R E H A B I L I T A T I O N - Ontario Hospital Association

More documents

Recommendations

Info

SUMMARY OF RESULTS (CONT’D)SYSTEM INTEGRATION AND CHANGEProviding accessible information topatients and families is a key factorin promoting client-centred care.This year’s results indicate that themost frequent information availableto patients and families prior toadmission was regarding serviceswithin the hospital relevant to thecondition. Although there is informationthat is readily accessiblein most hospitals (for example,printed information on display,available at information deskor posted at bedside) withinrehabilitation services at thehospital, hospitals can enhancehow they provide information bycreating new innovative processesto provide additional informationprior to a patient’s admission(Figure 6).How to Report aComplaint orCommendationServices Within theCommunity Relevant tothe ConditionServices Within theHospital Relevant to theConditionTaking Part in Researchor Clinical TrialsPatientAdvocate/OmbudspersonServices That SupportWellness, Improvementand Quality of LifeProviding Information to Patients/Families Prior to Admission0 20 40 60 80Percent of HospitalsSource: Hospital Report 2007: SIC Survey.Figure 6PAGE 14
PERFORMANCE ALLOCATION TABLEThe performance allocation table includes results for 56 hospitals that completed theRehabilitation SIC survey and are participating in this report.For each indicator, a higher score and above-average performance classification isinterpreted as a better result. The maximum score for each indicator is 100. As in thelast report, a three-point scale (above average, average, below average) was usedto determine performance.SYSTEM INTEGRATION AND CHANGEMethodology ChangesIn Hospital Report 2005, the method of assigning performance allocation was based oncomparing the hospital’s indicator score with the 99% confidence interval of the provincialmean for each corresponding indicator. This year, in order to be consistent with othersectors of the System Integration and Change quadrant’s performance allocationmethods, a new performance allocation method was applied. It sets the upper and lowercut-points at the 95th percentile and the 5th percentile, respectively. This method doesnot require normality, yet produces an interval similar the one obtained by mean+/- 1.645 standard deviations and should capture roughly 90% of the indicator values.Hospitals with a score at or higher than the upper cut-point are classified as above average;hospitals with a score at or less than the lower cut-point are classified as below average;and hospitals with a score between the cut points are classified as average. Using thismethod, approximately 90% of the hospitals would be classified as average.PAGE 15
Page 1: HospitalReportR E H A B I L I T A T
Page 5 and 6: A SNAPSHOT OF HOSPITAL ACTIVITYIN O
Page 7 and 8: Table 2 depicts the total number of
Page 9 and 10: “HIGH-PERFORMING” HOSPITALSHIGH
Page 11 and 12: INTERPRETATION OF BOX PLOTS AND PER
Page 13 and 14: SYSTEM INTEGRATION AND CHANGEINTEGR
Page 15 and 16: SUMMARY OF RESULTS (CONT’D)SYSTEM
Page 17: SUMMARY OF RESULTS (CONT’D)SYSTEM
Page 21 and 22: SYSTEM INTEGRATION AND CHANGECommun
Page 23 and 24: CLIENT PERSPECTIVESPERSPECTIVESThis
Page 25 and 26: SUMMARY OF RESULTS (CONT’D)CLIENT
Page 28 and 29: CLIENT PERSPECTIVESCommunityHospita
Page 30 and 31: CLINICAL UTILIZATION AND OUTCOMESUT
Page 32 and 33: SUMMARY OF RESULTSAll RCGsHospital-
Page 34 and 35: SUMMARY OF RESULTS (CONT’D)CLINIC
Page 36 and 37: SUMMARY OF RESULTS (CONT’D)CLINIC
Page 38 and 39: 8CLINICAL UTILIZATION AND OUTCOMESP
Page 40 and 41: FINANCIAL PERFORMANCE AND CONDITION
Page 42 and 43: SUMMARY OF RESULTSFINANCIAL PERFORM
Page 44 and 45: FINANCIAL PERFORMANCE AND CONDITION
Page 46: APPENDIX A: DATA SOURCESThe followi
Page 49: To download a copy of Hospital Repo

R E H A B I L I T A T I O N - Ontario Hospital Association

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

Delete template?

Save as template?