ANAGRAM EFFECTS IN VISUAL WORD RECOGNITION
ANAGRAM EFFECTS IN VISUAL WORD RECOGNITION
ANAGRAM EFFECTS IN VISUAL WORD RECOGNITION
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
P. Courrieu & M. Lequeux / Anagram Effects 36 / 40Mathey, S. (2001). L'influence du voisinage orthographique lors de lareconnaissance des mots écrits. Canadian Journal of ExperimentalPsychology, 55(1), 1-23.McClelland, J.L. (1976). Preliminary letter recognition in the perception of wordsand non-words. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perceptionand Performance, 2, 80-91.McClelland, J.L. (1986). The programmable blackboard model of reading. InJ.L. McClelland, D.E. Rumelhart, & the PDP Research Group (Eds.),hal-00429184, version 1 - 1 Nov 2009Parallel Distributed Processing: Explorations in the microstructure ofcognition. Vol. 2. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.McClelland, J.L., Rumelhart, D.E. (1981). An interactive activation model ofcontext effects in letter perception: Part 1, an account of basic findings.Psychological Review, 88(5), 375-407.Paap, K.R., Newsome, S.L., McDonald, J.E., Schvaneveldt, R.W. (1982). Anactivation-verification model for letter and word recognition: the Word-Superiority-Effect. Psychological Review, 89(5), 573-594.Perea, M., & Lupker, S.J. (2004). Can CANISO activate CAS<strong>IN</strong>O? Transposedlettersimilarity effects with nonadjacent letter positions. Journal ofMemory and Language, 51, 231-346.Peressotti, F., Grainger, J. (1999). The role of letter identity and letter position inorthographic priming. Perception and Psychophysics, 61(4), 691-706.Pring, L. (1981). Phonological codes and functional spelling units: reality andimplications. Perception and Psychophysics, 30(6), 573-578.Ratcliff, R. (1981). A theory of order relations in perceptual matching.Psychological Review, 88, 552–572.