Better, sooner, more convenient health care in Midlands

More documents

Recommendations

Info

8 Funding requirements (total picture)• Extensive mapping and flow processing.• RIP (Rapid Implementation Process) – shutdown + all staff, partners and patient involvement.• Facilitated RIP.• Contracting, system and staffing amendments.Devolved Service Cost ($)Discharge Process $2,545,000Needs assessment Service Coordination (only dealing with acute demand relatedissues as opposed to disability)$365,000Diagnostics (may cut by disease state) $13,200,000Nurse Educators $2,008,000Post Natal Care $420,000Well Child/Tamariki Ora $6,440,000Community Nursing $27,750,000Vision & Hearing Technicians $700,000b4 school $916,000Immunisation Services (Outreach and Mobile) $2,503,000Family Violence $353,000Breast Screening (coordination/budget for publicly funded) $270,000Smoking Cessation $499,000Community CVD Management $430,000Nurse Specialists (including Healthright Mobile Nurses) $100,000Occupational Therapy (some but not all) $1,495,000Physiotherapy (some but not all) $2,180,000Social Workers $506,000Diabetes Services (some but not all) $350,000Sexual Health $2,543,000Podiatry $280,000Speech Therapy $315 000This list is not exhaustive and the final detailed list will be driven by the supporting business case117
Funding requirements (total picture)8Primary health does not exist in isolation.The challenge for primary health is to shift to a wellness model of care. This shift will bear fruitdirectly in terms of better, sooner, more convenient access to primary heath services; it will also havea major impact on the prevalence of chronic conditions and the resulting acute demand.It is this reduction on demand in the secondary system that makes the implementation of structuressimilar to the Midlands IFHC model commonplace in countries where economic triggers supportshifts in funding from secondary to primary, if they reduce the overall cost of healthcare.A good example of this is the Group Health Medical Home model. Because the Group Healthsystem funds services through the line, they are able to allocate additional funds to the delivery ofprimary health in the knowledge that a healthier community will lead to reduced demand, and cost,in the secondary environment resulting in a net gain to Group Health.Our response to the challenge of contributing to a reduction in acute demand is similarly not for theoverall system to spend more. However, we do need to be able to shift resources and funding toPrimary Health when and where it will unlock an overall system-wide cost saving.It should also be recognised that changes in the performance of Primary Care may lead to shifts inthe funding requirements within the District Health Boards’ portfolio of services and providers.Where these shifts result in a saving to the secondary system we propose the creation of a rebatestructure to allow Primary health to continue to reinvest in activities that will create an overall savingfor the health system.It is therefore proposed that the devolution of funding is made within a partnering arrangementwith the individual District Health Boards where the total funding within any particular District HealthBoard area is economically neutral, and the efficiencies within the service delivery can be appliedwhere they best deliver better, sooner, more convenient health care.The collaboration between Primary and the District Health Boards will provide;• A holistic view of funding and planning across the health system.• A shared common vision for the provision of health services.• The most efficient use of funding.• The avoidance of duplication of health service activity.• A simpler contracting environment for allied health providers.• Improved health system performance.118
Page 5:
MihimihiKo te amorangi ki muaKo te
Page 8:
Index cont.DiabetesHealth targetCur
Page 12:
Devolution becomes aby-product of w
Page 15 and 16:
22. IntroductionA model for better,
Page 17 and 18:
IntroductionA model for better, soo
Page 19 and 20:
Page 21 and 22:
Page 23 and 24:
The Integrated Family Health Networ
Page 25 and 26:
Page 27 and 28:
Page 29 and 30:
Page 31 and 32:
Page 33 and 34:
Page 35 and 36:
Page 37 and 38:
Page 39 and 40:
Page 41 and 42:
44. The Integrated Family Health Ce
Page 43 and 44:
The Integrated Family Health Centre
Page 45 and 46:
Page 47 and 48:
Page 49 and 50:
Page 51 and 52:
Page 53 and 54:
Page 55 and 56:
Page 57 and 58:
Page 59 and 60:
Page 61:
Page 64 and 65:
5 CommunityA focus on health litera
Page 66 and 67:
5 CommunityA focus on health litera
Page 69 and 70: 66. Our NetworkA focus on workforce
Page 71 and 72: Our NetworkA focus on workforce kno
Page 73: Our NetworkA focus on workforce kno
Page 76 and 77: 7 Delivering on health targetsPerfo
Page 78 and 79: 7 Delivering on health targetsMakin
Page 80 and 81: 7 Delivering on health targetsHealt
Page 83 and 84: Promise 1: No Midlands child will b
Page 85 and 86: Delivering on health targets7Curren
Page 87: Delivering on health targets7Active
Page 90 and 91: 7 Delivering on health targetsCardi
Page 92 and 93: 7 Delivering on health targetsWhat
Page 94 and 95: 7 Delivering on health targetsHow w
Page 96: Promise 4: Free Cardiovascular Risk
Page 99 and 100: Delivering on health targets7Needs
Page 101 and 102: Delivering on health targets7How we
Page 103 and 104: 102
Page 107 and 108: Delivering on health targets7Care p
Page 109 and 110: Promise 8: If you live with mental
Page 113 and 114: Delivering on health targets7Aged C
Page 115 and 116: 114
Page 117: 88. Funding requirements“If clini
Page 121 and 122: 99. Performance measuresQualityThe
Page 123 and 124: Performance measures9122
Page 125 and 126: 124
Page 127 and 128: Letters of Support10126
Page 129 and 130: Letters of Support10128
Page 131 and 132: 130
show all

Better, sooner, more convenient health care in Midlands

Create successful ePaper yourself

Delete template?

Save as template?