FOR DIFFERENTIAL EQUATIONS OF FRACTIONAL ORDER
FOR DIFFERENTIAL EQUATIONS OF FRACTIONAL ORDER FOR DIFFERENTIAL EQUATIONS OF FRACTIONAL ORDER
70 T. S. Aleroev, H. T. Aleroeva, Ning-Ming Nie, and Yi-Fa Tangwhere C 0 [a, b] denotes the space of all continuous functions on [a, b]. Wedefine the norms ‖·‖ f , ‖·‖ g , ‖·‖ĝ and the operator T f , ̂T f , T g , ̂T g as follows:‖y‖ f := K fT f y(t) :=̂T f y(t) :=∫ ba∫ bamax |y(t)|,a≤t≤bG(t, s)f(s, y(s)) ds,Ĝ(t, s)f(s, y(s)) ds, ∀ y(t) ∈ P;[‖y‖ g := max Kg |y(t)| + L g | C a Dt θ y(t)| ] ,a≤t≤bT g y(t) :=∫ baG(t, s)g ( s, y(s), C a D θ sy(s) ) ds, ∀ y(t) ∈ P 1 ,[‖y‖ĝ := max Kg |y(t)| + L g | RLa Dt θ y(t)| ] ,a≤t≤b̂T g y(t) :=∫ baĜ(t, s)g ( s, y(s), RLa D θ sy(s) ) ds, ∀ y(t) ∈ P 2 .Obviously, P, P 1 , P 2 are complete normed spaces with respect to ‖ · ‖ f ,‖ · ‖ g and ‖ · ‖ĝ, respectively. The operators T f , ̂T f , T g , ̂T g are continuous.Now (3.19) and (3.21) can be rewritten as y = T y and y = ̂T f y, for y ∈ P;(3.23), (3.24) can be rewritten as y = T g y and y = ̂T g y, respectively. Accordingto the contractive mapping principle, “finding a sufficient conditionfor existence and uniqueness of the solution for FBVP (3.1)–(3.2) (or (3.7)–(3.8) or (3.3)–(3.4) or (3.9)–(3.10))” is equivalent to “finding a sufficientcondition under which T f (or ̂T f or T or ̂T g ) is a contractive mapping ofP(or P 1 or P 2 )”. Then, the following theorems are true.Theorem 3.1. (1) Let f be a continuous function on [a, b] × R andsatisfy the Lipschitz condition (3.5).(1.1) If2K f (b − a) γ< 1, (3.27)Γ(γ + 1)then there exists a unique solution for FBVP (3.1)–(3.2) in P.(1.2) If(γ − 1) γ−1 (b − a) γK fγ γ < 1, (3.28)Γ(γ + 1)then there exists a unique solution for FBVP (3.7)–(3.8) in the space P.(2) Let g be a continuous function on [a, b] × R × R and satisfy theLipschitz condition (3.6).
Boundary Value Problems for Differential Equations of Fractional Order 71(2.1) IfK g2(b − a) γΓ(γ + 1) + L g[(b − a) γ−θΓ(γ + 1)Γ(2 − θ) + (b −]a)γ−θ< 1, (3.29)Γ(γ + 1 − θ)then there exists a unique solution for FBVP (3.3)–(3.4) in P 1 .(2.2) IfK g(γ − 1) γ−1 (b − a) γγ γ Γ(γ + 1)+ L g(2γ − θ)(b − a) γ−θγΓ(γ − θ + 1)< 1, (3.30)then there exists a unique solution for FBVP (3.9)–(3.10) in the space P 2 .Proof. The proof for (1.1): For u(t), v(t) ∈ P, and (t, s) ∈ [a, b] × [a, b],according to the definition for the operator “T f ”, we have∣ Tf u(t) − T f v(t) ∣ ∣ ≤∫ba{ ∫b≤ ‖u − v‖ fThus∥ Tf u − T f v ∥ ∥f= maxaa≤t≤b K f|G(t, s)| · |f(s, u(s)) − f(s, v(s))| ds ≤(t − a)(b − s) γ−1(b − a)Γ(γ)∫ tds +≤a(t − s) γ−1Γ(γ)2(b − a)γΓ(γ + 1) ‖u − v‖ f .}ds ≤∣ Tf u(t) − T f v(t) ∣ 2K f (b − a) γ≤ ‖u − v‖ f .Γ(γ + 1)Considering (3.27), we finish the proof according to Lemma 3.2.The proof for (2.1): On one hand, we have∣∣T g u(t) − T g v(t) ∣ 2(b − a)γ≤Γ(γ + 1) ‖u − v‖ gfor u(t), v(t) ∈ P 1 , and (t, s) ∈ [a, b] × [a, b], which is similar to (1.1). Onthe other hand, according to Lemma 3.1, we haveCa D θ t T g u(t) =∫ b= (t−a)1−θ (b−s) γ−1Γ(2−θ) Γ(γ)(b − a) g( s, u(s), C a Dsu(s) θ ) ds−Ja γ−θ g ( t, u(t), C a Dt θ u(t) ) .aThen∣∣Ca Dt θ T g u − C a Dt θ T g v ∣ [≤ ‖u − v‖ g ·(b − a) γ−θΓ(2 − θ)Γ(γ + 1)(b −]a)γ−θ+ .Γ(γ − θ + 1)Combined with the definition of ‖ · ‖ g and Lemma 3.2, (3.29) holds.The proof for (1.2) and (2.2) are referred to [33].□
- Page 4 and 5: 24 T. S. Aleroev, H. T. Aleroeva, N
- Page 8 and 9: 28 T. S. Aleroev, H. T. Aleroeva, N
- Page 10 and 11: 30 T. S. Aleroev, H. T. Aleroeva, N
- Page 12 and 13: 32 T. S. Aleroev, H. T. Aleroeva, N
- Page 14 and 15: 34 T. S. Aleroev, H. T. Aleroeva, N
- Page 16 and 17: 36 T. S. Aleroev, H. T. Aleroeva, N
- Page 18 and 19: 38 T. S. Aleroev, H. T. Aleroeva, N
- Page 20 and 21: CHAPTER 2The Sturm-Liouville Proble
- Page 22 and 23: 42 T. S. Aleroev, H. T. Aleroeva, N
- Page 24 and 25: 44 T. S. Aleroev, H. T. Aleroeva, N
- Page 26 and 27: 46 T. S. Aleroev, H. T. Aleroeva, N
- Page 28 and 29: 48 T. S. Aleroev, H. T. Aleroeva, N
- Page 30 and 31: 50 T. S. Aleroev, H. T. Aleroeva, N
- Page 32 and 33: 52 T. S. Aleroev, H. T. Aleroeva, N
- Page 34 and 35: 54 T. S. Aleroev, H. T. Aleroeva, N
- Page 36 and 37: 56 T. S. Aleroev, H. T. Aleroeva, N
- Page 38 and 39: 58 T. S. Aleroev, H. T. Aleroeva, N
- Page 40 and 41: 60 T. S. Aleroev, H. T. Aleroeva, N
- Page 42 and 43: 62 T. S. Aleroev, H. T. Aleroeva, N
- Page 44 and 45: 64 T. S. Aleroev, H. T. Aleroeva, N
- Page 46 and 47: CHAPTER 3Solving Two-Point Boundary
- Page 48 and 49: 68 T. S. Aleroev, H. T. Aleroeva, N
- Page 52 and 53: 72 T. S. Aleroev, H. T. Aleroeva, N
- Page 54 and 55: 74 T. S. Aleroev, H. T. Aleroeva, N
- Page 56 and 57: 76 T. S. Aleroev, H. T. Aleroeva, N
- Page 58 and 59: Since∣∣f(t, u 2 ) − f(t, u 1
- Page 60 and 61: agreement with the fact that (3.33)
- Page 62: 82 T. S. Aleroev, H. T. Aleroeva, N
70 T. S. Aleroev, H. T. Aleroeva, Ning-Ming Nie, and Yi-Fa Tangwhere C 0 [a, b] denotes the space of all continuous functions on [a, b]. Wedefine the norms ‖·‖ f , ‖·‖ g , ‖·‖ĝ and the operator T f , ̂T f , T g , ̂T g as follows:‖y‖ f := K fT f y(t) :=̂T f y(t) :=∫ ba∫ bamax |y(t)|,a≤t≤bG(t, s)f(s, y(s)) ds,Ĝ(t, s)f(s, y(s)) ds, ∀ y(t) ∈ P;[‖y‖ g := max Kg |y(t)| + L g | C a Dt θ y(t)| ] ,a≤t≤bT g y(t) :=∫ baG(t, s)g ( s, y(s), C a D θ sy(s) ) ds, ∀ y(t) ∈ P 1 ,[‖y‖ĝ := max Kg |y(t)| + L g | RLa Dt θ y(t)| ] ,a≤t≤b̂T g y(t) :=∫ baĜ(t, s)g ( s, y(s), RLa D θ sy(s) ) ds, ∀ y(t) ∈ P 2 .Obviously, P, P 1 , P 2 are complete normed spaces with respect to ‖ · ‖ f ,‖ · ‖ g and ‖ · ‖ĝ, respectively. The operators T f , ̂T f , T g , ̂T g are continuous.Now (3.19) and (3.21) can be rewritten as y = T y and y = ̂T f y, for y ∈ P;(3.23), (3.24) can be rewritten as y = T g y and y = ̂T g y, respectively. Accordingto the contractive mapping principle, “finding a sufficient conditionfor existence and uniqueness of the solution for FBVP (3.1)–(3.2) (or (3.7)–(3.8) or (3.3)–(3.4) or (3.9)–(3.10))” is equivalent to “finding a sufficientcondition under which T f (or ̂T f or T or ̂T g ) is a contractive mapping ofP(or P 1 or P 2 )”. Then, the following theorems are true.Theorem 3.1. (1) Let f be a continuous function on [a, b] × R andsatisfy the Lipschitz condition (3.5).(1.1) If2K f (b − a) γ< 1, (3.27)Γ(γ + 1)then there exists a unique solution for FBVP (3.1)–(3.2) in P.(1.2) If(γ − 1) γ−1 (b − a) γK fγ γ < 1, (3.28)Γ(γ + 1)then there exists a unique solution for FBVP (3.7)–(3.8) in the space P.(2) Let g be a continuous function on [a, b] × R × R and satisfy theLipschitz condition (3.6).