12.07.2015 Views

first edition (1980) of the Orange Book - FDA Law Blog

first edition (1980) of the Orange Book - FDA Law Blog

first edition (1980) of the Orange Book - FDA Law Blog

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

posi tive evidence <strong>of</strong> bioavailabili ty is necessary, are shavn to be bioequivalentto an awropriate standard. The agency believes this policy iscoosistent with <strong>the</strong> prevailing opinioo <strong>of</strong> experts and with general experiencein <strong>the</strong> marketplace through <strong>the</strong> years.The agency has coosidered, and rejected, <strong>the</strong> optioo <strong>of</strong> requiringin vivo bioavailabili ty stu::Hes for every product. Such a policy v.ouldresul t in <strong>the</strong> testing in hunans <strong>of</strong> a large number <strong>of</strong> products for which<strong>the</strong>re is 00 evidence <strong>of</strong> a bioavailabili ty problem, and \',()uld <strong>the</strong>reby waste<strong>the</strong> nation's clinical research resources 00 <strong>the</strong> repeti ti ve testing <strong>of</strong> drugproducts for little or 00 scientific purpose. For this reason, <strong>FDA</strong> haselected under its bioavailability and bioequivalence regulations to confinein vivo testing <strong>of</strong> products for bioavailabili ty to those particular drugsror~ich such testing is scientifically and medically necessary. Incoosidering <strong>the</strong> <strong>the</strong>rapeutic equivalence <strong>of</strong> drugs with known or potentialbioavailability problems, <strong>the</strong> agency has followed a policy <strong>of</strong> evaluating as<strong>the</strong>rapeutic equivalents rnly those products that have met current requirements(in vivo testing in hunans, in vitro dissolutioo rate requirements, orboth, aepending 00 <strong>the</strong> drug). -When bioavailability or bioequivalencerequirements are newly established, <strong>the</strong>re is a transitioo period duringwhich all manufacturers are required to sul:rni t informatioo regarding <strong>the</strong>irproducts. For this reasoo sane manufacturers whose products may not haveyet met <strong>the</strong> requirement are still legally marketed.The agency has excluded from <strong>the</strong> List those products that are knavn tobe 00 looger marketed. Approved products row regarded as medical devices,biologics, or foods are also excluded from <strong>the</strong> List. In addition, approveddrug products solely marketed abroad are excluded.D. I.EX;AL STA'IUS OF THE LISTThe Approved Prescriptioo Drug Products list contains only publicinformatioo and advice. The List is not a recomnendatioo as to which drugproducts persoos should purchase, prescribe, dispense, or conversely, whichprodocts should be avoided. It dces not impose any requirement or restrictimupcn any person. TO <strong>the</strong> extent that <strong>the</strong> List identifies drug productsapproved for marketing under sectioos 505 and 507 <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Federal Food, Drug,and Cosmetic Act, it merely sets forth information to which <strong>the</strong> public isentitled under <strong>the</strong> Freecbm <strong>of</strong> Information Act. Exclusion <strong>of</strong> a drug productfrom <strong>the</strong> List

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!