wherein all the reason and philosophy of atheism is confuted, and

wherein all the reason and philosophy of atheism is confuted, and wherein all the reason and philosophy of atheism is confuted, and

cch.kcl.ac.uk
from cch.kcl.ac.uk More from this publisher
12.07.2015 Views

namelynamely,41 Speufippus, Xenocrates,- BookLIh Polit. of order, harmony, and proportion ; S-f '«? yi^ in toZto iwxuexi i^yov, iWx«i To7c- cvAyjn TO nciv, this is the work of divine power, which alfo contains thisuniverfe. Which Divinity containing and comprehending the whole natureand univerfe, muft needs be a Angle and folitary Being ;. according tothat exprcflion of Horace before cited,.Ncc viget juicquam ftmile aut fecundum^That, which hath nothing like it, nor feccnd to it. The next thing is, thataccording to the Pagan tradition, befides this iiniverfal Numen, there werecertain other particular and inferior deities a'.fo, that i«, underftanding beingsAiperior to men •, the animated ftars or fpheres, according tothe vu'gar apprehenfion, though Ariftotk\ phiiofophy would interpret thischiefly of their immovable Minds or Intelligences. Laftly, that all ths reftof the Pagan religion and theology,, thofe two things only excepted, werefibulous and fiditious, invented for the better perfuafion of the vulgar topiety, and the confcrving of them in obedience to civnl laws ; amongftwhich this may be reckoned for oae, that thofe gods are all like men orother animals ; and therefore to be worlhipped in images and ftatues ofthofe feveral forms ; with all that other fabulous farrago, which dependethhereupon. Which being feparated from the reft, the wxT^i.'^ cL^x, or an^cient tradition of their Pagan progenitors, would remain comprized withinthofe two particulars above mentioned •, that there is one fupremeDeity, that contains the whole univerfe, and that befidcs it, ths animatedftars or their minds are certain inferior gods alfo.To Ariflotle may be here fubfoined Speufippus and Xenocrates, his equalsand corrivals, they being Plato'^ fucceftbrs ; together with Theophrajltts, hiaown fcholar and fucceflbr. Concerning the former of which it is recordedUf A'. D. in Cicero, that agreeably with Plato^ he afterted vim quandam, qua omnia^^gi^^ilur, eamque animalem, one animal and intelleSfual force,rcap'xillby whiJj allp. 2898, things are governed ; by reafon whereof, Velleius the Epicurean complains2899. Tom. of him, as thereby endeavouring, evellere ex animis ccgnitionefn. dcorum, to.IX. Oper.]pli4(i^ QUI (,y (}pi njinds of men the notion of gods ; as indeed both he andPlato did tieftroy thofe Epicurean gods, which were all fuppofed to be independentand to have no fway or influence at all upon the governmentof the world ; whereas neither of them denied, a plurality of fubordinateand dependent deities, generated or created by one fupreme, andby him employed as his minifters in the ©economy of the univerfe : forhad they done any fuch thing as this, they would certainly have beeaS

Chap. IV. a^^d Theophraftus, Mo7tarchifts, 419Mind, and which is aJfo to him the jirfi God \ the other feminine^ as it werethe mother of the gods, which is to him the foul of the univerfe : b.fideswhich he acknowledgeth the heaven to be divine, that is, animated with aparticular foul of its own, and the fiery ftars to be celeftial gods, as he affertedalfo certain fublunary gods, viz. the invifible demons. Where inftcadof the Platonick trinity, Xenocrates feems to have acknowledged onlya duality of divine hypoftafes ; the firft calLd a Monad and Mind, thefecond a Dyad and Soul of the univerfe. And laftly, we have this teftimonyof Theophraflu!, bcfides other?, cited out of his Metaphyficks, S-.-i* yi^Tra'vTwi/ A^y/i, 4i' ?,- uTTxvla. xx\ tVl >^ J'lJi/xE.fi, There is one divine principle of allthings, by or from which all things fubfiji and remain.iXXV. The Stoicks and their chief do(5tors, Zeno, Cleanthes and Chryfippus,were no better naturalifts and metaphyficians than HeraclituSf in whofefootfteps they trode ; they in like manner admitting no other fubftance befidesbody,according to the true and proper notion thereof, as that which isnot only Sixrcciov, dijtant and extended, but alfo avTiTi,7rs», refifling and impenetrable.So that, according to thefc Stoicks, the fouls not only of otheranimals, but of men alfo, were properly corporeal, that is, fubftances impenetrablyextended; and which differed from that other part of theirs,'commonly called their body, no otherwife than that they were o-^ua ajatcTffovx«i A£7r7o/f j/j-ffoK, a more thin andfubtile body, and -TJi^^x 'iv^io^ov, a hotand fiery fpirit : it being fuppofed by thefe philofophers, that cogitation,reafon, and underllanding, are lodged only in the firy matter of the univerfe.And though the generality of thefe Stoicks acknowledged human fouls tohave a certain permanency after death, and fome of them till the next conflagration,(unkfs perhaps they fhould be crufhed and broken all to pieces,in their paflige out of the body, by the down-fall of fome tower, fteeple,or the like upon them) yet did they all conclu le againfl; their immortality,there being nothing at all immortal with them (as fliall be afterwards de-.clared) dve tn\y Jupiter, or the one fupreme Deity. And as for the pu»nifliment of wicked fouls after death, though fome of them feem to haveutterly exploded the fame, as a meer figment of poets, (infomuch, thatEpicfetus ^ himflf denies there was any /I heron, Cocytus, or Phlegethon)yet others granted, that as the better fouls after death did mount up to theftars, their firft original, fo the wicked wandred up and down here m certaindark and miry fubterraneous places, till at length they were quite extinft.Neverthelefs, they fecm to have been all of this perfuafion, thatthe frightning of men with punifliments after death was na proper nor accommodatemeans to promote virtue, becaufe that ought to be purfued aftecfor its own fake, or the good of honefty, as vice to be avoided for thatevil of turpitude which is. in it, and not for any other external evil confequentthereupon. Wherefore Chryft^pus reprehended P/a/o for fubjoiningto his republick fuch afFrightful ftories of punifhments after death, (pn-y^'v p^^^^ ^^»'« Offluf CCTTolplTrStV TM OCTli TMl/ SfWb' (^oSlf, Tllf aVl/.l*?, TOU Ki^ixAou' iv^id- Stoic. l^(f,QXirlovp- 104.0.'Thefe are the words of Chryftppus, pre- * Arrisn. ia Epiftct. Libk, IIJ. Cag. XUhferved by Plutarch, Libra de Repugnantiis Stoi-i p. 293corum, p. 1052, Tom. II. Oper..

Chap. IV. a^^d Theophraftus, Mo7tarchifts, 419Mind, <strong>and</strong> which <strong>is</strong> aJfo to him <strong>the</strong> jirfi God \ <strong>the</strong> o<strong>the</strong>r feminine^ as it were<strong>the</strong> mo<strong>the</strong>r <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> gods, which <strong>is</strong> to him <strong>the</strong> foul <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> univerfe : b.fideswhich he acknowledgeth <strong>the</strong> heaven to be divine, that <strong>is</strong>, animated with aparticular foul <strong>of</strong> its own, <strong>and</strong> <strong>the</strong> fiery ftars to be celeftial gods, as he affertedalfo certain fublunary gods, viz. <strong>the</strong> invifible demons. Where inftcad<strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Platonick trinity, Xenocrates feems to have acknowledged onlya duality <strong>of</strong> divine hyp<strong>of</strong>tafes ; <strong>the</strong> firft calLd a Monad <strong>and</strong> Mind, <strong>the</strong>fecond a Dyad <strong>and</strong> Soul <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> univerfe. And laftly, we have th<strong>is</strong> teftimony<strong>of</strong> Theophraflu!, bcfides o<strong>the</strong>r?, cited out <strong>of</strong> h<strong>is</strong> Metaphyficks, S-.-i* yi^Tra'vTwi/ A^y/i, 4i' ?,- uTTxvla. xx\ tVl >^ J'lJi/xE.fi, There <strong>is</strong> one divine principle <strong>of</strong> <strong>all</strong>things, by or from which <strong>all</strong> things fubfiji <strong>and</strong> remain.iXXV. The Stoicks <strong>and</strong> <strong>the</strong>ir chief do(5tors, Zeno, Clean<strong>the</strong>s <strong>and</strong> Chryfippus,were no better naturalifts <strong>and</strong> metaphyficians than HeraclituSf in wh<strong>of</strong>efootfteps <strong>the</strong>y trode ; <strong>the</strong>y in like manner admitting no o<strong>the</strong>r fubftance befidesbody,according to <strong>the</strong> true <strong>and</strong> proper notion <strong>the</strong>re<strong>of</strong>, as that which <strong>is</strong>not only Sixrcciov, dijtant <strong>and</strong> extended, but alfo avTiTi,7rs», refifling <strong>and</strong> impenetrable.So that, according to <strong>the</strong>fc Stoicks, <strong>the</strong> fouls not only <strong>of</strong> o<strong>the</strong>ranimals, but <strong>of</strong> men alfo, were properly corporeal, that <strong>is</strong>, fubftances impenetrablyextended; <strong>and</strong> which differed from that o<strong>the</strong>r part <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong>irs,'commonly c<strong>all</strong>ed <strong>the</strong>ir body, no o<strong>the</strong>rwife than that <strong>the</strong>y were o-^ua ajatcTffovx«i A£7r7o/f j/j-ffoK, a more thin <strong>and</strong>fubtile body, <strong>and</strong> -TJi^^x 'iv^io^ov, a hot<strong>and</strong> fiery fpirit : it being fupp<strong>of</strong>ed by <strong>the</strong>fe phil<strong>of</strong>ophers, that cogitation,reafon, <strong>and</strong> underll<strong>and</strong>ing, are lodged only in <strong>the</strong> firy matter <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> univerfe.And though <strong>the</strong> generality <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong>fe Stoicks acknowledged human fouls tohave a certain permanency after death, <strong>and</strong> fome <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong>m till <strong>the</strong> next conflagration,(unkfs perhaps <strong>the</strong>y fhould be crufhed <strong>and</strong> broken <strong>all</strong> to pieces,in <strong>the</strong>ir paflige out <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> body, by <strong>the</strong> down-f<strong>all</strong> <strong>of</strong> fome tower, fteeple,or <strong>the</strong> like upon <strong>the</strong>m) yet did <strong>the</strong>y <strong>all</strong> conclu le againfl; <strong>the</strong>ir immortality,<strong>the</strong>re being nothing at <strong>all</strong> immortal with <strong>the</strong>m (as fli<strong>all</strong> be afterwards de-.clared) dve tn\y Jupiter, or <strong>the</strong> one fupreme Deity. And as for <strong>the</strong> pu»nifliment <strong>of</strong> wicked fouls after death, though fome <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong>m feem to haveutterly exploded <strong>the</strong> fame, as a meer figment <strong>of</strong> poets, (infomuch, thatEpicfetus ^ himflf denies <strong>the</strong>re was any /I heron, Cocytus, or Phlegethon)yet o<strong>the</strong>rs granted, that as <strong>the</strong> better fouls after death did mount up to <strong>the</strong>ftars, <strong>the</strong>ir firft original, fo <strong>the</strong> wicked w<strong>and</strong>red up <strong>and</strong> down here m certaindark <strong>and</strong> miry fubterraneous places, till at length <strong>the</strong>y were quite extinft.Never<strong>the</strong>lefs, <strong>the</strong>y fecm to have been <strong>all</strong> <strong>of</strong> th<strong>is</strong> perfuafion, that<strong>the</strong> frightning <strong>of</strong> men with punifliments after death was na proper nor accommodatemeans to promote virtue, becaufe that ought to be purfued aftecfor its own fake, or <strong>the</strong> good <strong>of</strong> honefty, as vice to be avoided for thatevil <strong>of</strong> turpitude which <strong>is</strong>. in it, <strong>and</strong> not for any o<strong>the</strong>r external evil confequent<strong>the</strong>reupon. Wherefore Chryft^pus reprehended P/a/o for fubjoiningto h<strong>is</strong> republick fuch afFrightful ftories <strong>of</strong> punifhments after death, (pn-y^'v p^^^^ ^^»'« Offluf CCTTolplTrStV TM OCTli TMl/ SfWb' (^oSlf, Tllf aVl/.l*?, TOU Ki^ixAou' iv^id- Stoic. l^(f,QXirlovp- 104.0.'Thefe are <strong>the</strong> words <strong>of</strong> Chryftppus, pre- * Arr<strong>is</strong>n. ia Epiftct. Libk, IIJ. Cag. XUhferved by Plutarch, Libra de Repugnanti<strong>is</strong> Stoi-i p. 293corum, p. 1052, Tom. II. Oper..

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!