12.07.2015 Views

first edition (1980) of the Orange Book - FDA Law Blog

first edition (1980) of the Orange Book - FDA Law Blog

first edition (1980) of the Orange Book - FDA Law Blog

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

that are pharmaceutical equivalents are labeled by <strong>the</strong>irdifferent application holders for different routes <strong>of</strong>administration. Injectable products available as drypcMders for reconstitution, concentrated sterile solutionsfor dilution, or sterile solutions ready forinjection, are all considered to be pharmaceutically and<strong>the</strong>rapeutically equivalent provided <strong>the</strong>y are designed toproduce <strong>the</strong> same concentration for injection and areequivalently labeled. Consistent with accepted pr<strong>of</strong>essionalpractice, it is <strong>the</strong> responsibility <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> prescriber , dispenser, or individual administering <strong>the</strong>product to be familiar with a product's labeling toassure that it is given only by <strong>the</strong> route(s) <strong>of</strong>adrrdnistration stated in <strong>the</strong> labeling.Certain corrmonly used large volume intravenous productsare not included on <strong>the</strong> List (e.g., dextrose 5% withwater, dextrose 10% with water, sodium chloride 0.9%injection). Virtually all <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong>se drug products came on<strong>the</strong> market in glass containers before 1938 and have notbeen required to obtain an approved new drug applicationas a condi tion <strong>of</strong> marketing. When packaged in plasticcontainers, however, <strong>the</strong>se same drug products areconsidered to be ntw drugs requiring atproved new drugapplications for marketing. All large volume parenteralproducts are manufactured under similar standards,regardless <strong>of</strong> whe<strong>the</strong>r <strong>the</strong>y are packaged in glass orplastic. Thus, <strong>FDA</strong> has no reason to believe that <strong>the</strong>packaging container <strong>of</strong> large volume parenteral drugprodocts that are pharmaceutically equivalent would haveany effect on <strong>the</strong>ir <strong>the</strong>rapeutic equivalence.ATTopical ProductsThere are a variety <strong>of</strong> dosage forms available fortopical, ophthalmic, otic, rectal arrl vaginal administration,including solutions, creams, ointments, gels,lotions, pastes, sprays, and same sUfPOsitories. Differenttopical dosage forms are not pharmaceuticallyequivalent even though <strong>the</strong>y may contain <strong>the</strong> same active.ingredient, and, <strong>the</strong>refore, <strong>the</strong>y are not considered<strong>the</strong>rapeutically equivalent. Products in <strong>the</strong> same topicaldosage forms are, however, in <strong>the</strong> absence <strong>of</strong> contrarydata, considered <strong>the</strong>rapeutically equivalent if <strong>the</strong>y arepharmaceutically equivalent.I - 13

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!