Managing Conflict of Interest - Organisation for Economic Co ...
Managing Conflict of Interest - Organisation for Economic Co ... Managing Conflict of Interest - Organisation for Economic Co ...
Chapter 4Codes of conduct in thepublic sectorCodes of conduct are a useful tool used throughout the worldto establish standards for ethical and appropriate behavior in publicadministration. Many countries have incorporated targetedprovisions into their constitutions, their laws, or public administrationemployee handbooks and training activities. In this chapter,practitioners from the People’s Republic of China (P.R. China) andAustralia provide two different but equally successful approachesto implementing a code of conduct to guide their respective countries’public sector employees.As noted earlier, prevailing social, cultural, political, and economicnorms affect the extent to which conflicts—apparent, potential,or real—are dealt with in various countries. Prevailing normsalso determine what approaches—formal or informal—may provemost effective. Song Dajun, Deputy Director General for AdministrativeSupervision and Inspection with the Ministry of Supervisionin P.R. China, relates his country’s top-down centralized approachdesigned around a series of control and compliance mechanisms,while Mike Jones, Senior Executive Advisor with the AustralianPublic Service Commission (APSC) based in Jakarta, describes theprinciples-and-values-based approach enforced through a workplacemanagement framework guiding the APS.These examples demonstrate how political, social, and culturalmores influence how conflict of interest is perceived and handled.P.R. China’s code of conduct emphasizes what public sector employeesmust not do, whereas Australia’s code of conduct emphasizeswhat public sector employees must do. While vastly differentapproaches, both offer effective examples of how to implementand enforce a code of conduct to prevent conflicts of interest fromoccurring in the public sector.ADB/OECD Anti-Corruption Initiative for Asia and the Pacific
- Page 130 and 131: 88 Managing Conflict of InterestSan
- Page 132 and 133: 90 Managing Conflict of Interestare
- Page 134 and 135: Private gain from public loss:How T
- Page 136 and 137: 94 Managing Conflict of Interestor
- Page 138 and 139: 96 Managing Conflict of Interesthav
- Page 140 and 141: 98 Managing Conflict of Interestthi
- Page 142 and 143: 100 Managing Conflict of Interestfo
- Page 144 and 145: 102 Managing Conflict of InterestWh
- Page 146 and 147: 104 Managing Conflict of Interest
- Page 148 and 149: 106 Managing Conflict of InterestAn
- Page 150 and 151: 108 Managing Conflict of InterestSe
- Page 152 and 153: 110 Managing Conflict of Interest(5
- Page 154 and 155: 112 Managing Conflict of Interest(2
- Page 156 and 157: 114 Managing Conflict of InterestSe
- Page 158 and 159: 116 Managing Conflict of InterestNB
- Page 160 and 161: 118 Managing Conflict of InterestA
- Page 162 and 163: 120 Managing Conflict of Interestho
- Page 164 and 165: 122 Managing Conflict of Interestor
- Page 166 and 167: 124 Managing Conflict of Interestin
- Page 168 and 169: 126 Managing Conflict of InterestFr
- Page 170 and 171: Tracking corruption in the USA: Pol
- Page 172 and 173: 130 Managing Conflict of InterestMo
- Page 174 and 175: 132 Managing Conflict of InterestFi
- Page 176 and 177: 134 Managing Conflict of InterestFi
- Page 179: Section 3:Prevention andEnforcement
- Page 183 and 184: Codes and Conduct in the Public Sec
- Page 185 and 186: Codes and Conduct in the Public Sec
- Page 187 and 188: Codes and Conduct in the Public Sec
- Page 189 and 190: Codes and Conduct in the Public Sec
- Page 191 and 192: Codes and Conduct in the Public Sec
- Page 193 and 194: Codes and Conduct in the Public Sec
- Page 195 and 196: Codes and Conduct in the Public Sec
- Page 197 and 198: Codes and Conduct in the Public Sec
- Page 199 and 200: Codes and Conduct in the Public Sec
- Page 201: Codes and Conduct in the Public Sec
- Page 204 and 205: 162 Managing Conflict of Interestth
- Page 206 and 207: 164 Managing Conflict of Interest(I
- Page 208 and 209: 166 Managing Conflict of InterestTh
- Page 210 and 211: 168 Managing Conflict of Interestth
- Page 212 and 213: 170 Managing Conflict of Interest
- Page 214 and 215: 172 Managing Conflict of InterestIF
- Page 216 and 217: 174 Managing Conflict of Interest
- Page 218 and 219: 176 Managing Conflict of InterestBa
- Page 220 and 221: 178 Managing Conflict of Interestof
- Page 223: AppendicesADB/OECD Anti-Corruption
- Page 226 and 227: 184 Managing Conflict of InterestSp
- Page 228 and 229: 186 Managing Conflict of InterestDa
Chapter 4<strong>Co</strong>des <strong>of</strong> conduct in thepublic sector<strong>Co</strong>des <strong>of</strong> conduct are a useful tool used throughout the worldto establish standards <strong>for</strong> ethical and appropriate behavior in publicadministration. Many countries have incorporated targetedprovisions into their constitutions, their laws, or public administrationemployee handbooks and training activities. In this chapter,practitioners from the People’s Republic <strong>of</strong> China (P.R. China) andAustralia provide two different but equally successful approachesto implementing a code <strong>of</strong> conduct to guide their respective countries’public sector employees.As noted earlier, prevailing social, cultural, political, and economicnorms affect the extent to which conflicts—apparent, potential,or real—are dealt with in various countries. Prevailing normsalso determine what approaches—<strong>for</strong>mal or in<strong>for</strong>mal—may provemost effective. Song Dajun, Deputy Director General <strong>for</strong> AdministrativeSupervision and Inspection with the Ministry <strong>of</strong> Supervisionin P.R. China, relates his country’s top-down centralized approachdesigned around a series <strong>of</strong> control and compliance mechanisms,while Mike Jones, Senior Executive Advisor with the AustralianPublic Service <strong>Co</strong>mmission (APSC) based in Jakarta, describes theprinciples-and-values-based approach en<strong>for</strong>ced through a workplacemanagement framework guiding the APS.These examples demonstrate how political, social, and culturalmores influence how conflict <strong>of</strong> interest is perceived and handled.P.R. China’s code <strong>of</strong> conduct emphasizes what public sector employeesmust not do, whereas Australia’s code <strong>of</strong> conduct emphasizeswhat public sector employees must do. While vastly differentapproaches, both <strong>of</strong>fer effective examples <strong>of</strong> how to implementand en<strong>for</strong>ce a code <strong>of</strong> conduct to prevent conflicts <strong>of</strong> interest fromoccurring in the public sector.ADB/OECD Anti-<strong>Co</strong>rruption Initiative <strong>for</strong> Asia and the Pacific