Latvian Maritime academy

Latvian Maritime academy Latvian Maritime academy

12.07.2015 Views

Predicted & Actual Values of CO 2, %Predicted & Actual Values of NOx, ppmEngine SpeedEffectivePower, kWSFC, g/kWhSteam RatioEGR RatioNO x , ppmCO 2 , %Input Layer Hidden Layer Output LayerFigure 2. Multilayer neural network structure of BP800700ExperimentalNN (BP)60050040030020010000 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80Experimental Data NumberFigure 3. Comparison of predicted output and measured values of NOx222018ExperimentalNN (BP)16141210860 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80Experimental Data NumberFigure 4. Comparison of predicted output and measured values of CO 224

Predicted & Actual Values of SFC, g/kWhPredicted & Actual Values of Effective Power, kW1413ExperimentalNN (BP)12111098760 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80Experimental Data NumberFigure 5. Comparison of predicted output and measured values of Effective Power360340ExperimentalNN (BP)3203002802600 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80Experimental Data NumberFigure 6. Comparison of predicted output and measured values of SFCSo as to illustrate, NN structures performance Root Mean squared error (RMSE) and Mean AbsolutePercentage Error (MAPE) were used. They are formulated as follows:where, n is the number of samples and x i and y i are the values of the i th samples in x and y,respectively.(2)(3)where, f i is the predicted value, y i is the actual value, n is the number of pattern.In this context, in order to compare network performance of BP, Mean Absolute Percentage Error(MAPE) and RMSE (Root Mean Squared Error) were used. Analysis results are shown in the Table 2.(4)25

Predicted & Actual Values of CO 2, %Predicted & Actual Values of NOx, ppmEngine SpeedEffectivePower, kWSFC, g/kWhSteam RatioEGR RatioNO x , ppmCO 2 , %Input Layer Hidden Layer Output LayerFigure 2. Multilayer neural network structure of BP800700ExperimentalNN (BP)60050040030020010000 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80Experimental Data NumberFigure 3. Comparison of predicted output and measured values of NOx222018ExperimentalNN (BP)16141210860 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80Experimental Data NumberFigure 4. Comparison of predicted output and measured values of CO 224

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!