Managing Conflict of Interest - Organisation for Economic Co ...
Managing Conflict of Interest - Organisation for Economic Co ... Managing Conflict of Interest - Organisation for Economic Co ...
124 Managing Conflict of Interestinterest, which the employee reasonably should have knownwas actually pending under his or her official responsibilitywithin one year before leaving government service.• Section 207(b) – One-Year Bar: A covered person may notknowingly “represent, aid, or advise” any other person concerninga treaty or treaty negotiation in which the coveredperson participated on the basis of designated informationto which he or she had access and which he or she shouldhave known was so designated. 3• Section 207(c)-(f) – One-Year Restrictions on High-LevelOfficials: Commonly referred to as the “one-year cooling offperiod,” this section provides a series of one-year restrictionson post-employment representations by specified formerhigh-level officers and employees, which apply withoutregard to whether the matter involved in the representationwas actually pending—or even existed—during the periodof government service.Acts Affecting a Personal Financial Interest, Section 208Section 208 indicates that a public official may not personallyand substantially participate as an official in a particular matter inwhich, to the official’s knowledge, the official, his or her spouse,or other specified persons or entities—including businesses withwhich the official is negotiating for employment—has a financialinterest. 4 This statute is a mainstay of conflict-of-interest statutes. Itprohibits financial self-dealing, and is closely allied to Section 201on bribery. It was designed to prohibit public officials from advancingor appearing to advance their financial interests at the expenseof public interests.Salary of Government Officials Payable Only by the UnitedStates, Section 209A government official may not receive a salary from any sourceother than the United States as compensation for his or her services3Section 207(b)(2)(A) defines “trade negotiation” and Section 207 (b)(2)(B)defines “treaty.”4Section 208(b) provides a written-waiver provision for certain fact-specific circumstances.ADB/OECD Anti-Corruption Initiative for Asia and the Pacific
Implementation and Enforcement Tools 125as an official. This statute prevents the official from receiving largemonetary gifts from private sources for a job well done. The aim ofthe statute is to prohibit two payrolls and two paymasters for thesame job. It presumes that there is a natural tendency to favor anoutside donor even absent direct pressure to perform in a certainway. The statute alleviates even the appearance of impropriety. 5Enforcement in Practice: The Challenge to Determine IntentThe Public Integrity Section (PIN) of the US Department ofJustice was established in the 1970s—another outgrowth of theWatergate scandal. The unit was created to provide uniformity, standardization,and objectivity in handling all public corruption casesto include those brought under COI statutes.As outlined earlier, standards of enforcement are contingentupon how much evidence of corrupt intent can be established. Severalexamples of cases handled by PIN illustrate this principle.“Now let’s go out and buy us some votes” – Ben Reyes, Houston,TexasBen Reyes was the head of the City Council, in Houston, Texas, theUS’ fourth-largest city, for dozens of years spanning the decades ofthe 1970s through the 1990s. Throughout this time, the local FBI officereceived numerous allegations that Reyes demanded large sums ofmoney from anyone who wanted to do business with the city. Havingfailed to make a bribery case on him over the years, the FBI gotpermission to begin an “undercover operation.” Creating a fictitiouscompany, they bid on a city contract, and then sat back and waited.True to form, Reyes approached the FBI’s make-believe companyand demanded a bribe. Once he was paid for his vote, hedemanded more money to bribe the other members of the Councilfor their votes. The above quote was his precise words as recordedduring the investigation. It leaves little room for interpretation; itshows unequivocally that Reyes intended to receive money forvotes. Given this clear statement of corrupt intent, PIN prosecutedhim under the corruption statutes and asked for the maximum sentenceonce he was convicted.5Sections 209(b)–(e) provide certain exceptions.ADB/OECD Anti-Corruption Initiative for Asia and the Pacific
- Page 116 and 117: 74 Managing Conflict of InterestAnn
- Page 118 and 119: Conflict of interest in Indonesia:
- Page 120 and 121: 78 Managing Conflict of Interestthe
- Page 123: Section 2:Implementation andEnforce
- Page 126 and 127: 84 Managing Conflict of Interestimp
- Page 128 and 129: 86 Managing Conflict of InterestAs
- Page 130 and 131: 88 Managing Conflict of InterestSan
- Page 132 and 133: 90 Managing Conflict of Interestare
- Page 134 and 135: Private gain from public loss:How T
- Page 136 and 137: 94 Managing Conflict of Interestor
- Page 138 and 139: 96 Managing Conflict of Interesthav
- Page 140 and 141: 98 Managing Conflict of Interestthi
- Page 142 and 143: 100 Managing Conflict of Interestfo
- Page 144 and 145: 102 Managing Conflict of InterestWh
- Page 146 and 147: 104 Managing Conflict of Interest
- Page 148 and 149: 106 Managing Conflict of InterestAn
- Page 150 and 151: 108 Managing Conflict of InterestSe
- Page 152 and 153: 110 Managing Conflict of Interest(5
- Page 154 and 155: 112 Managing Conflict of Interest(2
- Page 156 and 157: 114 Managing Conflict of InterestSe
- Page 158 and 159: 116 Managing Conflict of InterestNB
- Page 160 and 161: 118 Managing Conflict of InterestA
- Page 162 and 163: 120 Managing Conflict of Interestho
- Page 164 and 165: 122 Managing Conflict of Interestor
- Page 168 and 169: 126 Managing Conflict of InterestFr
- Page 170 and 171: Tracking corruption in the USA: Pol
- Page 172 and 173: 130 Managing Conflict of InterestMo
- Page 174 and 175: 132 Managing Conflict of InterestFi
- Page 176 and 177: 134 Managing Conflict of InterestFi
- Page 179: Section 3:Prevention andEnforcement
- Page 182 and 183: Codes of conduct and mechanisms top
- Page 184 and 185: 142 Managing Conflict of Interestof
- Page 186 and 187: 144 Managing Conflict of Interestha
- Page 188 and 189: 146 Managing Conflict of Interestfa
- Page 190 and 191: Preventing conflicts of interest in
- Page 192 and 193: 150 Managing Conflict of Interestwo
- Page 194 and 195: 152 Managing Conflict of Interestac
- Page 196 and 197: 154 Managing Conflict of InterestAg
- Page 198 and 199: 156 Managing Conflict of Interestha
- Page 200 and 201: 158 Managing Conflict of Interest
- Page 203 and 204: Chapter 5Codes of conduct in thepri
- Page 205 and 206: Good corporate governance: Essentia
- Page 207 and 208: Codes of Conduct in the Private Sec
- Page 209 and 210: Codes of Conduct in the Private Sec
- Page 211 and 212: Codes of Conduct in the Private Sec
- Page 213 and 214: Codes of Conduct in the Private Sec
- Page 215 and 216: Codes of Conduct in the Private Sec
Implementation and En<strong>for</strong>cement Tools 125as an <strong>of</strong>ficial. This statute prevents the <strong>of</strong>ficial from receiving largemonetary gifts from private sources <strong>for</strong> a job well done. The aim <strong>of</strong>the statute is to prohibit two payrolls and two paymasters <strong>for</strong> thesame job. It presumes that there is a natural tendency to favor anoutside donor even absent direct pressure to per<strong>for</strong>m in a certainway. The statute alleviates even the appearance <strong>of</strong> impropriety. 5En<strong>for</strong>cement in Practice: The Challenge to Determine IntentThe Public Integrity Section (PIN) <strong>of</strong> the US Department <strong>of</strong>Justice was established in the 1970s—another outgrowth <strong>of</strong> theWatergate scandal. The unit was created to provide uni<strong>for</strong>mity, standardization,and objectivity in handling all public corruption casesto include those brought under COI statutes.As outlined earlier, standards <strong>of</strong> en<strong>for</strong>cement are contingentupon how much evidence <strong>of</strong> corrupt intent can be established. Severalexamples <strong>of</strong> cases handled by PIN illustrate this principle.“Now let’s go out and buy us some votes” – Ben Reyes, Houston,TexasBen Reyes was the head <strong>of</strong> the City <strong>Co</strong>uncil, in Houston, Texas, theUS’ fourth-largest city, <strong>for</strong> dozens <strong>of</strong> years spanning the decades <strong>of</strong>the 1970s through the 1990s. Throughout this time, the local FBI <strong>of</strong>ficereceived numerous allegations that Reyes demanded large sums <strong>of</strong>money from anyone who wanted to do business with the city. Havingfailed to make a bribery case on him over the years, the FBI gotpermission to begin an “undercover operation.” Creating a fictitiouscompany, they bid on a city contract, and then sat back and waited.True to <strong>for</strong>m, Reyes approached the FBI’s make-believe companyand demanded a bribe. Once he was paid <strong>for</strong> his vote, hedemanded more money to bribe the other members <strong>of</strong> the <strong>Co</strong>uncil<strong>for</strong> their votes. The above quote was his precise words as recordedduring the investigation. It leaves little room <strong>for</strong> interpretation; itshows unequivocally that Reyes intended to receive money <strong>for</strong>votes. Given this clear statement <strong>of</strong> corrupt intent, PIN prosecutedhim under the corruption statutes and asked <strong>for</strong> the maximum sentenceonce he was convicted.5Sections 209(b)–(e) provide certain exceptions.ADB/OECD Anti-<strong>Co</strong>rruption Initiative <strong>for</strong> Asia and the Pacific