wherein all the reason and philosophy of atheism is confuted, and

wherein all the reason and philosophy of atheism is confuted, and wherein all the reason and philosophy of atheism is confuted, and

cch.kcl.ac.uk
from cch.kcl.ac.uk More from this publisher
12.07.2015 Views

wherebycy6 Nene of VhXo Book I.m v.-rUy.x, £1 S\ HTio-jj-oc rvf^dvct, «x riv dlSio;. If the Sen be eternal, he was nocreature ; and, on the contrary, if he be a creature, he 'osas not eternal.Neither is there any force at all in that tcftimony of Macrobins % whi chP^/^xi/«j urgeth to the contrary ; whtrein the firft Caufe is faid de fe menterncreaffe, to have created Mindfrom it felf ; and again this Mind, animamfe creafje, to have created from it felffoul ; becaufe it is certain, that thefeantientPagans did not then fo ftridJy confine that word creare, (as we Chriftiansr.ow do) to tiiat narrow fenfe and notion, of the produdlion of things in time jbut ufed it generally for all manner of produ6tion or efficiency. But thechiefgroundof Pf/«^«j, thoughhe acknowledged it to be fenior to the world, yet does he feem to attributea temporary generation, or nativity to it. Neverthelefs, it is no way probable,that Plato's third principle of all things, in his epiftle to Dionyfius,and that Pyj't'-'-, or 5^/// of his, which is the only God, that in his tenth deLegibus he goes about to prove againft the Atheiils, Ihould ever not havebeen ; and therefore it is moft reafonable to compound this bufinefs, thus, byfuppofing, with Plotinus and others, tliat Plato held a double Pfyche, orfoul, onetj'xsV,!/.!;;', oi mundane, which is, as it were, the concrete form ofthis corporeal world -, this world is properly made an animal, and afecond, or created God j another vTripyJa-fji.io-j, fupramiindane, or feparate ; andwhich is not fo much the form, as the artificer of the world. The firft of£» 5 /. 5.which two Plotimu, calling it the heavenly Venus, thus defcribeth ; t);v S%f.2 [p. 2u: ] oCaaviav AfJ^O/t/tEk*;'.', £>: Kpo'i/s i/oJ i'vr'^ ixei\,Oj, avxixri ^/\j)(ri]i SiioTdTrij eivxi, eu^yj e'^ec'JTcu iz/tiipaTCV aKyipdiTov, (jt,ilvxiu iijCi Sfov aVi; (TiJtaiuf, oi' Sxtit-ovx e'nroi, a/AixIo'j oC

Chap. IV. Trinity^ Creatures. eyjfuch a 'iiature, as is not inclinable to/ink^ or lapfe downward. A certain feparatefubjiance, which doth not at all partake of matter^ as the fable intimated,when it called it motherlefs ; and therefore may it well be flyled by us, not a demon,but a god. Whence it comes to pafs, that this foul can never fall, it beingmuch more clofely united and conneSed with that immoveable Mind or Intelleit,than that light, which is circumfufed about the fun, is conneSed with thefun. This Venus, therefore following Chronus, or rather thefather of Chronus,Uranus, ailing towards it, and being enamoured with it, begat love, XotiH-^ ottjtEPjJiU TW yup^'l'J 'kiym-nq. Tin Trpuru; lWx[jL7r>i(jXV ria vpsc-r^', yuet—o-j }^tov taorxtStov 5mojj.e()(ii. Moreover, as we call this foul it felf feparate, fo is thislove of it, or begotten by it, a feparate love. After which, he ipeaks ofanother foul of the worJd, which is not feparate from it, but clofely conjoinedtherewith, he calling it a lower Venus and Love ; namely, that otherVenus, which in the fable is faid to have been begotten from Jupiter himfelf(die fuperior foul of the world) and Dione, a watry nymph. We concludetherefore, that though this lower mundane foul, might, according toPlato, have a temporary produflion together with the world, or before it ;yecthat other fuperiour and moft divine Ibul, which Plotinus calis the heavenlyVenus and Love, the fon of Chronus without a mother, and which was trulythe third hypoftafis oi Plato's trinity, was eternal, and without beginning.And thus, according to the forementioned principle of Athanafius, none ofthefe three hypoftafes of Plato''s trinity were creatures, but all of them divineand uncreated.Which to make yet more evident, we fhall further obfcrve, firft, thatPlato himfelf, in that fccond epiftle of his to Dicnyfius, after he had mentionedhis firft, fecond and third; that is, his trinity of divine hypoftafes, immediatelyfubjoins thefe words : 'H i-j dv^^uviv^ -j iS\)i iitaii/w; ep^fi' t» Si fixTiXiu;TTiOi, it, 5\i elwov, ^Siv Tc»»To" 'The mind of man (as parturient,) has always agreat dcfire to know what thefe things are, and to that end does it look uponthings cognate to it, which are all infuffcimt, imperfect and heterogeneous.But in that King of all things, and in the other, fecond and third, which I[pake of, there is nothing of this kind ; tlaat is, nothing like to thefe createdthings.Secondly, the three hypoftafes of P/rt/(?'s trioity are.not only all eternal,but alfo neceflarily e'xiften:, and abfolutcly undeftroyable. for the .firft ofthem can no more exift without the fecond, nor the tirft- and iecor.d withoutthe third, tlian original light can exift without its fpkndour, coruication, orefifulgency. And Plotinus, writing againlb fome Gnofticks in his time, whowould make more of thefe divine hypoftafes, or principles, than three, concludes,that there can be neither more of theui, nor fewer, in this manner ;»' TOi'vuv Su i(p STffa? '^^XP'-^iiva«, a.XKx tsto t! p-3TV,/rji/AiUif-:, EiVsa isv ^ust' csUto >^ £n,i. / r^.c.i.£V Tu voriTiJ, l^riTl iK-lrlta' f'lTc ya.o iXxrliAi, n '\"^'X2''' 'S>"^^ rx;jxa Cf->iff«

Chap. IV. Trinity^ Creatures. eyjfuch a 'iiature, as <strong>is</strong> not inclinable to/ink^ or lapfe downward. A certain feparatefubjiance, which doth not at <strong>all</strong> partake <strong>of</strong> matter^ as <strong>the</strong> fable intimated,when it c<strong>all</strong>ed it mo<strong>the</strong>rlefs ; <strong>and</strong> <strong>the</strong>refore may it well be flyled by us, not a demon,but a god. Whence it comes to pafs, that th<strong>is</strong> foul can never f<strong>all</strong>, it beingmuch more cl<strong>of</strong>ely united <strong>and</strong> conneSed with that immoveable Mind or Intelleit,than that light, which <strong>is</strong> circumfufed about <strong>the</strong> fun, <strong>is</strong> conneSed with <strong>the</strong>fun. Th<strong>is</strong> Venus, <strong>the</strong>refore following Chronus, or ra<strong>the</strong>r <strong>the</strong>fa<strong>the</strong>r <strong>of</strong> Chronus,Uranus, ailing towards it, <strong>and</strong> being enamoured with it, begat love, XotiH-^ ottjtEPjJiU TW yup^'l'J 'kiym-nq. Tin Trpuru; lWx[jL7r>i(jXV ria vpsc-r^', yuet—o-j }^tov taorxtStov 5mojj.e()(ii. Moreover, as we c<strong>all</strong> th<strong>is</strong> foul it felf feparate, fo <strong>is</strong> th<strong>is</strong>love <strong>of</strong> it, or begotten by it, a feparate love. After which, he ipeaks <strong>of</strong>ano<strong>the</strong>r foul <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> worJd, which <strong>is</strong> not feparate from it, but cl<strong>of</strong>ely conjoined<strong>the</strong>rewith, he c<strong>all</strong>ing it a lower Venus <strong>and</strong> Love ; namely, that o<strong>the</strong>rVenus, which in <strong>the</strong> fable <strong>is</strong> faid to have been begotten from Jupiter himfelf(die fuperior foul <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> world) <strong>and</strong> Dione, a watry nymph. We conclude<strong>the</strong>refore, that though th<strong>is</strong> lower mundane foul, might, according toPlato, have a temporary produflion toge<strong>the</strong>r with <strong>the</strong> world, or before it ;yecthat o<strong>the</strong>r fuperiour <strong>and</strong> m<strong>of</strong>t divine Ibul, which Plotinus cal<strong>is</strong> <strong>the</strong> heavenlyVenus <strong>and</strong> Love, <strong>the</strong> fon <strong>of</strong> Chronus without a mo<strong>the</strong>r, <strong>and</strong> which was truly<strong>the</strong> third hyp<strong>of</strong>taf<strong>is</strong> oi Plato's trinity, was eternal, <strong>and</strong> without beginning.And thus, according to <strong>the</strong> forementioned principle <strong>of</strong> Athanafius, none <strong>of</strong><strong>the</strong>fe three hyp<strong>of</strong>tafes <strong>of</strong> Plato''s trinity were creatures, but <strong>all</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong>m divine<strong>and</strong> uncreated.Which to make yet more evident, we fh<strong>all</strong> fur<strong>the</strong>r obfcrve, firft, thatPlato himfelf, in that fccond epiftle <strong>of</strong> h<strong>is</strong> to Dicnyfius, after he had mentionedh<strong>is</strong> firft, fecond <strong>and</strong> third; that <strong>is</strong>, h<strong>is</strong> trinity <strong>of</strong> divine hyp<strong>of</strong>tafes, immediatelyfubjoins <strong>the</strong>fe words : 'H i-j dv^^uviv^ -j iS\)i iitaii/w; ep^fi' t» Si fixTiXiu;TTiOi, it, 5\i elwov, ^Siv Tc»»To" 'The mind <strong>of</strong> man (as parturient,) has always agreat dcfire to know what <strong>the</strong>fe things are, <strong>and</strong> to that end does it look uponthings cognate to it, which are <strong>all</strong> infuffcimt, imperfect <strong>and</strong> heterogeneous.But in that King <strong>of</strong> <strong>all</strong> things, <strong>and</strong> in <strong>the</strong> o<strong>the</strong>r, fecond <strong>and</strong> third, which I[pake <strong>of</strong>, <strong>the</strong>re <strong>is</strong> nothing <strong>of</strong> th<strong>is</strong> kind ; tlaat <strong>is</strong>, nothing like to <strong>the</strong>fe createdthings.Secondly, <strong>the</strong> three hyp<strong>of</strong>tafes <strong>of</strong> P/rt/(?'s trioity are.not only <strong>all</strong> eternal,but alfo neceflarily e'xiften:, <strong>and</strong> abfolutcly undeftroyable. for <strong>the</strong> .firft <strong>of</strong><strong>the</strong>m can no more exift without <strong>the</strong> fecond, nor <strong>the</strong> tirft- <strong>and</strong> iecor.d without<strong>the</strong> third, tlian original light can exift without its fpkndour, coruication, orefifulgency. And Plotinus, writing againlb fome Gn<strong>of</strong>ticks in h<strong>is</strong> time, whowould make more <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong>fe divine hyp<strong>of</strong>tafes, or principles, than three, concludes,that <strong>the</strong>re can be nei<strong>the</strong>r more <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong>ui, nor fewer, in th<strong>is</strong> manner ;»' TOi'vuv Su i(p STffa? '^^XP'-^iiva«, a.XKx tsto t! p-3TV,/rji/AiUif-:, EiVsa <strong>is</strong>v ^ust' csUto >^ £n,i. / r^.c.i.£V Tu voriTiJ, l^riTl iK-lrlta' f'lTc ya.o iXxrliAi, n '\"^'X2''' 'S>"^^ rx;jxa Cf->iff«

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!