12.07.2015 Views

first edition (1980) of the Orange Book - FDA Law Blog

first edition (1980) of the Orange Book - FDA Law Blog

first edition (1980) of the Orange Book - FDA Law Blog

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

CURRENT STATUS - POSSIBLY EFFECTIVE - Products that were <strong>first</strong>evaluated bY NAS/NRC and thEm bY <strong>the</strong> agency. These products werefound .to be possibly effective and required additional evidence tosUbstantiate labeling claims. Although products existed in thiscategory for <strong>the</strong> proposed List, published in January 1979, <strong>the</strong>seproducts 00 looger exist in this category because <strong>the</strong>ir effectivenessissues have been resolved.CURRENT STATUS - INEFFECTIVE - Products that were <strong>first</strong> evaluatedby NAS/NRC and <strong>the</strong>n by <strong>the</strong> agency. These products were found tolack evidence <strong>of</strong> effectiveness and are awaiting oompletioo <strong>of</strong>administrative proceedings.Cl1ERENT STATUS - INEE'F'ECTlVE AS CCMBlNATIONS/NEW SAFEI'Y ISSUEprOaoctsthat were <strong>first</strong> evaluated by NAS/NRC and <strong>the</strong>n by <strong>the</strong>agency. These products were fotmd to lack substantial evidence <strong>of</strong>effectiveness as a fixed canbinatioo and present a safety issue.They are awaiting cornpletioo <strong>of</strong> adrrdnistrative proceedings.CURRENT STATUS - "EXEMPl''' (OOURT ORDER) - Products that are subjectto paragraph XIV <strong>of</strong> Federal District Court Judge William B.Bryant's order as published in <strong>the</strong> Federal Register <strong>of</strong> December 14,1972 (37 FR 26623) • The majority <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong>se products were <strong>first</strong>evaluated by NAS/NRC and <strong>the</strong>n later all were evaluated by <strong>FDA</strong>.These products were fotmd to be less than effective, but a decisionen whe<strong>the</strong>r to remove <strong>the</strong>m fran <strong>the</strong> market was deferred pendingcompletien <strong>of</strong> additienal clinica~ studies.CURRENT STATUS - EFF'ECl'IVENFSS 'IO BE DEI'ERMINED - Products thatwere not reviewed bY NAS/NRC and which are tmdergoing agencyevaluatien for effectiveness.CURRENT STATUS - EE'E'EC'rIVE/NEW SAFEI'Y ISSUE - Products that werenot reviewed through <strong>the</strong> DES I process and determined to beeffective but subsequently which have been found to present a newsafety issue. These products are awaiting completion <strong>of</strong> administrativeproceedings.II - 3

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!