wherein all the reason and philosophy of atheism is confuted, and
wherein all the reason and philosophy of atheism is confuted, and wherein all the reason and philosophy of atheism is confuted, and
602 I'he EJjfence of the Godhead^ B o o k I.doth ejfence or fubftance^ differ from hypof^infes ; that is to fay, that efTcnce orfubftanceof the Godhead, which is common to all the three hypoftafes, orwhereby each ofthem is God, was concluded by the fathers, not tobeonefingu-Jaror indi/idual,but oaegeneral or univerfxlefTence and fubftance; Theodoret,notwithftanding, there acknowledging, that no fuch diftindion was obfervedby other Greek, writers betwixt tiiofe two words xVi'a and x^TrdraiK;^ effence orftibjlatice a.nd hypoftafis, as that the former of them fliould be reftrained touniverfalsonly, generical or fpccifical elTences or fubftances ; but that thiswas peculiar to the Chriftian fathers, in their doflrine concerning the Trinity.They in the mean time not denying, but that each hypoftafis, profopon,or perfon, in the Trinity, might be laid in another fenfe, and in way ofoppofition to SaMIius, to have its own fingular, individual, or exiftent effencealfo ;and that there are thus, r^fiV ouViai, three fingular exiftent effences in^^^^ Deity, as well as t^cT? j7ror
Chap. IV. to the Fathers^ univerfal. 603thus defined by fome of thcfe fathers {viz. Anafiafius and Cyril •) to beEffentia cum fuis quibufdam froprietatiius ab iisy qua funt ejufdem fpeciei,numero differens ; an epnce orfuljtance, with its certain properties {or individuatingcircumflances) differing only numerically from thofe of the famefpecies -with it. This dodtrine was plainly aflerted and induftrioufly purfued,(befides feveral others both of the Greeks and Latins) efpecially byGregory ISyffeu, Cyril of Alexandria, Maximus the Martyr, and Damafcen ;whofe words, becaufe P^/
- Page 586 and 587: thoughe^2 ^^ Cabala of the Trinity
- Page 588 and 589: 554Ideas made Animals and Gods. Boo
- Page 590 and 591: 5 Tlje fpuriom PlaWtkk Trinityy Boo
- Page 592 and 593: £^8 The Chrifilan Trmity^ as oppof
- Page 594 and 595: Nonnt.^QThis Platonick Trinity^ not
- Page 596 and 597: 562 Godf not a Mundane Soul, BookI
- Page 598 and 599: c;64^"^0 created Henades, Book I.I.
- Page 600 and 601: and^66 Different Degrees of Souls.'
- Page 602 and 603: 568 The Henades and Noes, B o o k I
- Page 604 and 605: 57© The Genuine Cabala, of the Tri
- Page 606 and 607: -572 Plato'j Plurality in ths Deity
- Page 608 and 609: forpyA Nous or Logos caUed Autopa.t
- Page 610 and 611: wherebycy6 Nene of VhXo Book I.m v.
- Page 612 and 613: ^ ^ 8 PlatoV Trinity Homooufmn. B o
- Page 614 and 615: 580 The Dependence and Subordinatio
- Page 616 and 617: '582 7^^ diJlinSiive CharaSiers Boo
- Page 618 and 619: 8^. Platonifls make Mind and JVjfdo
- Page 620 and 621: 5 86 The Ground of this Platonick B
- Page 622 and 623: •588 PlatoV three Thpofiafcs Book
- Page 624 and 625: oQ How 'Phto s Trinity "B o o k I.a
- Page 626 and 627: merely^gt ^e Agreement and Difagree
- Page 628 and 629: 594- The Platomck'Ba,'^}i.o\ cenfur
- Page 630 and 631: ,q(f In u'hai Je?}fc PlatoV Tri?iit
- Page 632 and 633: 'but5^8 What Inequality Book!.
- Page 634 and 635: 6oo Plato'j Trinity reSiified. B o
- Page 638 and 639: weaut604 A Trithei/iick Trinity, Bo
- Page 640 and 641: and6o6 II3& true Notion of the B o
- Page 642 and 643: 6o8 7^^ Nicene Fathers Book 5.irxTB
- Page 644 and 645: 6io The Homooufian Trinity Book L'T
- Page 646 and 647: 6 1 Whether Co-effe?ntaUty alone B
- Page 648 and 649: 614* Co'EJfentiality necejfary Book
- Page 650 and 651: and6i6 How the Homooufian Trinity^
- Page 652 and 653: 618" "TJ^e Perichorejts in the 'Tri
- Page 654 and 655: 6 20 77je Reafons for this Platonic
- Page 656 and 657: 62 2 Tb^ Father s Senfey ofthe Book
- Page 658 and 659: j624 ^^ Cahala of the Trinity Book
- Page 660 and 661: 626 Proclus'j Monad before the Trin
- Page 662 and 663: 628 Arians charged hy the Fathers B
- Page 664 and 665: 630 Orthodox Chrifiians worpipped B
- Page 666: (3^2 Human Nature depravahle. Book
Chap. IV. to <strong>the</strong> Fa<strong>the</strong>rs^ univerfal. 603thus defined by fome <strong>of</strong> thcfe fa<strong>the</strong>rs {viz. Anafiafius <strong>and</strong> Cyril •) to beEffentia cum fu<strong>is</strong> quibufdam froprietatiius ab i<strong>is</strong>y qua funt ejufdem fpeciei,numero differens ; an epnce orfuljtance, with its certain properties {or individuatingcircumflances) differing only numeric<strong>all</strong>y from th<strong>of</strong>e <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> famefpecies -with it. Th<strong>is</strong> dodtrine was plainly aflerted <strong>and</strong> induftrioufly purfued,(befides feveral o<strong>the</strong>rs both <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Greeks <strong>and</strong> Latins) efpeci<strong>all</strong>y byGregory ISyffeu, Cyril <strong>of</strong> Alex<strong>and</strong>ria, Maximus <strong>the</strong> Martyr, <strong>and</strong> Damafcen ;wh<strong>of</strong>e words, becaufe P^/
Change language