Petrogenesis of Plio-Pleistocene volcanic rocks from the chagai arc ...
Petrogenesis of Plio-Pleistocene volcanic rocks from the chagai arc ...
Petrogenesis of Plio-Pleistocene volcanic rocks from the chagai arc ...
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
5.2. Tectonic SettingA number <strong>of</strong> plots and tectonomagmaticdiscrimination diagrams based on major, minor ortrace elements are designed to study <strong>the</strong> parentmagma and tectonic setting <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>volcanic</strong> <strong>rocks</strong>.Diagrams based on major elements or large ionlithophile (LIL) elements must be used withcaution, as <strong>the</strong>se elements are more mobile duringpost-magmatic alteration or metamorphicprocesses as compared to high field elements(Pe<strong>arc</strong>e and Can, 1973; Floyed and Winchister,1975; Weaver and Tarney, 1981).The FeO/MgO ratios generally show highervalues in tholeiitic assemblages for a given SiO 2content (Miyashiro; 1974; Gill, 1981). The SiO 2versus FeO/MgO plots (Miyashiro, 1974) for all<strong>the</strong> samples reveal that most <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>Plio</strong>-<strong>Pleistocene</strong> <strong>volcanic</strong> <strong>rocks</strong> are calc-alkaline innature (Fig. 11A). To ascertain whe<strong>the</strong>r <strong>the</strong>studied <strong>rocks</strong> were erupted in an oceanic island<strong>arc</strong> environment or in a continental margin-type<strong>arc</strong> settings, <strong>the</strong> sample are plotted in Zr versusZr/Y plot (after Pe<strong>arc</strong>e, 1983). In this diagram(Fig. 11B), all <strong>the</strong> sample plot in continentalmargin-type <strong>arc</strong> domain. The discriminationdiagram based on trace element ratios isconsidered more au<strong>the</strong>ntic. The Th/Yb versusTa/Yb plot <strong>of</strong> Pe<strong>arc</strong>e, (1983) is widely used, notonly for <strong>the</strong> determination <strong>of</strong> tectonicenvironment but also for <strong>the</strong> estimation <strong>of</strong> nature<strong>of</strong> source (enriched or depleted), crustalcontamination, within-plate enrichment andfractionation, etc. A plot <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> KSV <strong>volcanic</strong>s inthis diagram (Fig. 11C) confirms <strong>the</strong>ir continentalmargin-type <strong>arc</strong> affinities. The plot <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> analysesin this diagram fur<strong>the</strong>r suggests that <strong>the</strong> parentmagma <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong>se <strong>volcanic</strong>s was generated by anenriched mantle source.The spider patterns (Fig. 9), which exhibitpositive spikes generally on K and Sr and markednegative anomalies on Nb, fur<strong>the</strong>r confirm <strong>the</strong>island <strong>arc</strong> signatures <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>rocks</strong> (Pe<strong>arc</strong>e, 1982;Wilson 1989; Saunders et al., 1991). The markednegative Nb anomalies are explained by retention<strong>of</strong> this element in <strong>the</strong> residual mantle peridotitesource during its partial melting. The positivespikes or enrichment <strong>of</strong> certain LIL elements aregenerally considered to have formed byincorporation <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong>se elements in <strong>the</strong> source <strong>from</strong><strong>the</strong> subducting slab (Pe<strong>arc</strong>e, 1982; Wilson, 1989).5.3. Nature <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Source <strong>of</strong> Parent MagmaThe Zr versus Zr/Y diagram (Fig. 11D)provides useful information about <strong>the</strong> nature <strong>of</strong>source, degree <strong>of</strong> partial melting andfractionation, etc. Plots <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> analyses in thisdiagram indicate that <strong>the</strong>se <strong>rocks</strong> are fractionated<strong>from</strong> 15 % partially melted enriched mantlesource. The plots also indicate that <strong>the</strong> KSV<strong>volcanic</strong>s were fractionated <strong>from</strong> a least enrichedsource as compared to KDV, DKV and BKV<strong>volcanic</strong>s, which were developed in progressivelyincreasing enriched sources. This diagram fur<strong>the</strong>rsuggests that KSV <strong>volcanic</strong>s are least fractionatedas compared to o<strong>the</strong>r <strong>volcanic</strong>s, which show anoverlapping increase in fractionation.6. Comparison with o<strong>the</strong>r <strong>arc</strong>sIn Table 2, average trace element chemistry<strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>Plio</strong>-<strong>Pleistocene</strong> calc-alkaline <strong>volcanic</strong><strong>rocks</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Chagai <strong>arc</strong> is compared with averagecalc-alkaline <strong>rocks</strong> <strong>of</strong> continental margin type<strong>arc</strong>s, including Andes, Zagros, Sunda, and Japan<strong>arc</strong>s, and oceanic island <strong>arc</strong>s including MarianaSouth West Pacific <strong>arc</strong>s, Fiji and New Britain<strong>arc</strong>s. This comparison shows close affinities <strong>of</strong><strong>the</strong> <strong>Plio</strong>-<strong>Pleistocene</strong> <strong>volcanic</strong> <strong>rocks</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Chagai<strong>arc</strong> with continental margin type <strong>arc</strong>s ra<strong>the</strong>r thanthose <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> oceanic <strong>arc</strong>s. The average andesite<strong>from</strong> <strong>the</strong> Chagai <strong>arc</strong> shows closer similarity inLILE, HFSE and REE and <strong>the</strong>ir ratios with itscounterpart in Zagros <strong>arc</strong>, and less with Japanand Sunda <strong>arc</strong>s It greatly differs in <strong>the</strong>seelements with its counterpart in Andes <strong>arc</strong> (Table2).19