12.07.2015 Views

Knowledge Management in an E-commerce System

Knowledge Management in an E-commerce System

Knowledge Management in an E-commerce System

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

<strong>Knowledge</strong> <strong>M<strong>an</strong>agement</strong> <strong>in</strong> <strong>an</strong> E-<strong>commerce</strong> <strong>System</strong> 11- guar<strong>an</strong>tees of customer privacy,- convenient forms of payment,- the system’s behavior when a product is out of stock,as well as other service-oriented aspects, while still keep<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> m<strong>in</strong>d the profit goals of the enterprise. Thus the strategy ofthis perspective is “sell what you c<strong>an</strong> to <strong>an</strong>yone you c<strong>an</strong>.” It is impossible to only address customer needs <strong>an</strong>dexpectations; the bus<strong>in</strong>ess perspective has to be taken <strong>in</strong>to account as well. Customer support strategies have to strike abal<strong>an</strong>ce between the goals of the system <strong>an</strong>d the customer.5.6 <strong>Knowledge</strong> spacesThis implementation-level ontology categorizes knowledge created from <strong>in</strong>formation sources <strong>an</strong>d hum<strong>an</strong> experts <strong>in</strong>toknowledge about users, knowledge about the system <strong>an</strong>d knowledge about the environment <strong>in</strong> which the system resides.These are spheres of knowledge, knowledge spaces, <strong>an</strong>d are closely related to <strong>an</strong>d structured accord<strong>in</strong>g to the orig<strong>in</strong>alsources, which the referred-to knowledge is acquired from. <strong>Knowledge</strong> created from <strong>in</strong>teractions with users falls <strong>in</strong> to theuser sphere, while knowledge concern<strong>in</strong>g the system’s operation as <strong>an</strong> enterprise (<strong>in</strong>clud<strong>in</strong>g supply support) resides <strong>in</strong> thesystem sphere. <strong>Knowledge</strong> derived from the outside world is <strong>in</strong> the environment sphere. <strong>Knowledge</strong> about users is fairlyeasy to def<strong>in</strong>e (though not so easy to gather): who the users are, what they like <strong>an</strong>d dislike, how they employ the system,etc. <strong>Knowledge</strong> about the system is much broader, <strong>an</strong>d <strong>in</strong>cludes knowledge of: current <strong>an</strong>d potential products offered bythe system, suppliers of those products, the system’s bus<strong>in</strong>ess models <strong>an</strong>d operat<strong>in</strong>g parameters <strong>an</strong>d other categoriesrelated to the e-<strong>commerce</strong> system’s role <strong>in</strong> the environment. <strong>Knowledge</strong> <strong>in</strong> the environment is everyth<strong>in</strong>g that is externalto the system, but must still be known to it; the system does not exist <strong>in</strong> a void, <strong>an</strong>d if it is to succeed it must be “aware”of what of the world <strong>in</strong> which it operates. This requires knowledge of the theoretical (such as the basic laws of economy)to the practical (network outages).The knowledge space ontology divides the functions of the e-<strong>commerce</strong> system <strong>an</strong>d associated knowledge at a verylow level, <strong>an</strong>d thus it is especially useful <strong>in</strong> implementation. Components that operate <strong>in</strong> the user sphere <strong>in</strong>teract witheach other <strong>in</strong> a common doma<strong>in</strong>, while components deal<strong>in</strong>g with the environment sphere may be configured as a “wall”around the system. In addition, there are l<strong>in</strong>ks between the spheres <strong>in</strong> the form of components whose work<strong>in</strong>g ontologiesrefer to portions of multiple spheres.5.8 Dynamics of ch<strong>an</strong>geOne of the most import<strong>an</strong>t considerations <strong>in</strong> m<strong>an</strong>ag<strong>in</strong>g knowledge <strong>in</strong> a near real-time environment such as <strong>an</strong> e-<strong>commerce</strong>system is time dependence. From this perspective <strong>an</strong> ontology may be def<strong>in</strong>ed which divides knowledge <strong>in</strong>to const<strong>an</strong>t,slowly-ch<strong>an</strong>g<strong>in</strong>g <strong>an</strong>d fast-ch<strong>an</strong>g<strong>in</strong>g knowledge. This ontology may be correlated with the empirical-model-situationalontology, <strong>in</strong> identify<strong>in</strong>g const<strong>an</strong>t knowledge as empirical knowledge, slow-ch<strong>an</strong>g<strong>in</strong>g knowledge as model knowledge <strong>an</strong>dsituational knowledge as fast-ch<strong>an</strong>g<strong>in</strong>g knowledge. The correlation is not exact, of course. Fast-ch<strong>an</strong>g<strong>in</strong>g knowledge<strong>in</strong>cludes most knowledge derived from user <strong>in</strong>teractions, but may describe knowledge which was, from the hum<strong>an</strong>perspective, identified as empirical. The time-dependency categorizations are very fuzzy, because situations may arise <strong>in</strong>which const<strong>an</strong>t knowledge may require modification on the basis of fast-ch<strong>an</strong>g<strong>in</strong>g or slow-ch<strong>an</strong>g<strong>in</strong>g, model-typeknowledge. Such a shift would describe the ch<strong>an</strong>ge <strong>in</strong> th<strong>in</strong>k<strong>in</strong>g before <strong>an</strong>d after the large-scale development of theInternet as a commercial doma<strong>in</strong>. The time-m<strong>an</strong>agement functions of the system may be localized <strong>in</strong> <strong>an</strong> <strong>in</strong>dividualcomponent that “watches” for ch<strong>an</strong>ges <strong>an</strong>d <strong>in</strong>terruptions of this nature, or it may be <strong>in</strong>tegrated <strong>in</strong>to each of the exist<strong>in</strong>groles. The purpose of this ontology is to make the system “aware” of time <strong>an</strong>d the dynamics of ch<strong>an</strong>ge <strong>in</strong> the knowledgefeedback loop, so that the system does not get “stuck” or become outmoded.5.9 <strong>Knowledge</strong> tr<strong>an</strong>sfer (flow)In addition to the established, role-attached perspectives on knowledge with<strong>in</strong> the system, there is the view of knowledgeas a tr<strong>an</strong>sferable qu<strong>an</strong>tity. Here low-level knowledge is the modicum of exch<strong>an</strong>ge between knowledge entities.International Conference on Electronic Commerce Research (ICECR-5)

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!