Mohamad-Ziad Charif - Antares
Mohamad-Ziad Charif - Antares Mohamad-Ziad Charif - Antares
Figure 5.9: Tchi2 distribution for data, atmospheric neutrinos/muons and severalDark Matter models. The Distribution represents the 10pe-3pe 5,9,10,12 Linesperiods combined. The muon and neutrino Monte Carlo are normalized to thelifetime of the data taking. The absolute normalization of the Dark Matter distributionsare arbitrary.with high χ 2 . As for the 10 Lines period this disagreement is due to the fact thatthis period has only 2 data runs (about 2.4 hours of livetime), this effect is purely astatistical phenomenon. Finally we can combine all the different periods as seen infigure 5.9. Different WIMP annihilation spectra are included in this plot to studyhow would a Dark Matter neutrino signal manifest in the detector. Two importantobservations can be made, one is that we have a very good data Monte Carloagreement for our whole livetime, and second is that Dark Matter neutrino signalbehaves much like the atmospheric neutrinos. The second observation is not validfor all track distributions, this can be seen by looking at the Cos[Zenith] distributionin figure 5.10, this distribution was obtained by cutting loosely on Tchi2 (lessthan 2). Again we see in this figure that we have a very good data Monte Carloagreement, but that the Dark Matter neutrino distribution is slightly different fromthe atmospheric neutrinos.86
Figure 5.10: Distribution of Cos[Zenith] after a cut on Tchi2
- Page 38 and 39: Muon Energy (GeV )1p| dEdx | (GeV.c
- Page 40 and 41: Figure 3.4: Energy loss of per dist
- Page 42 and 43: Figure 3.6: Effective muon range as
- Page 44 and 45: Figure 3.8: Differential flux of at
- Page 46 and 47: 3.2.1.1 Detector layoutOptical Modu
- Page 48 and 49: • The LED (light emitting diode)
- Page 50 and 51: Anchor & BuoyEach line is anchored
- Page 52 and 53: Figure 3.17: Distribution of azimut
- Page 54 and 55: Figure 3.20: Height and radial disp
- Page 56 and 57: Figure 3.22: Distribution of sea cu
- Page 58 and 59: Figure 3.24: Time offset among OMs
- Page 60 and 61: Figure 3.26: Distribution of time d
- Page 62 and 63: Line number Connection Date Mainten
- Page 64 and 65: Figure 3.29: Comparison between sky
- Page 66 and 67: Figure 3.31: The effective area for
- Page 68 and 69: Figure 4.1: Median counting rate of
- Page 70 and 71: Figure 4.4: Average neutrino events
- Page 72 and 73: 2. All hits on the same floor are m
- Page 74 and 75: 4.2.1 Neutrino simulationFigure 4.6
- Page 76 and 77: • Multiplicity range of the muon
- Page 78 and 79: Chapter 5Dark Matter search in the
- Page 80 and 81: Figure 5.2: Annihilation spectrum f
- Page 82 and 83: Livetime(days) 5 Lines 9 Lines 10 L
- Page 84 and 85: Figure 5.4: Monte Carlo Truth distr
- Page 86 and 87: Figure 5.7: Tchi2 distribution for
- Page 90 and 91: Figure 5.11: Sun’s position taken
- Page 92 and 93: Figure 5.13: Comparison between the
- Page 94 and 95: Figure 5.15: Estimation of the back
- Page 96 and 97: Figure 5.16: Mean angle between the
- Page 98 and 99: Figure 5.18: A comparison of the di
- Page 100 and 101: a look at figure 5.22 we find a cle
- Page 102 and 103: The resulting optimized sensitiviti
- Page 104 and 105: Figure 5.26: A comparison plot of t
- Page 106 and 107: dΦ µdE ν= dΦ νdE νP earth ρN
- Page 108 and 109: Figure 5.31: Limits on the muon flu
- Page 110 and 111: Chapter 6Dark Matter search in the
- Page 112 and 113: Figure 6.1: . True Position of the
- Page 114 and 115: Figure 6.3: Comparison of the three
- Page 116 and 117: For BBFit all variables mentioned i
- Page 118 and 119: Figure 6.6: The distribution of χ
- Page 120 and 121: annihilation channel W + W − the
- Page 122 and 123: lowering the total contribution of
- Page 124 and 125: 6.4.2 BBFit Single-line analysisThe
- Page 126 and 127: Figure 6.15: Comparison between the
- Page 128 and 129: Figure 6.17: Comparison of Nhit dis
- Page 130 and 131: Figure 6.19: The estimation of the
- Page 132 and 133: Figure 6.21: Comparison of the opti
- Page 134 and 135: Figure 6.23: Comparison of sensitiv
- Page 136 and 137: Figure 6.25: Estimation of our back
Figure 5.10: Distribution of Cos[Zenith] after a cut on Tchi2