12.07.2015 Views

Calibration of a Terrestrial Laser Scanner - Institute of Geodesy and ...

Calibration of a Terrestrial Laser Scanner - Institute of Geodesy and ...

Calibration of a Terrestrial Laser Scanner - Institute of Geodesy and ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

^-3.1 Laboratories <strong>and</strong> Tools for <strong>Calibration</strong> 27be stated by a value <strong>of</strong> 0.5 mm in 2 m, cf. Figure 3.3.Since the vertical <strong>of</strong>fset between interferometer <strong>and</strong>instrument is far below 2 m, this influence can be neglected. The variation in the straightness <strong>of</strong> alignmentshows an increasing deviation up to 3 mm in arangestraight distance is far below the desired distance accuracy. In the lower figure,<strong>of</strong> 50 m. The influence <strong>of</strong> this deviation on the desiredthe cant <strong>of</strong> the track can beseen <strong>and</strong> is relatively small <strong>and</strong> thus, negligible. In summary, the track line is well-adjusted regarding thestraightness <strong>of</strong> alignment, the verticality <strong>of</strong> alignmentcalibration procedures that will result in a high accuracy.<strong>and</strong> the cant.The trajectory <strong>of</strong> the calibration track line is not <strong>of</strong> importancement systems <strong>of</strong> geodetic instruments in static applications.Thus, this track line is well-suited forto the calibration <strong>of</strong> the distance measure¬The small variations <strong>of</strong> the track do not influ¬ence the operation <strong>of</strong> the laser interferometer <strong>and</strong> does not significantly influence the ranges measured bythe geodetic instruments.In addition, for kinematic applications, the 3D trajectory <strong>of</strong> the moving instru¬ment has to be known in terms <strong>of</strong> the position (x, y, z) <strong>and</strong> in terms <strong>of</strong> the attitude angles {to, -3.0—•—straightness <strong>of</strong> alignment-*verticality <strong>of</strong> alignment~"t 10 20 30 40 50 0 10 20 30 40range [m]0.4E0.2££ o.O'co-0.2"°"40 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50range [m]Figure 3.3: Trajectory <strong>of</strong> the calibration track line. In the upperfigure, the straightness <strong>of</strong> alignment <strong>and</strong> the vertical¬ity <strong>of</strong> alignment can be seen. In the lower figure, the cant <strong>of</strong> the track is shown.The wall behind the interferometer <strong>of</strong> the calibration track line, cf. Figure 3.10, is covered with a darkvelvet curtain to avoid reflections from the background, which would resulting in mixed pixels, blundersor multipaths.3.1.2 Test Field <strong>of</strong> Control PointsAlong the calibration track line, a test field <strong>of</strong> control points was installed. It consists <strong>of</strong> observation pillarslocated beside the track line <strong>and</strong> bolts drilled into concrete walls. These control points are located along thecalibration track line at both sides <strong>and</strong> at different heights. The location <strong>of</strong> the points can be seen in Figure3.4. The coordinate system is oriented in such a way that the track <strong>of</strong> the test trolleydefines the x-axis.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!