wherein all the reason and philosophy of atheism is confuted, and
wherein all the reason and philosophy of atheism is confuted, and wherein all the reason and philosophy of atheism is confuted, and
57THE TRUEINTELLECTUAL SYSTEMO FT H EUNIVERSE.BOOK I.CHAP.II.in this Chapter are contained all the grounds of reafon for the atheifiick hypothefts.I. ^hat the Democritick philofophy, which is made up of thefe twoprinciples^ corporealifm and atomifm complicated together., is effentiallyatheiflical. 2. Though Epicurus, who was an Atomical-Corporealift, pretendedto affert a democracy of Gods, yet he was, for all that, an cibfolutejitheijl : and that Atheifis commonly equivocate and difguife themfelves.3. That the Democritical philofophy is nothing elfe but afyjlem of atheology,or athetfm fwaggering under the glorious appearance of philofopJjy. Andthough there be another form of atheifm, which we call Stratonical, yetthe Democritick atheifm is only conftderable ; all whofe dark 7nyjieries will behere revealed. 4. That we being to treat concerning the Deity, and to produceall that profane and unhallowed fluff of Atheifis in order to a confutation,the divine afjijtance and dire£lion ought to be implored. 5. That there aretwo things here to be performed : firjl, to Jloew what are the Atheifis pretendedgrounds of reafon againji the Deity ; andfecondly, how they endeavoureither to folve or confute the contrary ph^enomena. The firfi of thofe grounds,that no man can have an idea or conception of God., and that he is an incomprehenftblenothing. 6. The fecond atheifiick argument, that there canbe no creation out of nothing, nor no omnipotence, becaufe nothing cancome from nothing ; and therefore whatfoever fubfiantially is, was from eternityfelf-exijient, and uncreated by any Deity. 7. The third pretetidedIreafoit
- Page 50 and 51: AndThe Moderation of this Difcourfe
- Page 52 and 53: He Atheifiical Hypothefts founded B
- Page 54 and 55: lo Tie Records m Arlft^tle and Plat
- Page 56 and 57: 1 2 l^oe Antiquity of Atomology. Bo
- Page 58 and 59: I Proved clearly that Em^edoc\es Bo
- Page 60 and 61: i6 An2iX2Lgov2iS a Spurious Ato?mJt
- Page 62 and 63: 8 Democ. and Leiicip. thefirft Athe
- Page 64 and 65: Epicurus20 Proved clearly that Inco
- Page 66 and 67: 2 2 Pythagoras and Parmenides Incor
- Page 68 and 69: 24 Empedocles vindicated from heing
- Page 70 and 71: 2 6 Anaxagoras an Incorporealiji. B
- Page 72 and 73: 2 8 The near Cognation hetwixt Book
- Page 74 and 75: thus iNamji dc nihilo fierent, ex o
- Page 76 and 77: ^2 Tb2 Orlg'rn of ihz -'Book I.vtrs
- Page 78 and 79: '^ 4.77je Origin of the Book I.abfo
- Page 80 and 81: 2 Jncorporealifm fprung f?'om thcfa
- Page 82 and 83: ^8 Immortality of Souls ajferted Bo
- Page 84 and 85: j^(j "Evsv^Q^oclt^ from 'the fame P
- Page 86 and 87: ^2 Vyth.^gor2i^ his Tranfmigration
- Page 88 and 89: 44 A Cenfure ofihe_ Book I.pre-exlf
- Page 90 and 91: 46 7/5^ Senftive Soul not Corporeal
- Page 92 and 93: ^S The Advantages of the Book I.XXX
- Page 94 and 95: ut^o The e'Jire P/jilofophy of the'
- Page 96 and 97: c 2 The Atcmicl. Phyfiology fuperfc
- Page 98 and 99: 'dpvSvC4. A Commendation of Ariftot
- Page 102 and 103: TheirakS The Democntical Phtlofophy
- Page 104 and 105: 5o That Epicurus was Book!.principl
- Page 106 and 107: •fion,. fothe.^2 The Myfleries of
- Page 108 and 109: ut64 The Athcijls Argument agalnfl
- Page 110 and 111: ipace or nothing j* — Vrceter^^ *
- Page 112 and 113: which^8 Athcijls difpute again fl b
- Page 114 and 115: ^o Ath2iJ}s contend that the Firji
- Page 116 and 117: 7 2 l^at Se7jfelefs Atoms hegotSoul
- Page 118 and 119: andj"^ ufltheijls impug7i the World
- Page 120 and 121: 7 Atheifts impugn a Firji Caufe of
- Page 122 and 123: 7 8 Ath2ijls contend that the World
- Page 124 and 125: Atheijrs Exceptions agatnji Book I.
- Page 126 and 127: utS2 Several hold paries of Athetfi
- Page 128 and 129: g^'Atheifis pretend that The'ifm is
- Page 130 and 131: 7'he Atheljls Conclufon that. Book
- Page 133 and 134: lOITHE TRUEINTELLECTUAL SYSTEMO FT
- Page 135 and 136: Chap. III.CONTENTS.pathian atheifm^
- Page 137 and 138: Chap. III. further explained' 105at
- Page 139 and 140: EgoChap. III. accounted an Athelft.
- Page 141 and 142: Chap. III. Acheijlkal Hylozoift. 10
- Page 143 and 144: Chap. III. of the Fortuitous Atheif
- Page 145 and 146: Chap. II. PhilofopherSi Atleljls. 1
- Page 147 and 148: theyChap. III. Pythagorlch^ andthe
- Page 149 and 150: Ch A p. III. interpreted^ Nothing o
57THE TRUEINTELLECTUAL SYSTEMO FT H EUNIVERSE.BOOK I.CHAP.II.in th<strong>is</strong> Chapter are contained <strong>all</strong> <strong>the</strong> grounds <strong>of</strong> reafon for <strong>the</strong> a<strong>the</strong>ifiick hypo<strong>the</strong>fts.I. ^hat <strong>the</strong> Democritick phil<strong>of</strong>ophy, which <strong>is</strong> made up <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong>fe twoprinciples^ corporealifm <strong>and</strong> atomifm complicated toge<strong>the</strong>r., <strong>is</strong> effenti<strong>all</strong>ya<strong>the</strong>iflical. 2. Though Epicurus, who was an Atomical-Corporealift, pretendedto affert a democracy <strong>of</strong> Gods, yet he was, for <strong>all</strong> that, an cibfoluteji<strong>the</strong>ijl : <strong>and</strong> that A<strong>the</strong>if<strong>is</strong> commonly equivocate <strong>and</strong> difguife <strong>the</strong>mfelves.3. That <strong>the</strong> Democritical phil<strong>of</strong>ophy <strong>is</strong> nothing elfe but afyjlem <strong>of</strong> a<strong>the</strong>ology,or a<strong>the</strong>tfm fwaggering under <strong>the</strong> glorious appearance <strong>of</strong> phil<strong>of</strong>opJjy. Andthough <strong>the</strong>re be ano<strong>the</strong>r form <strong>of</strong> a<strong>the</strong>ifm, which we c<strong>all</strong> Stratonical, yet<strong>the</strong> Democritick a<strong>the</strong>ifm <strong>is</strong> only conftderable ; <strong>all</strong> wh<strong>of</strong>e dark 7nyjieries will behere revealed. 4. That we being to treat concerning <strong>the</strong> Deity, <strong>and</strong> to produce<strong>all</strong> that pr<strong>of</strong>ane <strong>and</strong> unh<strong>all</strong>owed fluff <strong>of</strong> A<strong>the</strong>if<strong>is</strong> in order to a confutation,<strong>the</strong> divine afjijtance <strong>and</strong> dire£lion ought to be implored. 5. That <strong>the</strong>re aretwo things here to be performed : firjl, to Jloew what are <strong>the</strong> A<strong>the</strong>if<strong>is</strong> pretendedgrounds <strong>of</strong> reafon againji <strong>the</strong> Deity ; <strong>and</strong>fecondly, how <strong>the</strong>y endeavourei<strong>the</strong>r to folve or confute <strong>the</strong> contrary ph^enomena. The firfi <strong>of</strong> th<strong>of</strong>e grounds,that no man can have an idea or conception <strong>of</strong> God., <strong>and</strong> that he <strong>is</strong> an incomprehenftblenothing. 6. The fecond a<strong>the</strong>ifiick argument, that <strong>the</strong>re canbe no creation out <strong>of</strong> nothing, nor no omnipotence, becaufe nothing cancome from nothing ; <strong>and</strong> <strong>the</strong>refore whatfoever fubfianti<strong>all</strong>y <strong>is</strong>, was from eternityfelf-exijient, <strong>and</strong> uncreated by any Deity. 7. The third pretetidedIreafoit