wherein all the reason and philosophy of atheism is confuted, and
wherein all the reason and philosophy of atheism is confuted, and wherein all the reason and philosophy of atheism is confuted, and
wherebycy6 Nene of VhXo Book I.m v.-rUy.x, £1 S\ HTio-jj-oc rvf^dvct, «x riv dlSio;. If the Sen be eternal, he was nocreature ; and, on the contrary, if he be a creature, he 'osas not eternal.Neither is there any force at all in that tcftimony of Macrobins % whi chP^/^xi/«j urgeth to the contrary ; whtrein the firft Caufe is faid de fe menterncreaffe, to have created Mindfrom it felf ; and again this Mind, animamfe creafje, to have created from it felffoul ; becaufe it is certain, that thefeantientPagans did not then fo ftridJy confine that word creare, (as we Chriftiansr.ow do) to tiiat narrow fenfe and notion, of the produdlion of things in time jbut ufed it generally for all manner of produ6tion or efficiency. But thechiefgroundof Pf/«^«j, thoughhe acknowledged it to be fenior to the world, yet does he feem to attributea temporary generation, or nativity to it. Neverthelefs, it is no way probable,that Plato's third principle of all things, in his epiftle to Dionyfius,and that Pyj't'-'-, or 5^/// of his, which is the only God, that in his tenth deLegibus he goes about to prove againft the Atheiils, Ihould ever not havebeen ; and therefore it is moft reafonable to compound this bufinefs, thus, byfuppofing, with Plotinus and others, tliat Plato held a double Pfyche, orfoul, onetj'xsV,!/.!;;', oi mundane, which is, as it were, the concrete form ofthis corporeal world -, this world is properly made an animal, and afecond, or created God j another vTripyJa-fji.io-j, fupramiindane, or feparate ; andwhich is not fo much the form, as the artificer of the world. The firft of£» 5 /. 5.which two Plotimu, calling it the heavenly Venus, thus defcribeth ; t);v S%f.2 [p. 2u: ] oCaaviav AfJ^O/t/tEk*;'.', £>: Kpo'i/s i/oJ i'vr'^ ixei\,Oj, avxixri ^/\j)(ri]i SiioTdTrij eivxi, eu^yj e'^ec'JTcu iz/tiipaTCV aKyipdiTov, (jt,ilvxiu iijCi Sfov aVi; (TiJtaiuf, oi' Sxtit-ovx e'nroi, a/AixIo'j oC
Chap. IV. Trinity^ Creatures. eyjfuch a 'iiature, as is not inclinable to/ink^ or lapfe downward. A certain feparatefubjiance, which doth not at all partake of matter^ as the fable intimated,when it called it motherlefs ; and therefore may it well be flyled by us, not a demon,but a god. Whence it comes to pafs, that this foul can never fall, it beingmuch more clofely united and conneSed with that immoveable Mind or Intelleit,than that light, which is circumfufed about the fun, is conneSed with thefun. This Venus, therefore following Chronus, or rather thefather of Chronus,Uranus, ailing towards it, and being enamoured with it, begat love, XotiH-^ ottjtEPjJiU TW yup^'l'J 'kiym-nq. Tin Trpuru; lWx[jL7r>i(jXV ria vpsc-r^', yuet—o-j }^tov taorxtStov 5mojj.e()(ii. Moreover, as we call this foul it felf feparate, fo is thislove of it, or begotten by it, a feparate love. After which, he ipeaks ofanother foul of the worJd, which is not feparate from it, but clofely conjoinedtherewith, he calling it a lower Venus and Love ; namely, that otherVenus, which in the fable is faid to have been begotten from Jupiter himfelf(die fuperior foul of the world) and Dione, a watry nymph. We concludetherefore, that though this lower mundane foul, might, according toPlato, have a temporary produflion together with the world, or before it ;yecthat other fuperiour and moft divine Ibul, which Plotinus calis the heavenlyVenus and Love, the fon of Chronus without a mother, and which was trulythe third hypoftafis oi Plato's trinity, was eternal, and without beginning.And thus, according to the forementioned principle of Athanafius, none ofthefe three hypoftafes of Plato''s trinity were creatures, but all of them divineand uncreated.Which to make yet more evident, we fhall further obfcrve, firft, thatPlato himfelf, in that fccond epiftle of his to Dicnyfius, after he had mentionedhis firft, fecond and third; that is, his trinity of divine hypoftafes, immediatelyfubjoins thefe words : 'H i-j dv^^uviv^ -j iS\)i iitaii/w; ep^fi' t» Si fixTiXiu;TTiOi, it, 5\i elwov, ^Siv Tc»»To" 'The mind of man (as parturient,) has always agreat dcfire to know what thefe things are, and to that end does it look uponthings cognate to it, which are all infuffcimt, imperfect and heterogeneous.But in that King of all things, and in the other, fecond and third, which I[pake of, there is nothing of this kind ; tlaat is, nothing like to thefe createdthings.Secondly, the three hypoftafes of P/rt/(?'s trioity are.not only all eternal,but alfo neceflarily e'xiften:, and abfolutcly undeftroyable. for the .firft ofthem can no more exift without the fecond, nor the tirft- and iecor.d withoutthe third, tlian original light can exift without its fpkndour, coruication, orefifulgency. And Plotinus, writing againlb fome Gnofticks in his time, whowould make more of thefe divine hypoftafes, or principles, than three, concludes,that there can be neither more of theui, nor fewer, in this manner ;»' TOi'vuv Su i(p STffa? '^^XP'-^iiva«, a.XKx tsto t! p-3TV,/rji/AiUif-:, EiVsa isv ^ust' csUto >^ £n,i. / r^.c.i.£V Tu voriTiJ, l^riTl iK-lrlta' f'lTc ya.o iXxrliAi, n '\"^'X2''' 'S>"^^ rx;jxa Cf->iff«
- Page 560 and 561: 526 The Pagans Political Gods, gene
- Page 562 and 563: 5 2 8 7^^ Egyptians alfo reduced B
- Page 564 and 565: "r^o ^^^ ^^^fiPagan Gods. Book I.pa
- Page 566 and 567: 532 Of thofe Pagan Theologers, 'who
- Page 568 and 569: 534 To thefey the Parts of the Worl
- Page 570 and 571: cog *Th2S Mu77dane A?iimal worpipfd
- Page 572 and 573: 538^7%e fVbfM i^ ui'ao, ruv Si ^oxj
- Page 574 and 575: c^o Vagaii DoBrine\ the Vulgar . Bo
- Page 576 and 577: .the542 l^he Pagans Real Polytheifm
- Page 578 and 579: ^44- Themis; the Eternal Law ^ or G
- Page 580 and 581: 5-4^ '^he Platonifis Super-Mundane
- Page 582 and 583: £^8 The Pagans Trinity^ derived Bo
- Page 584 and 585: Nobisceo T^^ Pagans Trinity ^ a Tri
- Page 586 and 587: thoughe^2 ^^ Cabala of the Trinity
- Page 588 and 589: 554Ideas made Animals and Gods. Boo
- Page 590 and 591: 5 Tlje fpuriom PlaWtkk Trinityy Boo
- Page 592 and 593: £^8 The Chrifilan Trmity^ as oppof
- Page 594 and 595: Nonnt.^QThis Platonick Trinity^ not
- Page 596 and 597: 562 Godf not a Mundane Soul, BookI
- Page 598 and 599: c;64^"^0 created Henades, Book I.I.
- Page 600 and 601: and^66 Different Degrees of Souls.'
- Page 602 and 603: 568 The Henades and Noes, B o o k I
- Page 604 and 605: 57© The Genuine Cabala, of the Tri
- Page 606 and 607: -572 Plato'j Plurality in ths Deity
- Page 608 and 609: forpyA Nous or Logos caUed Autopa.t
- Page 612 and 613: ^ ^ 8 PlatoV Trinity Homooufmn. B o
- Page 614 and 615: 580 The Dependence and Subordinatio
- Page 616 and 617: '582 7^^ diJlinSiive CharaSiers Boo
- Page 618 and 619: 8^. Platonifls make Mind and JVjfdo
- Page 620 and 621: 5 86 The Ground of this Platonick B
- Page 622 and 623: •588 PlatoV three Thpofiafcs Book
- Page 624 and 625: oQ How 'Phto s Trinity "B o o k I.a
- Page 626 and 627: merely^gt ^e Agreement and Difagree
- Page 628 and 629: 594- The Platomck'Ba,'^}i.o\ cenfur
- Page 630 and 631: ,q(f In u'hai Je?}fc PlatoV Tri?iit
- Page 632 and 633: 'but5^8 What Inequality Book!.
- Page 634 and 635: 6oo Plato'j Trinity reSiified. B o
- Page 636 and 637: 602 I'he EJjfence of the Godhead^ B
- Page 638 and 639: weaut604 A Trithei/iick Trinity, Bo
- Page 640 and 641: and6o6 II3& true Notion of the B o
- Page 642 and 643: 6o8 7^^ Nicene Fathers Book 5.irxTB
- Page 644 and 645: 6io The Homooufian Trinity Book L'T
- Page 646 and 647: 6 1 Whether Co-effe?ntaUty alone B
- Page 648 and 649: 614* Co'EJfentiality necejfary Book
- Page 650 and 651: and6i6 How the Homooufian Trinity^
- Page 652 and 653: 618" "TJ^e Perichorejts in the 'Tri
- Page 654 and 655: 6 20 77je Reafons for this Platonic
- Page 656 and 657: 62 2 Tb^ Father s Senfey ofthe Book
- Page 658 and 659: j624 ^^ Cahala of the Trinity Book
Chap. IV. Trinity^ Creatures. eyjfuch a 'iiature, as <strong>is</strong> not inclinable to/ink^ or lapfe downward. A certain feparatefubjiance, which doth not at <strong>all</strong> partake <strong>of</strong> matter^ as <strong>the</strong> fable intimated,when it c<strong>all</strong>ed it mo<strong>the</strong>rlefs ; <strong>and</strong> <strong>the</strong>refore may it well be flyled by us, not a demon,but a god. Whence it comes to pafs, that th<strong>is</strong> foul can never f<strong>all</strong>, it beingmuch more cl<strong>of</strong>ely united <strong>and</strong> conneSed with that immoveable Mind or Intelleit,than that light, which <strong>is</strong> circumfufed about <strong>the</strong> fun, <strong>is</strong> conneSed with <strong>the</strong>fun. Th<strong>is</strong> Venus, <strong>the</strong>refore following Chronus, or ra<strong>the</strong>r <strong>the</strong>fa<strong>the</strong>r <strong>of</strong> Chronus,Uranus, ailing towards it, <strong>and</strong> being enamoured with it, begat love, XotiH-^ ottjtEPjJiU TW yup^'l'J 'kiym-nq. Tin Trpuru; lWx[jL7r>i(jXV ria vpsc-r^', yuet—o-j }^tov taorxtStov 5mojj.e()(ii. Moreover, as we c<strong>all</strong> th<strong>is</strong> foul it felf feparate, fo <strong>is</strong> th<strong>is</strong>love <strong>of</strong> it, or begotten by it, a feparate love. After which, he ipeaks <strong>of</strong>ano<strong>the</strong>r foul <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> worJd, which <strong>is</strong> not feparate from it, but cl<strong>of</strong>ely conjoined<strong>the</strong>rewith, he c<strong>all</strong>ing it a lower Venus <strong>and</strong> Love ; namely, that o<strong>the</strong>rVenus, which in <strong>the</strong> fable <strong>is</strong> faid to have been begotten from Jupiter himfelf(die fuperior foul <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> world) <strong>and</strong> Dione, a watry nymph. We conclude<strong>the</strong>refore, that though th<strong>is</strong> lower mundane foul, might, according toPlato, have a temporary produflion toge<strong>the</strong>r with <strong>the</strong> world, or before it ;yecthat o<strong>the</strong>r fuperiour <strong>and</strong> m<strong>of</strong>t divine Ibul, which Plotinus cal<strong>is</strong> <strong>the</strong> heavenlyVenus <strong>and</strong> Love, <strong>the</strong> fon <strong>of</strong> Chronus without a mo<strong>the</strong>r, <strong>and</strong> which was truly<strong>the</strong> third hyp<strong>of</strong>taf<strong>is</strong> oi Plato's trinity, was eternal, <strong>and</strong> without beginning.And thus, according to <strong>the</strong> forementioned principle <strong>of</strong> Athanafius, none <strong>of</strong><strong>the</strong>fe three hyp<strong>of</strong>tafes <strong>of</strong> Plato''s trinity were creatures, but <strong>all</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong>m divine<strong>and</strong> uncreated.Which to make yet more evident, we fh<strong>all</strong> fur<strong>the</strong>r obfcrve, firft, thatPlato himfelf, in that fccond epiftle <strong>of</strong> h<strong>is</strong> to Dicnyfius, after he had mentionedh<strong>is</strong> firft, fecond <strong>and</strong> third; that <strong>is</strong>, h<strong>is</strong> trinity <strong>of</strong> divine hyp<strong>of</strong>tafes, immediatelyfubjoins <strong>the</strong>fe words : 'H i-j dv^^uviv^ -j iS\)i iitaii/w; ep^fi' t» Si fixTiXiu;TTiOi, it, 5\i elwov, ^Siv Tc»»To" 'The mind <strong>of</strong> man (as parturient,) has always agreat dcfire to know what <strong>the</strong>fe things are, <strong>and</strong> to that end does it look uponthings cognate to it, which are <strong>all</strong> infuffcimt, imperfect <strong>and</strong> heterogeneous.But in that King <strong>of</strong> <strong>all</strong> things, <strong>and</strong> in <strong>the</strong> o<strong>the</strong>r, fecond <strong>and</strong> third, which I[pake <strong>of</strong>, <strong>the</strong>re <strong>is</strong> nothing <strong>of</strong> th<strong>is</strong> kind ; tlaat <strong>is</strong>, nothing like to <strong>the</strong>fe createdthings.Secondly, <strong>the</strong> three hyp<strong>of</strong>tafes <strong>of</strong> P/rt/(?'s trioity are.not only <strong>all</strong> eternal,but alfo neceflarily e'xiften:, <strong>and</strong> abfolutcly undeftroyable. for <strong>the</strong> .firft <strong>of</strong><strong>the</strong>m can no more exift without <strong>the</strong> fecond, nor <strong>the</strong> tirft- <strong>and</strong> iecor.d without<strong>the</strong> third, tlian original light can exift without its fpkndour, coruication, orefifulgency. And Plotinus, writing againlb fome Gn<strong>of</strong>ticks in h<strong>is</strong> time, whowould make more <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong>fe divine hyp<strong>of</strong>tafes, or principles, than three, concludes,that <strong>the</strong>re can be nei<strong>the</strong>r more <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong>ui, nor fewer, in th<strong>is</strong> manner ;»' TOi'vuv Su i(p STffa? '^^XP'-^iiva«, a.XKx tsto t! p-3TV,/rji/AiUif-:, EiVsa <strong>is</strong>v ^ust' csUto >^ £n,i. / r^.c.i.£V Tu voriTiJ, l^riTl iK-lrlta' f'lTc ya.o iXxrliAi, n '\"^'X2''' 'S>"^^ rx;jxa Cf->iff«