12.07.2015 Views

Calibration of a Terrestrial Laser Scanner - Institute of Geodesy and ...

Calibration of a Terrestrial Laser Scanner - Institute of Geodesy and ...

Calibration of a Terrestrial Laser Scanner - Institute of Geodesy and ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

6.3 Kinematic Application: Test Tunnel 123Px=xa + xi + AtvxPy=Va+Vl+At-Vy (6.3)Pz=Za+Zi+At-VzAt = 3-—5—(6.4)^^pr<strong>of</strong>ilewhereas the time interval At isdefined by the rotation time T, the number <strong>of</strong> points within each verticalpr<strong>of</strong>ile nrpr<strong>of</strong>ile (depending on the scanning mode) <strong>and</strong> the current point number j <strong>of</strong> the whole point cloud.Table 6.1:Characteristics <strong>of</strong> one total station data set.tracking time [s] : 410number <strong>of</strong> measurements : 3278measured velocity [m/s] : 0.100216st<strong>and</strong>ard deviation <strong>of</strong> velocity [m/s] : 0.000001Several data series varying in length, rotation time <strong>and</strong> scan resolution were acquired <strong>and</strong> processed. Forexample, the calculation <strong>of</strong> one regression line is presented. The characteristics <strong>of</strong> the data set are givenin Table 6.1. The residuals to the regression line are shown in Figure 6.14. It can be seen that the velocityisestimated within high accuracy <strong>and</strong> the residuals do not to exceed ±5 mm. Therefore, blunders wereeliminated within the adjustment algorithm.'1°4oO 4450 4500 4550 4600 4650 4700 4750time tag [s]Figure 6.14: Residuals <strong>of</strong> total station data to regression line.The quality <strong>of</strong> the mathematical model is verified by comparingthe coordinates <strong>of</strong> the calculated centerpoints <strong>of</strong> the control points, i.e. spheres, with their nominal values. Therefore, the center pointscan bederived using the 'free' adjustment <strong>and</strong> the 'fix' adjustment, cf. Section 3.1.5. The results <strong>of</strong> a completedata set for the velocity v = 0.1 are given in Table 6.2. The 3D accuracyis about 3 mm for the centerpoints derived by the 'free' adjustment. In addition, the use <strong>of</strong> the well-known diameter <strong>of</strong> the spheresincreases the 3D accuracy to 2 mm. The data sets differ in the rotation time, length,scan resolution <strong>and</strong>number <strong>of</strong> control points.The table shows that neither the rotation time nor the scan resolution influencedthe accuracy significantly. Only treatment <strong>of</strong> the diameter <strong>of</strong> the spheres increased the accuracy. Changingthe velocity 0.3m,=to v 0.2 <strong>and</strong> = v the results are similar to the results shown in Table 6.2.6.3.3 Kinematic Model: Kaiman FilterThe system state <strong>of</strong> the moving test trolley along the track line is estimated bya Kaiman filter. The to¬tal station data defining the absolute reference frame are pre-processed in two steps.First, blunders are

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!