wherein all the reason and philosophy of atheism is confuted, and
wherein all the reason and philosophy of atheism is confuted, and wherein all the reason and philosophy of atheism is confuted, and
178 All Atheifms Nonfenje and Inipojfibility. Book I.even with its own weapons, and plainly demonftrate, that all forms ofatheifm are unintelligible nonfenfe and abfolute impofTibility to human reafon: as we fhall likewife, over and above, occafionally infert fome (as wethink) undeniable arguments for a Deity.The Digreflion concerning the Plajiick Life of Natiireyor an Artificial, Orderly and Methodical Nature,N. 37. Chap. 3.* i.rr^HAT neither the hylozoick nor cofmo-plaftick Atheifts are con-*j_ demned for aflerting an orderly and artificial plaftick nature, as a' life diflinft from the animal, however this be a thing exploded, not only*by the atomick Atheifts, but alfo by fome profefTed Theifts, who nocwith-• {landing might have an undifcerned tang of the mechanically-atheiftick* humour hanging about them. 2. If there be no plaftick artificial nature* admitted, then it muft be concluded, that either all things come to pafs'by fortuitous mechanifm, and material necefTity (the motion of matter* unguided) or elfe that God doth a-vT^s^ytiv aVai/lj;,, do all things himfelf* immediately and miraculoufly, framing the body of every gnat and fly,* as rt were with his own hands-, fince divine laws and commands cannot' execute themfelves, nor be the proper efficient caufes of things in nature.* 3. To fuppofe all things to come to pafs tortuitoufly, or by the unguided* motion of matter, a thing altogether as irrational as it is athciftical and*'impious -, there being many phaenomena, not only above the powers of' mechanifm, but alfo contrary to the laws of it. The mechanick Theifts' make God but an idle fpedlator of the fortuitous motions of matter, and' render hiswifdom altogether ufelefs and infignificant. /^r//?o//t''s judicious* cenfure of the fortuitous Mechanifts, with the ridiculoufnefs of that pre-' tence, that material and mechanical reafons are the only philofophical.4. That it feems neither decorous in refpeft of God, nor congruous to'*rcafon, that he fiiould a'jT»p;)/£ru aTravIa, do all things himfelf immediately'and miraculoufly, nature being quite fuperfeded and made to fignify no-' thing. The fame further confuted by the (low and gradual procefs of' things in nature, .as alfo by thofe errors and bungles, that are committed,' when the matter proves inept and contumacious, arguing the agent not to* be irrefiilible. 5. Reaibnably inferred, that there is a plaftick nature in'the univerfe, as a fubordinate inftrument of divine providence, in the or-'derly difpofal of matter ; but yet fo as not without a higher providence'prefiding over it, forafmuch as this plaftick nature cannot acSt eledlively' or with difcretion. Thofe laws of nature concerning motion, which the' mechanick Theifts themfelves fuppofe, really nothing elfe but a plaftick.* nature. 6. The agreeablenefs of this dodlrine with the fentiments of the* beft philofophers in all ages, Arijtotle., Plato, Empedocles, HeraclituSy* Hippocrates., Zeno, and the Paracelfians. Anaxagoras, though a profefiedTheift,
C HAP .III. Digrejjhn concerning the PlafiickLife ofNature, 179Theifl:, feverely cenfur'J, both by Ariftotle and Plato., as an encouragerofatheifm, merely becaufe he ufed material and mechanical caufes morethan mental and final. Phyfiologers and ailronomers why vulgarly fufpededof atheifm in Plato's time. 7. The plaOick nature no occultquality, but the only intelligible caufe of that, which is the grandell: ofall phasnomena, the orderly regularity and harmony of things, whichthe mechanick Theiils, however pretending to folve all phenomena, cangive no account at all of. A God, or infinite mind, afll-rted by them,in vain and to no purpofe. 8. Two things here to be performed byus ; firft, to give an account cf the plaftick nature, and then to fliewhow the notion of it hath been mirtaken, and abuild by Atheifts. Thefirfl: general account of this plaftick nature, according to Arijlotk, that itis to be conceived as art itfclf ading, inwardly and immediately, upon thematter •, as if harmony living in the mufical inflruments fhould movethe firings of them without any external impulfe. 9. Two pre-eminencesof the plaftick nature above human art. Firft, that whereas human artafls upon the matter from without cumberfomely and moliminoufly, withtumult and hurly-burly, nature ading on it from within more commandinglydoth its work eafily, cleverly and filently. Human art ads onthe matter mechanically, but nature vitally and magically. 10. The fecondpre-eminence of nature above human art, that whereas humanartifls are often to feek and at a lofs, anxioufly confult and deliberate,and upon fecond thoughts mend their former work, nature is never tofeek, nor unrefolved what to do, nor doth fhe ever repent afterwards ofwhat file hath done, changing her former courfe. Human artiffs themfelvesconfult not, as artifts, but only for want of art ; and thereforenature, though never confulting, may aft artificially. Concluded, thatwhat is called nature is really the divine art. 11. Neverthelefs, that natureis not the divine art, pure and abflraft, but concreted and embodiedin matter, ratio merfa i^ confufa; not the divine art archetypal, but ectypal.Nature differs from the divine art, as the manuary opificer fromthe architefl. 12. Two imperfedions of the plallick nature, in refpeftwhereof it falls fhirt even of human art -, firff, that though it aft for endsartificially, yet icfjlf neither intends thole ends, nor underflands the reafonof what it doth, and therefore cannot aft eleftively. The differencebetwen the fpennatick rcafons and knov/lcdge. Nature doth but ape ormimick the dlvuie art or wifdom, being not mailer of that reafon, accordingto which it afts, but only a fervant to it, and drudging executionerof ir. 13. Proved that there may be fuch a thing as afts artificially,though itleU do not comprehend that art, by which its motions are governed•, firil from mufical habits ; the dancer refembles the artificial lifeof nature. 14. The fame further evinced froni the inflmfts of bruteanimals,direfting them to aft rationally and artificially, in order to theirown good and the good of the univerfe, without any reafon of their own.The inftinfts in brutes but paffive imprelTes of the divine wifdom, and akind of fate upon them. 15, The fecond imperfcftion of the plafticknature, that it afts without animal fancy,
- Page 162 and 163: 130 Tljeijls and Athe'ifis mi ftali
- Page 164 and 165: 132 77je Cofmo-Vh^ick /^theifm Book
- Page 166 and 167: 134 Athz'ijis^ thathlindGoddsfi Nat
- Page 168 and 169: 1^6 All Atheijls mere Corpor call f
- Page 170 and 171: 138 Th& Canting Ajlrohgical Atheijl
- Page 172 and 173: though14.0 What Atheifis denied^ an
- Page 174 and 175: 142 Atheiftn §luadrifartlte^ the B
- Page 176 and 177: 144- Two principal Torms of Atheifm
- Page 178 and 179: 146 A DigreJJion tonclrnlng thi Boo
- Page 180 and 181: 14S Final Caufes Book I.3. Now to a
- Page 182 and 183: 150 Nature a fuhordinate Book I,muc
- Page 184 and 185: 152 'A Plaftick Nature agreeable to
- Page 186 and 187: J7%e Plaflick Nature,, \ BookK.be b
- Page 188 and 189: ''156 That Nature liB'ook I..nor co
- Page 190 and 191: 'I -JNature the Manuary Opificer of
- Page 192 and 193: and''i6o The Energy of Nature Book
- Page 194 and 195: 1 62 Vital Eftergks Book I.Neverthe
- Page 196 and 197: 164 Nature aBs fatally and magicall
- Page 198 and 199: upon1 66 The Plajiick Nature incorp
- Page 200 and 201: ^^$ ^^i them is Plaftick Nature "Bo
- Page 202 and 203: [f68] Tloat kxAoXk held Book I.his
- Page 204 and 205: ofX7» The Plaflkk Nature of the Wo
- Page 206 and 207: thenupon^72 ^^ Errors of Atheljis^
- Page 208 and 209: 1 74. 7^^ Atheifilcli J^tomology Bo
- Page 210 and 211: 176 Two forts of Atheijls in Plato.
- Page 214 and 215: i*-8i3 T>igreffton concerning the B
- Page 217 and 218: Chap. IV. 183THE TRUEINTELLECTUAL S
- Page 219 and 220: Chap. IV. CONTENTS. 185that no fuch
- Page 221 and 222: Chap. IV. CONTENTS. 187tions of the
- Page 223 and 224: Chap. I. CONTENTS. 189vnthout fame
- Page 225 and 226: Chap. IV. CONTENTS. 191Cod and men.
- Page 227 and 228: -Ch AP. IV. Impudence of Atheijis.
- Page 229 and 230: Chap. IV. the Principle of other th
- Page 231 and 232: Chap. IV. God, and the Matter, *^^T
- Page 233 and 234: Chap. IV. imperfeSi Theifls, 199by
- Page 235 and 236: Chap. IV. in the Divine Idea. 201Be
- Page 237 and 238: Chap. IV. mah not up a God. 203>^ n
- Page 239 and 240: Chap. IV. Morality in the ISFafure
- Page 241 and 242: Chap. IV. Onelinefs containedJn the
- Page 243 and 244: Chap. IV. from the Pagan Pofytheifm
- Page 245 and 246: Chap. IV. becaufe they held aTheogo
- Page 247 and 248: Cha p. IV". fJ^e Ditheifl'ick DoBri
- Page 249 and 250: Chap. IV. of an evil Principle, 215
- Page 251 and 252: Chap. IV. or unmade SouL 2 7control
- Page 253 and 254: Chap. IV. of a Suhjlantial Evil Pri
- Page 255 and 256: Chap. IV. Platonick Origine of Evil
- Page 257 and 258: Chap. IV. Magi, conjidered. 223mani
- Page 259 and 260: andC^HAP. IV. hn{{ot\ts Co7tfutatw?
- Page 261 and 262: •C H A P. IV. of the Pagan Deitie
178 All A<strong>the</strong>ifms Nonfenje <strong>and</strong> Inipojfibility. Book I.even with its own weapons, <strong>and</strong> plainly demonftrate, that <strong>all</strong> forms <strong>of</strong>a<strong>the</strong>ifm are unintelligible nonfenfe <strong>and</strong> abfolute imp<strong>of</strong>Tibility to human reafon: as we fh<strong>all</strong> likewife, over <strong>and</strong> above, occafion<strong>all</strong>y infert fome (as wethink) undeniable arguments for a Deity.The Digreflion concerning <strong>the</strong> Plajiick Life <strong>of</strong> Natiireyor an Artificial, Orderly <strong>and</strong> Methodical Nature,N. 37. Chap. 3.* i.rr^HAT nei<strong>the</strong>r <strong>the</strong> hylozoick nor c<strong>of</strong>mo-plaftick A<strong>the</strong>ifts are con-*j_ demned for aflerting an orderly <strong>and</strong> artificial plaftick nature, as a' life diflinft from <strong>the</strong> animal, however th<strong>is</strong> be a thing exploded, not only*by <strong>the</strong> atomick A<strong>the</strong>ifts, but alfo by fome pr<strong>of</strong>efTed Theifts, who nocwith-• {l<strong>and</strong>ing might have an undifcerned tang <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> mechanic<strong>all</strong>y-a<strong>the</strong>iftick* humour hanging about <strong>the</strong>m. 2. If <strong>the</strong>re be no plaftick artificial nature* admitted, <strong>the</strong>n it muft be concluded, that ei<strong>the</strong>r <strong>all</strong> things come to pafs'by fortuitous mechanifm, <strong>and</strong> material necefTity (<strong>the</strong> motion <strong>of</strong> matter* unguided) or elfe that God doth a-vT^s^ytiv aVai/lj;,, do <strong>all</strong> things himfelf* immediately <strong>and</strong> miraculoufly, framing <strong>the</strong> body <strong>of</strong> every gnat <strong>and</strong> fly,* as rt were with h<strong>is</strong> own h<strong>and</strong>s-, fince divine laws <strong>and</strong> comm<strong>and</strong>s cannot' execute <strong>the</strong>mfelves, nor be <strong>the</strong> proper efficient caufes <strong>of</strong> things in nature.* 3. To fupp<strong>of</strong>e <strong>all</strong> things to come to pafs tortuitoufly, or by <strong>the</strong> unguided* motion <strong>of</strong> matter, a thing altoge<strong>the</strong>r as irrational as it <strong>is</strong> athciftical <strong>and</strong>*'impious -, <strong>the</strong>re being many phaenomena, not only above <strong>the</strong> powers <strong>of</strong>' mechanifm, but alfo contrary to <strong>the</strong> laws <strong>of</strong> it. The mechanick Theifts' make God but an idle fpedlator <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> fortuitous motions <strong>of</strong> matter, <strong>and</strong>' render h<strong>is</strong>wifdom altoge<strong>the</strong>r ufelefs <strong>and</strong> infignificant. /^r//?o//t''s judicious* cenfure <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> fortuitous Mechanifts, with <strong>the</strong> ridiculoufnefs <strong>of</strong> that pre-' tence, that material <strong>and</strong> mechanical reafons are <strong>the</strong> only phil<strong>of</strong>ophical.4. That it feems nei<strong>the</strong>r decorous in refpeft <strong>of</strong> God, nor congruous to'*rcafon, that he fiiould a'jT»p;)/£ru aTravIa, do <strong>all</strong> things himfelf immediately'<strong>and</strong> miraculoufly, nature being quite fuperfeded <strong>and</strong> made to fignify no-' thing. The fame fur<strong>the</strong>r <strong>confuted</strong> by <strong>the</strong> (low <strong>and</strong> gradual procefs <strong>of</strong>' things in nature, .as alfo by th<strong>of</strong>e errors <strong>and</strong> bungles, that are committed,' when <strong>the</strong> matter proves inept <strong>and</strong> contumacious, arguing <strong>the</strong> agent not to* be irrefiilible. 5. Reaibnably inferred, that <strong>the</strong>re <strong>is</strong> a plaftick nature in'<strong>the</strong> univerfe, as a fubordinate inftrument <strong>of</strong> divine providence, in <strong>the</strong> or-'derly difp<strong>of</strong>al <strong>of</strong> matter ; but yet fo as not without a higher providence'prefiding over it, forafmuch as th<strong>is</strong> plaftick nature cannot acSt eledlively' or with difcretion. Th<strong>of</strong>e laws <strong>of</strong> nature concerning motion, which <strong>the</strong>' mechanick Theifts <strong>the</strong>mfelves fupp<strong>of</strong>e, re<strong>all</strong>y nothing elfe but a plaftick.* nature. 6. The agreeablenefs <strong>of</strong> th<strong>is</strong> dodlrine with <strong>the</strong> fentiments <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong>* beft phil<strong>of</strong>ophers in <strong>all</strong> ages, Arijtotle., Plato, Empedocles, HeraclituSy* Hippocrates., Zeno, <strong>and</strong> <strong>the</strong> Paracelfians. Anaxagoras, though a pr<strong>of</strong>efiedTheift,