12.07.2015 Views

wherein all the reason and philosophy of atheism is confuted, and

wherein all the reason and philosophy of atheism is confuted, and

wherein all the reason and philosophy of atheism is confuted, and

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS
  • No tags were found...

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

46 7/5^ Senftive Soul not Corporeal. Book I^to unlawful lufts <strong>and</strong> undue conjunftions •, but efpejci<strong>all</strong>y than <strong>the</strong> continualdecreation <strong>and</strong> annihilation <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> fouls <strong>of</strong> brutes ; we fh<strong>all</strong> notbe very unwilling to acknowledge thus much to <strong>the</strong>m, that indeed <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong>two th<strong>is</strong> opinion <strong>is</strong> more reafonable <strong>and</strong> tolerable than that o<strong>the</strong>r extravagancy<strong>of</strong> th<strong>of</strong>e, who will ei<strong>the</strong>r make <strong>all</strong> fouls to be generated, <strong>and</strong> confequentlyto be corporeal, or at lead <strong>the</strong> fenfitive foul, both in men <strong>and</strong> brutes.For befides <strong>the</strong> monilr<strong>of</strong>ity <strong>of</strong> th<strong>is</strong> latter opinion, in making two diftindtfouls <strong>and</strong> perceptive fubftances in eveiy man, which <strong>is</strong> a thing fufficiently<strong>confuted</strong> by internal fenfe, it leaves us alfo in an abfolute imp<strong>of</strong>Tibility <strong>of</strong>provipg <strong>the</strong> immortality <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> rational foul, <strong>the</strong> incorporeity <strong>of</strong> any fubilance,<strong>and</strong> by conlequence, <strong>the</strong> exiftence <strong>of</strong> any Deity diftind from <strong>the</strong> corporealworld.And as for that pretence <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong>irs, that fenfelefs matter may as well becomefenfitive, <strong>and</strong>, as it were, kindled into life <strong>and</strong> cogitation, as a body,that was devoid <strong>of</strong> light <strong>and</strong> heat, may be kindled into fire <strong>and</strong> flame ; th<strong>is</strong>feems to argue too much ignorance <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> d<strong>of</strong>trine <strong>of</strong> bodies in men o<strong>the</strong>rwifelearned <strong>and</strong> ingenious •, <strong>the</strong> beft naturalifts having already concluded,that fire <strong>and</strong> flame <strong>is</strong> nothing but llich a motion <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> infenfible parts <strong>of</strong> abody, as whereby <strong>the</strong>y are violently agitated, <strong>and</strong> many times diffipated <strong>and</strong>fcattercd from each o<strong>the</strong>r, begetting in <strong>the</strong> mean time th<strong>of</strong>e fancies <strong>of</strong> light<strong>and</strong> heat in animals. Now <strong>the</strong>re <strong>is</strong> no difficulty at <strong>all</strong> in conceiving, that<strong>the</strong> infenfible particles <strong>of</strong> a body, which were before quiefcent, may be putinto motion ; th<strong>is</strong> being nothing but a new modification <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong>m, <strong>and</strong> noentity re<strong>all</strong>y diftihct from <strong>the</strong> fubftance <strong>of</strong> body, as life, fenfe <strong>and</strong> cogitationare. There <strong>is</strong> nothing in fire <strong>and</strong> flame, or a kindled body, differentfrom o<strong>the</strong>r bodies, but only <strong>the</strong> motion or mechanifm, <strong>and</strong> fancy <strong>of</strong>- it.And <strong>the</strong>refore it <strong>is</strong> but a crude conceit, which <strong>the</strong> A<strong>the</strong>ilts <strong>and</strong> Corporealifts<strong>of</strong> former times have been always (o fond <strong>of</strong>, that fouls are nothing but firyor flammeous bodies. For though heat in <strong>the</strong> bodies <strong>of</strong> animals be a neceffaryinftrument for foul <strong>and</strong> life to aft by in <strong>the</strong>m, yet it <strong>is</strong> a thing re<strong>all</strong>ydiftincl from life; <strong>and</strong> a red-hot iron hath not <strong>the</strong>refore any nearer approximationto life than it had before, nor <strong>the</strong> flame <strong>of</strong> a c<strong>and</strong>le than <strong>the</strong> extinguifli'dfnuff" or t<strong>all</strong>ow <strong>of</strong> it ; <strong>the</strong> difference between <strong>the</strong>m being only in <strong>the</strong>agitation <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> infenfible parts. We might alfo add, that, according to th<strong>is</strong>hypo<strong>the</strong>f<strong>is</strong>, <strong>the</strong> fouls <strong>of</strong> animals could not be numeric<strong>all</strong>y <strong>the</strong> fame throughout<strong>the</strong> whole fpace <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong>ir lives ; fince that fire, that needs a pabulum to preyupon, doth not continue always one <strong>and</strong> <strong>the</strong> fame numerical fubflrance.The foul <strong>of</strong> a new-born animal could be no more <strong>the</strong> fame with <strong>the</strong>foul <strong>of</strong> that animal feveral years after, than <strong>the</strong> flame <strong>of</strong> a new lightedc<strong>and</strong>le <strong>is</strong> <strong>the</strong> fame with that flame that twinkles laft in <strong>the</strong> focket ; whichindeed are no more <strong>the</strong> fame, than a river or ftream <strong>is</strong> <strong>the</strong> fame atfeveral difbances <strong>of</strong> time. Which reafon may be alfo extended fur<strong>the</strong>r toprove <strong>the</strong> foul to be no body at <strong>all</strong>, fince <strong>the</strong> bodies <strong>of</strong> <strong>all</strong> animals are in 3perpetual flux.XXXVIII.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!