Managing Conflict of Interest - Organisation for Economic Co ...
Managing Conflict of Interest - Organisation for Economic Co ... Managing Conflict of Interest - Organisation for Economic Co ...
166 Managing Conflict of InterestThis survey also provides a demographic profile of those committingfraud, indicating that losses caused by men are nearly four timesthose caused by women; losses caused by managers are four timesthose caused by employees; and losses caused by executives andowners are 16 times those of their employees. These statistics may becorrelated on the basis of the ratio of men to women in managerialpositions. While the occurrence of employee fraud is most frequent,the cost of fraudulent financial reporting is much higher. Small businessesare the most vulnerable to fraud and abuse. Financial statementfraud causes a decrease in market value of stock of approximately 500to 1,000 times the amount of the fraud. Essentially USD7 million infraud can be equated to a $2 billion drop in stock value.The findings of this survey and other empirical evidence make itabundantly clear that it is imperative for organizations to establishrobust fraud prevention mechanisms and processes to safeguardtheir assets and shareholder interests.Preventing Fraud: The Case for Establishing Effective “Whistleblower”SystemsWho Detects FraudAs shown in Figure 2 below, the most common method of detectingfraud is an employee, customer, vendor, or anonymous sourceinforming authorities. Among the cases that were detected by suchwhistle-blowing, 60% came from employees, 20% from customers,16% from vendors, and 13% from anonymous sources. Organizationswith fraud hotlines and anonymous reporting cut their fraudlosses in half. Among the cases of fraud committed by owners andexecutives, which tend to be most costly, over half were identifiedby a tip-off. Internal controls, internal and external audits, notificationsby employees, and background checks are some leading waysto uncover fraud. Thus, it is imperative that organizations establisheffective processes to encourage employees and third parties toreport irregularities. Key measures include establishing fraud hotlinesand policies to protect whistle-blowers.Fraud Triangle: What Conditions Lead to FraudThe conditions that lead to fraud can be illustrated by threepoints of a triangle: perceived opportunity and suitable targets atADB/OECD Anti-Corruption Initiative for Asia and the Pacific
Codes of Conduct in the Private Sector 167Figure 2: Who Detects FraudSource: Association of Certified Fraud Examiners (ACFE), 2004.the base of the triangle feed the supply of motivated offendersat the apex. Perceived opportunity arises when favorable circumstancesexist, e.g., there is an absence of controls, or managementis able to override controls. Management or other employees mayhave an incentive or be under pressure, and thus motivated to commitfraud. And those involved in a fraud are invariably those whocan rationalize a fraudulent act as being consistent with their personalcode of ethics. Some individuals possess an attitude or personalitycharacteristic that allows them to make a value judgmentto knowingly and intentionally commit a dishonest act. Thus, toprevent fraud, it is necessary to reduce the opportunities for fraudand educate the public on ethics to ultimately reduce the supply ofmotivated offenders.Pakistan’s ExperiencePakistan’s Regulatory FrameworkThe corporate regulatory framework in Pakistan is guided bythree key entities—the Securities and Exchange Commission ofPakistan (SECP), which regulates all corporate entities and administerscorporate laws; the State Bank of Pakistan, which regulatesADB/OECD Anti-Corruption Initiative for Asia and the Pacific
- Page 158 and 159: 116 Managing Conflict of InterestNB
- Page 160 and 161: 118 Managing Conflict of InterestA
- Page 162 and 163: 120 Managing Conflict of Interestho
- Page 164 and 165: 122 Managing Conflict of Interestor
- Page 166 and 167: 124 Managing Conflict of Interestin
- Page 168 and 169: 126 Managing Conflict of InterestFr
- Page 170 and 171: Tracking corruption in the USA: Pol
- Page 172 and 173: 130 Managing Conflict of InterestMo
- Page 174 and 175: 132 Managing Conflict of InterestFi
- Page 176 and 177: 134 Managing Conflict of InterestFi
- Page 179: Section 3:Prevention andEnforcement
- Page 182 and 183: Codes of conduct and mechanisms top
- Page 184 and 185: 142 Managing Conflict of Interestof
- Page 186 and 187: 144 Managing Conflict of Interestha
- Page 188 and 189: 146 Managing Conflict of Interestfa
- Page 190 and 191: Preventing conflicts of interest in
- Page 192 and 193: 150 Managing Conflict of Interestwo
- Page 194 and 195: 152 Managing Conflict of Interestac
- Page 196 and 197: 154 Managing Conflict of InterestAg
- Page 198 and 199: 156 Managing Conflict of Interestha
- Page 200 and 201: 158 Managing Conflict of Interest
- Page 203 and 204: Chapter 5Codes of conduct in thepri
- Page 205 and 206: Good corporate governance: Essentia
- Page 207: Codes of Conduct in the Private Sec
- Page 211 and 212: Codes of Conduct in the Private Sec
- Page 213 and 214: Codes of Conduct in the Private Sec
- Page 215 and 216: Codes of Conduct in the Private Sec
- Page 217 and 218: Compliance enforcement in a multina
- Page 219 and 220: Living business ethics: Good govern
- Page 221: Codes of Conduct in the Private Sec
- Page 225 and 226: Appendix 1: Seminar agendaADB/OECD
- Page 227 and 228: Appendix 185The experience of asset
- Page 229 and 230: Appendix 187Detecting conflict of i
- Page 231 and 232: Appendix 2: List of participantsMem
- Page 233 and 234: Appendix 191Asad Ali SHAHPartner, D
- Page 235 and 236: Appendix 193WaluyoDeputy of Prevent
- Page 237 and 238: Appendix 195PALAUSecilil ELDEBECHEL
- Page 239 and 240: Appendix 197Sandie HITOJOSenior Con
- Page 241 and 242: Appendix 199TRANSPARENCY INTERNATIO
- Page 243 and 244: Appendix 201Arie SISWANTOAssistant
- Page 245: Secretariat 203ADB/OECD Anti-Corrup
166 <strong>Managing</strong> <strong><strong>Co</strong>nflict</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Interest</strong>This survey also provides a demographic pr<strong>of</strong>ile <strong>of</strong> those committingfraud, indicating that losses caused by men are nearly four timesthose caused by women; losses caused by managers are four timesthose caused by employees; and losses caused by executives andowners are 16 times those <strong>of</strong> their employees. These statistics may becorrelated on the basis <strong>of</strong> the ratio <strong>of</strong> men to women in managerialpositions. While the occurrence <strong>of</strong> employee fraud is most frequent,the cost <strong>of</strong> fraudulent financial reporting is much higher. Small businessesare the most vulnerable to fraud and abuse. Financial statementfraud causes a decrease in market value <strong>of</strong> stock <strong>of</strong> approximately 500to 1,000 times the amount <strong>of</strong> the fraud. Essentially USD7 million infraud can be equated to a $2 billion drop in stock value.The findings <strong>of</strong> this survey and other empirical evidence make itabundantly clear that it is imperative <strong>for</strong> organizations to establishrobust fraud prevention mechanisms and processes to safeguardtheir assets and shareholder interests.Preventing Fraud: The Case <strong>for</strong> Establishing Effective “Whistleblower”SystemsWho Detects FraudAs shown in Figure 2 below, the most common method <strong>of</strong> detectingfraud is an employee, customer, vendor, or anonymous sourcein<strong>for</strong>ming authorities. Among the cases that were detected by suchwhistle-blowing, 60% came from employees, 20% from customers,16% from vendors, and 13% from anonymous sources. Organizationswith fraud hotlines and anonymous reporting cut their fraudlosses in half. Among the cases <strong>of</strong> fraud committed by owners andexecutives, which tend to be most costly, over half were identifiedby a tip-<strong>of</strong>f. Internal controls, internal and external audits, notificationsby employees, and background checks are some leading waysto uncover fraud. Thus, it is imperative that organizations establisheffective processes to encourage employees and third parties toreport irregularities. Key measures include establishing fraud hotlinesand policies to protect whistle-blowers.Fraud Triangle: What <strong>Co</strong>nditions Lead to FraudThe conditions that lead to fraud can be illustrated by threepoints <strong>of</strong> a triangle: perceived opportunity and suitable targets atADB/OECD Anti-<strong>Co</strong>rruption Initiative <strong>for</strong> Asia and the Pacific