12.07.2015 Views

Minutes of a Regular Meeting, June 22-23, 2004 - Digital Collections

Minutes of a Regular Meeting, June 22-23, 2004 - Digital Collections

Minutes of a Regular Meeting, June 22-23, 2004 - Digital Collections

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

REGENTS’ POLICY MANUALSECTION 2—ACADEMICSe) Freedom <strong>of</strong> access to recorded knowledge being essential to learning and research ina democracy, the right and the obligation <strong>of</strong> the university to provide a full range <strong>of</strong>materials on any subject, even though some views might be currently unpopular orcontroversial, or appear incorrect, shall not be infringed. The principles <strong>of</strong> academicfreedom shall apply to the presence <strong>of</strong> materials and also to those who provide andthose who use them.The University endorses the 1957 declaration <strong>of</strong> the American Association <strong>of</strong> UniversityPr<strong>of</strong>essors which “…asserts the right <strong>of</strong> college and university students to listen toanyone whom they wish to hear…affirms its own belief that it is educationally desirablethat students be confronted with diverse opinions <strong>of</strong> all kinds, (and) therefore, holds thatany person who is presented by a recognized student or faculty organization should beallowed to speak on a college or university campus.” Duly constituted organizations atthe University may invite speakers without fear <strong>of</strong> sanctions. However, in the exercise <strong>of</strong>these rights, it is clearly recognized that: “Membership in the academic communityimposes on students, faculty members, administrators, and trustees an obligation torespect the dignity <strong>of</strong> others, to acknowledge their right to express differing opinions, andto foster and defend intellectual honesty, freedom <strong>of</strong> inquiry and instruction, and freeexpression on and <strong>of</strong>f the campus. The expression <strong>of</strong> dissent and the attempt to producechange, therefore, may not be carried out in ways which injure individuals or damageinstitutional facilities or disrupt the classes <strong>of</strong> one’s teachers or colleagues. Speakers oncampus must not only be protected from violence but must be given an opportunity to beheard. Those who seek to call attention to grievances must not do so in ways thatsignificantly impede the functions <strong>of</strong> the institution.” (1970 declaration <strong>of</strong> the AAUPCouncil).STATEMENT ON PROFESSIONAL ETHICS1. Faculty members, guided by a deep conviction <strong>of</strong> the worth and dignity <strong>of</strong> the advancement<strong>of</strong> knowledge, recognize the special responsibilities placed upon them. Their primaryresponsibility to their subject is to seek and to state the truth as they see it. To this endfaculty members devote their energies to developing and improving their scholarlycompetence. They accept the obligation to exercise critical self-discipline and judgment inusing, extending and transmitting knowledge. They practice intellectual honesty. Althoughfaculty members may follow subsidiary interests, these interests must never seriously hamperor compromise their freedom <strong>of</strong> inquiry.2. As teachers, faculty members encourage the free pursuit <strong>of</strong> learning in their students. Theyhold before them the best scholarly and ethical standards <strong>of</strong> their discipline. Facultymembers demonstrate respect for students as individuals and adhere to their proper roles asintellectual guides and counselors. Faculty members make every reasonable effort to fosterhonest academic conduct and to ensure that their evaluations <strong>of</strong> students reflect each student’strue merit. They respect the confidential nature <strong>of</strong> the relationship between faculty memberand student. They avoid any exploitation, harassment or discriminatory treatment <strong>of</strong> students.They acknowledge significant academic or scholarly assistance from them. They protecttheir academic freedom.3. As colleagues, faculty members have obligations that derive from common membership inthe community <strong>of</strong> scholars. They do not discriminate against or harass colleagues. TheyTHE UNIVERSITY OF OKLAHOMA 11

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!