Integrated Training Area Management EA and Final FNSI

More documents

Recommendations

Info

U.S. Army Alaska (USARAK). 1998. Proposed Plan for Cleanup Action at Operable Unit C, FortRichardson, Alaska. Directorate of Public Works, U.S. Army Alaska: Fort Richardson, Alaska.U.S. Army Alaska (USARAK). 1999. Final Legislative Environmental Impact Statement for AlaskaArmy Lands Withdrawal Renewal. U.S. Army Alaska, Department of the Army: Fort Richardson,Anchorage, Alaska.U.S. Army Alaska (USARAK). 2002a. Draft Fire Management Plan, Donnelly Training Area, Alaska.Natural Resources Branch.U.S. Army Alaska (USARAK). 2002b. Draft Fire Management Plan, Fort Richardson, Alaska. NaturalResources Branch.U.S. Army Alaska (USARAK). 2002c. Draft Fire Management Plan. Fort Wainwright, Alaska. NaturalResources Branch.U.S. Army Alaska (USARAK). 2002d. Integrated Natural Resources Management Plan 2002-2006: FortGreely and Donnelly Training Area. Natural Resources Branch, U.S. Army Alaska: FortRichardson, Alaska.U.S. Army Alaska (USARAK). 2002e. Integrated Natural Resources Management Plan 2002-2006: FortRichardson. Natural Resource Branch, U.S. Army Alaska: Fort Richardson, Alaska.U.S. Army Alaska (USARAK). 2002f. Integrated Natural Resources Management Plan 2002-2006: FortWainwright. Natural Resources Branch, U.S. Army Alaska: Fort Richardson, Alaska.U.S. Army Alaska (USARAK). 2004. Transformation of U.S. Army Alaska Final Environmental ImpactStatement. Center for Environmental Management of Military Lands: Fort Collins, Colorado.U.S. Army Alaska (USARAK). 2004. Draft Environmental Impact Statement for the Construction andOperation of a Battle Area Complex and a Combined Arms Collective Training Facility withinU.S. Army Training Lands in Alaska: Combat Training Facility.U.S. Army Alaska (USARAK) Public Affairs Office. 1995-2002. “FY 2000 Demographics” CommandInformation Cards for Fort Greely, Fort Wainwright and Fort Richardson. Managerial ServicesDivision, Fort Richardson: Anchorage, Alaska.U.S. Army Corps of Engineers. 1994. Background Data Analysis for Arsenic, Barium, Cadmium,Chromium, and Lead on Fort Wainwright. U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Alaska District:Anchorage, Alaska.Williams, J.R. 1970. Groundwater in the Permafrost Regions of Alaska. Geological Survey ProfessionalPaper 696._____________________________________________________________________________________________Environmental AssessmentUnited States Army Alaska, Integrated Training Area Management ProgramManagement Plan 77
CHAPTER 6: AGENCIES AND INDIVIDUALS CONTACTEDTom Brooks, Alaska RailroadBruce Carr, Director of Strategic Planning, Alaska RailroadTami Defries, Bureau of Land Management, Alaska Fire ServiceChristy Everett, U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Regulatory BranchKevin Gardner, Chief of Environmental Planning, USAGAKChristopher Garner, USAGAKBarbara Hotchkin, Alaska RailroadNancy Ihlenfeldt, Alaska Department of Natural Resources, Office of Habitat and PermittingTom Kurth, State of Alaska, Division of ForestryForrest McDaniel, U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Regulatory BranchBob Henszey, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Project Planning DivisionLarry Molitor, Salcha-Delta Soil and Water Conservation DistrictMark A. Somerville, Alaska Department of Natural Resources, Office of Habitat and PermittingNancy Sonafrank, Alaska Department of Environmental Conservation, Division of WaterRyan Winn, U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Regulatory Branch_____________________________________________________________________________________________Environmental AssessmentUnited States Army Alaska, Integrated Training Area Management ProgramManagement Plan 78
Page 1:
DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMYUNITED STATES
Page 5 and 6:
TABLE OF CONTENTSCHAPTER 1: PURPOSE
Page 7 and 8:
Table 3.9 Summary of Impacts to Hum
Page 9 and 10:
and Training Land Program, the rang
Page 11 and 12:
• Establish a defined land condit
Page 13:
Donnelly Training AreaDonnelly Trai
Page 17 and 18:
determine whether additional NEPA a
Page 19 and 20:
Table 2.2 Summary of Environmental
Page 21 and 22:
CHAPTER 3: DESCRIPTION OF THE AFFEC
Page 23 and 24:
Maneuver Trail Maintenance and Upgr
Page 25 and 26:
Mungoven 2001). Engineering soil ty
Page 27 and 28:
projects and would result in wide,
Page 29 and 30:
growth. Wind and sand fences would
Page 31 and 32:
iological impacts of military train
Page 33 and 34: willow scrub communities are common
Page 35 and 36: disturbed. Further, hardening low w
Page 37 and 38: disturbance or removal, best manage
Page 39 and 40: SRAThrough the SRA program, soldier
Page 41 and 42: Ship Creek (from the Glenn Highway
Page 43 and 44: effective site drainage. Required p
Page 45 and 46: Game 1998). More information on wil
Page 47 and 48: Fort Wainwright and associated land
Page 49 and 50: Long-term beneficial impacts to wil
Page 51 and 52: 1998).The Alaska Interagency Wildla
Page 53 and 54: Prescribed burns, mechanical thinni
Page 55 and 56: unplanned fires, soldiers are direc
Page 57 and 58: USARAK also implemented the USARTRA
Page 59 and 60: LRAM projects beneficial to public
Page 61 and 62: Cumulative ImpactsPast military act
Page 63 and 64: Two surveys conducted on Yukon Trai
Page 65 and 66: LRAM activities under Alternative 1
Page 67 and 68: 3.9.1 Affected EnvironmentFort Rich
Page 69 and 70: SRA program, which educates soldier
Page 71 and 72: 3.10.2 Environmental ConsequencesAl
Page 73 and 74: Fort Richardson receives few compla
Page 75 and 76: Table 3.11 Summary of Impacts 1 to
Page 77 and 78: oads and hauling fill and rock mate
Page 79 and 80: CHAPTER 4: PREPARERS AND CONTRIBUTO
Page 81 and 82: Benson, A.M. 1999. Distribution of
Page 83: Neely, R. J. 2001. Early Mining His
Page 87 and 88: Project NameBulldog TrailWidening P
Page 89 and 90: Project NameYukon TrainingArea Demo
Page 91 and 92: Project NameYukon TrainingArea Firi
Page 93 and 94: Project NameEddy Drop ZoneVegetatio
Page 95 and 96: Project Name33 Mile LoopRoad Shortc
Page 97 and 98: APPENDIX B: BEST MANAGEMENT PRACTIC
Page 99 and 100: Sediment Trap(Permanent) SeedingSil
Page 101 and 102: APPENDIX C: SAMPLE RECORD OF ENVIRO
Page 103 and 104: APPENDIX D: ITAM PROJECT ASSESSMENT
Page 105 and 106: Fire ManagementYes No□ □ Could
Page 107 and 108: APPENDIX E: AGENCY COMMENTSThe foll
Page 109 and 110: ___________________________________
Page 111 and 112: ___________________________________
Page 113 and 114: Sent: Monday, June 13, 2005 5:00 PM
Page 115 and 116: Second paragraph - I do not underst
Page 117 and 118: sentence could read, "The trees are
Page 119 and 120: The third paragraph seems too speci
Page 121: USARAK does not have a current five
show all

Integrated Training Area Management EA and Final FNSI

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

Delete template?

Save as template?