Acuity Specialty Products Group Inc.
Acuity Specialty Products Group Inc. Acuity Specialty Products Group Inc.
IIDateOctober 30, 200 1November 6, 2001anuary 8, 2002anuary 29, 2002September 5, 2002September 25, 2002!December 10, 200233. On or about the dates listed below, Defendant ASP, through EmployeeA, knowingly failed to report accurate pH results on the SMRs submitted to the R.M.Clayton Reclamation Center POTW:DateJune 2002July 2002August 2002September 200234. On or about the dates listed below, Defendant ASP, through EmployeeA, knowingly failed to report accurate flow data on the SMRs submitted to the R.M.Clayton Reclamation Center POTW:DateOctober 2001November 2001December 2001January 2002February 2002March 2002April2 002May 200210
IIDateAugust 2002September 200235. On or about the dates listed below, Defendant ASP employees knowinglyrendered inaccurate a monitoring device or method required under the Clean WaterAct, by holding wastewater, or not discharging wastewater from the Wastewater Pre-Treatment Plant during monitoring conducted by the City of Atlanta.DateOctober 200 1June 2002November 200236. On or about November 7, 2002, Defendant ASP, through Employee A,knowingly rendered inaccurate a monitoring device or method required under theClean Water Act, by diluting the facility's wastewater with a hose during monitoringconducted by the City of Atlanta.11
- Page 2 and 3: GUILTY PLEA and PLEA AGREEMENTr!:ed
- Page 4 and 5: 1'1.up and the facts of this case,
- Page 6 and 7: the prov1s10ns set out mthe Complia
- Page 8 and 9: this Plea Agreement, the Government
- Page 10 and 11: CERTIFICATION OF ATTORNEY AND DEFEN
- Page 12 and 13: ATTACHMENT A
- Page 14 and 15: company, ASP. ASP is a Delaware cor
- Page 16 and 17: II10. The R.M. Clayton Reclamation
- Page 18 and 19: IIless than 25,000 gallons of waste
- Page 20 and 21: discharged to the R.M. Clayton Recl
- Page 24 and 25: ATTACHMENT B
- Page 26 and 27: purchased from other companies to m
- Page 28 and 29: eceiving a representative sample of
- Page 30 and 31: IHIconstruction on improvements to
- Page 32 and 33: X. Acuity represents to EPA that AS
- Page 39 and 40: allegations of Acuity's corporate i
- Page 41 and 42: (v). Schedule.After submission of t
- Page 43 and 44: (b) Vice President of Compliance/Du
- Page 45 and 46: ....12. Training.(a) Environmental
- Page 47 and 48: 5. that the training requirements d
- Page 49 and 50: I IG6. Freedom of InformationRespon
- Page 51 and 52: "during the term of this Agreement
- Page 53 and 54: 1111submissions to SOD through thei
- Page 55 and 56: ATTACHMENT C
- Page 57 and 58: EXHIBIT ARESOLUTIONSOFTHE BOARD OF
- Page 59 and 60: 2) WAIVER OF RIGHTS(a)The Governmen
- Page 61 and 62: 4) LIMITATION OF CHARGESThe United
- Page 63 and 64: 7) WAIVER OF APPEALIf the Court acc
- Page 65 and 66: In Open Court thisday of June, 2007
- Page 67: Ii iINFORMATION BELOW MUST BE TYPED
IIDateOctober 30, 200 1November 6, 2001anuary 8, 2002anuary 29, 2002September 5, 2002September 25, 2002!December 10, 200233. On or about the dates listed below, Defendant ASP, through EmployeeA, knowingly failed to report accurate pH results on the SMRs submitted to the R.M.Clayton Reclamation Center POTW:DateJune 2002July 2002August 2002September 200234. On or about the dates listed below, Defendant ASP, through EmployeeA, knowingly failed to report accurate flow data on the SMRs submitted to the R.M.Clayton Reclamation Center POTW:DateOctober 2001November 2001December 2001January 2002February 2002March 2002April2 002May 200210
Change language