1885 Watch Tower - A2Z.org
1885 Watch Tower - A2Z.org 1885 Watch Tower - A2Z.org
how the work is done." And, it asks: "If a theory does not reconcileor save men, why plead for one?"This is an easy and a popular method of disposing of statementswhich will not bear investigation. Our subtle adversary, Satan, isever anxious to delude, and to make use of those once engaged indisseminating truth, and is always anxious to be let alone, that hemight weave his web of sophistry to ensnare the saints, withoutinterruption, and without having any one point out its snares.Faithfulness to the Master, and to the flock, demands that theseerrors be exposed by those who realize them.R735 : page 5So error of every kind wants to be let alone. The Scribes andPharisees and devils of Jesus' day, all wanted to be let alone; butJesus and the Apostles would not let them alone. They exposedthem, and declared it to be part of their mission to bear witness tothe truth and let the light shine which reproved the darkness oferror. Every member of the body of Christ should be controlled bythe same spirit of opposition to error from love of truth and of thosewho are made to stumble by the errors.The term theory, as defined by Webster is:--(1st def.) "A doctrineor scheme which terminates in speculation." (2d def.) "Anexposition of the general principles of any science: as, the theory ofmusic."If by the term theory, the first definition is meant, we fully agreewith the statement of our contemporary. The fact, the doctrine ofthe atonement, is superior to any mere speculation concerning it.But will our contemporary claim that its theory as to how the workis done, which is constantly endeavors to elaborate and emphasize,and to wrest the Scriptures to prove, is after all merely its"speculation"? Speculation is dangerous work on such importantquestions, and would be much better let alone. But we apprehendthat it regards its theory as of rather more weight than thedefinition--speculation--would imply.If the second definition be taken--viz.: "an exposition of the generalprinciples," then the statement that, "God was in Christ (or wasworking through Christ) reconciling the world unto himself," is notindependent of, or superior to the theory. On the contrary it is a partof the theory, a part of the "exposition of the general principles" ofGod's plan-- that his purposes are all to be wrought out in orthrough Christ; that He is the Alpha and Omega of it, the agentthrough whom Jehovah accomplishes all his will. The works ofcreation, redemption, and reconciliation--restitution, are allaccomplished by Jehovah working in or through Christ.But this is not the whole of the theory, or exposition of God's planwhich the inspired Word presents. No, the Lord himself states it;prophets foretell it; types foreshadow it; eye-witnesses confirm it;and inspired Apostles cover every point of objection which reason
can bring against it. Since then, the Bible theory is an exposition ofthe general principles of God's plan, and since it requires the entireBible testimony to complete this exposition or theory, it followsthat no fragmentary statement of Scripture, could be, eitherindependent of, or superior to the entire exposition--the Bible. Andthe mission of the faithful servant of God is to stand as an indexfinger, helping the household of faith to trace for themselves on thesacred page, the great principles as well as the minor details of thatDivine exposition or theory.The idea that it matters not what we believe, if we only live right,is, alas, too popular to-day. Yet it is as absurd as to say, It mattersnot whether the Sun rises to-morrow, if we only have sunlight. It isas impossible to live up to the light, and opportunities, andprivileges of our day without a correct understanding of the truth, asto have clear sunlight without the Sun. Truly the time has comewhen men will not endure sound doctrine --the Bible doctrine ortheory--and if reproved and rebuked with patience and doctrine, andtheir theories shown to be absurd and contradictory, in their pridethey regard the effort as a personal thrust, aimed by ill-will."If a theory does not reconcile or save men," says our contemporary(assuming that it does not) "why plead for one?" We answer,Because we believe the true Bible theory does reconcile. It pleasedGod by the simple process of preaching the true theory ofreconciliation through the death of His Son to reconcile and savethem which believe. 1 Cor. 1:21. What should be preached but thetruth--the true theory revealed in God's Word? What should bebelieved but the truth--the true theory? What will sanctify wholly,but a knowledge of the truth--the true theory? "Sanctify themthrough thy truth; thy word is truth," was Jesus' prayer.Our contemporary requests us to answer some questions. Certainlyand with pleasure we will answer any questions bearing upon ourfaith in the teachings of God's Word, remembering and heeding theApostle's injunction: "Be ready to give an answer to every man thatasketh you a reason of the hope that is in you, with meekness andfear." 1 Pet. 3:15.It asks, "If he [Jesus] were only a man when he gave himself aransom, how could it be the Lord that bought us?" For an answerwe refer it to an article in our last issue--"The Lordship of Christ"--written by J.H. Paton.Its query, relative to "A corn of wheat," is also answered in our lastissue in an article under that caption.It inquires why we did not refer to and refute its "reference to Acts20:28 and John 3:16, which show that God laid down his life for usand purchased us with his own blood."Ah! now we see what we failed to notice before: It is upon thesetwo proof texts that it attempts to hang its new theory(speculation?) that the atoning blood was not the blood or life
- Page 89 and 90: R721 : page 3Our Friend, our Brothe
- Page 91 and 92: entirely unaware of it (Prov. 5:21)
- Page 93 and 94: "shall shine as the brightness of t
- Page 95 and 96: If this be true, the sacrifice of J
- Page 97 and 98: which God considers necessary to a
- Page 99 and 100: they were redeemed by his precious
- Page 101 and 102: ====================R725 : page 5WI
- Page 103 and 104: Secondly, Satan so far as we are in
- Page 105 and 106: Paul says that God--In the ages to
- Page 107 and 108: The reference in this text is to Ch
- Page 109 and 110: "Further than this, let me frankly
- Page 111 and 112: the New Testament repeatedly. Hence
- Page 113 and 114: But is not deadness to sin, or a ce
- Page 115 and 116: to-day think of it--as "the angel G
- Page 117 and 118: ecome joint-heirs with Him. Like Je
- Page 119 and 120: R730 : page 1page 1VOL. VI.PITTSBUR
- Page 121 and 122: their numbers were far less, but th
- Page 123 and 124: ook. Every one will be called a Chr
- Page 125 and 126: that I tried to shake it off, but i
- Page 127 and 128: Taunton, Mass.DEAR BROTHER:--Please
- Page 129 and 130: the responsibilities of our maturer
- Page 131 and 132: their office, of their being finall
- Page 133 and 134: passed away because the necessity f
- Page 135 and 136: These thoughts were suggested by tw
- Page 137 and 138: Hence without attempting to teach i
- Page 139: us a copy of such paper with the ar
- Page 143 and 144: for existence though every proof-te
- Page 145 and 146: Here the lecturer wanders still fur
- Page 147 and 148: scientific knowledge, and thereby p
- Page 149 and 150: trust we shall be able to show this
- Page 151 and 152: directly in the hands of those whos
- Page 153 and 154: While we understand from Scripture
- Page 155 and 156: faith. And apparently most of the "
- Page 157 and 158: would you not, sacrifice your honor
- Page 159 and 160: come, buy wine and milk without mon
- Page 161 and 162: had failed to prove a real blessing
- Page 163 and 164: BROTHER RUSSELL: I received the pap
- Page 165 and 166: therefore, never been baptized (by
- Page 167 and 168: lameless of any disobedience; but t
- Page 169 and 170: harmony with it, you never will be
- Page 171 and 172: "This great salvation" must take pl
- Page 173 and 174: R742 : page 4RICHES OF HIS grace in
- Page 175 and 176: RECKONED as filling up that which i
- Page 177 and 178: Since the Gospel Church enters upon
- Page 179 and 180: ----------"IT is easier to find a s
- Page 181 and 182: glorified with Him and made fully l
- Page 183 and 184: "SHOW me the man you honor. I know
- Page 185 and 186: Episcopalians and United Presbyteri
- Page 187 and 188: They do not openly deny the meaning
- Page 189 and 190: Why does our Saviour take the serpe
can bring against it. Since then, the Bible theory is an exposition ofthe general principles of God's plan, and since it requires the entireBible testimony to complete this exposition or theory, it followsthat no fragmentary statement of Scripture, could be, eitherindependent of, or superior to the entire exposition--the Bible. Andthe mission of the faithful servant of God is to stand as an indexfinger, helping the household of faith to trace for themselves on thesacred page, the great principles as well as the minor details of thatDivine exposition or theory.The idea that it matters not what we believe, if we only live right,is, alas, too popular to-day. Yet it is as absurd as to say, It mattersnot whether the Sun rises to-morrow, if we only have sunlight. It isas impossible to live up to the light, and opportunities, andprivileges of our day without a correct understanding of the truth, asto have clear sunlight without the Sun. Truly the time has comewhen men will not endure sound doctrine --the Bible doctrine ortheory--and if reproved and rebuked with patience and doctrine, andtheir theories shown to be absurd and contradictory, in their pridethey regard the effort as a personal thrust, aimed by ill-will."If a theory does not reconcile or save men," says our contemporary(assuming that it does not) "why plead for one?" We answer,Because we believe the true Bible theory does reconcile. It pleasedGod by the simple process of preaching the true theory ofreconciliation through the death of His Son to reconcile and savethem which believe. 1 Cor. 1:21. What should be preached but thetruth--the true theory revealed in God's Word? What should bebelieved but the truth--the true theory? What will sanctify wholly,but a knowledge of the truth--the true theory? "Sanctify themthrough thy truth; thy word is truth," was Jesus' prayer.Our contemporary requests us to answer some questions. Certainlyand with pleasure we will answer any questions bearing upon ourfaith in the teachings of God's Word, remembering and heeding theApostle's injunction: "Be ready to give an answer to every man thatasketh you a reason of the hope that is in you, with meekness andfear." 1 Pet. 3:15.It asks, "If he [Jesus] were only a man when he gave himself aransom, how could it be the Lord that bought us?" For an answerwe refer it to an article in our last issue--"The Lordship of Christ"--written by J.H. Paton.Its query, relative to "A corn of wheat," is also answered in our lastissue in an article under that caption.It inquires why we did not refer to and refute its "reference to Acts20:28 and John 3:16, which show that God laid down his life for usand purchased us with his own blood."Ah! now we see what we failed to notice before: It is upon thesetwo proof texts that it attempts to hang its new theory(speculation?) that the atoning blood was not the blood or life