wherein all the reason and philosophy of atheism is confuted, and
wherein all the reason and philosophy of atheism is confuted, and wherein all the reason and philosophy of atheism is confuted, and
fromBook• g2 Concerning the Magic}, .1.the only inventor of the natural holy. Which Eufebius tells us that this Zoroaftriandefcription of God was contained verhiitim in a book entitled, Aho:y colleSlton of the Perftan momments ; as a'fo that Oflaues (lumfck" a U-nious magician, and admirer of Zoroafler) had recorded the very ianie ofhim in \(\%Oclatettchon.Now we having, in this difcourfe concerning Zorcafler and the Magi^cited the oracles, called by fome magical, and imputed to Zoroqfier, but byothers Chaldaical i we conceive it not improper to give fomc account ofthem here. And indeed if there could be any afTurance of the antiquityand fincericy of thofe reputed oracles, there would then need no other teftimonyto prove, that either Zorcajler and the Perfian Mc.gi^ or elfc at leaftthe Chaldeans, aflerted not only a divine monarchy, or one fapreme Deitythe original of all things, but alfo a trinity confiftently with the fame.And it is certain, that thofe oracles are not fuch novel things as fomcwould fufpeft, they being cited by Synefiiis \ as then venerable, and ofgreat authority, under the name of iff i >.oyix^ holy cracks ; and therebeing, of this number, fome produced by him, that are not to be found inthe copies of Pfellus and Pletho -, whence it may be concluded, that wchave only fome fragments of thefe oracles now left. And that they werenot forged by Chriftians, as fome of the Sibylline oracles undoubtedly were,feems probable from hence, becaufe fo many Pagan philofophers make ufcof their tellimonies, laying no fmall flrefs upon them •, as for exampleDamafcius, out of whom Patrititts hath made a confiderable colledion offuch of thefe oracles as are wanting in Pfellus and PUtho's copies. And welearn from Pbotitis *, that whereas Hierocles his book of fate and providencewas divided into {cvtx\ parts, the drift of the fourth of them was this,Tx htyofjitvx MyiXj ti? (Tiy-fpovixv a-j-jxyiiv, oij TIKxtxv lioyfj.ariiji^ to reconcilethe reputed oracles with Plato'j doctrines. Where it is not to be doubted, butthat thofe reputed oracles of Hierocles were the fime with thefe Magick orChaldaick oracles •, becaufe thefe are frequently cited by philofophers underthat name of ^'-oyix or oracles. Proclus upon the Tim^us, vVo tj nxj^Twi/of,J-Evvuv f*fv T« nKv^ri tmv Sfui', ^jyjii; S\ TrifxTruv fi'f ycAirti; avJ'fwv" T'he makerof the univerfe is celebrated bath by Plato, and Orpheus, and the oracles, asthe father of gods and men., "who both produceth multitudes of gods, and fendsdown fouls for the generations of men. And as there are other fragments ofthefe cited by Proclus elfcwhere under the name of hoyiy. or oracles, fo dothhe fometimes give them that higher title of SsoTraeaVoTCf 3-m^oj-iz, and ^j.-j-xyuy!«,the theology that was of divine tradition or revelation. Which magnificentencomium was beftowed in like manner upon Pythagoras his philofophyby Jamblichus ', that being thought to have been derived in greatpart from the Chaldeans and the Magi -, '.•< Sfa'u aJr^f -rrx^xSo^iijn; to xxra^zii' This philofophy of Pythagoras having been firfi divinely delivered, orrevealed by the gods, ought not to be handled by us without a religious invocationof them. And that Porphyrins was not unacquainted with thefe oraclesneither,* De Infomnii-s pafiim. ' In Vitu Pythag. Cap. I p. i, 2. Ed. Kuf-? Biblioth^ Cod. CCX^'. p. 553. teri.
Chap. IV. or Chaldakk Oracles. 293neither, may be concluded from that book of his, intitled, m^i t»;\- eh >,«.j'lMv ^iAo(3-o^iV.f, concerning the philofophy from oracles; which confifting ofmore parts, one of them was calied, t« txv XxxSx(uv xoyix, the oracles of theChaldeans : which, that they were the very fame with thofe we now fpeakof, fhall be further proved afterward. Now, though Pfellus affirms, thatthe Chaldean dogmata contained in thofe oracles were fome of them admittedboth by Ariflotle and Plato -, yet does he no: pretend thefe veryGreek verfes t.hemfelves to have been fo ancient. But it feems probablefrom Suichs, that Julian a Chaldean and Theurgift, the fon of Julian aphilofopher, (who wrote concerning Dsemons and Telefiurgicks) was thelirlt, that turned thofe Chaldee or Magick oracles into Greek verfe ; 'IsAiovoV,STTi Micxx 'Avto'jiw t» jS^triAEKf, iypx^^e ^inpymXy riXe^ixx, Xoy^cx. S^ Ittuv Julian,in the time of Marcus Antoninus the eviperor^ wrote the theurgick andteleftick oracles in verfe. For that there is fomething of the theurgical magickmixed together with myftical theology in thefe oracles, is a thing fomanifcft from that operation about the Hccatine circle, and other palTagesin them, that it cannot be denied ; which renders it ftill more unlikelythat they fhould have been forged by Chriftians. Neverthelefs, they carryalong with them (as hath been already obferved) a clear acknowledgmentof a divine monarch, or one fupreme Deity, the original of all things ;which is called in them the father, and the paternal principle, and that intelligible,' x^ri fl-E voiTv 108 Kifin, that cannot be apprehended otherwife than bythe flower of the mind; as alfo that ^ one fire, from whence all things fpring :Pfellus, thus gloffing upon that oracle, all things were the cff-fpring of onefire, TrdvTX Tx ovTx rare \;oriTX, t^ al^nrx, «7ro f/.o'vs C£b tiu UTroj-oKTiv tAxZov, yyKci^ [xovov S-£Oi/ ETTEj-paTrlai, &C. XTrlxiro'J av to Xoyiov, x, 7r?^r,cei; r>s V{J.iti^\s Soyfj-xr^-All things, whether intelligible or fenfible, receive their effence fromGod alone, and return back again only to him ; fo that this oracle is irreprehenftble,and full cf our do£irine. And it is very obfervable, that thefe veryfameoracles exprefly determined alfo that matter was not xyiy/d'^, umnadeor felf-exiflent, but derived in like manner from the Deity. Which welearn from Proclus upon Platans Tim^us, where, when he had pofuivelyaflerted, that there is 'ev ttxvtuv x'Itiov, one thing the caufe of all things; andrxyx^oM TTccvTui aiViov ov, il-jxi >^ \lxn; ciVioii, that the fuprcme good, being thecaufe of all things, is alfo the caufe of matter : he confirms this aflertion ofhis from the authority of the oracles, xiro TaJr-.); >^ t^? roi^eui; xj rx Xoyix nx- Pag. 1 1 S,^yn tW TToXuTTOixiAou vKx'j, EuS^fv cipS-'TJ ^'piocxii J'EVcO'if TToAiiTroixiAs CArjf" Fromthis order alfo do the oracles deduce the generation of the matter, in thefe words ;from thence (that is, from one fupreme Deity) altogether proceeds the genefisef the multivarious matter. Which unqueftionably was one of thofe veryMagick or Chaldee oracles ' ; and it may be further proved from hence, htcaufeit was by Porphyrins fet down amongft them, as appears from MneaiCazeus in his iheophrajlus * : « yx^ xyiwd^ iSi avx^^iD l^vpi^ilxi' I^cithcr was matter voidtf generation or beginnings which the Chaldeans and Porphyrias teach thee ; be' Oraculor. Sea.III. verf. jS. ' Scf". IF. verf. 5K ' Se!t. I. verf. 20, * P. 56.4inakifig
- Page 275 and 276: Chap. IV. the Newmfs or Beginning o
- Page 277 and 278: andChap. IV. a divine Theogonifi. 2
- Page 279 and 280: Chap. IV. of one unmade Deity, 245B
- Page 281 and 282: C HAP. IV. and Theifis. 247Befides
- Page 283 and 284: Chap. IV. Chaos and Nightfenior to
- Page 285 and 286: Chap. IV. neither Theogonifis^ nor
- Page 287 and 288: whichCh AP. rV. of the VForld a7id
- Page 289 and 290: ^HAP. IV. derivedfrom one fe^f-exij
- Page 291 and 292: Chap. IV. the Supremefrom the infer
- Page 293 and 294: fometimesCThap. IV. for tke fupreme
- Page 295 and 296: in ihls of Euripedes ^: AAX Ej-i",
- Page 297 and 298: Chap. IV. To @eiw & To Acuf^vuv the
- Page 299 and 300: Chap. IV. Champions for Paganifm aJ
- Page 301 and 302: willin(cuithoughChap. IV. Rival wit
- Page 303 and 304: Ch a p. IVi ^Jfertor of Monarchy. 2
- Page 305 and 306: heChap. IV. both Polythelfis and Mo
- Page 307 and 308: forafmuchChap. IV. acknowledged a f
- Page 309 and 310: Chap. IV. derived all his Gods' fro
- Page 311 and 312: Chap. IV. of Independent Deities, 3
- Page 313 and 314: C H A p. IV. the Pagan Polytheijis.
- Page 315 and 316: Chap. IV. tie Pagans Polytheifis. 2
- Page 317 and 318: andChap. IV. Sibylline Oracles, 283
- Page 319 and 320: Chap. IV. Zoroafter a PolytheifiV'
- Page 321 and 322: andChap. IV. of one fupreme Deity,
- Page 323 and 324: ''Chap. IV. l73e Magick and Chaldat
- Page 325: Chap. IV. Oromafdes, Mithras, ^WAri
- Page 329 and 330: Chat. IV. not a mere Roma?ice, 295a
- Page 331 and 332: C H A P. IV. of the Poems called Or
- Page 333 and 334: Chap. IV. neverthehfs a Monarchijl.
- Page 335 and 336: Chap. IV. Profejfed MonanhiJ}, 301N
- Page 337 and 338: Chap. IV. afferted Monarchy. ^6'Omn
- Page 339 and 340: C H A p. IV. of the Orpbick Cabala.
- Page 341 and 342: Chap. IV. Theology^ that God is all
- Page 343 and 344: Chap. IV. Tlse Polytheifm of the Eg
- Page 345 and 346: Chap. IV. Egypt a School of Literat
- Page 347 and 348: Chap. IV. y^Jferters of the Cofmogo
- Page 349 and 350: Chap. IV. Their arcane Theology. 31
- Page 351 and 352: Chap. IV. had an Arcane Theology. 3
- Page 353 and 354: C MAP. IV. Some Trifmegiflkk Booh c
- Page 355 and 356: Chap. IV. jiot Chrtjlian Cheats, 32
- Page 357 and 358: Chap. IV. Hermaick Books exta?tt af
- Page 359 and 360: C H A p. IV. ly Pagam and Phiiofoph
- Page 361 and 362: Chap. IV. Old Egyptian Philofophy.
- Page 363 and 364: Chap. IV. no Chrijtiafi Forgery. 32
- Page 365 and 366: andChap. III. hy La
- Page 367 and 368: Chap. IV. contain Egyptian DoSirine
- Page 369 and 370: Chap. IV. a Firjl^ aitd Supreme God
- Page 371 and 372: Chap. IV. from o?ie Divine Principl
- Page 373 and 374: Chap. IV. Hammon a h'ddinand i?ivif
- Page 375 and 376: andChap. IV. tahn notice of in Scri
Chap. IV. or Chaldakk Oracles. 293nei<strong>the</strong>r, may be concluded from that book <strong>of</strong> h<strong>is</strong>, intitled, m^i t»;\- eh >,«.j'lMv ^iAo(3-o^iV.f, concerning <strong>the</strong> phil<strong>of</strong>ophy from oracles; which confifting <strong>of</strong>more parts, one <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong>m was calied, t« txv XxxSx(uv xoyix, <strong>the</strong> oracles <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong>Chaldeans : which, that <strong>the</strong>y were <strong>the</strong> very fame with th<strong>of</strong>e we now fpeak<strong>of</strong>, fh<strong>all</strong> be fur<strong>the</strong>r proved afterward. Now, though Pfellus affirms, that<strong>the</strong> Chaldean dogmata contained in th<strong>of</strong>e oracles were fome <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong>m admittedboth by Ariflotle <strong>and</strong> Plato -, yet does he no: pretend <strong>the</strong>fe veryGreek verfes t.hemfelves to have been fo ancient. But it feems probablefrom Suichs, that Julian a Chaldean <strong>and</strong> Theurgift, <strong>the</strong> fon <strong>of</strong> Julian aphil<strong>of</strong>opher, (who wrote concerning Dsemons <strong>and</strong> Telefiurgicks) was <strong>the</strong>lirlt, that turned th<strong>of</strong>e Chaldee or Magick oracles into Greek verfe ; 'IsAiovoV,STTi Micxx 'Avto'jiw t» jS^triAEKf, iypx^^e ^inpymXy riXe^ixx, Xoy^cx. S^ Ittuv Julian,in <strong>the</strong> time <strong>of</strong> Marcus Antoninus <strong>the</strong> eviperor^ wrote <strong>the</strong> <strong>the</strong>urgick <strong>and</strong>teleftick oracles in verfe. For that <strong>the</strong>re <strong>is</strong> fomething <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>the</strong>urgical magickmixed toge<strong>the</strong>r with myftical <strong>the</strong>ology in <strong>the</strong>fe oracles, <strong>is</strong> a thing fomanifcft from that operation about <strong>the</strong> Hccatine circle, <strong>and</strong> o<strong>the</strong>r palTagesin <strong>the</strong>m, that it cannot be denied ; which renders it ftill more unlikelythat <strong>the</strong>y fhould have been forged by Chriftians. Never<strong>the</strong>lefs, <strong>the</strong>y carryalong with <strong>the</strong>m (as hath been already obferved) a clear acknowledgment<strong>of</strong> a divine monarch, or one fupreme Deity, <strong>the</strong> original <strong>of</strong> <strong>all</strong> things ;which <strong>is</strong> c<strong>all</strong>ed in <strong>the</strong>m <strong>the</strong> fa<strong>the</strong>r, <strong>and</strong> <strong>the</strong> paternal principle, <strong>and</strong> that intelligible,' x^ri fl-E voiTv 108 Kifin, that cannot be apprehended o<strong>the</strong>rwife than by<strong>the</strong> flower <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> mind; as alfo that ^ one fire, from whence <strong>all</strong> things fpring :Pfellus, thus gl<strong>of</strong>fing upon that oracle, <strong>all</strong> things were <strong>the</strong> cff-fpring <strong>of</strong> onefire, TrdvTX Tx ovTx rare \;oriTX, t^ al^nrx, «7ro f/.o'vs C£b tiu UTroj-oKTiv tAxZov, yyKci^ [xovov S-£Oi/ ETTEj-paTrlai, &C. XTrlxiro'J av to Xoyiov, x, 7r?^r,cei; r>s V{J.iti^\s Soyfj-xr^-All things, whe<strong>the</strong>r intelligible or fenfible, receive <strong>the</strong>ir effence fromGod alone, <strong>and</strong> return back again only to him ; fo that th<strong>is</strong> oracle <strong>is</strong> irreprehenftble,<strong>and</strong> full cf our do£irine. And it <strong>is</strong> very obfervable, that <strong>the</strong>fe veryfameoracles exprefly determined alfo that matter was not xyiy/d'^, umnadeor felf-exiflent, but derived in like manner from <strong>the</strong> Deity. Which welearn from Proclus upon Platans Tim^us, where, when he had p<strong>of</strong>uivelyaflerted, that <strong>the</strong>re <strong>is</strong> 'ev ttxvtuv x'Itiov, one thing <strong>the</strong> caufe <strong>of</strong> <strong>all</strong> things; <strong>and</strong>rxyx^oM TTccvTui aiViov ov, il-jxi >^ \lxn; ciVioii, that <strong>the</strong> fuprcme good, being <strong>the</strong>caufe <strong>of</strong> <strong>all</strong> things, <strong>is</strong> alfo <strong>the</strong> caufe <strong>of</strong> matter : he confirms th<strong>is</strong> aflertion <strong>of</strong>h<strong>is</strong> from <strong>the</strong> authority <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> oracles, xiro TaJr-.); >^ t^? roi^eui; xj rx Xoyix nx- Pag. 1 1 S,^yn tW TToXuTTOixiAou vKx'j, EuS^fv cipS-'TJ ^'piocxii J'EVcO'if TToAiiTroixiAs CArjf" Fromth<strong>is</strong> order alfo do <strong>the</strong> oracles deduce <strong>the</strong> generation <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> matter, in <strong>the</strong>fe words ;from <strong>the</strong>nce (that <strong>is</strong>, from one fupreme Deity) altoge<strong>the</strong>r proceeds <strong>the</strong> genef<strong>is</strong>ef <strong>the</strong> multivarious matter. Which unqueftionably was one <strong>of</strong> th<strong>of</strong>e veryMagick or Chaldee oracles ' ; <strong>and</strong> it may be fur<strong>the</strong>r proved from hence, htcaufeit was by Porphyrins fet down amongft <strong>the</strong>m, as appears from MneaiCazeus in h<strong>is</strong> iheophrajlus * : « yx^ xyiwd^ iSi avx^^iD l^vpi^ilxi' I^cithcr was matter voidtf generation or beginnings which <strong>the</strong> Chaldeans <strong>and</strong> Porphyrias teach <strong>the</strong>e ; be' Oraculor. Sea.III. verf. jS. ' Scf". IF. verf. 5K ' Se!t. I. verf. 20, * P. 56.4inakifig