12.07.2015 Views

wherein all the reason and philosophy of atheism is confuted, and

wherein all the reason and philosophy of atheism is confuted, and

wherein all the reason and philosophy of atheism is confuted, and

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS
  • No tags were found...

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

28o 7%e Judgment <strong>of</strong> Fa<strong>the</strong>rs y concerni7ig Book t,cfficerSy which one greatcfi God, who <strong>is</strong> omnipotent, bath varioujly appointeda?7d conjtitilted, fo as to ferve h<strong>is</strong> comm<strong>and</strong> <strong>and</strong> beck. Now, if ail <strong>the</strong> Pagangods be net equal, <strong>the</strong>n can <strong>the</strong>y not be <strong>all</strong> gods ; ftnce that which ruleth, <strong>and</strong>that which ferveth, cannot be <strong>the</strong> fame. God <strong>is</strong> a name <strong>of</strong> abfolute power, <strong>and</strong>implies incorruptibility.^ perfeHion, impaffibility <strong>and</strong> fubje£iicn to nothing.Pa^. 2S. Wherefore <strong>the</strong>fe ought net to be c<strong>all</strong>ed gods, whom necejfity compels to obey one[Cap. \. V-greateJl God. Again, in <strong>the</strong> fame book, Nunc fat<strong>is</strong> eft demonftrare, fummo^ 'ingenio viros attigiffe veritatem ac prope tenuiffe ; nifi eos retrorfuin iyifatuataprav<strong>is</strong> opinionibus confuetudo rapuiffet, qua i^ deos alios effe opinabanttir, i£ea, qua in ufum homin<strong>is</strong> Deus fecit, tanquam fenfu pradita effent, pro di<strong>is</strong>habenda ^ colenda credebant. It <strong>is</strong> now fufficient to have fhown, that <strong>the</strong>more ingenious <strong>and</strong> intelligent Pagans came very near to <strong>the</strong> truth, <strong>and</strong> wouldhave fully reached it^ had not a certain cuflomary infatuation <strong>of</strong> evil opinionsfnatched <strong>the</strong>m away to an acknowledgment <strong>of</strong> o<strong>the</strong>r gods, <strong>and</strong> to a belief, thatth<strong>of</strong>e things, which God made for <strong>the</strong> ufe <strong>of</strong> men, as endued with fenfe {or animated)ought to be accounted gods <strong>and</strong> worftoipped ; namely, <strong>the</strong> ftars. And^"Z- 39- afterward, ^bd ft cultores deorum €os ipfos fe colere putant, quos fummi Dei[Cop.'^'jniniftros appellamus, nihil eji quod nob<strong>is</strong> faciant invidiam, qui unum Deum dicamus,multos negemus. If <strong>the</strong> worfhippers <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> gods think, that <strong>the</strong>y wcrfhipno o<strong>the</strong>r than <strong>the</strong> minifiers <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> one fupremt God, <strong>the</strong>n <strong>the</strong>re <strong>is</strong> no caufe, why<strong>the</strong>y ffiould render us as hateful, who fay, that <strong>the</strong>re <strong>is</strong> one God, <strong>and</strong> deny manygods.Trjcf Evang. Eufebius defar'ienfts likewife gives us th<strong>is</strong> account <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Pagans creed, orrP ^ I l"'^*^^ tenor <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong>ir <strong>the</strong>ology, as it was <strong>the</strong>n held forth by <strong>the</strong>m ; r.a yxa fjjx^ ^'^ TuxtiTicv ii'^y.ovjx' >^ tktov clxoruif-oDiTii' oiimfAXTu; Si xj xpavuf Iv 'J'^C'""' "''^"'je,x r&j aeiTi\u:ixt:-j:v ff/bfiK ©ari* The Pagans declare <strong>the</strong>mfelves in th<strong>is</strong> manner^that <strong>the</strong>re <strong>is</strong> one God, who with h<strong>is</strong> various powers filleth <strong>all</strong> things, <strong>and</strong> pa f-feth through <strong>all</strong> things, <strong>and</strong> prefideth over <strong>all</strong> things ; but being inccrpcre<strong>all</strong>yend invifibly prefent in <strong>all</strong> things, <strong>and</strong> pervading <strong>the</strong>m, he <strong>is</strong> reafonably wcrfinppedby or in thcfe things., that are nianifeft <strong>and</strong> vifible. "Which paffage <strong>of</strong>Eufebius will be fur<strong>the</strong>r confiJered afterward, when we come to give a moreparticular account <strong>of</strong> paganifm.What St. /iuftinh fenfe was ' concerning <strong>the</strong> <strong>the</strong>ology <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Pagans,hath been already declared ; namely, That <strong>the</strong>y had not fo far degeneratedas to have l<strong>of</strong>i <strong>the</strong> knowledge cf one fupreme God, from whom <strong>is</strong> <strong>all</strong> whatfoeverfiature; <strong>and</strong> that <strong>the</strong>y derived <strong>all</strong> <strong>the</strong>ir gods from one. We fli<strong>all</strong> now, in <strong>the</strong>////:/. 6. f. i.laft place, conclude with <strong>the</strong> judgment <strong>of</strong> Prttt/z^ Or<strong>of</strong>tus, who was h<strong>is</strong> con-[j'.4i6.E

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!