ANAGRAM EFFECTS IN VISUAL WORD RECOGNITION

P. Courrieu & M. Lequeux / Anagram Effects 38 / 40Winer, B.J. (1971). Statistical Principles in Experimental Design (2nd ed.). NewYork: McGraw-Hill.Ziegler, J.C., Ferrand, L., Jacobs, A.M., Rey, A., Grainger, J. (2000). Visual andphonological codes in letter and word recognition: Evidence fromincremental priming. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology,53 A, 671-692.hal-00429184, version 1 - 1 Nov 2009APPENDIXThe test stimuli used in the four experiments are listed below. Thefrequencies of use can be found in Trésor de la Langue Française (1971), whilethe anagram sets can be found in Larousse du Scrabble (1978).Experiment 1Frequent anagrams: poser, sacré, lampe, santé, perdu, cause, voile.Infrequent anagrams: opter, rouet, rebut, piler, urine, store, piton.Frequent non anagrams: juger, digne, choix, nuage, moral, forme, jouir.Infrequent non anagrams: miner, canif, cible, cuver, magot, bocal, purge.Experiment 2.The pairs (prime-test word) are presented in anagram pairing.Set 1, frequent test:acier-craie, sceau-cause, sueur-usure, aimer-maire,crédo-décor, trois-sorti, repos-prose, merci-crime.Set 1, infrequent test: