wherein all the reason and philosophy of atheism is confuted, and

wherein all the reason and philosophy of atheism is confuted, and wherein all the reason and philosophy of atheism is confuted, and

cch.kcl.ac.uk
from cch.kcl.ac.uk More from this publisher
12.07.2015 Views

Atheijrs Exceptions agatnji Book I.fignilications of his wrath and difpleafure : whereas it is plain, that thefe areHung at random, and that the fury of them often lights upon the innocent,whilil the notoriouQy guilty fcape untouched ; and therefore we underflandnot, how this can be anfwered by any Theiils.'Car, quibus iiirautuni fceliis averfahile amqiie efiyNon faciunt^ iSliflammas ut fulguris halent,Pe£iore perfxo ; documen morlalibus acre ?Et potiiis 7tuUce fibi turpis confciiis reii,Volvitur inflammis innoxhis^ inqiie peditur.Turbine ccelefti fubito correptus, i^ igni ?Now the force of this argument appears to be very powerful, becaufe ithath not only ftaggered and confounded Theifts in all ages, but alfo hath effectuallytransformed many of them into Atheifts. For Diagcras Melius *himfcif was once a fuperflitious religionift, in fo much that being a Dithyrambickpoet, he began one of his poems with thefe words, hxtx Sactfj-ovx vi, tu-•)(j.ri-:ziv^x TiXincit, all things are dotie by God and fortune. But being injuredafterwards by a perjured perfon, that fuffl-red no evil nor difafter thereupon,he therefore took up this contrary perfuafion, that there was no Deity. Andthere have been innumerable others, who have been fo far wrought upon bythis confideration, as if not abfolutely to difclaim and difcard a Deity, yetutterly to deny providence, and all care of human affairs by any invifiblepowers. Amongft whom the poet was one, who thus exprefled his fenfe :* Sed ciitn res hominum tantd caligine volviAfpicerem, latofque diu florere nocenteSyVexarique pios, rurfus labefaMa cadebatRelligio, cauficqueviamnon fponte fequebarAlterius, vacuo qua; currere femina viotiiAffirmat, magniimque novas per inane figuras.Fortuna, 7ion arte regi ;qu

(!!hap. II. a Providtntial Deity,j?l|Ignihus atheriis taras fuffire feraceis ?Omnibus hique locis ejfe o/imi tempore prajlb ;Nubibus lit tenebras facial^ ccliqueferenaConcutiat fon'Uu? &c.And fecondly, if it were fuppofed to be pofiible, yet iucli infinite negotiofitywould be abfolutely inconfillent with a happy ftate ; nor could fiich a Deityever have any quiet enjoyment of himfelf, being perpetually filled with tiirnultand hurliburly:' »' (rU|«(pwvKVi, nr^aj/y.aTji'jn yCj ^ j/a^ils?jj^ocxxpiorriTi, aAA* a^ivilx h, (poQco >c, zypoaSsyxTH run zrXnirm rx-jTO, yivsrxi' DiJiy'O.Sllonof bufinefs and foUicitous cares, difpkafures andfavours , do not at all agreewith happinefs, but they proceed from imbecility, indigency and fear : * To fx,a.v.oieiov>cj afpSapTov bte wjto m^a'y^.xlx £p^£i, vrt uXXu wapi^si, J.'5~s i'rs opyxi'; ire "XJ"--(iiri (ruv£p^£Ta;, h d&tviicc yx,? z!oi,v to toistou" That which is happy and incorrjiptible,would neither have it felf any bufinefs to do, nor create any to others ;it would neither have difpleafure nor favour towards any other perfons, to engageit in a£lion ; all this proceeding from indigency. That is, favour and benevolence,as well as anger and difpleafure, arife only from imbecility. Thatwhich is perfectly happy, and wanteth nothing, Sxo-j ov -nrfjl tw cwo'xrpi rnglii'xg eviaiixuvixc, being wholly pojjeffed and taken up in the enjoyment of its ownhappinefs, would be regardiefs of the concernments of any others ; and mindnothing befidcs it felf, either to do it good or harm. Wherefore, thijcuriofus y plenus negotii deus ', this bufy, refilefs, and pragmatical deity,that muft needs intermeddle and have to do with every thing in the wholeworld, is a contradidlious notion, fince it cannot but be the moil unhappyof all things.XIX. In the next place, the Atheifts difpute further by propounding feveralbold quasries, which they conceive unanfwerable, after this manner.If the world were made by a Deity, why was it not made by him fooner? orfince it was fo long unmade, why did he make it at all ? '* Cur mundi a:difcatorrepente extitcrit, innumerabilia ante fcccula dormierit ? How came thisbuilder and architeEl of the world to Jiart up upon a fudden, after he hadJlept for infinite ages, and bethink himfelf of making a world ?For, certainly,if he had been awake all that while, he would either hjive made it fooner,or not at all ; becaufe there was either fomething wanting to his happinefs,before, or nothing : if there had been any thing wanting before, then theworld could not have been fo long unmade ; but if he were completely happyin himfelf without it, then y-nSiv fAAsiVwu xsvaTf 'ifxtyM^ i-myji^s'iv Tr^d^sa-i,wanting nothing, he vainly went about to make fuperfluous things. All defire ofchange and novelty argues a faftidious fatiety, proceeding from defed andindigency i' Quidve novi potuit tantlphfl, ante quietosMInlicere, ut cuperent vit-am mutare priorem ?Nam» Epicut". in Epift. ad Herodonim apud * Vclleius apud Cicer. de Natur. Deor.Diog. LaeiT. Lib X. Segm. --. p. 65 4. Lib. I. cap. XX. p. 2911.a Vide Diog. Laert. Lib. X. Segm. 139. 4 Id. ibid. Lib. 1. cap. IX. p. 2S91.^61. ^ Lucret. Lib. V. ver. 169, &c.

A<strong>the</strong>ijrs Exceptions agatnji Book I.fignilications <strong>of</strong> h<strong>is</strong> wrath <strong>and</strong> difpleafure : whereas it <strong>is</strong> plain, that <strong>the</strong>fe areHung at r<strong>and</strong>om, <strong>and</strong> that <strong>the</strong> fury <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong>m <strong>of</strong>ten lights upon <strong>the</strong> innocent,whilil <strong>the</strong> notoriouQy guilty fcape untouched ; <strong>and</strong> <strong>the</strong>refore we underfl<strong>and</strong>not, how th<strong>is</strong> can be anfwered by any Theiils.'Car, quibus iiirautuni fceli<strong>is</strong> averfahile amqiie efiyNon faciunt^ iSliflammas ut fulgur<strong>is</strong> halent,Pe£iore perfxo ; documen morlalibus acre ?Et potii<strong>is</strong> 7tuUce fibi turp<strong>is</strong> confcii<strong>is</strong> reii,Volvitur inflamm<strong>is</strong> innoxh<strong>is</strong>^ inqiie peditur.Turbine ccelefti fubito correptus, i^ igni ?Now <strong>the</strong> force <strong>of</strong> th<strong>is</strong> argument appears to be very powerful, becaufe ithath not only ftaggered <strong>and</strong> confounded Theifts in <strong>all</strong> ages, but alfo hath effectu<strong>all</strong>ytransformed many <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong>m into A<strong>the</strong>ifts. For Diagcras Melius *himfcif was once a fuperflitious religionift, in fo much that being a Dithyrambickpoet, he began one <strong>of</strong> h<strong>is</strong> poems with <strong>the</strong>fe words, hxtx Sactfj-ovx vi, tu-•)(j.ri-:ziv^x TiXincit, <strong>all</strong> things are dotie by God <strong>and</strong> fortune. But being injuredafterwards by a perjured perfon, that fuffl-red no evil nor difafter <strong>the</strong>reupon,he <strong>the</strong>refore took up th<strong>is</strong> contrary perfuafion, that <strong>the</strong>re was no Deity. And<strong>the</strong>re have been innumerable o<strong>the</strong>rs, who have been fo far wrought upon byth<strong>is</strong> confideration, as if not abfolutely to difclaim <strong>and</strong> difcard a Deity, yetutterly to deny providence, <strong>and</strong> <strong>all</strong> care <strong>of</strong> human affairs by any invifiblepowers. Amongft whom <strong>the</strong> poet was one, who thus exprefled h<strong>is</strong> fenfe :* Sed ciitn res hominum tantd caligine volviAfpicerem, lat<strong>of</strong>que diu florere nocenteSyVexarique pios, rurfus labefaMa cadebatRelligio, cauficqueviamnon fponte fequebarAlterius, vacuo qua; currere femina viotiiAffirmat, magniimque novas per inane figuras.Fortuna, 7ion arte regi ;qu

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!