wherein all the reason and philosophy of atheism is confuted, and

wherein all the reason and philosophy of atheism is confuted, and wherein all the reason and philosophy of atheism is confuted, and

cch.kcl.ac.uk
from cch.kcl.ac.uk More from this publisher
12.07.2015 Views

310 Names of GreehiJJj Gods^ derived from Egypt, Book I.eafy inverfion h.we been at firft turned into Thien, or 0-;^, fmcn commonlypronouncing cxolick words ill-flivourcdly) and then by additional .-fZ/'Z'rt'.fat the beginning and end, transformed uno'Ah.oi? This feems much moreprobable than either Piaio's O-ovoji, or 'HS^ovo'--;, or any other of thofe Greeketymologies belbrc-mentioned. And as the Greeks thus derived the nanusot' many of their gods from the Egyptians, fo do the Latins feem to havedone the like, from this one inftance of the word Neptune; which thoughVarro^ would deduce a nubendo, as if it had been Nuplunus, becaufe thefea covers and hides the land, ^unAScaliger with others, o-'tto t? viVIej.', fromwaJJ/uig, this being the chief ufeof water ; yet as the learned Bochart - hatiiobferved, it may with greater probability be derived from the Egyptianword Ncphthus, Plutarch telling us % on N='2)9oiy xax7(^i t?; j/ji? ra J^^ala >«JKCDocix j^ ^ocdojlcx. T)i; ^xXuiT^ aAiTr), xj ttcottjXxiuv lAiyiBn t£ >4j yJ.KK-i\ >t, lifu S-au^aff-ioi, x, qv.v;ix\are not 0>i-niuXgen'%M\Ccl- , Yijg VoiTmm de Origine & Progreffu 3 De Ifide & Ofiride p 3C6./«^'^J Idololatrix Lib II. Cap. LXXVIl. p. 259. Ibid. p. 35;.» In Phaleg. Lib. I. Cap. II. p. 9, 10. &' Lib. I (.Cap. XXXVII. p. 102.* Revclat. XI. 8.Lib. IV. Cap. XXX. p. 283.

Chap. IV. Egypt a School of Literature before Greece. 311hiioTi^'f ycvajjim, ^I'ji^iTtxi TraotrK'^vvfJt.tv'^ a.'iXv^'^, r 7n'3-j)xor, >) >i^oy.o^it\

310 Names <strong>of</strong> GreehiJJj Gods^ derived from Egypt, Book I.eafy inverfion h.we been at firft turned into Thien, or 0-;^, fmcn commonlypronouncing cxolick words ill-flivourcdly) <strong>and</strong> <strong>the</strong>n by additional .-fZ/'Z'rt'.fat <strong>the</strong> beginning <strong>and</strong> end, transformed uno'Ah.oi? Th<strong>is</strong> feems much moreprobable than ei<strong>the</strong>r Piaio's O-ovoji, or 'HS^ovo'--;, or any o<strong>the</strong>r <strong>of</strong> th<strong>of</strong>e Greeketymologies belbrc-mentioned. And as <strong>the</strong> Greeks thus derived <strong>the</strong> nanusot' many <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong>ir gods from <strong>the</strong> Egyptians, fo do <strong>the</strong> Latins feem to havedone <strong>the</strong> like, from th<strong>is</strong> one inftance <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> word Neptune; which thoughVarro^ would deduce a nubendo, as if it had been Nuplunus, becaufe <strong>the</strong>fea covers <strong>and</strong> hides <strong>the</strong> l<strong>and</strong>, ^unAScaliger with o<strong>the</strong>rs, o-'tto t? viVIej.', fromwaJJ/uig, th<strong>is</strong> being <strong>the</strong> chief ufe<strong>of</strong> water ; yet as <strong>the</strong> learned Bochart - hatiiobferved, it may with greater probability be derived from <strong>the</strong> Egyptianword Ncphthus, Plutarch telling us % on N='2)9oiy xax7(^i t?; j/ji? ra J^^ala >«JKCDocix j^ ^ocdojlcx. T)i; ^xXuiT^ aAiTr), xj ttcottjXxiuv lAiyiBn t£ >4j yJ.KK-i\ >t, lifu S-au^aff-ioi, x, qv.v;ix\are not 0>i-niuXgen'%M\Ccl- , Yijg VoiTmm de Origine & Progreffu 3 De Ifide & Ofiride p 3C6./«^'^J Idololatrix Lib II. Cap. LXXVIl. p. 259. Ibid. p. 35;.» In Phaleg. Lib. I. Cap. II. p. 9, 10. &' Lib. I (.Cap. XXXVII. p. 102.* Revclat. XI. 8.Lib. IV. Cap. XXX. p. 283.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!