Mohamad-Ziad Charif - Antares
Mohamad-Ziad Charif - Antares Mohamad-Ziad Charif - Antares
mass of 200 GeV and a cross-section of 2.5·10 −4 pb. With the 2007-2010 analysisprobed mass region is extended to 450 GeV and the lowest achieved cross-sectionis 6 · 10 −5 pb at 330 GeV GeV using the AAFit analysis. On the other hand theBBFit combined analysis clearly offers us better cross-section sensitivities below150 GeV.As for the spin-independent cross-section sensitivities we are just starting to probesome models. However, even as we are not expected to put significant limits onthe cross-section the improvement is clear. However, these new results in spindependentcross-section outperforms those of Super-K presented in figure 5.32 inthe low WIMP mass area (below 100 GeV) and if we add to that now between250 GeV and 500 GeV the results also outperform those by ICECUBE.Figure 6.45: Sensitivities to spin-dependent cross-section for BBFit-combinedand AAFit analyzes as a function of WIMP mass and annihilation channel.150
Figure 6.46: Sensitivities to spin-independent cross-section for BBFit-combinedand AAFit analyzes as a function of WIMP mass and annihilation channel.151
- Page 102 and 103: The resulting optimized sensitiviti
- Page 104 and 105: Figure 5.26: A comparison plot of t
- Page 106 and 107: dΦ µdE ν= dΦ νdE νP earth ρN
- Page 108 and 109: Figure 5.31: Limits on the muon flu
- Page 110 and 111: Chapter 6Dark Matter search in the
- Page 112 and 113: Figure 6.1: . True Position of the
- Page 114 and 115: Figure 6.3: Comparison of the three
- Page 116 and 117: For BBFit all variables mentioned i
- Page 118 and 119: Figure 6.6: The distribution of χ
- Page 120 and 121: annihilation channel W + W − the
- Page 122 and 123: lowering the total contribution of
- Page 124 and 125: 6.4.2 BBFit Single-line analysisThe
- Page 126 and 127: Figure 6.15: Comparison between the
- Page 128 and 129: Figure 6.17: Comparison of Nhit dis
- Page 130 and 131: Figure 6.19: The estimation of the
- Page 132 and 133: Figure 6.21: Comparison of the opti
- Page 134 and 135: Figure 6.23: Comparison of sensitiv
- Page 136 and 137: Figure 6.25: Estimation of our back
- Page 138 and 139: Figure 6.28: Comparison of the mult
- Page 140 and 141: Figure 6.29: Comparison of the Λ d
- Page 142 and 143: Figure 6.31: Comparison of the cos(
- Page 144 and 145: Figure 6.34: Comparison of the esti
- Page 146 and 147: The optimal Λ cut for all dark mat
- Page 148 and 149: Figure 6.40: Sensitivity to neutrin
- Page 150 and 151: 6.7 Comparison with 2007-2008 analy
- Page 154 and 155: Chapter 7ConclusionsThe limits pres
- Page 156 and 157: Bibliography[1] Volders, L. M. J. S
- Page 158 and 159: [22] S. Burles et al., “Big bang
- Page 160 and 161: [46] G. Debrassi, S. Heinemeyer, W.
- Page 162 and 163: [74] C. Hettlage, K. Mannheim, and
- Page 164: [102] D. Heck and J. Knapp, “Fors
mass of 200 GeV and a cross-section of 2.5·10 −4 pb. With the 2007-2010 analysisprobed mass region is extended to 450 GeV and the lowest achieved cross-sectionis 6 · 10 −5 pb at 330 GeV GeV using the AAFit analysis. On the other hand theBBFit combined analysis clearly offers us better cross-section sensitivities below150 GeV.As for the spin-independent cross-section sensitivities we are just starting to probesome models. However, even as we are not expected to put significant limits onthe cross-section the improvement is clear. However, these new results in spindependentcross-section outperforms those of Super-K presented in figure 5.32 inthe low WIMP mass area (below 100 GeV) and if we add to that now between250 GeV and 500 GeV the results also outperform those by ICECUBE.Figure 6.45: Sensitivities to spin-dependent cross-section for BBFit-combinedand AAFit analyzes as a function of WIMP mass and annihilation channel.150
Change language