wherein all the reason and philosophy of atheism is confuted, and
wherein all the reason and philosophy of atheism is confuted, and wherein all the reason and philosophy of atheism is confuted, and
3o6 The grand Arcanum of the Orphick Book I.and poets, Plutarch plainly meant Orpheus and his follower?, ic being anOrphick verfe, that is here cited by him, whereby he gives alio an acknov/-Jedgment of their antiquity. But by their juniors, who are called PMy?t/,he could underftand no other than thofe firiil lonick philofophers, Anaxi.mander, Anaximenes, Hippo, and the reft, whom thofe degenerate Italicksafterward followed, atomizing atheiflically, Leucrppus, Democritits, and Epicurus.So that here we have another confirmation alfo of what was beforeafTerted by us, that the lonick philofophers after Shales, and before Anaxa.goras, were generally atheiftical. And indeed from them the word (Puo-iko!,or Naluralijls, came to be often ufed as fynonymous with ;, xxtx tbtkjXf'C"''?",? Rth. Fliidd M.D. in the Preface to his fhihfofhia Mo/aica ; and Jacob Behmtn.4
Chap. IV. Theology^ that God is all, 307jLtsra TVi; vjv.iaq J^i'-nTi, x, ivxnx tx UmQi^ix ^iw, >^ tjjj tj-ot^xi; t? Tavfa^f • Jupiter,w^o containeth the univerfe^ and all things within himfelf, unitively and intelle£lually^according to thefe Orpbick oracles, gives a particular fubfijlenceof their ozvn alfo to all the mundane gods, and other parts of the univerfe.And this is ;ic«fK 'i^'.xro-j, in tfiat fore-cited Orpliick verfe, Every thing apartby itfelf, the whole produced or created univerfe, with all its variety of thingsin it ; which yet are Orphically fiid to be God alfo in a certain other fenfe,that fhall be decl.ired afterward. Korean the Orphick theologers be chargedwith making God all in the fecond Scoical fenfe, as if they denied all incorporealfubftance, they plainly alTerting, as Z>^;;j^yf/«j and others particularlynote, S-c-o\ ao-£o//.2Tov, an incorporeal Deity. But as for the third way, it isvery true, that the Orphick theologers did frequently call the world, thebody of God, and its kveral parts his members, making the whole univerfeto be one divine animal ; notwithftanding which, they fuppofed notthis animated world to be ti.e firft and higheft God, but either Siuri^ov ^lov,as the Hermaick or Trifmegiftick writers call it, the fecond God; or elfe, asA'":iWf«/«^ and others of the Platonifts fpeak, TjiVou flsov, the third God ; thefoul thereof being as well in the Orphick, as it was in thePythagorick andPlatonick trinity, but the third hypollafis ; they fuppofing two other divinehypoftafcs fiiperior thereunto, which were perfeftly fecrete from matter.Wherefore, as to the fupreme Deity, thefe Orphick theologers made him tobe all things, chiefly upon the two following accounts : firft, becaufe allthings coming from God, they inferred, that therefore they were all containedin him, and confequently were in a certain fenfe himfclf ; thus muchbeing declared in thofe Orphick verfes cited by Proclus ' and others,TlxJTX Txh Xfuxj/jitf, aj9-(5 (p«©J £; TroAuJ/Jiflsj*Which Apuleiits'- thus renders,J^amque fjjiu occultans, dukes in luminis orasCun£fa tulit, facro verfans fub peSiore curas.The fenfe whereof is plainly this ; That God at firft hiding or occultly containingall (kings within himfelf, did from thence difplay them, and bring themforth into light, or difiinct beings of their own, and fo make the world. Thefecond is, becaufe the world produced by God, and really exifting withouthim, is not therefore quite cut off from him, nor fubfifts alone by itfelf asa dead thing, but is ftill livingly united to him, eflcntially dependent onhim, always fupported and upheld, quickned and enlivened, adled and pervadedby him ; according to that Orphick paffige', 'Ev / auVir? «JtoV -rrmviVcTc-laiGod paffes through and intimately pervades all things.Now it is very true, that fome Chriftian theologers alfo have made Godto be all, according to thefe latter fenfv.s v as wlien they affirm the wholeworld' Comment, in Timium Platon, Lib. II. ^ Apud Jjilin. Martyr, in Cohortat. adGentes. & in Apol. II. & apud Ciemenc. kkx-» Libro de Mundo p, 25. andiin. Euleb.&c.P- 25- ^ , , , ,
- Page 289 and 290: ^HAP. IV. derivedfrom one fe^f-exij
- Page 291 and 292: Chap. IV. the Supremefrom the infer
- Page 293 and 294: fometimesCThap. IV. for tke fupreme
- Page 295 and 296: in ihls of Euripedes ^: AAX Ej-i",
- Page 297 and 298: Chap. IV. To @eiw & To Acuf^vuv the
- Page 299 and 300: Chap. IV. Champions for Paganifm aJ
- Page 301 and 302: willin(cuithoughChap. IV. Rival wit
- Page 303 and 304: Ch a p. IVi ^Jfertor of Monarchy. 2
- Page 305 and 306: heChap. IV. both Polythelfis and Mo
- Page 307 and 308: forafmuchChap. IV. acknowledged a f
- Page 309 and 310: Chap. IV. derived all his Gods' fro
- Page 311 and 312: Chap. IV. of Independent Deities, 3
- Page 313 and 314: C H A p. IV. the Pagan Polytheijis.
- Page 315 and 316: Chap. IV. tie Pagans Polytheifis. 2
- Page 317 and 318: andChap. IV. Sibylline Oracles, 283
- Page 319 and 320: Chap. IV. Zoroafter a PolytheifiV'
- Page 321 and 322: andChap. IV. of one fupreme Deity,
- Page 323 and 324: ''Chap. IV. l73e Magick and Chaldat
- Page 325 and 326: Chap. IV. Oromafdes, Mithras, ^WAri
- Page 327 and 328: Chap. IV. or Chaldakk Oracles. 293n
- Page 329 and 330: Chat. IV. not a mere Roma?ice, 295a
- Page 331 and 332: C H A P. IV. of the Poems called Or
- Page 333 and 334: Chap. IV. neverthehfs a Monarchijl.
- Page 335 and 336: Chap. IV. Profejfed MonanhiJ}, 301N
- Page 337 and 338: Chap. IV. afferted Monarchy. ^6'Omn
- Page 339: C H A p. IV. of the Orpbick Cabala.
- Page 343 and 344: Chap. IV. Tlse Polytheifm of the Eg
- Page 345 and 346: Chap. IV. Egypt a School of Literat
- Page 347 and 348: Chap. IV. y^Jferters of the Cofmogo
- Page 349 and 350: Chap. IV. Their arcane Theology. 31
- Page 351 and 352: Chap. IV. had an Arcane Theology. 3
- Page 353 and 354: C MAP. IV. Some Trifmegiflkk Booh c
- Page 355 and 356: Chap. IV. jiot Chrtjlian Cheats, 32
- Page 357 and 358: Chap. IV. Hermaick Books exta?tt af
- Page 359 and 360: C H A p. IV. ly Pagam and Phiiofoph
- Page 361 and 362: Chap. IV. Old Egyptian Philofophy.
- Page 363 and 364: Chap. IV. no Chrijtiafi Forgery. 32
- Page 365 and 366: andChap. III. hy La
- Page 367 and 368: Chap. IV. contain Egyptian DoSirine
- Page 369 and 370: Chap. IV. a Firjl^ aitd Supreme God
- Page 371 and 372: Chap. IV. from o?ie Divine Principl
- Page 373 and 374: Chap. IV. Hammon a h'ddinand i?ivif
- Page 375 and 376: andChap. IV. tahn notice of in Scri
- Page 377 and 378: Chap. IV.That God h All Things.the
- Page 379 and 380: accordingChap. IV, Dcemons lament t
- Page 381 and 382: Chap. IV.upon God's being All Thing
- Page 383 and 384: Chap. IV. ivith the 0/^ Egyptian Th
- Page 385 and 386: .fummus,Chap. IV. :\Oims afid^cv2i:
- Page 387 and 388: Chap. IV.veneratur orbis,Cneph (^r
- Page 389 and 390: ~nChap. IV.cut in pieces hy Typhon.
Chap. IV. Theology^ that God <strong>is</strong> <strong>all</strong>, 307jLtsra TVi; vjv.iaq J^i'-nTi, x, ivxnx tx UmQi^ix ^iw, >^ tjjj tj-ot^xi; t? Tavfa^f • Jupiter,w^o containeth <strong>the</strong> univerfe^ <strong>and</strong> <strong>all</strong> things within himfelf, unitively <strong>and</strong> intelle£lu<strong>all</strong>y^according to <strong>the</strong>fe Orpbick oracles, gives a particular fubfijlence<strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong>ir ozvn alfo to <strong>all</strong> <strong>the</strong> mundane gods, <strong>and</strong> o<strong>the</strong>r parts <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> univerfe.And th<strong>is</strong> <strong>is</strong> ;ic«fK 'i^'.xro-j, in tfiat fore-cited Orpliick verfe, Every thing apartby itfelf, <strong>the</strong> whole produced or created univerfe, with <strong>all</strong> its variety <strong>of</strong> thingsin it ; which yet are Orphic<strong>all</strong>y fiid to be God alfo in a certain o<strong>the</strong>r fenfe,that fh<strong>all</strong> be decl.ired afterward. Korean <strong>the</strong> Orphick <strong>the</strong>ologers be chargedwith making God <strong>all</strong> in <strong>the</strong> fecond Scoical fenfe, as if <strong>the</strong>y denied <strong>all</strong> incorporealfubftance, <strong>the</strong>y plainly alTerting, as Z>^;;j^yf/«j <strong>and</strong> o<strong>the</strong>rs particularlynote, S-c-o\ ao-£o//.2Tov, an incorporeal Deity. But as for <strong>the</strong> third way, it <strong>is</strong>very true, that <strong>the</strong> Orphick <strong>the</strong>ologers did frequently c<strong>all</strong> <strong>the</strong> world, <strong>the</strong>body <strong>of</strong> God, <strong>and</strong> its kveral parts h<strong>is</strong> members, making <strong>the</strong> whole univerfeto be one divine animal ; notwithft<strong>and</strong>ing which, <strong>the</strong>y fupp<strong>of</strong>ed notth<strong>is</strong> animated world to be ti.e firft <strong>and</strong> higheft God, but ei<strong>the</strong>r Siuri^ov ^lov,as <strong>the</strong> Hermaick or Trifmegiftick writers c<strong>all</strong> it, <strong>the</strong> fecond God; or elfe, asA'":iWf«/«^ <strong>and</strong> o<strong>the</strong>rs <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Platonifts fpeak, TjiVou flsov, <strong>the</strong> third God ; <strong>the</strong>foul <strong>the</strong>re<strong>of</strong> being as well in <strong>the</strong> Orphick, as it was in <strong>the</strong>Pythagorick <strong>and</strong>Platonick trinity, but <strong>the</strong> third hypollaf<strong>is</strong> ; <strong>the</strong>y fupp<strong>of</strong>ing two o<strong>the</strong>r divinehyp<strong>of</strong>tafcs fiiperior <strong>the</strong>reunto, which were perfeftly fecrete from matter.Wherefore, as to <strong>the</strong> fupreme Deity, <strong>the</strong>fe Orphick <strong>the</strong>ologers made him tobe <strong>all</strong> things, chiefly upon <strong>the</strong> two following accounts : firft, becaufe <strong>all</strong>things coming from God, <strong>the</strong>y inferred, that <strong>the</strong>refore <strong>the</strong>y were <strong>all</strong> containedin him, <strong>and</strong> confequently were in a certain fenfe himfclf ; thus muchbeing declared in th<strong>of</strong>e Orphick verfes cited by Proclus ' <strong>and</strong> o<strong>the</strong>rs,TlxJTX Txh Xfuxj/jitf, aj9-(5 (p«©J £; TroAuJ/Jiflsj*Which Apuleiits'- thus renders,J^amque fjjiu occultans, dukes in lumin<strong>is</strong> orasCun£fa tulit, facro verfans fub peSiore curas.The fenfe where<strong>of</strong> <strong>is</strong> plainly th<strong>is</strong> ; That God at firft hiding or occultly containing<strong>all</strong> (kings within himfelf, did from <strong>the</strong>nce difplay <strong>the</strong>m, <strong>and</strong> bring <strong>the</strong>mforth into light, or difiinct beings <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong>ir own, <strong>and</strong> fo make <strong>the</strong> world. Thefecond <strong>is</strong>, becaufe <strong>the</strong> world produced by God, <strong>and</strong> re<strong>all</strong>y exifting withouthim, <strong>is</strong> not <strong>the</strong>refore quite cut <strong>of</strong>f from him, nor fubfifts alone by itfelf asa dead thing, but <strong>is</strong> ftill livingly united to him, eflcnti<strong>all</strong>y dependent onhim, always fupported <strong>and</strong> upheld, quickned <strong>and</strong> enlivened, adled <strong>and</strong> pervadedby him ; according to that Orphick paffige', 'Ev / auVir? «JtoV -rrmviVcTc-laiGod paffes through <strong>and</strong> intimately pervades <strong>all</strong> things.Now it <strong>is</strong> very true, that fome Chriftian <strong>the</strong>ologers alfo have made Godto be <strong>all</strong>, according to <strong>the</strong>fe latter fenfv.s v as wlien <strong>the</strong>y affirm <strong>the</strong> wholeworld' Comment, in Timium Platon, Lib. II. ^ Apud Jjilin. Martyr, in Cohortat. adGentes. & in Apol. II. & apud Ciemenc. kkx-» Libro de Mundo p, 25. <strong>and</strong>iin. Euleb.&c.P- 25- ^ , , , ,