wherein all the reason and philosophy of atheism is confuted, and

wherein all the reason and philosophy of atheism is confuted, and wherein all the reason and philosophy of atheism is confuted, and

cch.kcl.ac.uk
from cch.kcl.ac.uk More from this publisher
12.07.2015 Views

fromBook• g2 Concerning the Magic}, .1.the only inventor of the natural holy. Which Eufebius tells us that this Zoroaftriandefcription of God was contained verhiitim in a book entitled, Aho:y colleSlton of the Perftan momments ; as a'fo that Oflaues (lumfck" a U-nious magician, and admirer of Zoroafler) had recorded the very ianie ofhim in \(\%Oclatettchon.Now we having, in this difcourfe concerning Zorcafler and the Magi^cited the oracles, called by fome magical, and imputed to Zoroqfier, but byothers Chaldaical i we conceive it not improper to give fomc account ofthem here. And indeed if there could be any afTurance of the antiquityand fincericy of thofe reputed oracles, there would then need no other teftimonyto prove, that either Zorcajler and the Perfian Mc.gi^ or elfc at leaftthe Chaldeans, aflerted not only a divine monarchy, or one fapreme Deitythe original of all things, but alfo a trinity confiftently with the fame.And it is certain, that thofe oracles are not fuch novel things as fomcwould fufpeft, they being cited by Synefiiis \ as then venerable, and ofgreat authority, under the name of iff i >.oyix^ holy cracks ; and therebeing, of this number, fome produced by him, that are not to be found inthe copies of Pfellus and Pletho -, whence it may be concluded, that wchave only fome fragments of thefe oracles now left. And that they werenot forged by Chriftians, as fome of the Sibylline oracles undoubtedly were,feems probable from hence, becaufe fo many Pagan philofophers make ufcof their tellimonies, laying no fmall flrefs upon them •, as for exampleDamafcius, out of whom Patrititts hath made a confiderable colledion offuch of thefe oracles as are wanting in Pfellus and PUtho's copies. And welearn from Pbotitis *, that whereas Hierocles his book of fate and providencewas divided into {cvtx\ parts, the drift of the fourth of them was this,Tx htyofjitvx MyiXj ti? (Tiy-fpovixv a-j-jxyiiv, oij TIKxtxv lioyfj.ariiji^ to reconcilethe reputed oracles with Plato'j doctrines. Where it is not to be doubted, butthat thofe reputed oracles of Hierocles were the fime with thefe Magick orChaldaick oracles •, becaufe thefe are frequently cited by philofophers underthat name of ^'-oyix or oracles. Proclus upon the Tim^us, vVo tj nxj^Twi/of,J-Evvuv f*fv T« nKv^ri tmv Sfui', ^jyjii; S\ TrifxTruv fi'f ycAirti; avJ'fwv" T'he makerof the univerfe is celebrated bath by Plato, and Orpheus, and the oracles, asthe father of gods and men., "who both produceth multitudes of gods, and fendsdown fouls for the generations of men. And as there are other fragments ofthefe cited by Proclus elfcwhere under the name of hoyiy. or oracles, fo dothhe fometimes give them that higher title of SsoTraeaVoTCf 3-m^oj-iz, and ^j.-j-xyuy!«,the theology that was of divine tradition or revelation. Which magnificentencomium was beftowed in like manner upon Pythagoras his philofophyby Jamblichus ', that being thought to have been derived in greatpart from the Chaldeans and the Magi -, '.•< Sfa'u aJr^f -rrx^xSo^iijn; to xxra^zii' This philofophy of Pythagoras having been firfi divinely delivered, orrevealed by the gods, ought not to be handled by us without a religious invocationof them. And that Porphyrins was not unacquainted with thefe oraclesneither,* De Infomnii-s pafiim. ' In Vitu Pythag. Cap. I p. i, 2. Ed. Kuf-? Biblioth^ Cod. CCX^'. p. 553. teri.

Chap. IV. or Chaldakk Oracles. 293neither, may be concluded from that book of his, intitled, m^i t»;\- eh >,«.j'lMv ^iAo(3-o^iV.f, concerning the philofophy from oracles; which confifting ofmore parts, one of them was calied, t« txv XxxSx(uv xoyix, the oracles of theChaldeans : which, that they were the very fame with thofe we now fpeakof, fhall be further proved afterward. Now, though Pfellus affirms, thatthe Chaldean dogmata contained in thofe oracles were fome of them admittedboth by Ariflotle and Plato -, yet does he no: pretend thefe veryGreek verfes t.hemfelves to have been fo ancient. But it feems probablefrom Suichs, that Julian a Chaldean and Theurgift, the fon of Julian aphilofopher, (who wrote concerning Dsemons and Telefiurgicks) was thelirlt, that turned thofe Chaldee or Magick oracles into Greek verfe ; 'IsAiovoV,STTi Micxx 'Avto'jiw t» jS^triAEKf, iypx^^e ^inpymXy riXe^ixx, Xoy^cx. S^ Ittuv Julian,in the time of Marcus Antoninus the eviperor^ wrote the theurgick andteleftick oracles in verfe. For that there is fomething of the theurgical magickmixed together with myftical theology in thefe oracles, is a thing fomanifcft from that operation about the Hccatine circle, and other palTagesin them, that it cannot be denied ; which renders it ftill more unlikelythat they fhould have been forged by Chriftians. Neverthelefs, they carryalong with them (as hath been already obferved) a clear acknowledgmentof a divine monarch, or one fupreme Deity, the original of all things ;which is called in them the father, and the paternal principle, and that intelligible,' x^ri fl-E voiTv 108 Kifin, that cannot be apprehended otherwife than bythe flower of the mind; as alfo that ^ one fire, from whence all things fpring :Pfellus, thus gloffing upon that oracle, all things were the cff-fpring of onefire, TrdvTX Tx ovTx rare \;oriTX, t^ al^nrx, «7ro f/.o'vs C£b tiu UTroj-oKTiv tAxZov, yyKci^ [xovov S-£Oi/ ETTEj-paTrlai, &C. XTrlxiro'J av to Xoyiov, x, 7r?^r,cei; r>s V{J.iti^\s Soyfj-xr^-All things, whether intelligible or fenfible, receive their effence fromGod alone, and return back again only to him ; fo that this oracle is irreprehenftble,and full cf our do£irine. And it is very obfervable, that thefe veryfameoracles exprefly determined alfo that matter was not xyiy/d'^, umnadeor felf-exiflent, but derived in like manner from the Deity. Which welearn from Proclus upon Platans Tim^us, where, when he had pofuivelyaflerted, that there is 'ev ttxvtuv x'Itiov, one thing the caufe of all things; andrxyx^oM TTccvTui aiViov ov, il-jxi >^ \lxn; ciVioii, that the fuprcme good, being thecaufe of all things, is alfo the caufe of matter : he confirms this aflertion ofhis from the authority of the oracles, xiro TaJr-.); >^ t^? roi^eui; xj rx Xoyix nx- Pag. 1 1 S,^yn tW TToXuTTOixiAou vKx'j, EuS^fv cipS-'TJ ^'piocxii J'EVcO'if TToAiiTroixiAs CArjf" Fromthis order alfo do the oracles deduce the generation of the matter, in thefe words ;from thence (that is, from one fupreme Deity) altogether proceeds the genefisef the multivarious matter. Which unqueftionably was one of thofe veryMagick or Chaldee oracles ' ; and it may be further proved from hence, htcaufeit was by Porphyrins fet down amongft them, as appears from MneaiCazeus in his iheophrajlus * : « yx^ xyiwd^ iSi avx^^iD l^vpi^ilxi' I^cithcr was matter voidtf generation or beginnings which the Chaldeans and Porphyrias teach thee ; be' Oraculor. Sea.III. verf. jS. ' Scf". IF. verf. 5K ' Se!t. I. verf. 20, * P. 56.4inakifig

Chap. IV. or Chaldakk Oracles. 293nei<strong>the</strong>r, may be concluded from that book <strong>of</strong> h<strong>is</strong>, intitled, m^i t»;\- eh >,«.j'lMv ^iAo(3-o^iV.f, concerning <strong>the</strong> phil<strong>of</strong>ophy from oracles; which confifting <strong>of</strong>more parts, one <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong>m was calied, t« txv XxxSx(uv xoyix, <strong>the</strong> oracles <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong>Chaldeans : which, that <strong>the</strong>y were <strong>the</strong> very fame with th<strong>of</strong>e we now fpeak<strong>of</strong>, fh<strong>all</strong> be fur<strong>the</strong>r proved afterward. Now, though Pfellus affirms, that<strong>the</strong> Chaldean dogmata contained in th<strong>of</strong>e oracles were fome <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong>m admittedboth by Ariflotle <strong>and</strong> Plato -, yet does he no: pretend <strong>the</strong>fe veryGreek verfes t.hemfelves to have been fo ancient. But it feems probablefrom Suichs, that Julian a Chaldean <strong>and</strong> Theurgift, <strong>the</strong> fon <strong>of</strong> Julian aphil<strong>of</strong>opher, (who wrote concerning Dsemons <strong>and</strong> Telefiurgicks) was <strong>the</strong>lirlt, that turned th<strong>of</strong>e Chaldee or Magick oracles into Greek verfe ; 'IsAiovoV,STTi Micxx 'Avto'jiw t» jS^triAEKf, iypx^^e ^inpymXy riXe^ixx, Xoy^cx. S^ Ittuv Julian,in <strong>the</strong> time <strong>of</strong> Marcus Antoninus <strong>the</strong> eviperor^ wrote <strong>the</strong> <strong>the</strong>urgick <strong>and</strong>teleftick oracles in verfe. For that <strong>the</strong>re <strong>is</strong> fomething <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>the</strong>urgical magickmixed toge<strong>the</strong>r with myftical <strong>the</strong>ology in <strong>the</strong>fe oracles, <strong>is</strong> a thing fomanifcft from that operation about <strong>the</strong> Hccatine circle, <strong>and</strong> o<strong>the</strong>r palTagesin <strong>the</strong>m, that it cannot be denied ; which renders it ftill more unlikelythat <strong>the</strong>y fhould have been forged by Chriftians. Never<strong>the</strong>lefs, <strong>the</strong>y carryalong with <strong>the</strong>m (as hath been already obferved) a clear acknowledgment<strong>of</strong> a divine monarch, or one fupreme Deity, <strong>the</strong> original <strong>of</strong> <strong>all</strong> things ;which <strong>is</strong> c<strong>all</strong>ed in <strong>the</strong>m <strong>the</strong> fa<strong>the</strong>r, <strong>and</strong> <strong>the</strong> paternal principle, <strong>and</strong> that intelligible,' x^ri fl-E voiTv 108 Kifin, that cannot be apprehended o<strong>the</strong>rwife than by<strong>the</strong> flower <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> mind; as alfo that ^ one fire, from whence <strong>all</strong> things fpring :Pfellus, thus gl<strong>of</strong>fing upon that oracle, <strong>all</strong> things were <strong>the</strong> cff-fpring <strong>of</strong> onefire, TrdvTX Tx ovTx rare \;oriTX, t^ al^nrx, «7ro f/.o'vs C£b tiu UTroj-oKTiv tAxZov, yyKci^ [xovov S-£Oi/ ETTEj-paTrlai, &C. XTrlxiro'J av to Xoyiov, x, 7r?^r,cei; r>s V{J.iti^\s Soyfj-xr^-All things, whe<strong>the</strong>r intelligible or fenfible, receive <strong>the</strong>ir effence fromGod alone, <strong>and</strong> return back again only to him ; fo that th<strong>is</strong> oracle <strong>is</strong> irreprehenftble,<strong>and</strong> full cf our do£irine. And it <strong>is</strong> very obfervable, that <strong>the</strong>fe veryfameoracles exprefly determined alfo that matter was not xyiy/d'^, umnadeor felf-exiflent, but derived in like manner from <strong>the</strong> Deity. Which welearn from Proclus upon Platans Tim^us, where, when he had p<strong>of</strong>uivelyaflerted, that <strong>the</strong>re <strong>is</strong> 'ev ttxvtuv x'Itiov, one thing <strong>the</strong> caufe <strong>of</strong> <strong>all</strong> things; <strong>and</strong>rxyx^oM TTccvTui aiViov ov, il-jxi >^ \lxn; ciVioii, that <strong>the</strong> fuprcme good, being <strong>the</strong>caufe <strong>of</strong> <strong>all</strong> things, <strong>is</strong> alfo <strong>the</strong> caufe <strong>of</strong> matter : he confirms th<strong>is</strong> aflertion <strong>of</strong>h<strong>is</strong> from <strong>the</strong> authority <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> oracles, xiro TaJr-.); >^ t^? roi^eui; xj rx Xoyix nx- Pag. 1 1 S,^yn tW TToXuTTOixiAou vKx'j, EuS^fv cipS-'TJ ^'piocxii J'EVcO'if TToAiiTroixiAs CArjf" Fromth<strong>is</strong> order alfo do <strong>the</strong> oracles deduce <strong>the</strong> generation <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> matter, in <strong>the</strong>fe words ;from <strong>the</strong>nce (that <strong>is</strong>, from one fupreme Deity) altoge<strong>the</strong>r proceeds <strong>the</strong> genef<strong>is</strong>ef <strong>the</strong> multivarious matter. Which unqueftionably was one <strong>of</strong> th<strong>of</strong>e veryMagick or Chaldee oracles ' ; <strong>and</strong> it may be fur<strong>the</strong>r proved from hence, htcaufeit was by Porphyrins fet down amongft <strong>the</strong>m, as appears from MneaiCazeus in h<strong>is</strong> iheophrajlus * : « yx^ xyiwd^ iSi avx^^iD l^vpi^ilxi' I^cithcr was matter voidtf generation or beginnings which <strong>the</strong> Chaldeans <strong>and</strong> Porphyrias teach <strong>the</strong>e ; be' Oraculor. Sea.III. verf. jS. ' Scf". IF. verf. 5K ' Se!t. I. verf. 20, * P. 56.4inakifig

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!