wherein all the reason and philosophy of atheism is confuted, and

wherein all the reason and philosophy of atheism is confuted, and wherein all the reason and philosophy of atheism is confuted, and

cch.kcl.ac.uk
from cch.kcl.ac.uk More from this publisher
12.07.2015 Views

57THE TRUEINTELLECTUAL SYSTEMO FT H EUNIVERSE.BOOK I.CHAP.II.in this Chapter are contained all the grounds of reafon for the atheifiick hypothefts.I. ^hat the Democritick philofophy, which is made up of thefe twoprinciples^ corporealifm and atomifm complicated together., is effentiallyatheiflical. 2. Though Epicurus, who was an Atomical-Corporealift, pretendedto affert a democracy of Gods, yet he was, for all that, an cibfolutejitheijl : and that Atheifis commonly equivocate and difguife themfelves.3. That the Democritical philofophy is nothing elfe but afyjlem of atheology,or athetfm fwaggering under the glorious appearance of philofopJjy. Andthough there be another form of atheifm, which we call Stratonical, yetthe Democritick atheifm is only conftderable ; all whofe dark 7nyjieries will behere revealed. 4. That we being to treat concerning the Deity, and to produceall that profane and unhallowed fluff of Atheifis in order to a confutation,the divine afjijtance and dire£lion ought to be implored. 5. That there aretwo things here to be performed : firjl, to Jloew what are the Atheifis pretendedgrounds of reafon againji the Deity ; andfecondly, how they endeavoureither to folve or confute the contrary ph^enomena. The firfi of thofe grounds,that no man can have an idea or conception of God., and that he is an incomprehenftblenothing. 6. The fecond atheifiick argument, that there canbe no creation out of nothing, nor no omnipotence, becaufe nothing cancome from nothing ; and therefore whatfoever fubfiantially is, was from eternityfelf-exijient, and uncreated by any Deity. 7. The third pretetidedIreafoit

57THE TRUEINTELLECTUAL SYSTEMO FT H EUNIVERSE.BOOK I.CHAP.II.in th<strong>is</strong> Chapter are contained <strong>all</strong> <strong>the</strong> grounds <strong>of</strong> reafon for <strong>the</strong> a<strong>the</strong>ifiick hypo<strong>the</strong>fts.I. ^hat <strong>the</strong> Democritick phil<strong>of</strong>ophy, which <strong>is</strong> made up <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong>fe twoprinciples^ corporealifm <strong>and</strong> atomifm complicated toge<strong>the</strong>r., <strong>is</strong> effenti<strong>all</strong>ya<strong>the</strong>iflical. 2. Though Epicurus, who was an Atomical-Corporealift, pretendedto affert a democracy <strong>of</strong> Gods, yet he was, for <strong>all</strong> that, an cibfoluteji<strong>the</strong>ijl : <strong>and</strong> that A<strong>the</strong>if<strong>is</strong> commonly equivocate <strong>and</strong> difguife <strong>the</strong>mfelves.3. That <strong>the</strong> Democritical phil<strong>of</strong>ophy <strong>is</strong> nothing elfe but afyjlem <strong>of</strong> a<strong>the</strong>ology,or a<strong>the</strong>tfm fwaggering under <strong>the</strong> glorious appearance <strong>of</strong> phil<strong>of</strong>opJjy. Andthough <strong>the</strong>re be ano<strong>the</strong>r form <strong>of</strong> a<strong>the</strong>ifm, which we c<strong>all</strong> Stratonical, yet<strong>the</strong> Democritick a<strong>the</strong>ifm <strong>is</strong> only conftderable ; <strong>all</strong> wh<strong>of</strong>e dark 7nyjieries will behere revealed. 4. That we being to treat concerning <strong>the</strong> Deity, <strong>and</strong> to produce<strong>all</strong> that pr<strong>of</strong>ane <strong>and</strong> unh<strong>all</strong>owed fluff <strong>of</strong> A<strong>the</strong>if<strong>is</strong> in order to a confutation,<strong>the</strong> divine afjijtance <strong>and</strong> dire£lion ought to be implored. 5. That <strong>the</strong>re aretwo things here to be performed : firjl, to Jloew what are <strong>the</strong> A<strong>the</strong>if<strong>is</strong> pretendedgrounds <strong>of</strong> reafon againji <strong>the</strong> Deity ; <strong>and</strong>fecondly, how <strong>the</strong>y endeavourei<strong>the</strong>r to folve or confute <strong>the</strong> contrary ph^enomena. The firfi <strong>of</strong> th<strong>of</strong>e grounds,that no man can have an idea or conception <strong>of</strong> God., <strong>and</strong> that he <strong>is</strong> an incomprehenftblenothing. 6. The fecond a<strong>the</strong>ifiick argument, that <strong>the</strong>re canbe no creation out <strong>of</strong> nothing, nor no omnipotence, becaufe nothing cancome from nothing ; <strong>and</strong> <strong>the</strong>refore whatfoever fubfianti<strong>all</strong>y <strong>is</strong>, was from eternityfelf-exijient, <strong>and</strong> uncreated by any Deity. 7. The third pretetidedIreafoit

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!