponent. So what should we do?For <strong>Kill</strong> <strong>Phil</strong>, we assumed plausible opponent strategiesbased on our <strong>to</strong>urnament experience and computational experiments.We also made a computational compromise by


11 • <strong>Kill</strong> <strong>Phil</strong>assum<strong>in</strong>g an <strong>in</strong>f<strong>in</strong>ite number of decks. This is slightly <strong>in</strong>accurate,because the <strong>in</strong>f<strong>in</strong>ite-deck assumption doesn’t accountfor effects of removal. For example, <strong>in</strong> a real 52-card deck,it’s slightly less likely for your opponent <strong>to</strong> <strong>hold</strong> an ace ifyou already <strong>hold</strong> one yourself. But the <strong>in</strong>accuracies of ourassumption are m<strong>in</strong>or and it makes the poker problem computationallytractable.Also, we chose the rais<strong>in</strong>g and re-rais<strong>in</strong>g hands <strong>to</strong> maximizethe expected profits aga<strong>in</strong>st the range of opponenthands. This depends on the number of players and pot odds<strong>in</strong> addition <strong>to</strong> opponents’ strategies. In practice, you shouldbluff less aga<strong>in</strong>st loose opponents who call <strong>to</strong>o much and callmore aga<strong>in</strong>st loose opponents who have low rais<strong>in</strong>g standards.But overall, the strategy works quite well.Computers were useful <strong>in</strong> craft<strong>in</strong>g other important detailsof the <strong>Kill</strong> <strong>Phil</strong> strategy. For example, KQ is ranked twohand groups below a similar hand, AQ. This is because KQperforms particularly poorly aga<strong>in</strong>st other high hands. In particularit gets dom<strong>in</strong>ated by both AK and AQ, the most likelyhands for your opponent <strong>to</strong> call. To illustrate, suppose youropponent will call with AJ and 77 or better. Aga<strong>in</strong>st him, KQactually has slightly less pot equity than KJ. In other words,KQ is arguably worse than KJ. <strong>The</strong>refore we ranked it twofull categories below AQ.Calculations also emphasize the need <strong>to</strong> loosen up <strong>in</strong>short-handed situations. For example, suppose you’re headsupwith an effective stack size of ten times the bl<strong>in</strong>ds. Andsuppose your opponent will call with any pair and any twocards ten or higher; that’s 18% of hands. That means you cansuccessfully steal the bl<strong>in</strong>ds 82% of the time. In order <strong>to</strong> breakeven, you must expect <strong>to</strong> lose less than .82 times the bl<strong>in</strong>dson those 18% of hands where you get called. On those occasions,you’ll contribute your stack of 10 times the bl<strong>in</strong>ds <strong>to</strong>build a pot of 21 times the bl<strong>in</strong>ds. If your pot equity is 26%,you’ll expect <strong>to</strong> lose 4.54 times the bl<strong>in</strong>ds. Fortunately, this


12 • <strong>Kill</strong> <strong>Phil</strong>happens only 18% of the time, so the contribution <strong>to</strong> yourexpected loss is only .82 times the bl<strong>in</strong>ds, exactly offsett<strong>in</strong>gthe ga<strong>in</strong>s from steal<strong>in</strong>g the bl<strong>in</strong>ds. <strong>The</strong>refore, you only need26% pot equity <strong>to</strong> make a steal worthwhile. Even the worsthands have at least 27% equity aga<strong>in</strong>st your opponents call<strong>in</strong>grange, so you can profitably raise with any hand. As <strong>Kill</strong>Everyone expla<strong>in</strong>s, <strong>in</strong> certa<strong>in</strong> <strong>to</strong>urnament situations it can beoptimal for your opponents <strong>to</strong> play tight and call with only18% of hands. In these situations you should literally raisewith any two cards. <strong>The</strong> <strong>Kill</strong> <strong>Phil</strong> strategy <strong>in</strong>corporates these<strong>in</strong>sights by loosen<strong>in</strong>g up dramatically <strong>in</strong> short-stack andshort-handed games.A few critics have been disappo<strong>in</strong>ted by the simplifiedphilosophy beh<strong>in</strong>d <strong>Kill</strong> <strong>Phil</strong>. <strong>The</strong>y worry that our strategieswon’t enable students <strong>to</strong> ascend <strong>to</strong> higher skill levels. Somedemand<strong>in</strong>g readers have even compla<strong>in</strong>ed that this bookwon’t literally guarantee you will beat <strong>Phil</strong> Hellmuth. Thisreflects a misunderstand<strong>in</strong>g of how <strong>to</strong> use the book.<strong>The</strong> goal of <strong>Kill</strong> <strong>Phil</strong> is not <strong>to</strong> use mechanical strategiesforever. <strong>The</strong> careful reader will f<strong>in</strong>d a number of places wherewe advocate expanded strategies that demand skill and judgment,even for beg<strong>in</strong>ners. Frankly, we f<strong>in</strong>d virtually all otherno-<strong>limit</strong> <strong>hold</strong> ’em books <strong>to</strong> be <strong>in</strong>complete. <strong>The</strong> best ones givesound start<strong>in</strong>g-hand advice and general guidance. But they<strong>in</strong>variably encourage students <strong>to</strong> <strong>in</strong>vest money <strong>in</strong> hands thatcan leave them <strong>in</strong> very uncomfortable and potentially costlypots. Our basic strategies are easy <strong>to</strong> use <strong>in</strong> stressful <strong>to</strong>urnamentsituations and provide a “safe harbor” <strong>to</strong> avoid trickyspots. <strong>The</strong> beg<strong>in</strong>ner can take our <strong>in</strong>termediate and advancedadvice <strong>to</strong> deviate from these strategies. Readers will soon learn<strong>to</strong> have more fun and earn more profits by mix<strong>in</strong>g small-ballpoker <strong>in</strong><strong>to</strong> their perceptions of opponents. We’re proud thatmany students have come <strong>to</strong> the <strong>Kill</strong><strong>Phil</strong>Poker.com forumsand become formidable players.Of course, learn<strong>in</strong>g expert poker is fraught with perils as


13 • <strong>Kill</strong> <strong>Phil</strong>well as profits. On this note, we must relate the s<strong>to</strong>ry of ourpublisher Anthony Curtis. Anthony is a respected gambl<strong>in</strong>gexpert and has won many large prizes <strong>in</strong> blackjack, crap, andother types of <strong>to</strong>urnaments. You can imag<strong>in</strong>e our surprisewhen we went <strong>to</strong> YouTube and saw our publisher <strong>in</strong> a bighand with no<strong>to</strong>rious poker expert Sammy Farha (“Farha’s33’s Crack AA’s!!!”).Unfortunately, Anthony had yet <strong>to</strong> fully learn the <strong>Kill</strong><strong>Phil</strong> deviations and chose the wrong time <strong>to</strong> get creative.Curtis raised roughly 10% of his stack with pocket aces. Thisviolates our recommendation <strong>to</strong> raise 16% of your stack. Farha<strong>in</strong>stantly knew that Anthony had a large pair and calledwith pocket threes. Farha realized his own hand was <strong>in</strong>ferior,but he also suspected that Anthony would be unable <strong>to</strong> getaway from his aces. Unfortunately for Curtis, a three came onthe flop and Farha busted Curtis’ aces with his set. Importantly,Farha would not have called a bet of 16% of Anthony’sstack. He would have known what Curtis held, but wouldhave been unable <strong>to</strong> profit.This demonstrates a moral <strong>to</strong> the s<strong>to</strong>ry: <strong>The</strong>re is an underly<strong>in</strong>gmathematical logic <strong>to</strong> our strategies. You can lose alot of money by improvis<strong>in</strong>g your own strategies before appreciat<strong>in</strong>gthis logic. So learn the basic strategies first, thenenjoy yourself with advanced tactics.


Let’s <strong>Kill</strong> <strong>Phil</strong>Poker is like sex—everyone th<strong>in</strong>ks they’re the best at it,but only a few actually know what they’re do<strong>in</strong>g.—Layne FlackPoker, baby! <strong>No</strong> longer does the mention of this gameevoke images of smoky back rooms, card sharps, and lowlifes.<strong>No</strong>wadays, br<strong>in</strong>g up the subject of poker <strong>to</strong> nearlyanyone and you’ll w<strong>in</strong>d up talk<strong>in</strong>g about no-<strong>limit</strong> <strong>hold</strong> ’em(NLH), the World Poker Tour (WPT), the World Seriesof Poker (WSOP), or one of the many other televised pokershows. Big-name players of the day have become TV stars.W<strong>in</strong> a nationally televised <strong>to</strong>urnament and suddenly everyoneknows your name. <strong>The</strong> biggest names, like Gus Hansen,Howard Lederer, Daniel Negreanu, Annie Duke, and ofcourse, the “<strong>Phil</strong>s”—Hellmuth, Ivey, etc.—are liv<strong>in</strong>g the livesof celebrities. <strong>The</strong>y hang with Hollywood stars, get preferredtreatment, sign au<strong>to</strong>graphs, and garner lucrative endorsementdeals.<strong>No</strong> less than Ben Affleck and Tobey Maguire havewon big-time poker <strong>to</strong>urnaments. Affleck pocketed a cool


15 • <strong>Kill</strong> <strong>Phil</strong>$350,000 for w<strong>in</strong>n<strong>in</strong>g a major event <strong>in</strong> Los Angeles, andLord knows he needs the money! Almost any day <strong>in</strong> L.A.you’ll f<strong>in</strong>d a big-name star <strong>in</strong> one of the huge card rooms.<strong>The</strong> star-studded cast play<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> the last two World Series <strong>in</strong><strong>Las</strong> <strong>Vegas</strong> would make a film producer drool: James Woods,Leonardo DiCaprio, Gabe Kaplan, Matt Damon, and, ofcourse, Ben Affleck. In 2005, Jennifer Tilley beat 600 otherladies <strong>to</strong> w<strong>in</strong> a coveted bracelet and more than $158,000.<strong>The</strong>re’s even a TV show dedicated entirely <strong>to</strong> celebrity poker.<strong>The</strong> money <strong>in</strong>volved <strong>in</strong> poker <strong>to</strong>day is stagger<strong>in</strong>g. Firstprize at the 2008 WSOP ma<strong>in</strong> event was more than $9 million!<strong>No</strong> other sport<strong>in</strong>g event comes close. W<strong>in</strong>n<strong>in</strong>g poker’sWorld Series is worth more than w<strong>in</strong>n<strong>in</strong>g Wimbledon, theMasters, and the Kentucky Derby comb<strong>in</strong>ed! Players fromall parts of the globe vie for multiple hundreds of thousandsof dollars every week <strong>in</strong> poker <strong>to</strong>urnaments around the world.TV audiences thrive on the excitement, as hidden camerasthat reveal the players’ cards allow the viewers <strong>to</strong> get <strong>in</strong><strong>to</strong>the game. It’s like the ultimate “Survivor” show, as playersuse every trick <strong>in</strong> the book <strong>to</strong> send their competition home.<strong>The</strong> hundreds of thousands of dollars (sometimes a millionor more) <strong>in</strong> cash dramatically stacked up on the green-felttables goes <strong>to</strong> the last man (or woman) left stand<strong>in</strong>g—it’sa seductive arena. Meanwhile, onl<strong>in</strong>e <strong>to</strong>urnaments can nowattract more than 8,000 players at a time, and they cont<strong>in</strong>ue<strong>to</strong> grow. Big money, movie stars, glamorous venues, television—nowonder poker is explod<strong>in</strong>g.And the phenomenon shows no signs of slow<strong>in</strong>g down.Today, an estimated 50 million Americans play poker. ThisAmerican pastime has become a worldwide mania, especiallywhen played <strong>in</strong> the form that’s all the rage—no-<strong>limit</strong> <strong>hold</strong>’em. This is the game played <strong>in</strong> virtually all major <strong>to</strong>urnaments<strong>to</strong>day. Teach<strong>in</strong>g you how <strong>to</strong> compete <strong>in</strong> no-<strong>limit</strong> <strong>hold</strong>’em <strong>to</strong>urnaments is the focus of this book. But not just compete;you’ll also learn how <strong>to</strong> w<strong>in</strong>! That’s right. Assiduously


16 • <strong>Kill</strong> <strong>Phil</strong>applied, the pr<strong>in</strong>ciples you learn here will give you a real shotat the big money.Once you’ve cultivated the necessary skills, the <strong>to</strong>urnamentsyou see on TV aren’t out of reach. <strong>The</strong>re’s no specialqualify<strong>in</strong>g. You don’t have <strong>to</strong> be drafted or <strong>in</strong>vited. All ittakes is the money <strong>to</strong> enter and the guts <strong>to</strong> sit down and play.Com<strong>in</strong>g up with the money is your job. Provid<strong>in</strong>g you withan approach <strong>to</strong> play<strong>in</strong>g that will give you a chance, regardlessof your level of experience, is ours.Th<strong>in</strong>k about the big-name players you’ve seen on TV. Dothey really have that big an edge over a player who’s relativelynew <strong>to</strong> the game? Certa<strong>in</strong>ly, they have an advantage <strong>in</strong>knowledge and experience. But because of the fundamentalnature of no-<strong>limit</strong> <strong>to</strong>urnaments, if you know how <strong>to</strong> tailoryour game <strong>to</strong> your own level of experience, you can compete<strong>in</strong> the no-<strong>limit</strong> arena with a very real chance of success. <strong>The</strong>application of certa<strong>in</strong> key concepts allows you first <strong>to</strong> levelthe play<strong>in</strong>g field, then move <strong>to</strong> a po<strong>in</strong>t where you become aplayer <strong>to</strong> be feared—especially by the best players! Imag<strong>in</strong>ewalk<strong>in</strong>g up <strong>to</strong> a table and hear<strong>in</strong>g a player you recognize fromTV say someth<strong>in</strong>g like, “Oh, no, not you.” Wouldn’t that befun? It’s possible, because it’s the style of play that they fear.<strong>The</strong> style you’ll learn from read<strong>in</strong>g this book. We show youthe type of player <strong>to</strong>p pros love <strong>to</strong> see at their table, and thetype that they hate. <strong>The</strong>n we show you how <strong>to</strong> become thereal threat that they detest.Is it a gimmick, noth<strong>in</strong>g but an over-simplified answer<strong>to</strong> a complex question? Yes and no. Simple strategies won’tgive you a long-term edge aga<strong>in</strong>st the best. But idiosyncrasies<strong>in</strong> <strong>to</strong>urnament no-<strong>limit</strong> poker open the door for an <strong>in</strong>experiencedplayer who’s been properly tra<strong>in</strong>ed.We beg<strong>in</strong> with <strong>Kill</strong> <strong>Phil</strong> Rookie, a simplified strategyfor those who’ve never played a <strong>to</strong>urnament before. We thenmove on <strong>to</strong> <strong>Kill</strong> <strong>Phil</strong> Basic. Armed with the basic strategyalone, even a complete novice has a decent shot at gett<strong>in</strong>g


17 • <strong>Kill</strong> <strong>Phil</strong><strong>in</strong> the money. Later, we improve on basic by <strong>in</strong>corporat<strong>in</strong>gsome powerful poker concepts. Understand<strong>in</strong>g and modify<strong>in</strong>gyour game <strong>in</strong> accordance with these concepts will makeyou an above average player. F<strong>in</strong>ally, we cover some highlevelplays and strategies. Master everyth<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> this book andyou could be the next superstar!Who is <strong>Kill</strong> <strong>Phil</strong> For?<strong>Kill</strong> <strong>Phil</strong> is for <strong>to</strong>urnament players of all levels.Complete novices benefit from a strategy that offers agenu<strong>in</strong>e chance of success while they acquire the valuablereal-time experience needed <strong>to</strong> make consistent profits <strong>in</strong><strong>to</strong>urnament play. Beg<strong>in</strong>ners also benefit from primers on themechanics of no-<strong>limit</strong> <strong>hold</strong> ’em and <strong>to</strong>urnaments <strong>in</strong> general,as well as the sections on rules and ethics.Players who’ve had some experience, but little success,ga<strong>in</strong> from the more advanced strategies, which could putthem over the <strong>to</strong>p on their way <strong>to</strong> success.“Old-school-style” players who’ve been struggl<strong>in</strong>g learnhow <strong>to</strong> transform their games <strong>to</strong> the modern style of play.Players who are competent <strong>in</strong> the small-ball arena, butare hav<strong>in</strong>g problems with the nuances of long ball may f<strong>in</strong>dthe strategies enlighten<strong>in</strong>g.Even already successful players can f<strong>in</strong>d valuable nuggetsof <strong>in</strong>formation.Regardless of your current level of expertise, the manypo<strong>in</strong>ters throughout this book can help you ga<strong>in</strong> perspectiveand add ammunition <strong>to</strong> your play<strong>in</strong>g arsenal.<strong>The</strong>se pages conta<strong>in</strong> strategies for both onl<strong>in</strong>e and liveplay. If you’re exclusively an onl<strong>in</strong>e player, the strategies presentedallow you <strong>to</strong> successfully modify your play<strong>in</strong>g style <strong>to</strong>adapt <strong>to</strong> live-<strong>to</strong>urnament play.


18 • <strong>Kill</strong> <strong>Phil</strong>Who’s <strong>Phil</strong>?“<strong>Phil</strong>” is our code name for any accomplished <strong>to</strong>urnamentplayer. Certa<strong>in</strong>ly, several poker superstars are named <strong>Phil</strong>—<strong>Phil</strong> Hellmuth, Ivey, Laak, and Gordon among them—butwe’ve lumped all the best players <strong>in</strong><strong>to</strong> the <strong>Phil</strong> category. Wehad <strong>to</strong> call them someth<strong>in</strong>g. Plus, we thought it made for adamn funny title.Many of the <strong>Phil</strong>s with whom we confided our plans forthis book begged us <strong>to</strong> abort. <strong>The</strong>ir fears were genu<strong>in</strong>e, becausethis strategy hurts the best players the most. <strong>The</strong>ir lifeblood,the timid <strong>in</strong>experienced player, suddenly becomes athreat. That’s the essence of <strong>Kill</strong> <strong>Phil</strong>—prey becomes preda<strong>to</strong>rand vice versa.How This Book Came AboutBlair Rodman has been a full-time professional gamblerfor more than 25 years and has experienced success <strong>in</strong> manydifferent areas of the gambl<strong>in</strong>g world. He’s an accomplishedblackjack player, was a member of Stanford Wong’s famousgambl<strong>in</strong>g-<strong>to</strong>urnament team <strong>in</strong> the ’80s and part of a highlysuccessful sports-bett<strong>in</strong>g group for more than 10 years, andhas <strong>in</strong>-depth knowledge and experience <strong>in</strong> many other areasof cas<strong>in</strong>o advantage play. But his first love is, and always hasbeen, poker—both as a <strong>to</strong>urnament and live-game player. In2007, he won his first World Series of Poker bracelet and$707,000.Lee Nelson is a retired doc<strong>to</strong>r whose medical fields of<strong>in</strong>terest are nutrition and prostate cancer; he’s the author ofthe book Prostate Cancer Prevention and Cure. Over the pastsix years, Lee has performed <strong>in</strong> poker <strong>to</strong>urnaments with remarkableconsistency, mak<strong>in</strong>g f<strong>in</strong>al tables with such regularity<strong>in</strong> <strong>in</strong>ternational <strong>to</strong>urnaments that he’s now known by thenickname “F<strong>in</strong>al Table.” He won the 2006 Aussie MillionsMa<strong>in</strong> Event and its grand prize of Aus$1,295,800 (aboutUS$1,000,000).


19 • <strong>Kill</strong> <strong>Phil</strong>Steve Hes<strong>to</strong>n, a professor of f<strong>in</strong>ance at a prestigious EastCoast university, developed option and quantitative- <strong>in</strong>vestmentmodels used on Wall Street. His research <strong>in</strong>cludesgame theory.Blair Rodman met Lee Nelson through Hunt<strong>in</strong>g<strong>to</strong>nPress publisher Anthony Curtis. Blair and Anthony havebeen friends and gambl<strong>in</strong>g partners for years, while Lee hadauthored his prostate-cancer-prevention book for Hunt<strong>in</strong>g<strong>to</strong>nPress. Anthony knew Lee orig<strong>in</strong>ally through poker andwhen Lee decided <strong>to</strong> author a book on poker <strong>to</strong>urnaments,he came <strong>to</strong> HP for publish<strong>in</strong>g. What Lee didn’t know wasthat Anthony was already talk<strong>in</strong>g <strong>to</strong> Blair about a poker book(Blair and Lee knew each other by reputation only at thispo<strong>in</strong>t). Anthony <strong>to</strong>ld Lee about Blair’s ideas and it was decidedthat Blair Rodman and Lee Nelson should meet.It didn’t take long for the two authors <strong>to</strong> come <strong>to</strong> theconclusion that, <strong>to</strong>gether, they could produce a work on <strong>to</strong>urnamentpoker that would rival anyth<strong>in</strong>g done by the otherprofessional players. <strong>The</strong>y set <strong>to</strong> work on the project, putt<strong>in</strong>g<strong>to</strong>gether a comprehensive outl<strong>in</strong>e on no-<strong>limit</strong> <strong>hold</strong> ’em poker<strong>to</strong>urnaments.Time was of the essence, as it was obvious that therewould soon be a wave of books on the market. In fact, notlong after serious work began, the authors realized that amasterwork on the subject would take far <strong>to</strong>o long <strong>to</strong> complete,given that the flood of new poker books had already begun.Both concluded that their work, regardless of its merits,would get lost <strong>in</strong> the shuffle. On the verge of abandon<strong>in</strong>g theproject, Blair proposed an alternative—a simple method thatwould encourage novice players <strong>to</strong> participate immediately,allow<strong>in</strong>g them <strong>to</strong> accumulate valuable real-action experience,while ma<strong>in</strong>ta<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g a reasonable chance of success—<strong>in</strong> essence,a simple, but effective, basic strategy for no-<strong>limit</strong> <strong>hold</strong>’em <strong>to</strong>urnaments.This approach fit <strong>in</strong> perfectly with the Hunt<strong>in</strong>g<strong>to</strong>n Press


20 • <strong>Kill</strong> <strong>Phil</strong>philosophy. While other gambl<strong>in</strong>g-publish<strong>in</strong>g companies oftenfocus on the elite player, over the years HP has catered<strong>to</strong> the many occasional gamblers that have neither the timenor <strong>in</strong>cl<strong>in</strong>ation <strong>to</strong> become experts, but still want <strong>to</strong> have afight<strong>in</strong>g chance. In fairness, the fundamentals of a no-<strong>limit</strong><strong>to</strong>urnament basic strategy had been <strong>to</strong>uched on before, mostnotably by David Sklansky <strong>in</strong> Tournament Poker for AdvancedPlayers. However, the idea hadn’t been thoroughly explored.An outl<strong>in</strong>e was prepared and the authors spent several <strong>in</strong>tensiveweeks perfect<strong>in</strong>g the strategies. Blair has a long his<strong>to</strong>ryas a blackjack player; consequently, the <strong>Kill</strong> <strong>Phil</strong> basic strategyis similar <strong>in</strong> many ways <strong>to</strong> blackjack basic strategy. It takesabout as long <strong>to</strong> assimilate and memorize and is adaptable<strong>to</strong> strategy cards, which can be used as learn<strong>in</strong>g aids or evenbrought along <strong>to</strong> the table. Like blackjack, it greatly evensthe odds and allows beg<strong>in</strong>ners <strong>to</strong> be competitive, though itdoesn’t yield a long-term advantage. But just as blackjack basicstrategy provides a gateway <strong>to</strong> that game’s powerful countstrategies, so <strong>to</strong>o does the <strong>Kill</strong> <strong>Phil</strong> basic strategy lead <strong>to</strong> morepowerful and w<strong>in</strong>n<strong>in</strong>g strategies for <strong>to</strong>urnament poker.More Help<strong>The</strong> poker world is chang<strong>in</strong>g so rapidly that any book issubject <strong>to</strong> become outdated quickly. <strong>Kill</strong> <strong>Phil</strong> pr<strong>in</strong>ciples arebe<strong>in</strong>g employed effectively <strong>in</strong> <strong>to</strong>urnaments by more and moreplayers every day. In order <strong>to</strong> keep our followers abreast ofhow these changes relate <strong>to</strong> the <strong>Kill</strong> <strong>Phil</strong> strategy as presented<strong>in</strong> this book, the authors will ma<strong>in</strong>ta<strong>in</strong> a website at <strong>Kill</strong><strong>Phil</strong>Poker.com, which will provide articles, blogs from our<strong>to</strong>urnaments, a message board, and other <strong>in</strong>terest<strong>in</strong>g featuresperta<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g <strong>to</strong> the world of poker.Additionally, as a supplement <strong>to</strong> this book, condensedversions of the <strong>Kill</strong> <strong>Phil</strong> strategies are available on portablestrategy cards (see ad, back of book). <strong>The</strong> cards reference the


21 • <strong>Kill</strong> <strong>Phil</strong>Rookie, Basic, and Advanced strategies, and can be taken withyou <strong>to</strong> consult or use at the <strong>to</strong>urnament table. <strong>The</strong>re’s also anonl<strong>in</strong>e card for use when play<strong>in</strong>g computer <strong>to</strong>urnaments.<strong>The</strong> Essence of <strong>Kill</strong> <strong>Phil</strong>While no-<strong>limit</strong> <strong>hold</strong> ’em is a game of <strong>in</strong>f<strong>in</strong>ite complexities,it can be reasonably broken down <strong>in</strong><strong>to</strong> two ma<strong>in</strong> tacticalelements: “small ball” and “long ball.”• Small ballers are s<strong>in</strong>gles hitters. <strong>The</strong>y chip away with avariety of <strong>in</strong>tricate strategies. It’s a style that requires a greatdeal of effort and many hours of experience at the tables <strong>to</strong>reach proficiency. Small ballers are <strong>in</strong>volved <strong>in</strong> a lot of pots,wait<strong>in</strong>g for the fattest opportunities. If someone presentsone, they’re poised <strong>to</strong> go for the kill. <strong>The</strong> primary prov<strong>in</strong>cefor small ball is after the flop.• Long ball, also known as “big-pot poker,” is analogous<strong>to</strong> home-run hitt<strong>in</strong>g. It’s an approach that’s much easier <strong>to</strong>learn and implement. It doesn’t take years of study and experience<strong>to</strong> rear back and sw<strong>in</strong>g with everyth<strong>in</strong>g you’ve got.Long-ball tactics are usually employed before the flop.In NLH cash games, where the bl<strong>in</strong>ds are relatively smallcompared <strong>to</strong> the average amount of money that can be atstake, small ball is one of the primary weapons of w<strong>in</strong>n<strong>in</strong>gplayers. For example, <strong>in</strong> a 25-50 no-<strong>limit</strong> game, most playerswill have at least $5,000, or more than 66 times the <strong>to</strong>tal ofthe bl<strong>in</strong>ds, <strong>in</strong> front of them. This leads <strong>to</strong> a lot of post-flopplay, as w<strong>in</strong>n<strong>in</strong>g just the bl<strong>in</strong>ds is essentially <strong>in</strong>significant.In <strong>to</strong>urnaments, long ball has a much bigger role, especiallylate <strong>in</strong> an event. Early on <strong>in</strong> <strong>to</strong>urnaments, there’s lots ofplay post-flop, because the bl<strong>in</strong>ds at that po<strong>in</strong>t are generallysmall compared <strong>to</strong> players’ stacks. Similar <strong>to</strong> cash games, thisis small-ball time. However, unlike cash games, <strong>in</strong> order <strong>to</strong>br<strong>in</strong>g about a conclusion of a <strong>to</strong>urnament <strong>in</strong> a reasonableamount of time, the bl<strong>in</strong>ds <strong>in</strong>crease at set <strong>in</strong>tervals. As a <strong>to</strong>ur-


22 • <strong>Kill</strong> <strong>Phil</strong>nament progresses, the bl<strong>in</strong>ds (and antes, which are generally<strong>in</strong>stituted fairly early on) become much more significant.For example, at the start of the second day of the championshipevent <strong>in</strong> the 2004 World Series of Poker, the 250-500 bl<strong>in</strong>d/100 ante structure meant that if an average stackdidn’t play a hand, it would be gone <strong>in</strong> 12 rounds. In this typeof situation, the struggle for the pre-flop pot becomes muchmore important and long ball is a much more viable strategy.By the time the <strong>to</strong>urnament is down <strong>to</strong> the f<strong>in</strong>al table, thebl<strong>in</strong>ds and antes are usually so high that all-<strong>in</strong> moves pre-flopbecome the norm. It’s not uncommon <strong>to</strong> watch a f<strong>in</strong>al tablefor an hour or more without see<strong>in</strong>g a s<strong>in</strong>gle flop.So, if there are two dist<strong>in</strong>ct areas of skill <strong>in</strong> no-<strong>limit</strong> <strong>hold</strong>’em <strong>to</strong>urnaments and expert players are well-versed <strong>in</strong> both,which should the aspir<strong>in</strong>g player focus on first? Let’s look.Small Ball …• is complex and difficult <strong>to</strong> master. <strong>The</strong> best players haveyears of the experience necessary <strong>to</strong> excel <strong>in</strong> this arena.• is primarily employed at the earlier levels of a <strong>to</strong>urnament,when pressure from bl<strong>in</strong>ds is light and <strong>in</strong>experiencedplayers can simply choose not <strong>to</strong> get <strong>in</strong>volved without a monsterhand.• is not manda<strong>to</strong>ry for success <strong>in</strong> no-<strong>limit</strong> <strong>hold</strong> ’em <strong>to</strong>urnaments.Long Ball …• is formulaic and much easier <strong>to</strong> learn.• is the prevalent strategy late <strong>in</strong> <strong>to</strong>urnaments, when itmatters most.• can be a stand-alone strategy.• gives the <strong>to</strong>urnament novice the best chance <strong>to</strong> “getlucky.”


25 • <strong>Kill</strong> <strong>Phil</strong>and more players are effectively employ<strong>in</strong>g variations of the<strong>Kill</strong> <strong>Phil</strong> strategy, and those who don’t adjust are be<strong>in</strong>g left<strong>in</strong> the dust.Blair is a prime example. He was the epi<strong>to</strong>me of the oldschoolplayer, hav<strong>in</strong>g competed <strong>in</strong> <strong>to</strong>urnaments almost s<strong>in</strong>cetheir <strong>in</strong>ception. While he saw a change tak<strong>in</strong>g place <strong>in</strong> theway <strong>to</strong>urnaments were be<strong>in</strong>g played, he couldn’t put his f<strong>in</strong>geron it until recently. His change <strong>in</strong> philosophy co<strong>in</strong>cidedwith his dramatically improved results beg<strong>in</strong>n<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> 2004.<strong>The</strong> exercise of writ<strong>in</strong>g this book crystallized these ideas andhis success has been ongo<strong>in</strong>g. Players aga<strong>in</strong>st whom Blairhas competed for years now remark on his revamped style—though they don’t necessarily grasp it. Other old-school playerscan make similar changes through an understand<strong>in</strong>g ofthe pr<strong>in</strong>ciples discussed <strong>in</strong> this book.Warn<strong>in</strong>g: Play<strong>in</strong>g the unaugmented <strong>Kill</strong> <strong>Phil</strong> requires anuncommon level of patience. Remember that the strategy isdesigned <strong>to</strong> give a new player the best chance of success, agoal best achieved by avoid<strong>in</strong>g unfamiliar (and dangerous)situations. Enter<strong>in</strong>g the small-ball fray before you have sufficientexperience <strong>to</strong> sidestep the pitfalls is a recipe for disaster.Accord<strong>in</strong>gly, <strong>Kill</strong> <strong>Phil</strong>lers must throw away many tempt<strong>in</strong>gstart<strong>in</strong>g hands <strong>in</strong> the early go<strong>in</strong>g.It’s a difficult th<strong>in</strong>g <strong>to</strong> do; fold<strong>in</strong>g hands as strong as QQ,JJ, or AK <strong>in</strong> unraised pots pre-flop is bound <strong>to</strong> frustrate you.Likewise, our advice <strong>to</strong> make oversized raises with AA andKK will foster comments and puzzled looks from opponents.Some who are frustrated by your style might even make derisiveremarks. Even worse, this style of play won’t look anyth<strong>in</strong>glike what you’ve seen on TV!Keep three th<strong>in</strong>gs <strong>in</strong> m<strong>in</strong>d. First, the TV players are, forthe most part, extremely experienced and their games haveevolved immensely. Second, what you see on TV is f<strong>in</strong>al-tablepoker, which is vastly different from the early game. Andthird, the action level on TV is the result of edit<strong>in</strong>g <strong>to</strong> feature


26 • <strong>Kill</strong> <strong>Phil</strong>big hands. Someone isn’t really go<strong>in</strong>g all-<strong>in</strong> with 96 off-suitevery hand.Still, most new players want action and all these th<strong>in</strong>gsmay tempt you <strong>to</strong> wade <strong>in</strong><strong>to</strong> the small-ball arena before you’reready. Don’t do it. <strong>The</strong> time for that will come (we providea read<strong>in</strong>g list <strong>in</strong> the Appendix that you can use <strong>to</strong> learn), butat the outset, don’t get <strong>to</strong>o far away from the <strong>Kill</strong> <strong>Phil</strong> strategyas written. As a bonus, many of the <strong>Kill</strong> <strong>Phil</strong> long-ballstrategies will rema<strong>in</strong> the corners<strong>to</strong>ne of your approach <strong>to</strong> thegame, regardless of your level of advancement.Another warn<strong>in</strong>g: Poker is jargon-<strong>in</strong>tensive. <strong>The</strong>re’s areason for this, as the descriptive nature of the lexicon facilitatesan efficient conveyance of ideas. But if you don’t knowit go<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>, you’ll be lost. Many poker terms are <strong>in</strong>cluded <strong>in</strong>this book’s extensive Glossary. Some have been given quotemarks when they first appear <strong>in</strong> the text, and a few are accompaniedby brief parenthetical explanations. Most, however,simply appear naturally. If you encounter a term thatyou don’t understand, take a moment <strong>to</strong> consult the Glossary.Do<strong>in</strong>g so enhances your overall understand<strong>in</strong>g of thetext, as well as better prepares you for live play.<strong>No</strong> doubt many of you will be content with the occasionalsuccesses and moments <strong>in</strong> the sun that <strong>Kill</strong> <strong>Phil</strong> canhelp br<strong>in</strong>g your way. Others will use it as a platform fromwhich <strong>to</strong> build a world-class game. Whatever your objective,remember <strong>to</strong> enjoy the challenges, rewards, and enterta<strong>in</strong>mentthat poker can provide—not <strong>to</strong> mention the rush ofbagg<strong>in</strong>g yourself a <strong>Phil</strong>.A F<strong>in</strong>al WordIt’s absolutely critical that you pay attention <strong>to</strong> and graspthis sem<strong>in</strong>al po<strong>in</strong>t: <strong>Kill</strong> <strong>Phil</strong> is not a poker strategy, it’s a <strong>to</strong>urnamentstrategy. If someone reacts <strong>to</strong> your play by say<strong>in</strong>g,“That’s not poker!”, simply acknowledge that he’s right.


27 • <strong>Kill</strong> <strong>Phil</strong><strong>The</strong>re are few true experts <strong>in</strong> both the cash and <strong>to</strong>urnamentarenas. <strong>The</strong>y’re related, but separate, skills. <strong>The</strong>re are<strong>to</strong>urnaments <strong>in</strong> many gambl<strong>in</strong>g games—blackjack, craps,baccarat, even keno. <strong>The</strong> proper strategy <strong>in</strong> these <strong>to</strong>urnamentsis often a distant relative of proper play <strong>in</strong> a non-<strong>to</strong>urnamentsett<strong>in</strong>g. Tournaments are a discipl<strong>in</strong>e un<strong>to</strong> themselves. Whileyou may not be as skilled a poker player as your opponents,it’s very likely that you’ll become a better <strong>to</strong>urnament player—andthat’s what gets the money.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!