12.07.2015 Views

Alternative Dispute Resolution Issue - Contra Costa County Bar ...

Alternative Dispute Resolution Issue - Contra Costa County Bar ...

Alternative Dispute Resolution Issue - Contra Costa County Bar ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

ALERT!Legislature Prohibits Advance Fee Retainer Agreementsfor Residential Mortgage Loan Modificationsby Karl E. GeierNew legislation signed by the Governor onOctober 13 imposes a number of restrictionsupon third parties who attempt to assistborrowers in the negotiation of loanmodifications, forbearance and similartransactions. While no doubt motivated bya desire to thwart fraudulent and deceptivepractices of predatory opportunists holdingthemselves out as mortgage modificationconsultants, the legislative process hasresulted in a statute that may discouragelegitimate advisors and counselors, includingattorneys, from representing borrowersin troubled loan situations.Under SB 94 (Calderon), effective as anemergency measure as of October 13, 1 anyattorney or other person who requiresadvance consideration or security for futurepayment from a borrower as a conditionof providing loan modification or forbearance-relatedservices commits a violationof Civil Code §2944.7. This statute appliesto any such agreement where the mortgageis secured by residential real propertycontaining four or fewer dwelling units.There are no exemptions for any sort ofpreexisting attorney-client relationship orother criteria. The penalty for violationis a fine of $10,000, a jail term of oneyear for the individual, as well as a $50,000fine for a business entity. The operativelanguage of the statute prohibits any person(including an attorney) from requiringcompensation until the person has fullyperformed each and every service contractedto perform, and prohibits any suchperson from taking “any wage assignment,lien, or other security to secure the paymentof compensation” or any power of attorneyfrom the borrower for any purpose. Ineffect, it is illegal and a criminal offense torequire an upfront retainer as part of a legalengagement with a client who falls withinthe statutory provisions. Further, underBusiness & Professions Code §6106.3, theviolation of §2944.7 by any attorney iscause for discipline of the attorney.As a result of this statute, any legalengagement that may involve the provisionof advice or assistance in negotiatinga modification, forbearance or other revisionsof the loan terms or the remedies ofa lender where the borrower’s securityproperty consists of a one to four familyresidential property (whether or not owneroccupied) will require careful scrutinyand compliance. The Legislature mightnot have intended the term “security”or “advance compensation” to includestandard attorney retention agreements,but the language of the statute does notsupport a contrary interpretation.Under a second provision, also enactedas an urgency measure under SB 94, anyattorney or any other person attemptingto represent a borrower in the negotiationof a loan modification or forbearance, priorto entering into any fee agreement withthe borrower, is required to provide to theclient, a separate statement in not less than14 point bold type, containing a specificdisclosure prescribed by the statute, to theeffect that it is not necessary for a borrowerto pay a third party to arrange for a loanmodification or forbearance. 2 This provisionmust be provided in the language inwhich the mortgage loan forbearanceservices are offered or negotiated if theretainer agreement is negotiated in one ofthe six languages other than English thatare specified in Civil Code §1632. A violationof this statute also is a public offensefor which the individual is subject to a fineof $10,000 and a one-year jail term, anda business entity is subject to a fine of$50,000. Again, it only applies to residentialreal property containing four or fewerdwelling units. Under Business and ProfessionsCode §6106.3, a violation of CivilCode §2944.6 by any attorney is alsogrounds for discipline of that attorney. u— Karl E. Geier is a shareholder of MillerStarr Regalia and Editor in Chief of Miller& Starr California Real Estate 3 rd .12009 Status., Ch. 94 (SB 94, Calderon).2The full text of this disclosure is as follows: It is notnecessary to pay a third party to arrange for a loanmodification or other form of forbearance from yourmortgage lender or servicer. You may call your lenderdirectly to ask for a change in your loan terms. Nonprofithousing counseling agencies also offer these andother forms of borrower assistance free of charge. Alist of nonprofit housing counseling agencies approvedby the United States Department of Housing andUrban Development (HUD) is available from yourlocal HUD office of by visiting www.hud.gov.925.790-2600 • info@amllp.com • www.amllp.comNicole M. Mills, Esq.Mediation ServicesSpecializing inElder and Civil MediationpMills ADR Services(925) 351-3171nicolemillsesq@yahoo.com<strong>Contra</strong> <strong>Costa</strong> Lawyer 13

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!