wherein all the reason and philosophy of atheism is confuted, and

wherein all the reason and philosophy of atheism is confuted, and wherein all the reason and philosophy of atheism is confuted, and

cch.kcl.ac.uk
from cch.kcl.ac.uk More from this publisher
12.07.2015 Views

3o6 The grand Arcanum of the Orphick Book I.and poets, Plutarch plainly meant Orpheus and his follower?, ic being anOrphick verfe, that is here cited by him, whereby he gives alio an acknov/-Jedgment of their antiquity. But by their juniors, who are called PMy?t/,he could underftand no other than thofe firiil lonick philofophers, Anaxi.mander, Anaximenes, Hippo, and the reft, whom thofe degenerate Italicksafterward followed, atomizing atheiflically, Leucrppus, Democritits, and Epicurus.So that here we have another confirmation alfo of what was beforeafTerted by us, that the lonick philofophers after Shales, and before Anaxa.goras, were generally atheiftical. And indeed from them the word (Puo-iko!,or Naluralijls, came to be often ufed as fynonymous with ;, xxtx tbtkjXf'C"''?",? Rth. Fliidd M.D. in the Preface to his fhihfofhia Mo/aica ; and Jacob Behmtn.4

Chap. IV. Theology^ that God is all, 307jLtsra TVi; vjv.iaq J^i'-nTi, x, ivxnx tx UmQi^ix ^iw, >^ tjjj tj-ot^xi; t? Tavfa^f • Jupiter,w^o containeth the univerfe^ and all things within himfelf, unitively and intelle£lually^according to thefe Orpbick oracles, gives a particular fubfijlenceof their ozvn alfo to all the mundane gods, and other parts of the univerfe.And this is ;ic«fK 'i^'.xro-j, in tfiat fore-cited Orpliick verfe, Every thing apartby itfelf, the whole produced or created univerfe, with all its variety of thingsin it ; which yet are Orphically fiid to be God alfo in a certain other fenfe,that fhall be decl.ired afterward. Korean the Orphick theologers be chargedwith making God all in the fecond Scoical fenfe, as if they denied all incorporealfubftance, they plainly alTerting, as Z>^;;j^yf/«j and others particularlynote, S-c-o\ ao-£o//.2Tov, an incorporeal Deity. But as for the third way, it isvery true, that the Orphick theologers did frequently call the world, thebody of God, and its kveral parts his members, making the whole univerfeto be one divine animal ; notwithftanding which, they fuppofed notthis animated world to be ti.e firft and higheft God, but either Siuri^ov ^lov,as the Hermaick or Trifmegiftick writers call it, the fecond God; or elfe, asA'":iWf«/«^ and others of the Platonifts fpeak, TjiVou flsov, the third God ; thefoul thereof being as well in the Orphick, as it was in thePythagorick andPlatonick trinity, but the third hypollafis ; they fuppofing two other divinehypoftafcs fiiperior thereunto, which were perfeftly fecrete from matter.Wherefore, as to the fupreme Deity, thefe Orphick theologers made him tobe all things, chiefly upon the two following accounts : firft, becaufe allthings coming from God, they inferred, that therefore they were all containedin him, and confequently were in a certain fenfe himfclf ; thus muchbeing declared in thofe Orphick verfes cited by Proclus ' and others,TlxJTX Txh Xfuxj/jitf, aj9-(5 (p«©J £; TroAuJ/Jiflsj*Which Apuleiits'- thus renders,J^amque fjjiu occultans, dukes in luminis orasCun£fa tulit, facro verfans fub peSiore curas.The fenfe whereof is plainly this ; That God at firft hiding or occultly containingall (kings within himfelf, did from thence difplay them, and bring themforth into light, or difiinct beings of their own, and fo make the world. Thefecond is, becaufe the world produced by God, and really exifting withouthim, is not therefore quite cut off from him, nor fubfifts alone by itfelf asa dead thing, but is ftill livingly united to him, eflcntially dependent onhim, always fupported and upheld, quickned and enlivened, adled and pervadedby him ; according to that Orphick paffige', 'Ev / auVir? «JtoV -rrmviVcTc-laiGod paffes through and intimately pervades all things.Now it is very true, that fome Chriftian theologers alfo have made Godto be all, according to thefe latter fenfv.s v as wlien they affirm the wholeworld' Comment, in Timium Platon, Lib. II. ^ Apud Jjilin. Martyr, in Cohortat. adGentes. & in Apol. II. & apud Ciemenc. kkx-» Libro de Mundo p, 25. andiin. Euleb.&c.P- 25- ^ , , , ,

Chap. IV. Theology^ that God <strong>is</strong> <strong>all</strong>, 307jLtsra TVi; vjv.iaq J^i'-nTi, x, ivxnx tx UmQi^ix ^iw, >^ tjjj tj-ot^xi; t? Tavfa^f • Jupiter,w^o containeth <strong>the</strong> univerfe^ <strong>and</strong> <strong>all</strong> things within himfelf, unitively <strong>and</strong> intelle£lu<strong>all</strong>y^according to <strong>the</strong>fe Orpbick oracles, gives a particular fubfijlence<strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong>ir ozvn alfo to <strong>all</strong> <strong>the</strong> mundane gods, <strong>and</strong> o<strong>the</strong>r parts <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> univerfe.And th<strong>is</strong> <strong>is</strong> ;ic«fK 'i^'.xro-j, in tfiat fore-cited Orpliick verfe, Every thing apartby itfelf, <strong>the</strong> whole produced or created univerfe, with <strong>all</strong> its variety <strong>of</strong> thingsin it ; which yet are Orphic<strong>all</strong>y fiid to be God alfo in a certain o<strong>the</strong>r fenfe,that fh<strong>all</strong> be decl.ired afterward. Korean <strong>the</strong> Orphick <strong>the</strong>ologers be chargedwith making God <strong>all</strong> in <strong>the</strong> fecond Scoical fenfe, as if <strong>the</strong>y denied <strong>all</strong> incorporealfubftance, <strong>the</strong>y plainly alTerting, as Z>^;;j^yf/«j <strong>and</strong> o<strong>the</strong>rs particularlynote, S-c-o\ ao-£o//.2Tov, an incorporeal Deity. But as for <strong>the</strong> third way, it <strong>is</strong>very true, that <strong>the</strong> Orphick <strong>the</strong>ologers did frequently c<strong>all</strong> <strong>the</strong> world, <strong>the</strong>body <strong>of</strong> God, <strong>and</strong> its kveral parts h<strong>is</strong> members, making <strong>the</strong> whole univerfeto be one divine animal ; notwithft<strong>and</strong>ing which, <strong>the</strong>y fupp<strong>of</strong>ed notth<strong>is</strong> animated world to be ti.e firft <strong>and</strong> higheft God, but ei<strong>the</strong>r Siuri^ov ^lov,as <strong>the</strong> Hermaick or Trifmegiftick writers c<strong>all</strong> it, <strong>the</strong> fecond God; or elfe, asA'":iWf«/«^ <strong>and</strong> o<strong>the</strong>rs <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Platonifts fpeak, TjiVou flsov, <strong>the</strong> third God ; <strong>the</strong>foul <strong>the</strong>re<strong>of</strong> being as well in <strong>the</strong> Orphick, as it was in <strong>the</strong>Pythagorick <strong>and</strong>Platonick trinity, but <strong>the</strong> third hypollaf<strong>is</strong> ; <strong>the</strong>y fupp<strong>of</strong>ing two o<strong>the</strong>r divinehyp<strong>of</strong>tafcs fiiperior <strong>the</strong>reunto, which were perfeftly fecrete from matter.Wherefore, as to <strong>the</strong> fupreme Deity, <strong>the</strong>fe Orphick <strong>the</strong>ologers made him tobe <strong>all</strong> things, chiefly upon <strong>the</strong> two following accounts : firft, becaufe <strong>all</strong>things coming from God, <strong>the</strong>y inferred, that <strong>the</strong>refore <strong>the</strong>y were <strong>all</strong> containedin him, <strong>and</strong> confequently were in a certain fenfe himfclf ; thus muchbeing declared in th<strong>of</strong>e Orphick verfes cited by Proclus ' <strong>and</strong> o<strong>the</strong>rs,TlxJTX Txh Xfuxj/jitf, aj9-(5 (p«©J £; TroAuJ/Jiflsj*Which Apuleiits'- thus renders,J^amque fjjiu occultans, dukes in lumin<strong>is</strong> orasCun£fa tulit, facro verfans fub peSiore curas.The fenfe where<strong>of</strong> <strong>is</strong> plainly th<strong>is</strong> ; That God at firft hiding or occultly containing<strong>all</strong> (kings within himfelf, did from <strong>the</strong>nce difplay <strong>the</strong>m, <strong>and</strong> bring <strong>the</strong>mforth into light, or difiinct beings <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong>ir own, <strong>and</strong> fo make <strong>the</strong> world. Thefecond <strong>is</strong>, becaufe <strong>the</strong> world produced by God, <strong>and</strong> re<strong>all</strong>y exifting withouthim, <strong>is</strong> not <strong>the</strong>refore quite cut <strong>of</strong>f from him, nor fubfifts alone by itfelf asa dead thing, but <strong>is</strong> ftill livingly united to him, eflcnti<strong>all</strong>y dependent onhim, always fupported <strong>and</strong> upheld, quickned <strong>and</strong> enlivened, adled <strong>and</strong> pervadedby him ; according to that Orphick paffige', 'Ev / auVir? «JtoV -rrmviVcTc-laiGod paffes through <strong>and</strong> intimately pervades <strong>all</strong> things.Now it <strong>is</strong> very true, that fome Chriftian <strong>the</strong>ologers alfo have made Godto be <strong>all</strong>, according to <strong>the</strong>fe latter fenfv.s v as wlien <strong>the</strong>y affirm <strong>the</strong> wholeworld' Comment, in Timium Platon, Lib. II. ^ Apud Jjilin. Martyr, in Cohortat. adGentes. & in Apol. II. & apud Ciemenc. kkx-» Libro de Mundo p, 25. <strong>and</strong>iin. Euleb.&c.P- 25- ^ , , , ,

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!