[30] Serge Lang. Fundamentals <strong>of</strong> differential geometry. Spr<strong>in</strong>ger–Verlag, 1999.[31] M. Leventon, E. Grimson, <strong>and</strong> O. Faugeras. Statistical <strong>shape</strong> <strong>in</strong>fluence <strong>in</strong>geodesic active contours. In IEEE Conf. on Comp. Vision <strong>and</strong> Patt. Recog.,volume 1, pages 316–323, 2000.[32] YanYan Li <strong>and</strong> Louis Nirenberg. The distance function to the boundary,F<strong>in</strong>sler geometry <strong>and</strong> the s<strong>in</strong>gular set <strong>of</strong> viscosity solutions <strong>of</strong> some Hamilton-Jacobi equations. Comm. Pure Appl. Math., LVIII, 2005. (first received as apersonal communication <strong>in</strong> June 2003).[33] R. Malladi, J. Sethian, <strong>and</strong> B. Vemuri. Shape model<strong>in</strong>g with front propagation:a level set approach. IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis <strong>and</strong>Mach<strong>in</strong>e Intelligence, (17):158–175, 1995.[34] A. C. G. Mennucci. On asymmetric distances. 2nd version, prepr<strong>in</strong>t, 2004.URL http://cvgmt.sns.it/papers/<strong>and</strong>04/.[35] <strong>Andrea</strong> Mennucci, Anthony Yezzi, <strong>and</strong> Ganesh Sundaramoorthi. Properties<strong>of</strong> Sobolev Active Contours. Interf. Free Bound., 10:423–445, 2008.[36] Peter W. Michor <strong>and</strong> David Mumford. An overview <strong>of</strong> the Riemannian metricson spaces <strong>of</strong> <strong>curves</strong> us<strong>in</strong>g the Hamiltonian approach. Applied <strong>and</strong> ComputationalHarmonic Analysis, 2007. doi: 10.1016/j.acha.2006.07.004. URLhttp://www.mat.univie.ac.at/~michor/<strong>curves</strong>-hamiltonian.pdf.[37] Peter W. Michor <strong>and</strong> David Mumford. Riemannian geometris <strong>of</strong> space <strong>of</strong>plane <strong>curves</strong>. J. Eur. Math. Soc. (JEMS), 8:1–48, 2006.[38] Peter W. Michor <strong>and</strong> David Mumford. Vanish<strong>in</strong>g geodesic distance onspaces <strong>of</strong> submanifolds <strong>and</strong> diffeomorphisms. Documenta Math., 10:217–245,2005. URL http://www.univie.ac.at/EMIS/journals/DMJDMV/vol-10/05.pdf.[39] Peter W. Michor, David Mumford, Jayant Shah, <strong>and</strong> Laurent Younes. Ametric on <strong>shape</strong> space with explicit geodesics. Atti Accad. Naz. L<strong>in</strong>cei Cl.Sci. Fis. Mat. Natur. Rend. L<strong>in</strong>cei, 9, 2008.[40] Wash<strong>in</strong>gton Mio <strong>and</strong> Anuj Srivastava. Elastic-str<strong>in</strong>g models for representation<strong>and</strong> <strong>analysis</strong> <strong>of</strong> planar <strong>shape</strong>s. In CVPR (2), pages 10–15, 2004.[41] Wash<strong>in</strong>gton Mio <strong>and</strong> Anuj Srivastava. Elastic-str<strong>in</strong>g models for representation<strong>and</strong> <strong>analysis</strong> <strong>of</strong> planar <strong>shape</strong>s. In Conference on Computer Vision<strong>and</strong> Pattern Recognition (CVPR), June 2004. URL http://stat.fsu.edu/~anuj/pdf/papers/CVPR_Paper_04.pdf.[42] D. Mumford <strong>and</strong> J. Shah. Boundary detection by m<strong>in</strong>imiz<strong>in</strong>g functionals.In Proc. IEEE Conf. Computer Vision Pattern Recognition, 1985.112
[43] D. Mumford <strong>and</strong> J. Shah. Optimal approximations by piecewise smoothfunctions <strong>and</strong> associated variational problems. Comm. Pure Appl. Math.,42:577–685, 1989.[44] S. Osher <strong>and</strong> J. Sethian. Fronts propagat<strong>in</strong>g with curvature-dependent speed:algorithms based on the Hamilton-Jacobi equations. J. Comp. Physics, 79:12–49, 1988.[45] T. R. Raviv, N. Kiryati, <strong>and</strong> N. Sochen. Unlevel-set: Geometry <strong>and</strong> priorbasedsegmentation. In Proc. European Conf. on Computer Vision, 2004.[46] Remi Ronfard. Region based strategies for active contour models. InternationalJournal <strong>of</strong> Computer Vision, 13(2):229–251, October 1994. URLhttp://perception.<strong>in</strong>rialpes.fr/Publications/1994/Ron94.[47] M. Rousson <strong>and</strong> N. Paragios. Shape priors for level set representations. InProc. European Conf. Computer Vision, volume 2, pages 78–93, 2002.[48] Walter Rud<strong>in</strong>. Functional <strong>analysis</strong>. McGraw–Hill, 1973.[49] Walter Rud<strong>in</strong>. Real <strong>and</strong> complex <strong>analysis</strong>. McGraw–Hill, 1987.[50] J. Shah. H 0 type Riemannian metrics on the space <strong>of</strong> planar <strong>curves</strong>.Quarterly <strong>of</strong> Applied Mathematics, 66:123–137, 2008.[51] Stefano Soatto <strong>and</strong> Anthony J. Yezzi. DEFORMOTION: Deform<strong>in</strong>g motion,<strong>shape</strong> average <strong>and</strong> the jo<strong>in</strong>t registration <strong>and</strong> segmentation <strong>of</strong> images. InECCV (3), pages 32–57, 2002.[52] Anuj Srivastava, Shantanu Joshi, Wash<strong>in</strong>gton Mio, <strong>and</strong> Xiuwen Liu. Statistical<strong>shape</strong> <strong>analysis</strong>: Cluster<strong>in</strong>g, learn<strong>in</strong>g, <strong>and</strong> test<strong>in</strong>g. 2004.[53] Ganesh Sundaramoorthi, Anthony Yezzi, <strong>and</strong> <strong>Andrea</strong> Mennucci. Sobolevactive contours. In Nikos Paragios, Olivier D. Faugeras, Tony Chan, <strong>and</strong>Christoph Schnörr, editors, VLSM, volume 3752 <strong>of</strong> Lecture Notes <strong>in</strong> ComputerScience, pages 109–120. Spr<strong>in</strong>ger, 2005. ISBN 3-540-29348-5. doi:10.1007/11567646_10.[54] Ganesh Sundaramoorthi, Jeremy D. Jackson, Anthony Yezzi, <strong>and</strong> <strong>Andrea</strong>Mennucci. Track<strong>in</strong>g with Sobolev active contours. In Conference on ComputerVision <strong>and</strong> Pattern Recognition (CVPR06). IEEE Computer Society,2006. ISBN 0-7695-2372-2. doi: 10.1109/CVPR.2006.314.[55] Ganesh Sundaramoorthi, Anthony Yezzi, <strong>and</strong> <strong>Andrea</strong> Mennucci. Sobolevactive contours. Intn. Journ. Computer Vision, 2007. doi: 10.1007/s11263-006-0635-2.[56] Ganesh Sundaramoorthi, Anthony Yezzi, <strong>Andrea</strong> Mennucci, <strong>and</strong> GuillermoSapiro. New possibilities with Sobolev active contours. In Scale SpaceVariational Methods 07, 2007. URL http://ssvm07.ciram.unibo.it/ssvm07_public/<strong>in</strong>dex.html. "Best Numerical Paper-Project Award" ; also[58].113
- Page 1 and 2:
Metrics of curves in shape optimiza
- Page 3 and 4:
shape analysis where we study a fam
- Page 5 and 6:
• F (c) = F (c ◦ φ) for all cu
- Page 7 and 8:
κ > 0HNNHNHκ < 0Figure 1: Example
- Page 9 and 10:
In the case of planar curves c 1 ,
- Page 11 and 12:
(a) (b) (c) (d) (e)Figure 3: Segmen
- Page 13 and 14:
where φ may be chosen to beφ(x) =
- Page 15 and 16:
2.4.1 Example: geometric heat flowW
- Page 17 and 18:
2.4.5 Centroid energyWe will now pr
- Page 20 and 21:
shapes. Unfortunately, H 0 does not
- Page 22 and 23:
• If the second request is waived
- Page 24 and 25:
• The Fréchet space of smooth fu
- Page 26 and 27:
Since φ k are homeomorphisms, then
- Page 28 and 29:
3.6.1 Riemann metric, lengthDefinit
- Page 30 and 31:
Theorem 3.30 Suppose that M is a sm
- Page 32 and 33:
Example 3.38 Let M = C ∞ ([−1,
- Page 34 and 35:
• sometimes S 1 will be identifie
- Page 36 and 37:
The proof is by direct computation.
- Page 38 and 39:
The term preshape space is sometime
- Page 40 and 41:
5 Representation/embedding/quotient
- Page 42 and 43:
6.1.1 Length induced by a distanceI
- Page 44 and 45:
0101200000000000011111111111110000
- Page 46 and 47:
6.2.4 Applications in computer visi
- Page 48 and 49:
of a small ball from A. The motion
- Page 50 and 51:
CutΩ(The arrows represent the dist
- Page 52 and 53:
7.3 L 1 metric and Plateau problemI
- Page 54 and 55:
Definition 8.3 (Flat curves) Let Z
- Page 56 and 57:
Proof. Fix α 0 ∈ S \ Z. Let T =
- Page 58 and 59:
8.2.2 RepresentationThe Stiefel man
- Page 60 and 61:
9.3 Conformal metricsYezzi and Menn
- Page 62 and 63: 10.1.1 Related worksA family of met
- Page 64 and 65: Definition 10.7 (Convolution) A arc
- Page 66 and 67: and̂∇˜HjE(0) = ̂∇ H 0E(0),̂
- Page 68 and 69: and we simply integrate twice! More
- Page 70 and 71: Corollary 10.18 In particular, the
- Page 72 and 73: 10.6 Existence of gradient flowsWe
- Page 74 and 75: • The length functional (from C 1
- Page 76 and 77: We can eventually estimate the diff
- Page 78 and 79: 7.552.5-10 -7.5 -5 -2.5 2.5 5 7.5 1
- Page 80 and 81: By using (i) and (ii) from lemma 10
- Page 82 and 83: 10.6.3 Existence of flow for geodes
- Page 84 and 85: 10.7.1 Robustness w.r.to local mini
- Page 86 and 87: We already presented all the calcul
- Page 88 and 89: 10.9 New regularization methodsTypi
- Page 90 and 91: can be solved for k (this is not so
- Page 92 and 93: 2. Now• at t = 1/2 it achieves th
- Page 94 and 95: Definition 11.10 • The orbit is O
- Page 96 and 97: y eqn. (11.3), where the terms RHS
- Page 98 and 99: So Prop. 11.19 guarantees that the
- Page 100 and 101: Theorem 11.23 Suppose that the Riem
- Page 102 and 103: 2.2.3 Examples of geometric energy
- Page 104 and 105: 9 Riemannian metrics of immersed cu
- Page 106 and 107: contour continuation, 11convolution
- Page 108 and 109: normal vector, 6objective function,
- Page 110 and 111: References[1] Luigi Ambrosio, Giuse
- Page 114 and 115: [57] Ganesh Sundaramoorthi, Anthony