68 3. <strong>Calibration</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Terrestrial</strong> <strong>Laser</strong> <strong>Scanner</strong>angle <strong>of</strong> incidence [°]30 30angle <strong>of</strong> incidence [°]Figure 3.41: Influence <strong>of</strong> the angle <strong>of</strong> incidence on the precision <strong>of</strong> the distance measurement to a planar object.particle. This particle causes a reflection <strong>of</strong> the ray inside the material, cf. Figuredistance is always longer than the desired distance to the surface <strong>of</strong> the object.3.42. Thus, the measuredincident rayreflected rays2ntl reflectionparticlesFigure 3.42: Surface backscattering <strong>and</strong> refractional effects in inhomogeneous semitransparent materials, e.g.foam, wood, marble [Ingens<strong>and</strong>, 2006].styro¬The effect <strong>of</strong> refraction <strong>and</strong> intrusion <strong>of</strong> the laser beam in materials is verified by comparingdetected by the laser scanner <strong>and</strong> the nominal distances provided bythe distancesthe interferometer on the calibrationtrack line. The experimental setup is analogous to the investigation<strong>of</strong> the 'static mode' <strong>of</strong> the distancemeasurement system, cf. Section 3.2.1. Theresultingresiduals between nominal <strong>and</strong> measured distancescan be interpreted regarding systematic effects caused by the intrusion <strong>of</strong> the laser beam. The followingmaterials were investigated: styr<strong>of</strong>oam (thickness <strong>of</strong> 2 cm <strong>and</strong> 5 cm), wood <strong>and</strong> metal.The results are given in Figure 3.43 <strong>and</strong> Figure 3.44. Figure 3.43 shows the accuracy for styr<strong>of</strong>oam<strong>and</strong> woodin comparison to a white paper used as a reference target.The findingsare clear: the laser beam intrudesthe styr<strong>of</strong>oam <strong>and</strong> wood. The depth <strong>of</strong> the intrusion depends on the granulation <strong>and</strong> the roughness. Forthe materials used, the intrusion depth shows a value <strong>of</strong> nearly 15 mm for styr<strong>of</strong>oam <strong>and</strong> nearlywood.5 mm for
3.6 Precision <strong>and</strong> Accuracy <strong>of</strong> <strong>Terrestrial</strong> <strong>Laser</strong> <strong>Scanner</strong> Data 6910-1020^1"-— ^-~-""**-—:z^-^:=,>---^ ^"^X" 7^^^" C" "" Ji^ts—+-T~*'—'—•Js*ï'r^^rr^r^ Z^*»~«i=.»-*S-30re-40-5010 15range [m]—•—styr<strong>of</strong>oam (2cm)-»--styr<strong>of</strong>oam (5cm)wood—white paperI20 25 30Figure 3.43: Distance accuracy <strong>of</strong> some materials (styr<strong>of</strong>oam, wood, white paper).In Figure 3.44, another systematic effect based on the reflected intensity<strong>of</strong> the laser beam can be seen. Sincein most laser scanners the signal-to-noise ratio is not regulated <strong>and</strong> not optimised the receiving avalanchediode is over-steered <strong>and</strong> generates systematic effects, which result in distance errors. This effect becomesclear considering the distance accuracy <strong>of</strong> metal. The upper part <strong>of</strong> Figure 3.44 shows systematic deviationswithin the first 25 m <strong>of</strong> several meters. Only beyond 35 m does the intensity <strong>of</strong> the reflected laser beam allowthe avalanche diode to work properly <strong>and</strong> the distances become reasonable. However, a systematic <strong>of</strong>fset<strong>of</strong> nearly 5 mm is left. .JEE_Üre1010\ J—T\^~ -^I0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50—•—metalrange [m]J\ fV« -200 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50range [m]Figure 3.44: Distance accuracy <strong>of</strong> metal. Only beyond 35 m does the distance accuracybecomes reasonable.The discussed selection <strong>of</strong> only three different materials (styr<strong>of</strong>oam, wood, metal) demonstrates that theinfluence <strong>of</strong> the surface properties <strong>of</strong> different materials is important. For achieving a high accuracy, theproperties<strong>of</strong> the material to be scanned have to be verified. Especially,regardingthe influence <strong>of</strong> thesurface reflectance, there are several investigations <strong>and</strong> publications for the specific laser scanner system,e.g.[Lichti <strong>and</strong> Harvey, 2002b], [Clark <strong>and</strong> Robson, 2004], <strong>and</strong> [Reshetyuk, 2006a]. Each laser scanner <strong>and</strong>its wavelengthgeneralise the findings.<strong>of</strong> the laser beam has a different behavior for different materials <strong>and</strong> makes it<strong>and</strong> other high-reflective surfaces.difficult toThere are some materials that may cause systematic effects, such as glass, metal,3.6 Precision <strong>and</strong> Accuracy <strong>of</strong> <strong>Terrestrial</strong> <strong>Laser</strong> <strong>Scanner</strong> DataThe investigation <strong>and</strong> calibration <strong>of</strong> each single component <strong>of</strong> a terrestrial laser scanner are necessary <strong>and</strong>important. The interesting question, which also has to be answered, is how precise <strong>and</strong> how accurate are theresults <strong>of</strong> one acquired single point <strong>and</strong> the results <strong>of</strong> the modeled objects. In the following, these questionsshall be answered.