wherein all the reason and philosophy of atheism is confuted, and
wherein all the reason and philosophy of atheism is confuted, and wherein all the reason and philosophy of atheism is confuted, and
namelynamely,41 Speufippus, Xenocrates,- BookLIh Polit. of order, harmony, and proportion ; S-f '«? yi^ in toZto iwxuexi i^yov, iWx«i To7c- cvAyjn TO nciv, this is the work of divine power, which alfo contains thisuniverfe. Which Divinity containing and comprehending the whole natureand univerfe, muft needs be a Angle and folitary Being ;. according tothat exprcflion of Horace before cited,.Ncc viget juicquam ftmile aut fecundum^That, which hath nothing like it, nor feccnd to it. The next thing is, thataccording to the Pagan tradition, befides this iiniverfal Numen, there werecertain other particular and inferior deities a'.fo, that i«, underftanding beingsAiperior to men •, the animated ftars or fpheres, according tothe vu'gar apprehenfion, though Ariftotk\ phiiofophy would interpret thischiefly of their immovable Minds or Intelligences. Laftly, that all ths reftof the Pagan religion and theology,, thofe two things only excepted, werefibulous and fiditious, invented for the better perfuafion of the vulgar topiety, and the confcrving of them in obedience to civnl laws ; amongftwhich this may be reckoned for oae, that thofe gods are all like men orother animals ; and therefore to be worlhipped in images and ftatues ofthofe feveral forms ; with all that other fabulous farrago, which dependethhereupon. Which being feparated from the reft, the wxT^i.'^ cL^x, or an^cient tradition of their Pagan progenitors, would remain comprized withinthofe two particulars above mentioned •, that there is one fupremeDeity, that contains the whole univerfe, and that befidcs it, ths animatedftars or their minds are certain inferior gods alfo.To Ariflotle may be here fubfoined Speufippus and Xenocrates, his equalsand corrivals, they being Plato'^ fucceftbrs ; together with Theophrajltts, hiaown fcholar and fucceflbr. Concerning the former of which it is recordedUf A'. D. in Cicero, that agreeably with Plato^ he afterted vim quandam, qua omnia^^gi^^ilur, eamque animalem, one animal and intelleSfual force,rcap'xillby whiJj allp. 2898, things are governed ; by reafon whereof, Velleius the Epicurean complains2899. Tom. of him, as thereby endeavouring, evellere ex animis ccgnitionefn. dcorum, to.IX. Oper.]pli4(i^ QUI (,y (}pi njinds of men the notion of gods ; as indeed both he andPlato did tieftroy thofe Epicurean gods, which were all fuppofed to be independentand to have no fway or influence at all upon the governmentof the world ; whereas neither of them denied, a plurality of fubordinateand dependent deities, generated or created by one fupreme, andby him employed as his minifters in the ©economy of the univerfe : forhad they done any fuch thing as this, they would certainly have beeaS
Chap. IV. a^^d Theophraftus, Mo7tarchifts, 419Mind, and which is aJfo to him the jirfi God \ the other feminine^ as it werethe mother of the gods, which is to him the foul of the univerfe : b.fideswhich he acknowledgeth the heaven to be divine, that is, animated with aparticular foul of its own, and the fiery ftars to be celeftial gods, as he affertedalfo certain fublunary gods, viz. the invifible demons. Where inftcadof the Platonick trinity, Xenocrates feems to have acknowledged onlya duality of divine hypoftafes ; the firft calLd a Monad and Mind, thefecond a Dyad and Soul of the univerfe. And laftly, we have this teftimonyof Theophraflu!, bcfides other?, cited out of his Metaphyficks, S-.-i* yi^Tra'vTwi/ A^y/i, 4i' ?,- uTTxvla. xx\ tVl >^ J'lJi/xE.fi, There is one divine principle of allthings, by or from which all things fubfiji and remain.iXXV. The Stoicks and their chief do(5tors, Zeno, Cleanthes and Chryfippus,were no better naturalifts and metaphyficians than HeraclituSf in whofefootfteps they trode ; they in like manner admitting no other fubftance befidesbody,according to the true and proper notion thereof, as that which isnot only Sixrcciov, dijtant and extended, but alfo avTiTi,7rs», refifling and impenetrable.So that, according to thefc Stoicks, the fouls not only of otheranimals, but of men alfo, were properly corporeal, that is, fubftances impenetrablyextended; and which differed from that other part of theirs,'commonly called their body, no otherwife than that they were o-^ua ajatcTffovx«i A£7r7o/f j/j-ffoK, a more thin andfubtile body, and -TJi^^x 'iv^io^ov, a hotand fiery fpirit : it being fuppofed by thefe philofophers, that cogitation,reafon, and underllanding, are lodged only in the firy matter of the univerfe.And though the generality of thefe Stoicks acknowledged human fouls tohave a certain permanency after death, and fome of them till the next conflagration,(unkfs perhaps they fhould be crufhed and broken all to pieces,in their paflige out of the body, by the down-fall of fome tower, fteeple,or the like upon them) yet did they all conclu le againfl; their immortality,there being nothing at all immortal with them (as fliall be afterwards de-.clared) dve tn\y Jupiter, or the one fupreme Deity. And as for the pu»nifliment of wicked fouls after death, though fome of them feem to haveutterly exploded the fame, as a meer figment of poets, (infomuch, thatEpicfetus ^ himflf denies there was any /I heron, Cocytus, or Phlegethon)yet others granted, that as the better fouls after death did mount up to theftars, their firft original, fo the wicked wandred up and down here m certaindark and miry fubterraneous places, till at length they were quite extinft.Neverthelefs, they fecm to have been all of this perfuafion, thatthe frightning of men with punifliments after death was na proper nor accommodatemeans to promote virtue, becaufe that ought to be purfued aftecfor its own fake, or the good of honefty, as vice to be avoided for thatevil of turpitude which is. in it, and not for any other external evil confequentthereupon. Wherefore Chryft^pus reprehended P/a/o for fubjoiningto his republick fuch afFrightful ftories of punifhments after death, (pn-y^'v p^^^^ ^^»'« Offluf CCTTolplTrStV TM OCTli TMl/ SfWb' (^oSlf, Tllf aVl/.l*?, TOU Ki^ixAou' iv^id- Stoic. l^(f,QXirlovp- 104.0.'Thefe are the words of Chryftppus, pre- * Arrisn. ia Epiftct. Libk, IIJ. Cag. XUhferved by Plutarch, Libra de Repugnantiis Stoi-i p. 293corum, p. 1052, Tom. II. Oper..
- Page 401 and 402: Chap. IV. hi the Monarchy of the wh
- Page 403 and 404: Gh A p. I\'. who ajferted many inde
- Page 405 and 406: C H A P. IV. afid. a Mmrarchijl. 3-
- Page 407 and 408: theChap. IV.the fole Principle of a
- Page 409 and 410: whichChap. IV. tthers^ tie Towngefl
- Page 411 and 412: Chap. IV. Xenopliaties Ih One OTtd
- Page 413 and 414: nightChap. IV. whoje Temple, the wh
- Page 415 and 416: Chap. IV. the Maler of the whole Wo
- Page 417 and 418: whichChap. IV. to Material than to
- Page 419 and 420: •beingChap. IV. O^e and Ally immo
- Page 421 and 422: andwas'Chap. IV. of Dlvim Hypojlafe
- Page 423 and 424: Chap. IV. Finite \ M.tX\'i{vi% his
- Page 425 and 426: eajis,Chap. IV. of one God , from t
- Page 427 and 428: Chap. IV. the Off-fpring of one God
- Page 429 and 430: Chap. IV. the Creator of Gods. -? n
- Page 431 and 432: Chap. IV.'EucMd^s his One the Fery
- Page 433 and 434: Chap. IV. Socrates an Affertor of o
- Page 435 and 436: C H A P. IV. one only God, a vulgar
- Page 437 and 438: Chap. IV. neverthekfs a Monarchifl.
- Page 439 and 440: Ch A p. IV. of Gods and All ; Jelf-
- Page 441 and 442: Chap. IV. properly i'he King of all
- Page 443 and 444: T/^f«v ruv ^-uj' y.x\ sVj'-Co-iP.E
- Page 445 and 446: Gh A p. IV. of one univerfal Numen.
- Page 447 and 448: Ch A P. IV. His Caufe of Well and F
- Page 449 and 450: Chap. IV. the efick7U Caufe of the
- Page 451: C H A P. IV. of AriftotleV Theology
- Page 455 and 456: each'dChap. iV. but not Atheifts. 4
- Page 457 and 458: in Seneca's language, that raiia in
- Page 459 and 460: whichChap. IV. One Eternal and Immo
- Page 461 and 462: HaftChap. IV. their inferior Gods.
- Page 463 and 464: Chap. IV. the Supreme God dhove all
- Page 465 and 466: Chap. IV. to the Supreme God. 431S-
- Page 467 and 468: 'Oi/ (pi6yo-n(q iua-i], ojoi Bvmuv
- Page 469 and 470: Chap. IV. of many independent Gods,
- Page 471 and 472: ofChap, IV. the Makers of the World
- Page 473 and 474: t?Chap. IV'. diJlinSi from th2 Myth
- Page 475 and 476: Chap. IV. Symmachusj One worjhipped
- Page 477 and 478: Chap. IV. a7id Plutarch ; their Tej
- Page 479 and 480: whomChap. IV. Maximus Tyrius, Arift
- Page 481 and 482: Chap. IV. not to be co7itraSied int
- Page 483 and 484: Chap. IV. both om Gody and many. 44
- Page 485 and 486: Chap. IV. Trimty ', or Cabiri. 451N
- Page 487 and 488: Chap. IV. the fupreme God, 453aedib
- Page 489 and 490: C H A p. IV. Litany^ to the fupreme
- Page 491 and 492: Chap. IV. not the fupreme Deity. 45
- Page 493 and 494: Chap. IV. PlutarchV Agreement of Pa
- Page 495 and 496: Chap. IV. Afclepiades, bis Symphony
- Page 497 and 498: Chap. IV. TVorld to h& dne Animal.-
- Page 499 and 500: Chap. IV. from the Deity. 465Genera
- Page 501 and 502: Chap. IV. of the Pagan Poiytheifm,
Chap. IV. a^^d Theophraftus, Mo7tarchifts, 419Mind, <strong>and</strong> which <strong>is</strong> aJfo to him <strong>the</strong> jirfi God \ <strong>the</strong> o<strong>the</strong>r feminine^ as it were<strong>the</strong> mo<strong>the</strong>r <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> gods, which <strong>is</strong> to him <strong>the</strong> foul <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> univerfe : b.fideswhich he acknowledgeth <strong>the</strong> heaven to be divine, that <strong>is</strong>, animated with aparticular foul <strong>of</strong> its own, <strong>and</strong> <strong>the</strong> fiery ftars to be celeftial gods, as he affertedalfo certain fublunary gods, viz. <strong>the</strong> invifible demons. Where inftcad<strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Platonick trinity, Xenocrates feems to have acknowledged onlya duality <strong>of</strong> divine hyp<strong>of</strong>tafes ; <strong>the</strong> firft calLd a Monad <strong>and</strong> Mind, <strong>the</strong>fecond a Dyad <strong>and</strong> Soul <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> univerfe. And laftly, we have th<strong>is</strong> teftimony<strong>of</strong> Theophraflu!, bcfides o<strong>the</strong>r?, cited out <strong>of</strong> h<strong>is</strong> Metaphyficks, S-.-i* yi^Tra'vTwi/ A^y/i, 4i' ?,- uTTxvla. xx\ tVl >^ J'lJi/xE.fi, There <strong>is</strong> one divine principle <strong>of</strong> <strong>all</strong>things, by or from which <strong>all</strong> things fubfiji <strong>and</strong> remain.iXXV. The Stoicks <strong>and</strong> <strong>the</strong>ir chief do(5tors, Zeno, Clean<strong>the</strong>s <strong>and</strong> Chryfippus,were no better naturalifts <strong>and</strong> metaphyficians than HeraclituSf in wh<strong>of</strong>efootfteps <strong>the</strong>y trode ; <strong>the</strong>y in like manner admitting no o<strong>the</strong>r fubftance befidesbody,according to <strong>the</strong> true <strong>and</strong> proper notion <strong>the</strong>re<strong>of</strong>, as that which <strong>is</strong>not only Sixrcciov, dijtant <strong>and</strong> extended, but alfo avTiTi,7rs», refifling <strong>and</strong> impenetrable.So that, according to <strong>the</strong>fc Stoicks, <strong>the</strong> fouls not only <strong>of</strong> o<strong>the</strong>ranimals, but <strong>of</strong> men alfo, were properly corporeal, that <strong>is</strong>, fubftances impenetrablyextended; <strong>and</strong> which differed from that o<strong>the</strong>r part <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong>irs,'commonly c<strong>all</strong>ed <strong>the</strong>ir body, no o<strong>the</strong>rwife than that <strong>the</strong>y were o-^ua ajatcTffovx«i A£7r7o/f j/j-ffoK, a more thin <strong>and</strong>fubtile body, <strong>and</strong> -TJi^^x 'iv^io^ov, a hot<strong>and</strong> fiery fpirit : it being fupp<strong>of</strong>ed by <strong>the</strong>fe phil<strong>of</strong>ophers, that cogitation,reafon, <strong>and</strong> underll<strong>and</strong>ing, are lodged only in <strong>the</strong> firy matter <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> univerfe.And though <strong>the</strong> generality <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong>fe Stoicks acknowledged human fouls tohave a certain permanency after death, <strong>and</strong> fome <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong>m till <strong>the</strong> next conflagration,(unkfs perhaps <strong>the</strong>y fhould be crufhed <strong>and</strong> broken <strong>all</strong> to pieces,in <strong>the</strong>ir paflige out <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> body, by <strong>the</strong> down-f<strong>all</strong> <strong>of</strong> fome tower, fteeple,or <strong>the</strong> like upon <strong>the</strong>m) yet did <strong>the</strong>y <strong>all</strong> conclu le againfl; <strong>the</strong>ir immortality,<strong>the</strong>re being nothing at <strong>all</strong> immortal with <strong>the</strong>m (as fli<strong>all</strong> be afterwards de-.clared) dve tn\y Jupiter, or <strong>the</strong> one fupreme Deity. And as for <strong>the</strong> pu»nifliment <strong>of</strong> wicked fouls after death, though fome <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong>m feem to haveutterly exploded <strong>the</strong> fame, as a meer figment <strong>of</strong> poets, (infomuch, thatEpicfetus ^ himflf denies <strong>the</strong>re was any /I heron, Cocytus, or Phlegethon)yet o<strong>the</strong>rs granted, that as <strong>the</strong> better fouls after death did mount up to <strong>the</strong>ftars, <strong>the</strong>ir firft original, fo <strong>the</strong> wicked w<strong>and</strong>red up <strong>and</strong> down here m certaindark <strong>and</strong> miry fubterraneous places, till at length <strong>the</strong>y were quite extinft.Never<strong>the</strong>lefs, <strong>the</strong>y fecm to have been <strong>all</strong> <strong>of</strong> th<strong>is</strong> perfuafion, that<strong>the</strong> frightning <strong>of</strong> men with punifliments after death was na proper nor accommodatemeans to promote virtue, becaufe that ought to be purfued aftecfor its own fake, or <strong>the</strong> good <strong>of</strong> honefty, as vice to be avoided for thatevil <strong>of</strong> turpitude which <strong>is</strong>. in it, <strong>and</strong> not for any o<strong>the</strong>r external evil confequent<strong>the</strong>reupon. Wherefore Chryft^pus reprehended P/a/o for fubjoiningto h<strong>is</strong> republick fuch afFrightful ftories <strong>of</strong> punifhments after death, (pn-y^'v p^^^^ ^^»'« Offluf CCTTolplTrStV TM OCTli TMl/ SfWb' (^oSlf, Tllf aVl/.l*?, TOU Ki^ixAou' iv^id- Stoic. l^(f,QXirlovp- 104.0.'Thefe are <strong>the</strong> words <strong>of</strong> Chryftppus, pre- * Arr<strong>is</strong>n. ia Epiftct. Libk, IIJ. Cag. XUhferved by Plutarch, Libra de Repugnanti<strong>is</strong> Stoi-i p. 293corum, p. 1052, Tom. II. Oper..