12.07.2015 Views

Recent Changes to USACE's Continuing Contract ... - U.S. Army

Recent Changes to USACE's Continuing Contract ... - U.S. Army

Recent Changes to USACE's Continuing Contract ... - U.S. Army

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

<strong>Recent</strong> <strong>Changes</strong> <strong>to</strong>USACE’s s <strong>Continuing</strong><strong>Contract</strong> AuthorityU.S. <strong>Army</strong> Corps of EngineersNational Dredging MeetingJune 13, 2007Outline• <strong>Continuing</strong> <strong>Contract</strong> Authority• <strong>Continuing</strong> <strong>Contract</strong> Clause• Reprogramming Authority• Congressional Criticism of USACE’s s use of<strong>Continuing</strong> <strong>Contract</strong> and Reprogramming authority• FY 06 <strong>Changes</strong> <strong>to</strong> <strong>Continuing</strong> <strong>Contract</strong> andReprogramming Authorities.• Interim <strong>Continuing</strong> <strong>Contract</strong> Clauses• <strong>Continuing</strong> Resolution and FY 07 Legislation1


<strong>Continuing</strong> <strong>Contract</strong> Authority• As as general rule, agencies:• Must obligate the full amount of the contract at thetime of award.• May not allow the contrac<strong>to</strong>r <strong>to</strong> work beyond theamount of funds awarded for that contract.• <strong>Continuing</strong> contract authority allows USACE <strong>to</strong>:• Award a contract for a civil works projects withouthaving all funds available at the time of award.• In other words, USACE may award the full amoun<strong>to</strong>f a civil works contract even when it has less thanthe full amount of funds available for that contract.<strong>Continuing</strong> <strong>Contract</strong> Clause• Under USACE’s s traditional continuing contractclause:• USACE “reserved” the government estimate ofcontrac<strong>to</strong>r earnings for the fiscal year.• Once the funds reserved were exhausted, the contrac<strong>to</strong>rcould work beyond the amount reserved and earn simpleinterest on the self-financed financed amount.• If USACE failed <strong>to</strong> reserve additional funds for thecontract in the following FY, the contrac<strong>to</strong>r could treatthe contract as having been terminated for convenience.2


Reprogramming• Reprogramming is the movement of funds from oneobject <strong>to</strong> another in the same appropriation account.• Authority <strong>to</strong> reprogram is inherent in lump sumappropriations, unless otherwise limited by law.• Prior <strong>to</strong> the FY 06 Energy and Water DevelopmentAppropriations Act, requirements for reprogrammingwere contained in the Conference Reportaccompanying the annual appropriations acts andrequired only notice <strong>to</strong> the committees ofreprogrammings that exceeded specified dollaramounts.Operation of the Civil WorksProgram prior <strong>to</strong> the FY 06E&WDAA• <strong>Continuing</strong> contract authority andreprogramming authority allowed USACE <strong>to</strong>:• Start more projects• Carryover fewer funds from year <strong>to</strong> year• Reprogram funds from projects with low fundingneeds in an FY <strong>to</strong> a project with high needs in thatFY.3


Congressional Criticism of<strong>Continuing</strong> <strong>Contract</strong>s andReprogramming• Allowing the contrac<strong>to</strong>r <strong>to</strong> work beyond the fundingreserved permits the contrac<strong>to</strong>r, , not USACE orCongress, , <strong>to</strong> decide rate that funds are expended on theproject.• Obligating the Government in advance of currentappropriations requires future appropriation or hightermination costs.• USACE uses reprogramming authority <strong>to</strong>o liberally,thwarting Congressional prerogatives.• USACE uses continuing contracts when otheracquisition methods would be more appropriate (e.g.,fully funded, base plus options, etc.)Congressional Goals for <strong>Continuing</strong><strong>Contract</strong>s and Reprogramming• Fully fund contracts with low dollar value orcontracts that cross only one fiscal year.• Reprogram funds less and with closercoordination with the AppropriationsCommittees.4


2006 Energy and Water DevelopmentAppropriations Act• Section 108 prohibits awarding new ormodifying existing continuing contracts <strong>to</strong>commit an amount in excess of what wasappropriated for that project plus funds carriedover from prior fiscal years and fundsreprogrammed <strong>to</strong> the project.• Section 101 restricts reprogramming.Impact of Section 101 and 108• USACE may not permit the contrac<strong>to</strong>r <strong>to</strong> work beyondthe amount appropriated for the project for the FYplus funds carried over from the prior fiscal year andfunds reprogrammed <strong>to</strong> the project.• Reprogramming authority is severely constrained.• Bot<strong>to</strong>m line: : <strong>Continuing</strong> contracts must now beperformed through a series of funding incrementsestablished for the most part by Congress.5


New USACE Policies• <strong>Continuing</strong> <strong>Contract</strong>s must be approved by HQUSACE and the ASA(CW)• Seek approval <strong>to</strong> use a continuing contract only afterrejecting all other acquisition methods.• All continuing contracts must use one of the twointerim clauses unless approval is granted <strong>to</strong> use thetraditional continuing contract clause.Interim <strong>Continuing</strong> <strong>Contract</strong> Clauses• To comply with the law, USACE published twointerim continuing contract clauses:• Special <strong>Continuing</strong> <strong>Contract</strong> Clause (Budgetedprojects)• Incremental Funding Clause (Off Budget projects)• These clauses are used on an interim basis andare in the DoD process for publication in theFederal Register <strong>to</strong> solicit public notice andcomment.6


<strong>Continuing</strong> Resolution and FY 07Legislation• The limitations of Section 108 apply even duringthe <strong>Continuing</strong> Resolution.• The House Energy and Water DevelopmentAppropriations Bill, 2007 includes essentially thesame language.• Democratic congress?• USACE expects <strong>to</strong> have these limitations for theforeseeable future.7

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!