ANAGRAM EFFECTS IN VISUAL WORD RECOGNITION

P. Courrieu & M. Lequeux / Anagram Effects 37 / 40Segui, J., Grainger, J. (1990). Priming word recognition with orthographicneighbors: effects of relative prime-target frequency. Journal ofExperimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 16(1), 65-76.Seidenberg, M.S., McClelland, J.L. (1989). A distributed, developmental modelof word recognition and naming. Psychological Review, 96(4), 523-568.Schoonbaert, S., & Grainger, J. (2004). Letter position coding in printed wordperception: effects of repeated and transposed letters. Language andhal-00429184, version 1 - 1 Nov 2009Cognitive Processes, 19(3), 333-367.Shillcock, R.C., Ellison, T.M., & Monaghan, P. (2000). Eye-fixation behavior,lexical storage, and visual word recognition in a split processing model.Psychological Review, 107, 824–851.Srihari, S.N., Bozinovic, R.M. (1987). A multi-level perception approach toreading cursive script. Artificial Intelligence, 33, 217-255.Trésor de la Langue Française (1971). Frequency count of the French language(edited by P. Imbs). Nancy: CNRS-TLF.Wagner, R.A., Fischer, M.J. (1974). The string to string correction problem.JACM, 21(1), 168-173.Whitney, C. (2001). How the brain encodes the order of letters in a printedword: The SERIOL model and selective literature review. PsychonomicBulletin and Review, 8, 221–243.Wickens, T.D., Kepple, G. (1983). On the choice of design and of test statistic inthe analysis of experiments with sampled materials. Journal of VerbalLearning and Verbal Behavior, 22, 296-309.