12.07.2015 Views

wherein all the reason and philosophy of atheism is confuted, and

wherein all the reason and philosophy of atheism is confuted, and

wherein all the reason and philosophy of atheism is confuted, and

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS
  • No tags were found...

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

<strong>the</strong>y292 Empedocles h<strong>is</strong> Ma?ty Gods. Book I.friend fhip. Never<strong>the</strong>lefs, lirsce, according to Empedocles^ contention <strong>and</strong>friendQiip did chemfelves depend alio upon one fupreme Deity, which hewith Parmenides <strong>and</strong> Xenophanes c<strong>all</strong>ed To £v, or <strong>the</strong> very One ; <strong>the</strong> writerDe Mundo might well conclude, that, according to Empedocles, <strong>all</strong> thingswhatf<strong>of</strong>cver, <strong>and</strong> not only men, but Gods, were derived from one fupremeDeity. And that th<strong>is</strong> was indeed Empedocles h<strong>is</strong> fenfe, appears plainly from^ , ^ , jirijhtle in h<strong>is</strong> Metaphyficks^ Ti6*io-i //.£» yi^ ['E/ATrfJoxAr;] a.f/Ji,\i nm r~( (pUf^j[P ip^.Tom. TO viiy.'^, iO^iK iJ' *u tiiv -^xlou t^ t»t8 ysuav f^ cJts t? 'Ei-ef. "A'lrtx.vlxyd^ tKTdTiiIV. Oper.J x' aAAa £rt ttAh'v o ©-cf AsJ/fi J'iV,'E^ m 7rx)){l' ajxr h, oix r icfj', oVa t' fWi CTrioTi', &C.Empedocles Wi^/^w contention to he a certain principle <strong>of</strong> corruption <strong>and</strong> generation: never<strong>the</strong>lefs, he feems to generate th<strong>is</strong> contention it felf alfo from <strong>the</strong> veryOne, (that <strong>is</strong>, from <strong>the</strong> fupreme Deity.) For <strong>all</strong> things, according to him, arefrom th<strong>is</strong> contention, God only excepted ; he writing after th<strong>is</strong> manner, fromwhich (that <strong>is</strong>, contention <strong>and</strong> friendfhipj <strong>all</strong> <strong>the</strong> things that have been, are,<strong>and</strong> flj<strong>all</strong> be (plants, beads, men <strong>and</strong> gods) derived <strong>the</strong>ir original. ForEmpedocles it leems fupp<strong>of</strong>ed, that were it not for vfiV.®^, difcordor contention,<strong>all</strong> things would be one : fo that, according to him, <strong>all</strong> things whatioeverproceeded from contention or difcord, togetiier with a mixture <strong>of</strong> friendfhip,fave only <strong>the</strong> fupreme God, who hath <strong>the</strong>refore no contention at <strong>all</strong> in him,becaufe he <strong>is</strong> elfcnti<strong>all</strong>y t'> eu, unity itfelf <strong>and</strong> friendfhip. From whenceAriflotle takes occafion to quarrel with Empedocles, as it it would follow fromh<strong>is</strong> principles,that <strong>the</strong> fupreme <strong>and</strong> m<strong>of</strong>t happy God was <strong>the</strong> lead wife <strong>of</strong> <strong>all</strong>,as being not able to know any thing befides himfclf, or in <strong>the</strong> world withoutyet. L i.-c-A- h'rn ; J'lo >^ (rxjfx^xnu au'rw, tov ivSxi>j.oviro^o\i Sjm rir/ov (p^oufJ.Q\i tiiaj twi/ aAAwv, «[p.2(;5 Torn. yxB yvoifi^n ra {"cip^fTa ttx^Ix to yx^ iiity.'^ ax £p(,£i' 1 <strong>of</strong> J'VUiri; tk OjUoik Tt c^ue;ai,iV. Upcr]Th<strong>is</strong> <strong>the</strong>refore happens /o Empedocles, that, according to h<strong>is</strong> principles, <strong>the</strong>m<strong>of</strong>i happy God <strong>is</strong> <strong>the</strong> leajl wife <strong>of</strong> <strong>all</strong> o<strong>the</strong>r things, for he carmot knoiv <strong>the</strong>elements, becaufe he hath no contention in him ; <strong>all</strong> knowledge being by that, which<strong>is</strong> like : himfelf writing thus ; We know earth by earth, water by water, air byair, <strong>and</strong> fire by fire ; friendfhip by friendfloip, <strong>and</strong> contention by contention. Butto let th<strong>is</strong> pafs Empedocles here making <strong>the</strong> gods <strong>the</strong>mfclves to be derived-,from contention <strong>and</strong> friendfhip, <strong>the</strong> fupreme Deity, or m<strong>of</strong>t happy God, onlyexcepted, (who hath no contention in him, <strong>and</strong> from whom contention <strong>and</strong>friendfhip <strong>the</strong>mfelves were derived) plainly acknowledged both one unmadeDeity, <strong>the</strong> original <strong>of</strong> <strong>all</strong> things under <strong>the</strong> name <strong>of</strong> to iv, <strong>the</strong> very One,<strong>and</strong> many o<strong>the</strong>r inferiour gods, generated or produced by him •,beingjuniors to contention, ordilcord, as th<strong>is</strong> was alio junior to unity, <strong>the</strong> firft <strong>and</strong>fupreme Deity. Which gods <strong>of</strong> £w//)c^(?f/fj, that were begotten from contention(as well as men <strong>and</strong> o<strong>the</strong>r things) were doubtlels <strong>the</strong> ftars <strong>and</strong>djemons.Moreover,

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!