12.07.2015 Views

Managing Conflict of Interest - Organisation for Economic Co ...

Managing Conflict of Interest - Organisation for Economic Co ...

Managing Conflict of Interest - Organisation for Economic Co ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Defining <strong><strong>Co</strong>nflict</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Interest</strong> 29by and large put their personal interests first. <strong>Co</strong>rruption in the mainhas been below the top level <strong>of</strong> government. <strong>Co</strong>nsequently, P.R.China has avoided the “state capture” by business interests that hasblighted Russia. Furthermore, it has been argued that Chinese corruption—becauseit is primarily at the local level—is <strong>of</strong> a competitivenature and there<strong>for</strong>e involves an element <strong>of</strong> “ market clearing.”Unlike monopoly “rent seeking” in central government, “competitivecorruption” can ensure the efficient use <strong>of</strong> the scarce resourcesthat <strong>of</strong>ficials control; if one set <strong>of</strong> local <strong>of</strong>ficials is too greedy, businessescan go to another locality.IndiaIn terms <strong>of</strong> governance, when India became independent in1947 it was <strong>for</strong>tunate in three respects. It had a democratic constitution.It had a pr<strong>of</strong>essional higher-level civil service well known <strong>for</strong> itsintegrity and impartiality. It had political leaders who, influenced byGhandi, lacked material ambition <strong>for</strong> themselves and were whollycommitted to the economic and political trans<strong>for</strong>mation <strong>of</strong> theircountry. Where corruption and conflict existed, it was at low levels<strong>of</strong> government and <strong>of</strong> a petty kind—involving “speed money” paidby the “common man” <strong>for</strong> various public services.Over the following decades, several things changed. Thestrict controls on imports and investment <strong>of</strong>fered significant “rentseeking”opportunities, especially in a situation <strong>of</strong> severe <strong>for</strong>eignexchange and capital goods shortage. Punitive tax rates encouragedtax evasion and bribery <strong>of</strong> revenue <strong>of</strong>ficials. As the <strong>Co</strong>ngressParty ceased to have a near monopoly <strong>of</strong> power at the center andin the states, it needed increasing amounts <strong>of</strong> money to fight elections.Other parties also needed money. Factionalism, particularlyat the state level, and the competition <strong>for</strong> limited public resourceswas a powerful driver <strong>of</strong> political corruption. 19 <strong>Co</strong>rruption by politiciansrequired the complicity <strong>of</strong> <strong>of</strong>ficials. Although the media havebeen reasonably effective in exposing political corruption, thisfactor has not stopped politicians with corrupt reputations or evencriminal records from getting elected: voters seem more interestedin whether the politician will deliver on his or her promises.19See Khan, Mushtaq. 2006. <strong>Co</strong>rruption and Governance in South Asia. In SouthAsia 2006. Europa Publications.ADB/OECD Anti-<strong>Co</strong>rruption Initiative <strong>for</strong> Asia and the Pacific

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!