12.07.2015 Views

wherein all the reason and philosophy of atheism is confuted, and

wherein all the reason and philosophy of atheism is confuted, and

wherein all the reason and philosophy of atheism is confuted, and

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS
  • No tags were found...

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Chap. IV. <strong>and</strong> om God in different Senfes. 233fenfe <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Pagan Theifts,may be thus defined, An underjt<strong>and</strong>ing Being fuferiorto men, not origin<strong>all</strong>y derived from fenjlefs matter, <strong>and</strong> looked upon asan objeil for men's religious worfhip. But th<strong>is</strong> general notion <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> wordGod <strong>is</strong> again reftrained <strong>and</strong> limited by differences, in <strong>the</strong> divifion <strong>of</strong> it.For fuch a God as th<strong>is</strong> may be ei<strong>the</strong>r ^.yiwr^©', ingenerate or unproduced,<strong>and</strong> confcquently felf-exiftent ; or elfe yijuy^oi, generated or produced, <strong>and</strong>dependent on fome higher Being as its caufe. In <strong>the</strong> former fenfe, <strong>the</strong> intelligentPagans, as we have declared, acknowledged only one God, whowas <strong>the</strong>refore c<strong>all</strong>ed by <strong>the</strong>m o Bio; kxt £c (^(v o .JeoV, aAX' el; fj-ivo fj-iyiro;, >cj y.x^- Ed, phsj, /.tjTrEolff^, xj xcocliuv TW TTOivlo;' ol S' oUxXm ttoAAoi Sixptpo'flt; kxtoc (Jti/a^iv, • • /* 4«Pxc, koxtsi >^ ftsJ/fSfi >^ dciTot, [jlii^uv' ir^ oe >^ t"nTTion^uv Tov cvi/.Trxvix xo(ry.ov toi a osAAoi oi ijcovls; fieri xxt ttpxvo'j cruu t£Tso TTXVTO; TriPixyririi, xxrx Xoyov uVoCeovIe? tu jtoutui y.a\ virjlui' It feemeth tOme, that <strong>the</strong>re <strong>is</strong> not only one God, but that <strong>the</strong>re <strong>is</strong> one <strong>the</strong> greateji <strong>and</strong> highefiGod, that governeth <strong>the</strong> zvhole world, <strong>and</strong> that <strong>the</strong>re are many o<strong>the</strong>r gods befideshim differing as to power, that one God reigning over <strong>the</strong>m <strong>all</strong>, who furmounts<strong>the</strong>m <strong>all</strong> in power, greatnefs, <strong>and</strong> virtue. That <strong>is</strong> that God, who contains<strong>and</strong> comprehends <strong>the</strong> whole world ; but <strong>the</strong> o<strong>the</strong>r gods are th<strong>of</strong>e, who toge<strong>the</strong>rwith <strong>the</strong> revolution <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> univerfe orderly follow that firfl <strong>and</strong> intelligibleGod. Where it <strong>is</strong> evident, that Onatus h<strong>is</strong> toAAsI ho\ or many gods, wereonly <strong>the</strong> heavenly bodies, or animated ftars. And partly from th<strong>of</strong>e wordscited, but chiefly o<strong>the</strong>rs, which follow after in <strong>the</strong> fame place, ("that will beproduced elfewhere) it plainly appears, that in Onatus h<strong>is</strong> time, <strong>the</strong>re werefome, who acknowledged one only God, denying <strong>all</strong> th<strong>of</strong>e o<strong>the</strong>r gods, <strong>the</strong>ncommonly worfhipped. And indeed Anaxagoras fcems to have been fucha one ; forafmuch as afferting one perfect mind ruling over <strong>all</strong>, (which <strong>is</strong><strong>the</strong> true Deity) he effedtu<strong>all</strong>y degraded <strong>all</strong> th<strong>of</strong>e o<strong>the</strong>r Pagan gods, <strong>the</strong> fun,moon, <strong>and</strong> ftars from <strong>the</strong>ir godfhips, by making <strong>the</strong> fun nothing but aglobe <strong>of</strong> fire, <strong>and</strong> <strong>the</strong> rhoon earth <strong>and</strong> ftones, <strong>and</strong> <strong>the</strong> like <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> o<strong>the</strong>r ftars<strong>and</strong> planets. And fome fuch <strong>the</strong>re were alfo amongft <strong>the</strong> ancient Egyptians,as fti<strong>all</strong> be declared in due place. Moreover, Proclus upon Plato's limaustells us, that <strong>the</strong>re hath been always lefs doubt <strong>and</strong> controverfy in <strong>the</strong> worldconcerning <strong>the</strong> one God, than concerning <strong>the</strong> many gods. WhereforeOnatus here declares h<strong>is</strong> own fenfe, as to th<strong>is</strong> particular, viz. that befides<strong>the</strong> one fupreme God, <strong>the</strong>re were alfo many o<strong>the</strong>r inferior deities, that <strong>is</strong>,underft<strong>and</strong>ing beings, that ought to be religioufly worlhipped.L. " "'^'• Lib. I, fegm. 35. p. 21. f.H h 2But

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!