wherein all the reason and philosophy of atheism is confuted, and
wherein all the reason and philosophy of atheism is confuted, and wherein all the reason and philosophy of atheism is confuted, and
256 How the Pagans diflingmjhed B.ook Kmereri, £5? quails quifque fit, quid agat, quid in fe admit tat, qua niente, quapictate religiones colat, intueri ;prionmque &" impiorwn habere rationem ; aprincipio civibus fuafum ejfe debet : The minds of citizens ought to be firji of allembued with a firm perfuafton, that the gods are the lords and moderators of allthings, and that the conduSi and management of the v:ho'e world is directed a;:do-ver-ruled by their judgment and divine power; that they deferve the befi of man-what he doth and takes up-kind, that they behold and confider what every man is,on himfelf, with what mind, fiety andfincerity he obferves the duties of religion ;andlaftly, that thefe gods have a very different regard to the pious and the impious.Now fuch palTages as thefe, abounding every where in Pagan writings, it isno wonder, if many, confidering their theology but flightly and fuperficially,.have been led into an error, and occafioned thereby to conclude the Pagansnot to have aflerted a divine monarchy, but to luve. imputed both the makingand governing of the world to an aridocracy or democracy of co-ordinategods, not only ail eternal, but alio felf-exiftent and unmade. The contrarywhereunto,. though it be already fufficiently proved, yet it will not be amifsfor us here in the clofe, to flievv how the Pagans, who fometimes jumble andconfound the fupreme and inferior gods all together, do notwithUanding atother times many ways diftinguilh between the one fupreme God, and theirothermany inferior gods.Firft therefore, as the Pagans had many proper names for one and thefame fupreme God, according to fcveral particular confiderations of him,,in refpe(5l of his feveral different manifeftations and effects in the world ;-,which are oftentimes miflaken for fo many diftindt deities (fome fuppofingthem independent, others fubordinate) fo had they alfo, befides thele, otherproper names of God, according to that more full and comprehenfive notionof him, as the maker of the whole world, and its fupreme governor, or thef )lc monarch of the univerfe. For thus the Greeks called him ZrK and Zw,,&c. the Latins Jupiter and Jovis, the Babylonians Belus and Eel, the PerfiansMithras and Oromafdes, the Egyptians and Scythians (according to•Herodotus) Ammotin and Pappaus. And Celfiis in Origen concludes it to bea matter of pure indiffcrency, to call the fupreme God by any of all thefe^'y.^' names, either Z.=Cf, or Ammcun, or Papp^cus, or the like ; KixQ^ olilai"A/^iUki/ v; ('if 2:'.i.'Sxi) naTTTrarou. CcKus thinks it to be a matter of no moment,whether we call the highefi and fupreme God, Adonai ^«(^ Sabaoth, rtj theJews do; or Dia and Zena, as the Greeks ; or, as the Egyptians, Animoun ;or, as the Scythians, Pappasus. Notwithftanding which, that pious andjealous father expreifeth a great deal of zeal againfl: Chriltians then ufingany of thofe P.igan names. But we will rather endure any torment (faith he)than confefs Zeus {or Jupiter) to he God ibeing well affured, that the Creeks oftenreally worfhip, under that name, an evil damcn, who is an enemy both toCod and men. And we will rather fuffer death, than call the fupreme GodAmmoun, whom the Egyptian enchanters thus invoke ; Xiyh(£^ Z>cJ^a»rov JlaTTTTaXiv Qiiv f7vai to'k ItA TraciV «A/.' r)(/.cii ou •rriKrou.Sa., riS/vlf? ^tXv rot5 ^i^'^n-
Chap. IV. the Supremefrom the inferior Gods, 2^y^uv, oj-x^ xjAx^TrKTiTxi. And though the Scythians call thefnfreme God Pappasus,yet -we acknowledging a fupreme God, will never be perfuaded to call him by that I" l-h 262name, which it pleafed that damon {who ruled over the Scythian defert, peopleand language) to impofe. Neverthekfs, he that Jhall ufe the appellative namefor God, either in the Scythian, Egyptian, or any other language which hehath been brought up in, will not offend. Where Origen plainly affirms theScythians to have acknowledged one fupreme God, called by them Papp^.us, and intimates that the Egyptians did the like, calling him Ammoun.Neither could it pofTibly be his intent to deny the fame of the Greeks andtheir Zeus, however his great jealoufy made him to call him here a dsemon;it being true in a certain fenfe, which fhill be declared afterward,that the Pagans did oftentimes really worfhip an evil dsemon, under thofevery names of Zeus and Jupiter., as they did iikewife under thofe of Hamvwnand Pappisus.In the mean time we deny not, but that both the Greeks ufed that wordZeus, and the Latins 7a^//^r, fometimes (pi-a-iy.w,-, for the asther, fire or air,fome accordingly etymologizing ZtuV from Zsm, others AfoV from (J'fu'wwhence came thofe forms of fpecch, fub Jove, and fub Dio. And thusCicero, Jovem Ennius nuncupat itd dicens. DeNauD.223./. 2.Afpice hoc fublime candens, quern invocant omnes Jovem. [Cap.'xxv,p. 2992.Hunc etiam augures ncjlri cum dicunt, Jove fuJgente, Jove tonante ; dicunt To"" 'X.enim in ccelo fulgente, tonante, iSc. The reafon of which fpeeches feems to P"'J.have been this, becaufe in ancient times fome had fuppofed the animatedheaven, Ecther and air, to be the fupreme deity. We grant moreover, thatthe fame words have been fometimes ufed la-ropixag alfo, for an hero or deifiedman, faid by fome to have been born in Crete, by others in Arcadia.And Callimachus ', though he were very angry with the Cretians for affirmingJupiter's iepulchral monument to have been with them in Crete^ asthereby making him mortalKf>iTEC c.Ei vf/fuoTai, Kxi yx^ Ta(pov, S avx, irfio,KcriTfj iTixrmxvTO' fl"u i o\j S'asvE?, tffcri yxa xm'Cretes/cmper mendaces, luum enim, rex, fepulcbrtimExtruxerunt : iu verb non es mortuns, femper enim es,Himfelf nevertheleft (as Athenagoras"^ and Or/f^?/ ' obferve) attributed the beginningof death to him, when he affirmed him to have been born in Arcadia; x^-x}, yxo ^x'ixtv y\ eVi yr,;; ymTi^, becaufe a terrene nativity is the beginningof death. Wherefore this may pafs tor a general obfervation here,that the Pagan theology was all along confounded with a certain mixtureof phyfiology and herology or hiftory blended together. Ncverthelefs it isunqueftionablt-, that the more intelligent of the Greekiffi Pagans did fre-L 1 2 quently' Hymno in Jovem, verf. 8, g. p. 121.* In Legation, pro C'hrittianis, Cap. XXVI. » Contra Celfum, Lib. IIL p. 1 37.
- Page 239 and 240: Chap. IV. Morality in the ISFafure
- Page 241 and 242: Chap. IV. Onelinefs containedJn the
- Page 243 and 244: Chap. IV. from the Pagan Pofytheifm
- Page 245 and 246: Chap. IV. becaufe they held aTheogo
- Page 247 and 248: Cha p. IV". fJ^e Ditheifl'ick DoBri
- Page 249 and 250: Chap. IV. of an evil Principle, 215
- Page 251 and 252: Chap. IV. or unmade SouL 2 7control
- Page 253 and 254: Chap. IV. of a Suhjlantial Evil Pri
- Page 255 and 256: Chap. IV. Platonick Origine of Evil
- Page 257 and 258: Chap. IV. Magi, conjidered. 223mani
- Page 259 and 260: andC^HAP. IV. hn{{ot\ts Co7tfutatw?
- Page 261 and 262: •C H A P. IV. of the Pagan Deitie
- Page 263 and 264: utChap. IV. deified^ but feveraiNam
- Page 265 and 266: 'Chap. IV. derived from one Supreme
- Page 267 and 268: Chap. IV. and om God in different S
- Page 269 and 270: Chap. IV. thing with the Cofmogonta
- Page 271 and 272: Chap. IV. a Theogonla. 237are godle
- Page 273 and 274: Chap. IV* The Pagan Theogonia how t
- Page 275 and 276: Chap. IV. the Newmfs or Beginning o
- Page 277 and 278: andChap. IV. a divine Theogonifi. 2
- Page 279 and 280: Chap. IV. of one unmade Deity, 245B
- Page 281 and 282: C HAP. IV. and Theifis. 247Befides
- Page 283 and 284: Chap. IV. Chaos and Nightfenior to
- Page 285 and 286: Chap. IV. neither Theogonifis^ nor
- Page 287 and 288: whichCh AP. rV. of the VForld a7id
- Page 289: ^HAP. IV. derivedfrom one fe^f-exij
- Page 293 and 294: fometimesCThap. IV. for tke fupreme
- Page 295 and 296: in ihls of Euripedes ^: AAX Ej-i",
- Page 297 and 298: Chap. IV. To @eiw & To Acuf^vuv the
- Page 299 and 300: Chap. IV. Champions for Paganifm aJ
- Page 301 and 302: willin(cuithoughChap. IV. Rival wit
- Page 303 and 304: Ch a p. IVi ^Jfertor of Monarchy. 2
- Page 305 and 306: heChap. IV. both Polythelfis and Mo
- Page 307 and 308: forafmuchChap. IV. acknowledged a f
- Page 309 and 310: Chap. IV. derived all his Gods' fro
- Page 311 and 312: Chap. IV. of Independent Deities, 3
- Page 313 and 314: C H A p. IV. the Pagan Polytheijis.
- Page 315 and 316: Chap. IV. tie Pagans Polytheifis. 2
- Page 317 and 318: andChap. IV. Sibylline Oracles, 283
- Page 319 and 320: Chap. IV. Zoroafter a PolytheifiV'
- Page 321 and 322: andChap. IV. of one fupreme Deity,
- Page 323 and 324: ''Chap. IV. l73e Magick and Chaldat
- Page 325 and 326: Chap. IV. Oromafdes, Mithras, ^WAri
- Page 327 and 328: Chap. IV. or Chaldakk Oracles. 293n
- Page 329 and 330: Chat. IV. not a mere Roma?ice, 295a
- Page 331 and 332: C H A P. IV. of the Poems called Or
- Page 333 and 334: Chap. IV. neverthehfs a Monarchijl.
- Page 335 and 336: Chap. IV. Profejfed MonanhiJ}, 301N
- Page 337 and 338: Chap. IV. afferted Monarchy. ^6'Omn
- Page 339 and 340: C H A p. IV. of the Orpbick Cabala.
Chap. IV. <strong>the</strong> Supremefrom <strong>the</strong> inferior Gods, 2^y^uv, oj-x^ xjAx^TrKTiTxi. And though <strong>the</strong> Scythians c<strong>all</strong> <strong>the</strong>fnfreme God Pappasus,yet -we acknowledging a fupreme God, will never be perfuaded to c<strong>all</strong> him by that I" l-h 262name, which it pleafed that damon {who ruled over <strong>the</strong> Scythian defert, people<strong>and</strong> language) to imp<strong>of</strong>e. Never<strong>the</strong>kfs, he that Jh<strong>all</strong> ufe <strong>the</strong> appellative namefor God, ei<strong>the</strong>r in <strong>the</strong> Scythian, Egyptian, or any o<strong>the</strong>r language which hehath been brought up in, will not <strong>of</strong>fend. Where Origen plainly affirms <strong>the</strong>Scythians to have acknowledged one fupreme God, c<strong>all</strong>ed by <strong>the</strong>m Papp^.us, <strong>and</strong> intimates that <strong>the</strong> Egyptians did <strong>the</strong> like, c<strong>all</strong>ing him Ammoun.Nei<strong>the</strong>r could it p<strong>of</strong>Tibly be h<strong>is</strong> intent to deny <strong>the</strong> fame <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Greeks <strong>and</strong><strong>the</strong>ir Zeus, however h<strong>is</strong> great jealoufy made him to c<strong>all</strong> him here a dsemon;it being true in a certain fenfe, which fhill be declared afterward,that <strong>the</strong> Pagans did <strong>of</strong>tentimes re<strong>all</strong>y worfhip an evil dsemon, under th<strong>of</strong>every names <strong>of</strong> Zeus <strong>and</strong> Jupiter., as <strong>the</strong>y did iikewife under th<strong>of</strong>e <strong>of</strong> Hamvwn<strong>and</strong> Papp<strong>is</strong>us.In <strong>the</strong> mean time we deny not, but that both <strong>the</strong> Greeks ufed that wordZeus, <strong>and</strong> <strong>the</strong> Latins 7a^//^r, fometimes (pi-a-iy.w,-, for <strong>the</strong> as<strong>the</strong>r, fire or air,fome accordingly etymologizing ZtuV from Zsm, o<strong>the</strong>rs AfoV from (J'fu'wwhence came th<strong>of</strong>e forms <strong>of</strong> fpecch, fub Jove, <strong>and</strong> fub Dio. And thusCicero, Jovem Ennius nuncupat itd dicens. DeNauD.223./. 2.Afpice hoc fublime c<strong>and</strong>ens, quern invocant omnes Jovem. [Cap.'xxv,p. 2992.Hunc etiam augures ncjlri cum dicunt, Jove fuJgente, Jove tonante ; dicunt To"" 'X.enim in ccelo fulgente, tonante, iSc. The reafon <strong>of</strong> which fpeeches feems to P"'J.have been th<strong>is</strong>, becaufe in ancient times fome had fupp<strong>of</strong>ed <strong>the</strong> animatedheaven, Ec<strong>the</strong>r <strong>and</strong> air, to be <strong>the</strong> fupreme deity. We grant moreover, that<strong>the</strong> fame words have been fometimes ufed la-ropixag alfo, for an hero or deifiedman, faid by fome to have been born in Crete, by o<strong>the</strong>rs in Arcadia.And C<strong>all</strong>imachus ', though he were very angry with <strong>the</strong> Cretians for affirmingJupiter's iepulchral monument to have been with <strong>the</strong>m in Crete^ as<strong>the</strong>reby making him mortalKf>iTEC c.Ei vf/fuoTai, Kxi yx^ Ta(pov, S avx, irfio,KcriTfj iTixrmxvTO' fl"u i o\j S'asvE?, tffcri yxa xm'Cretes/cmper mendaces, luum enim, rex, fepulcbrtimExtruxerunt : iu verb non es mortuns, femper enim es,Himfelf never<strong>the</strong>left (as A<strong>the</strong>nagoras"^ <strong>and</strong> Or/f^?/ ' obferve) attributed <strong>the</strong> beginning<strong>of</strong> death to him, when he affirmed him to have been born in Arcadia; x^-x}, yxo ^x'ixtv y\ eVi yr,;; ymTi^, becaufe a terrene nativity <strong>is</strong> <strong>the</strong> beginning<strong>of</strong> death. Wherefore th<strong>is</strong> may pafs tor a general obfervation here,that <strong>the</strong> Pagan <strong>the</strong>ology was <strong>all</strong> along confounded with a certain mixture<strong>of</strong> phyfiology <strong>and</strong> herology or hiftory blended toge<strong>the</strong>r. Ncver<strong>the</strong>lefs it <strong>is</strong>unqueftionablt-, that <strong>the</strong> more intelligent <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Greekiffi Pagans did fre-L 1 2 quently' Hymno in Jovem, verf. 8, g. p. 121.* In Legation, pro C'hrittian<strong>is</strong>, Cap. XXVI. » Contra Celfum, Lib. IIL p. 1 37.