wherein all the reason and philosophy of atheism is confuted, and

wherein all the reason and philosophy of atheism is confuted, and wherein all the reason and philosophy of atheism is confuted, and

cch.kcl.ac.uk
from cch.kcl.ac.uk More from this publisher
12.07.2015 Views

orjf\\An Account of the Life and TVritings«'Dr. More in a Letter to Dr. JVorthington, Feb. 7. 166^.Some few friends at Cambridge were exceeding earnefl: with me to write a'' fliort Ethicks, allcdging no fmall reafon for it. I did not only lieartily rejtdt*'them more than once, but with great zeal, if not nidenefs, alleclging fe-" veral things, whicii v/cre too long to write, indeed in a manner vihfying" the projed, prcfrrring Experience of Life before all fuch hne Syftems ; al-*'ledging alfo, that Dr. Cudwc'th had a ticfign for the greateft curiofity of«' that fiibjed. But nothing would content thci but my fetting upon the*'work •, that it was uncertain, when Dr. Cndz^crib's would come out ; and" befides, mine being a fmall treatife, running through the whole body of*' Ethicks, they would not interfere one with another. For my part, till I*'had by chance told Dr. Cudivorth of my purpofe, (which I did fimply," thinking nothing) and how many chapters I had fini died, I knew nothing" either of the time, or the fcope of his writing -, if he intended a'' general Ethicks. But the effed of thofe Friends earneftnefs (to tell you•' plainly how the cafe ftood) was this : A day or two after their laft impor-" tunicy, I waking in the morning, and fome of their weightiefl allegations" recurring to my mind ; and alio remembring, with what an exceiTive ear-" neftnefs one of them follicited me to this work (in which I thought there" might be fomething more than ordinary, and that he was actuated in*' this bufinefs I knew not how,) I began ferioufly to think with my felf of*' the matter; and at laft was fo confcientioufly illaqueated therein, that I*'could not abfolutely free myfelf therefrom to this very day. Nor was this" only an act of mere confcience, but of prefent felf-denial. For it did very" vehemently crofs other great and innocent pleafures, that I promifed myfelf" in a certain order of my ftudies, which I had newly propofed to myfelf at*' that very time. But when I was once engaged, I proceeded not without" fome jileafure."Dr. More^ In a Letter to Dr. Worthington., May 10. 1665." I thank you for your freedom both to him and to me. It never came" into my mind to print this Enchiridian, till his book was out, unlefs he would*•have profelTed his like of the projeft. I have new tranlcribed it all. Mr.«'Jenks and Mr. Fnlkvood are exceeding earned to fee it, and would tranfcribe*' it for their prefent latisfafcion. But if they fhould do {o, and ic be known,*' it would, it may be, d;fgull Dr. Cuduorth, whom I am very loth any way*' to grieve. But if yourfelf have a mind to fee it, and could get a fair and*' true copy tranfcrib'd of it, I would willingly pay the Tranfcriber, and the*' Copy fhould be yours ; for I am loth, that what I have writ on lo edifying.*' afubjcft,fhouldbeloll."Irreligion began now to lift up its head ; but the progrefs of it was oppofedby no perfon with greater force and learning than by our Author. For thispurpofe in 1670, lie pnbliHi'd at London, in folio, his True Intelle^ual Syjlemcf the Ufiiverfe : The frji Part, xvherein all the Reafon and Philofophy ofJiheifm

of K AL? H C U D W O R T IJ, D. D.Alheifm is confuted, and its ImpoJlbiUty demonjlrated. The Imprimatur byDr. Samuel Parker, Ciuplain to Archbifhop Sheldon, is dated May 29, 1671,feven years before the publication of this Work ; which met with great oppofitionfrom fome of the Courtiers of King Charles II. who endeavoured to deftroythe reputation of it, when it was Hrft publifh'd *. Nor has it efcap'dthe cenfures of Writers of different parties fince that time.The firft Piece, which appear'd againft it, was from a Roman Catholic, inA Letter to Mr. R. Cudworth, D. D- printed at the end of a I'raft, intitled,Anti-Haman, or an Anfwer to Mr. G. Burnet's Myftery of Iniquity unvailed:wherein is /loewed the Conformity of the Doiirine, Worfhip, and Prafiice of tJxRoman-Catholic Church with thofe of the purejl times -, the Idolatry of thePagans is truly fated, and the Imputation of Pa^an Idolatry clearly confuted ;and the Reafons are given, why Catholics avoid the Communicn of the ProtejlantChurch. 'To 'Vi^hich is annexed a Letter to R. Cudworth D. D. by W. E. Stu-xmdent in Divinity. With leave of Superiours ; 1 679 in odlavo. This Writer zt-'ta.c^.s'Dv.Cudtvcrth's alTcrtion, that tho' very few of the antient Philofophersthought God to be corporeal, a.s Epicurus, Strata, &:c. yet that the greateftpart of them believed him to be a pure Spirt, and adored the only true Godunder the names of Jupiter, Alinerva, Oftris and Venus. In oppofition towhich his Antagonift maintains f, " that altho' all Pagans (nay all" men) had naturally a knowledge of the true God, yet thofe, they adored ;" were Men :" in fupport of which he urges four proofs taken, i.from thediverjity of their Sexes : 2 from their Generation . : 3 from their Death : 4..from their Rites. He likewife attempts to confute what Dr. Cudworth hasftrenuoufly defended throughout his Book, that the Unity of God was a primeArticle of the Pagan Creed.But let us now fee, in how fevere a manner he was treated even by a ProteftantDivine, Mr. John Turner,'m his Difcourfe of the Meffiah \\. He tells us X,we mufi conclude Dr. Cudv/orth to he himf elf a Tritheiftic, a fe£l, for which, Ibelieve, he may have a kindnefs, becaufe he loves hard words; or fomething elfewithout either il'ick or trick, which I will not name, becaufe his Book pretendsto be written againft it. And again ||!|,that " the moft, that Charity itfelf can" allow the Dodor, if it were to llep forth, and fpeak his mod favourable" charaiffer to the world, is, that he is an Arian, a Socinian, or a Deift."Mr. Dry^wz likewife tells us **, that our Author " has railed fuch ftrong" objedlions againft the being of a God and Providence, that many think he" has no't anfwered them." And the late Earl o{ Shaftejbury, in his Moralijh,a Rhapfody -j-f, has the following paflage :" You know the common fate" of thofe, who dare to appear fair Authors. What was that pious and" learned man'^s cafe, who wrote the IntelleSfual Syftcm of the Univerfe ? I" confefs, it was pleafant enough to confider, tha;. the* the whole world were" no lefs fatisfied widi his Capacity and Learning, than with his Sincerity inI" the* Vitie Joannis Glerici Vitam, nd r.7!?i.** Dedication offcV Tranfl.ition of ^V»;7V1 " 1 1 . p. 129 Edit, ^mfiilud. 1 7 1 1 . in octaVO. jEncid, * (./. // />. 5 ' 8. edit. London 1730. itstP. 335,8cc. oitit-.o.P-'"-t. H Seel. 5. Ciiarafterifticfcsru/.y//Seep.II 16, K.ig, i(5i. f

orjf\\An Account <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Life <strong>and</strong> TVritings«'Dr. More in a Letter to Dr. JVorthington, Feb. 7. 166^.Some few friends at Cambridge were exceeding earnefl: with me to write a'' fliort Ethicks, <strong>all</strong>cdging no fm<strong>all</strong> reafon for it. I did not only lieartily rejtdt*'<strong>the</strong>m more than once, but with great zeal, if not nidenefs, <strong>all</strong>eclging fe-" veral things, whicii v/cre too long to write, indeed in a manner vihfying" <strong>the</strong> projed, prcfrrring Experience <strong>of</strong> Life before <strong>all</strong> fuch hne Syftems ; al-*'ledging alfo, that Dr. Cudwc'th had a ticfign for <strong>the</strong> greateft curi<strong>of</strong>ity <strong>of</strong>«' that fiibjed. But nothing would content thci but my fetting upon <strong>the</strong>*'work •, that it was uncertain, when Dr. Cndz^crib's would come out ; <strong>and</strong>" befides, mine being a fm<strong>all</strong> treatife, running through <strong>the</strong> whole body <strong>of</strong>*' Ethicks, <strong>the</strong>y would not interfere one with ano<strong>the</strong>r. For my part, till I*'had by chance told Dr. Cudivorth <strong>of</strong> my purp<strong>of</strong>e, (which I did fimply," thinking nothing) <strong>and</strong> how many chapters I had fini died, I knew nothing" ei<strong>the</strong>r <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> time, or <strong>the</strong> fcope <strong>of</strong> h<strong>is</strong> writing -, if he intended a'' general Ethicks. But <strong>the</strong> effed <strong>of</strong> th<strong>of</strong>e Friends earneftnefs (to tell you•' plainly how <strong>the</strong> cafe ftood) was th<strong>is</strong> : A day or two after <strong>the</strong>ir laft impor-" tunicy, I waking in <strong>the</strong> morning, <strong>and</strong> fome <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong>ir weightiefl <strong>all</strong>egations" recurring to my mind ; <strong>and</strong> alio remembring, with what an exceiTive ear-" neftnefs one <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong>m follicited me to th<strong>is</strong> work (in which I thought <strong>the</strong>re" might be fomething more than ordinary, <strong>and</strong> that he was actuated in*' th<strong>is</strong> bufinefs I knew not how,) I began ferioufly to think with my felf <strong>of</strong>*' <strong>the</strong> matter; <strong>and</strong> at laft was fo confcientioufly illaqueated <strong>the</strong>rein, that I*'could not abfolutely free myfelf <strong>the</strong>refrom to th<strong>is</strong> very day. Nor was th<strong>is</strong>" only an act <strong>of</strong> mere confcience, but <strong>of</strong> prefent felf-denial. For it did very" vehemently cr<strong>of</strong>s o<strong>the</strong>r great <strong>and</strong> innocent pleafures, that I promifed myfelf" in a certain order <strong>of</strong> my ftudies, which I had newly prop<strong>of</strong>ed to myfelf at*' that very time. But when I was once engaged, I proceeded not without" fome jileafure."Dr. More^ In a Letter to Dr. Worthington., May 10. 1665." I thank you for your freedom both to him <strong>and</strong> to me. It never came" into my mind to print th<strong>is</strong> Enchiridian, till h<strong>is</strong> book was out, unlefs he would*•have pr<strong>of</strong>elTed h<strong>is</strong> like <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> projeft. I have new tranlcribed it <strong>all</strong>. Mr.«'Jenks <strong>and</strong> Mr. Fnlkvood are exceeding earned to fee it, <strong>and</strong> would tranfcribe*' it for <strong>the</strong>ir prefent lat<strong>is</strong>fafcion. But if <strong>the</strong>y fhould do {o, <strong>and</strong> ic be known,*' it would, it may be, d;fgull Dr. Cuduorth, whom I am very loth any way*' to grieve. But if yourfelf have a mind to fee it, <strong>and</strong> could get a fair <strong>and</strong>*' true copy tranfcrib'd <strong>of</strong> it, I would willingly pay <strong>the</strong> Tranfcriber, <strong>and</strong> <strong>the</strong>*' Copy fhould be yours ; for I am loth, that what I have writ on lo edifying.*' afubjcft,fhouldbeloll."Irreligion began now to lift up its head ; but <strong>the</strong> progrefs <strong>of</strong> it was opp<strong>of</strong>edby no perfon with greater force <strong>and</strong> learning than by our Author. For th<strong>is</strong>purp<strong>of</strong>e in 1670, lie pnbliHi'd at London, in folio, h<strong>is</strong> True Intelle^ual Syjlemcf <strong>the</strong> Ufiiverfe : The frji Part, xvherein <strong>all</strong> <strong>the</strong> Reafon <strong>and</strong> Phil<strong>of</strong>ophy <strong>of</strong>Jiheifm

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!