wherein all the reason and philosophy of atheism is confuted, and

wherein all the reason and philosophy of atheism is confuted, and wherein all the reason and philosophy of atheism is confuted, and

cch.kcl.ac.uk
from cch.kcl.ac.uk More from this publisher
12.07.2015 Views

thus iNamji dc nihilo fierent, ex omnibus rebus30 Nothing comes from nothing. Book 1.than the intention of the firft Atomifts, to the difproving .of a divine creationof any thing out of nothing by it •, Nullum rem a nihilo gigni divinitiisuvqj'.am ' ; and confequently of a Deity : yet as the meaning of it was atfirft confined and reftraincd, that nothing of it felf could come from nothingnor go to nothings or that according to the ordinary courfe of nature (withoutan extraordinary divine pov/er) nothing could be rais'd from nothing,nor reduced to nothing •, it is not only an undoubted rule of reafon in icfelf,but it was alfo the principal original of that atomical phyfiology, which, diH.carding forms and qualities, acknowledged really nothing tMt in body befidesmechanifm.Wherefore it was not in vain, or to no purpofe, that Z^«*//«J in the life ofDemocritui ^ takes notice of this as one of his Dogmata^ {j^noih in t» /xn ovl'^ yt.lEjai, jur.Js £iV TO fxit on !pf)i!^c3a.i, that nothing was made or generated out of nothingsnor corrupted into nothing j this being a fundamental principle, notonly of his atheifm, but alfo of that very atomical phyfiology it felf, whichhe purfued. And Epicurus, in his epiftle to Herodotus ', plainly fetches thebeginning of all his philofophy from hence: n^ioTO)) yAv on «'

Chap. I. nor goes to Nothing. 31'Praterea quacunque vetujiate amovet tetas.Si penitus permit, confumens mateiiam annetn,Unde ajiimale genus generatim in lumina vitaReddiuit Venus ? aut reMu5lum D^dala tellusUnde alit atque aiiget ? generatim pabida pr^ebens. Sec.Hand igitur penitus pereunt quacunque videntur,^ando aliud ex alio reficit natura ; nee ullamRem gigni patitur niji morte adjutam aliena.In which paflages, though it be plain, that Lucretius ^oxki not immediatelydrive at atheifm, and nothing elfe, but primarily at the eftablifhing ofa pecuhar kind of atomical phyfiology, upon which indeed theie Democriticksafterward endeavoured to graft atheifm -, yet to take away that fulpicion,wefhall in the next place fhew, that generally the other ancient Phyfiologcrsalfo, who were Theifts, did likewife build the ftrudure of their philofophyupon the fame foundation, ^zl nothing can ccme from nothing, nor go to nothing:as for example, Parmenides, Melijfus, Zeno, Xenophanes, Anaxagorasand Empedocles. Of Parmenides and Melijjus Arijiotle thus writes % kVeuih\y'ai&xi ^xmii iSi (ph'ifiStat tku o'jIuv' The}' fay that no real entity is eithergenerated or corrupted, that is, made anew out of nothing, or dcftroy'd to nothing.And Simplicius tells us % that Parmenides gave a notable reafon forthe confirmation of this aflertion, that nothing in nature could be made outof nothing, aiV/ai/ ts Sum ariulcof £^ il-J]^, yttn&xi to ytvojj.ivov, Sjsu^aj-w; o Ilap-(/.mSm isrporiS'lxEi', oAw? yxo (p^o-iv, tl ix rs [xri o]il@^, ti; n xttoxXv^xg-i; tk tote J/evt^aioTi iyiiiiTo, x\Xx fj-ri z^fiOTipo]) fi vn^or Becaufe if any thing be made out ofnothing, then there could be no caufe, why it foculd then be made, and neitherfooner nor later. Again Arifiotle •» tcftifies of Xcnophanes and Zeno, that theymade this a main principle of their philofophy, p-'i hSsyJ^xi j/i'i/sSai fj.riSh ex jx-a-J'fucV,! that it cannot be, that any thing fhould be made out of nothing : And ofthis Xenophanes, Sextus the philofopher tells us % that he held o-'i\ xj xci^fjixl!^SUg- That there tvas but one God, and that he ivas incorporeal, fpeakingthus of himOjti Si^xi; S'l/JiTOilrti' oac/ii^', bts vi;'/i,ua.Arijiotle ^ alfo writes in like manner concerning Empedocles,

thus iNamji dc nihilo fierent, ex omnibus rebus30 Nothing comes from nothing. Book 1.than <strong>the</strong> intention <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> firft Atomifts, to <strong>the</strong> difproving .<strong>of</strong> a divine creation<strong>of</strong> any thing out <strong>of</strong> nothing by it •, Nullum rem a nihilo gigni diviniti<strong>is</strong>uvqj'.am ' ; <strong>and</strong> confequently <strong>of</strong> a Deity : yet as <strong>the</strong> meaning <strong>of</strong> it was atfirft confined <strong>and</strong> reftraincd, that nothing <strong>of</strong> it felf could come from nothingnor go to nothings or that according to <strong>the</strong> ordinary courfe <strong>of</strong> nature (withoutan extraordinary divine pov/er) nothing could be ra<strong>is</strong>'d from nothing,nor reduced to nothing •, it <strong>is</strong> not only an undoubted rule <strong>of</strong> reafon in icfelf,but it was alfo <strong>the</strong> principal original <strong>of</strong> that atomical phyfiology, which, diH.carding forms <strong>and</strong> qualities, acknowledged re<strong>all</strong>y nothing tMt in body befidesmechanifm.Wherefore it was not in vain, or to no purp<strong>of</strong>e, that Z^«*//«J in <strong>the</strong> life <strong>of</strong>Democritui ^ takes notice <strong>of</strong> th<strong>is</strong> as one <strong>of</strong> h<strong>is</strong> Dogmata^ {j^noih in t» /xn ovl'^ yt.lEjai, jur.Js £iV TO fxit on !pf)i!^c3a.i, that nothing was made or generated out <strong>of</strong> nothingsnor corrupted into nothing j th<strong>is</strong> being a fundamental principle, notonly <strong>of</strong> h<strong>is</strong> a<strong>the</strong>ifm, but alfo <strong>of</strong> that very atomical phyfiology it felf, whichhe purfued. And Epicurus, in h<strong>is</strong> epiftle to Herodotus ', plainly fetches <strong>the</strong>beginning <strong>of</strong> <strong>all</strong> h<strong>is</strong> phil<strong>of</strong>ophy from hence: n^ioTO)) yAv on «'

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!